logo
Virginia Giuffre's family says she would have wanted Epstein documents released

Virginia Giuffre's family says she would have wanted Epstein documents released

CNN4 days ago
Donald TrumpFacebookTweetLink
Follow
The family of Virginia Giuffre — one of the women who accused Jeffrey Epstein of sex trafficking and who died by suicide earlier this year — said Thursday that she would have wanted documents related to the disgraced financier to be made public, as the Trump administration faces mounting pressure around the case.
Amanda Roberts, Giuffre's sister-in-law, told CNN's Kaitlan Collins on 'The Source' that in one of their last conversations, Giuffre called for the release of the documents.
'She wanted the world to know what they've done to her and so many other survivors, and she had been fighting that till her very last day,' Roberts said.
Giuffre, a prominent Epstein accuser who also alleged that Britain's Prince Andrew abused her when she was a teenager, died by suicide in April at the age of 41. In 2019, Epstein died awaiting trial on federal charges accusing him of sexually abusing underage girls. His death was ruled a suicide.
Prince Andrew repeatedly denied the claims.
President Donald Trump, who had decadeslong ties to Epstein, said earlier this week that the sex offender poached young women from Mar-a-Lago, including Giuffre, who worked at Trump's resort as a teenager.
'I think she worked at the spa,' Trump said of Giuffre. 'I think that was one of the people, yeah. He stole her.'
Sky Roberts, Giuffre's brother, on Thursday took issue with Trump's use of the word 'stole,' telling Collins, 'She wasn't stolen, she was preyed upon at his property, at President Trump's property.'
'Stolen seems very impersonal, feels very much like an object, and these survivors are not objects,' Roberts said.
He added that Trump's comments raise questions about 'how much he knew during that time.'
The White House has said Trump barred Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club 'for being a creep.' Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.
Earlier Thursday, Giuffre's family expressed shock and raised questions about Trump's relationship with Epstein in a statement to CNN. Those comments were first reported by The Atlantic.
Sky Roberts on 'The Source' also weighed in on a top Justice Department official meeting last week with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's accomplice who has also offered to testify before Congress, but with major conditions, including immunity.
Giuffre 'was preyed upon by Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as many other predators out there. But she was preyed upon at Mar-a-Lago and we were very shocked and very surprised that they were giving her a voice and giving her a platform to essentially, possibly make a deal,' Sky Roberts said.
Lanette Wilson, Giuffre's sister-in-law, added that she doesn't 'see any real reason to speak with' Maxwell.
'She has perjured herself in the past and … we're talking about a sex trafficker, a monster that could do unspeakable things to young women without conscience,' Wilson added. 'So what would she do to get herself out of the situation that she's in?'
Maxwell was never tried or convicted of perjury. She initially faced perjury charges, but prosecutors later agreed to dismiss after Maxwell's conviction on more serious charges, citing a desire to avoid further emotional trauma for the victims.
In recent weeks, Trump has been noncommittal when asked about the possibility of a pardon or commutation for Maxwell. But a senior Trump administration official said Thursday that Trump is not currently considering clemency.
Sky Roberts told Collins that Maxwell 'deserves to rot in prison where she belongs because of what she's done to my sister and so many other women.'
Meanwhile, Wilson stressed that the possibility of Maxwell receiving immunity or a pardon sends a chilling message.
'It does send a message to the survivors that, you know, if you're in power, if you've got money, if you've got connections, then you're above the law,' Wilson said, later adding: 'It's just sending a message to survivors that their voices and all of the hard work that they've done for the last however many years, 10-plus years, doesn't matter.'
Sky Roberts also told Collins that he wants two questions answered: 'When are we going to start believing survivors?' and 'Why aren't the documents being released?'
'They deserve justice. These survivors were — had something taken away from them they can never get back,' Sky Roberts said. 'And it's time for these monsters to be exposed and get something they can never get back, which is their freedom.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nebraska Republican congressman booed over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'
Nebraska Republican congressman booed over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nebraska Republican congressman booed over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Republican U.S. Representative Mike Flood endured a contentious town hall meeting in Nebraska on Monday, as opponents of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax- and spending-cut bill booed and heckled him for over an hour. Flood fielded questions about Republican funding cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program for lower-income Americans, food assistance and funding for Trump's controversial crackdown on undocumented immigrants from his Lincoln audience. He argued that it was important to deny public health coverage to immigrants living in the U.S. illegally and to able-bodied adults who refuse work and then drew cheers backing the release of government files on disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. With Congress on its summer break, Republicans including Flood are trying to promote Trump's landmark legislation, nicknamed the "big, beautiful bill," which extended the president's 2017 tax cuts and ramped up spending for border security and the military. It will also add $3.4 trillion to the $36.2 trillion federal debt and leave about 10 million people without health coverage. "There's a lot of information out there that's wrong. We protected Medicaid. We cut $2 trillion out of the future debt. We worked to get results. And this bill builds for growth," he said to a chorus of boos. At times, angry audience members chanted: "Vote him out!" "How much does it cost for fascism? How much do the taxpayers have to pay for a fascist country?" asked one woman, who was irate about Trump's immigration crackdown and the use of disaster relief money to pay for an immigration detention center in South Florida nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz." Flood's district is heavily Republican and not among the roughly three-dozen House seats expected to be competitive in next year's midterm elections, when Republicans will be defending their narrow House of Representatives majority, currently 219-212 with four vacancies. At his town hall, Flood, 57, responded to critics by saying that voters backed Trump's policies in the 2024 election: "Americans voted for a border that is secure. And I support the president enforcing our immigration laws." He later told another questioner who criticized him for not speaking out against Trump: "When I see something that I don't agree with, I don't run to the TV station as my first stop. I try to stop it before it gets worse." After the meeting, Flood told reporters: "I like to think that I was able to answer their questions. They may not agree with my answer. But the questions are always good and that makes me a better member of Congress."

Analysis-Easy to lose, hard to restore: US data trust on the line
Analysis-Easy to lose, hard to restore: US data trust on the line

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Analysis-Easy to lose, hard to restore: US data trust on the line

By Andrea Shalal and Davide Barbuscia WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) -Donald Trump's move to fire the head of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has put trust in U.S. data reporting mechanisms on the line just as demand for reliable diagnoses of the health of the world's largest economy is bigger than ever. Examples from elsewhere show credibility is easily lost and hard to restore. A first test will be the choice to replace Erika McEntarfer, accused without evidence by Trump of manipulating U.S. job numbers after weaker-than-expected growth and large downward revisions were reported last week. "Imagine if one of your concerns is that there's a lackey in charge of the agency and the numbers are fake," said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, of an appointment Trump has said to expect within days. "That's a whole other level of problems." Policymakers, businesses and investors are scrambling to understand how Trump's attempt to up-end the global trade system will affect prices, employment and household wealth. Central banks, which once tried to guide market bets on rate moves months down the line, now say decisions are "data-dependent." The rub is that data collection is proving to be harder. Debt-laden governments have, as McEntarfer experienced, cut resources in their data departments; phone surveys, the go-to method for much macro research, are struggling to produce adequate samples as many households do without fixed lines. Trump's implicit accusation of partisanship by "this Biden Political Appointee" adds the troubling factor of a political dimension usually indicative of countries dogged by wider doubts over their democratic checks and balances. The key lesson from past examples of loss of data confidence is that it can take years for trust to be restored. 'MAN-MADE' NUMBERS When Argentina last year reported its first single-digit inflation in months, sceptics questioned the data and recalled the massive underreporting of inflation in the 2000s and 2010s for which it was censured by the International Monetary Fund. "They manipulated the data for a long time," said Aldo Abram of libertarian think tank Liberty and Progress Foundation in Buenos Aires. "It's logical people remember this and continue having doubts." Turkey has changed the head of its TUIK statistics institute four times since 2019, with opposition parties arguing the changes were political. Roger Marks, fixed income analyst at asset manager Ninety One, said the result for investors has been a "gradual erosion of our trust in the numbers." For Greece, whose efforts during the 2000s to conceal mounting public deficits fed that decade's sovereign debt crisis, it has been an equally long haul back to credibility. It required the overhaul of its ELSTAT statistics agency in 2016 and the creation of an international panel of experts to appoint its chief statistician - steps that have meant its hard-fought efforts to improve its budget are now unquestioned. It also prompted European governments to grant the Eurostat statistics arm of the European Union powers to check suspect national statistics reported to it. Longstanding doubts over the accuracy of Chinese statistics - with even former Premier Li Keqiang acknowledging in 2007 the country's output figures were man-made - have obscured genuine efforts to improve data quality, such as a new measure of youth unemployment excluding students that was released early in 2024. "There were genuine methodological reasons for the change, but because of the history around Chinese data a lot of people, particularly foreign investors, just didn't really trust that," Julian Evans-Pritchard, an analyst with Capital Economics. "That underscores to me that once you undermine confidence in the data, it is quite hard to restore that confidence." SPOILS SYSTEM Faced over the years with patchy official data, watchers of emerging economies have long sought to corroborate those numbers with other datasets. Capital Economics' China Activity Proxy is based on 18 indicators from freight traffic to electricity consumption. Another metric is found in the data and sentiment surveys provided by independent researchers in all the big economies. But they can only sketch in one perspective on the picture. "An awful lot of it is soft data: 'How do you feel? What do you think's going on?'" said Erik Weisman, chief economist and portfolio manager at MFS Investment Management in Boston. "They're not asking for specifics. They're not asking, how many widgets did you produce? How many insurance policies did you produce? How many hours worked?," he said, adding that the concerns raised by the sacking of McEntarfer could nonetheless force analysts to turn increasingly to those other sources. The most urgent question now is whether the breach in credibility which the Trump intervention has opened is now widened further or mended. Enrico Giovannini, former chief statistician for the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), said there was more scope in the U.S. for political appointments of key statistics roles than in other advanced economies which tended to make long, fixed-term appointments. "So the incoming government has to wait (to replace them), said Giovannini, who has also served in two Italian governments. "In the U.S., the spoils system works," he said of the practice of party supporters getting rewarded with government jobs. The International Statistical Institute, a professional organization for data collectors, issued a statement late on Monday that said Trump's move violated U.N. principles aimed at protecting fact-based statistics and called on his government to take steps to restore public confidence in U.S. federal data. William Wiatrowski, the BLS' deputy commissioner, will serve as acting commissioner until a successor to McEntarfer is named. Beyond that choice, some fear that further dangers may emerge from a Trump executive order on federal hiring intended to reserve posts for candidates who can prove they are "dedicated to the furtherance of American ideals, values, and interests." Aaron Sojourner, a senior researcher at the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, said such a move would, if passed by Congress, apply to many jobs in federal economic statistical agencies. "This proposal would convert many of those jobs into political jobs where people can be fired for any reason if they displease a political leader," Sojourner said. (Writing by Mark John; additional reporting by Claire Fu in Singapore, Marius Zaharia in Hong Kong, Karin Strohecker in London, David Lawder in Washington, Leila Miller in Buenos Aires; Lefteris Papadimas in Athens, Indradip Ghosh and Sarupya Ganguly in Bengaluru; editing by Paul Simao) Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store