
Campaigners welcome vaccine cash pledge but fear cut will see fewer lives saved
But now the Government has announced that it will give £1.25 billion between 2026 and 2030.
While some have praised the pledge, others have said that a reduction in the amount given to Gavi will lead to fewer lives being saved.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said that the money will help Gavi protect up to 500 million children from some of the world's deadliest diseases such as meningitis, cholera and measles.
Announcing the funds at Gavi's global summit in Brussels, Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'Gavi's global impact is undeniable. Over one billion children vaccinated, over 18 million lives saved, over 250 billion dollars injected into the global economy.
'I'm immensely proud of the role the UK has played in reaching these milestones. Our ongoing partnership with Gavi will give millions of children a better start, save lives and protect us all from the spread of deadly diseases.'
Commenting on the pledge, Adrian Lovett, the ONE Campaign's UK executive director, said: 'This is an important pledge from the UK to Gavi, a vital force in the fight against preventable disease.
'But despite this good news, we are seeing the harsh impact of the Prime Minister's deep cut to overall aid levels.
'The UK's contribution to Gavi could have saved almost 400,000 more lives if it had been maintained at the same level as before. And further impossible choices are looming.'
Dr Philip Goodwin, chief executive for the UK Committee for Unicef, said: 'This investment shows the UK's ongoing commitment to global partnerships that protect children around the world from preventable disease.
'However, cuts to the aid budget still pose a grave threat to children.
'We urge the UK Government to maximise this Gavi commitment by also funding other critical health services that make immunisation fully effective.'
Elsewhere, GSK and Bharat Biotech announced that the price of the world's first malaria vaccine for children in countries where malaria is endemic will be reduced by more than half, to less than five dollars a vaccine.
The jab is expected to be rolled out in 12 endemic countries in Africa through routine immunisation programmes by the end of 2025.
It comes as a new report revealed that global vaccination coverage against deadly diseases had stalled in recent decades.
The new review, published in The Lancet, concludes that as a result, millions of children around the world are left vulnerable to preventable disease and death.
Senior study author Dr Jonathan Mosser, from the University of Washington in the US, said: 'Routine childhood vaccinations are among the most powerful and cost-effective public health interventions available, but persistent global inequalities, challenges from the Covid pandemic, and the growth of vaccine misinformation and hesitancy have all contributed to faltering immunisation progress.
'These trends increase the risk of outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles, polio and diphtheria.'
In May the new aid minister, Baroness Jenny Chapman, said that the days of the British Government acting as a 'global charity' are 'over'.
Her appointment followed the resignation of Anneliese Dodds, who quit as development minister in protest at the decision to cut the aid budget to fund increased defence spending.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
8 hours ago
- Daily Record
You could be eligible for a one-off £120,000 payment if you had any of these vaccinations
The Vaccine Damage Payment is granted to individuals who have developed a severe disability because of a vaccine they were given - including Covid-19, measles and tetanus jabs. Individuals who have suffered serious complications as a result of receiving certain vaccines, including the Covid-19 vaccine, may be entitled to a one-off payment of £120,000 through the Vaccine Damage Payment scheme. This compensation is a available to those who have developed a series disability due to a vaccine they've received. The scheme covers a wide range of vaccines, including coronavirus, measles and tetanus. Vaccines approved for medical use are considered safe for most people and are typically the most effective methods for preventing infectious diseases, they also help protect others by reducing transmission. However, in some rare cases individuals may experience adverse side effects from receiving vaccines. Although most side effects are mild and temporary, in others they can be much more severe which may qualify you for a substantial one-off payment, the Mirror reports. Who can claim the £120,000 payment To qualify for the Vaccine Damage Payment, you must be categorised as severely disabled with the disability being caused from a vaccine included in the eligible list. The extend of disablement is measured in percentages, and a disability rating of 60% or higher is considered as severe. A severe disability can be either physical or mental and must be supported by medical evidence from a doctor or hospital involved in your case. In most cases, the vaccine must have been administer before your 18th birthday, unless it was given as part of a disease outbreak. Additionally, the vaccine must have been received in the UK or the Isle of Man, unless it was provided as part of medical treatment through the armed forces. You may also qualify if your mother was vaccinated during pregnancy or if you had close physical contact with someone who received an oral polio vaccine. Vaccines eligible for the payment A wide variety of vaccines can qualify you for the one-off payment if they resulted in a severe disability, including: coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumococcal infection tetanus pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 (swine flu) - up to August 31, 2010 meningococcal group B (meningitis B) measles pertussis (whooping cough) meningococcal group C (meningitis C) rubella (German measles) poliomyelitis iphtheria influenza, except for influenza caused by a pandemic influenza virus rotavirus haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) smallpox - up to August 1, 1971 meningococcal group W (meningitis W) human papillomavirus mumps tuberculosis (TB) One or more of these may have been administered as part of a combined vaccine, but they still remain eligible for the scheme. How to make a claim Payments are typically made directly to the claimant if they are over 18 and capable of managing their own affairs. If not the payment will be made to a trustee. Claims can be submitted online or by post via the NHSBSA website. For children a claim can only be made once they are two years old. For adults a claim must be submitted either by their 21st birthday or within six years of receiving the vaccination, whichever is the latest. Official guidance states that the Vaccine Damage Payment is not a compensation scheme and claimants may still pursue legal action for compensation, even if they make a successful claim for the payment. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.

The National
15 hours ago
- The National
Angela Rayner called out over 'tone deaf' tweet on social media
Angela Rayner has been called out for using an 'appalling' hashtag used alongside a post on social media where she announced that the UK Government has pledged more support for those diagnosed with a terminal illness. The Labour MP said in the post that no one battling terminal illness 'should have to face extra stress and worry over their job security'. She added: 'It's vital that employees with a terminal diagnosis are treated sensitively and with the best support – that's why I'm so proud we are backing this charter'. READ MORE: Scottish manufacturing firm announces 90 jobs face redundancy Rayner concluded the tweet with the hashtag 'DyingToWork'. No one battling terminal illness should have to face extra stress and worry over their job security. It's vital that employees with a terminal diagnosis are treated sensitively and with the best support – that's why I'm so proud we are backing this charter.#DyingToWork — Angela Rayner (@AngelaRayner) June 27, 2025 Since she posted the tweet on Friday, thousands of people have flooded the comments section to highlight how the post is 'tone deaf' and 'disgusting' with the use of the hashtag. However, Dying to Work is the campaign name of the movement, which aims to raise awareness of the important steps they can take to provide employees with dignity and peace of mind as they navigate a terminal diagnosis while still in work. The picture and post by Rayner is in reference to her signing the Dying to Work Charter, but has been accused of lacking clear context and that it is still in 'bad taste' with the UK Government set to announce cuts to the welfare system next week. SNP councillor Lauren Oxley first retweeted Rayner's post along with the comment: 'Whoever gave that hashtag the thumbs up needs fired, abhorrent.' However, once more context was provided by commenters to Oxley, she added that despite the hashtag making more sense it was still 'out of touch'. She wrote: 'This makes more sense, but it still feels very out of touch to post just days before her government are set to impose some of the most severe cuts to disability and sickness-related payments in over a decade.' In response to Rayner's post another person wrote: 'It would have been prudent to include more details about the charter you are supporting because otherwise, that hashtag seems very misjudged in the current climate.' While another person replied 'There is no world in which that was a good choice of hashtag.' Rayner's post comes after the UK Government said it would U-turn on some of its plans for its Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, which the initial proposal would cut back disability benefit payments by around £5 billion per year. The UK Government was forced into a partial U-turn on its welfare reform bill after more than 120 party MPs threatened to rebel against the government in a vote next week. As part of the concessions, people who currently receive Personal Independence Payments (Pip), or the health element of Universal Credit, will continue to do so. But planned cuts to these payments will still hit future claimants, with the fresh package of measures now being branded as a 'two-tier system' that will see the 'young treated worse than the old'. The new plan still keeps in place proposals to change the eligibility criteria for PIP for future claimants.


Sky News
16 hours ago
- Sky News
Hundreds of NHS quangos to be axed - as plans unveiled for health funding to be linked to patient feedback
NHS funding could be linked to patient feedback under new plans, with poorly performing services that "don't listen" penalised with less money. As part of the "10 Year Health Plan" to be unveiled next week, a new scheme will be trialled that will see patients asked to rate the service they received - and if they feel it should get a funding boost or not. It will be introduced first for services that have a track record of very poor performance and where there is evidence of patients "not being listened to", the government said. This will create a "powerful incentive for services to listen to feedback and improve patients' experience", it added. Sky News understands that it will not mean bonuses or pay increases for the best performing staff. NHS payment mechanisms will also be reformed to reward services that keep patients out of hospital as part of a new 'Year of Care Payments' initiative and the government's wider plan for change. 2:04 Speaking to The Times, chief executive of the NHS Confederation Matthew Taylor expressed concerns about the trial. He told the newspaper: "Patient experience is determined by far more than their individual interaction with the clinician and so, unless this is very carefully designed and evaluated, there is a risk that providers could be penalised for more systemic issues, such as constraints around staffing or estates, that are beyond their immediate control to fix." He said that NHS leaders would be keen to "understand more about the proposal", because elements were "concerning". Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: "We will reward great patient care, so patient experience and clinical excellence are met with extra cash. These reforms are key to keeping people healthy and out of hospital, and to making the NHS sustainable for the long-term as part of the Plan for Change." In the raft of announcements in the 10 Year Health Plan, the government has said 201 bodies responsible for overseeing and running parts of the NHS in England - known as quangos - will be scrapped. These include Healthwatch England, set up in 2012 to speak out on behalf of NHS and social care patients, the National Guardian's Office, created in 2015 to support NHS whistleblowers, and the Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB). Royal College of Nursing General Secretary chief executive Professor Nicola Ranger described the move as "so unsafe for patients right now". "Today, in hospitals across the NHS, we know one nurse can be left caring for 10, 15 or more patients at a time. It's not safe. It's not effective. And it's not acceptable. "For these proposed changes to be effective government must take ownership of the real issue, the staffing crisis on our wards, and not just shuffle people into new roles. Protecting patients has to be the priority and not just a drive for efficiency." Elsewhere, the new head of NHS England Sir Jim Mackey said key parts of the NHS appear "built to keep the public away because it's an inconvenience". "We've made it really hard, and we've probably all been on the end of it," he told the Daily Telegraph.