The many ways Kennedy is undermining vaccines
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The Food and Drug Administration canceled an open meeting on flu vaccines with scientific advisers, later holding it behind closed doors. A top official paused the agency's review of Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine. In a televised interview last week, Kennedy said falsely that similarly created vaccines don't work against respiratory viruses.
Related
:
Advertisement
Some scientists said they saw a pattern: an effort to erode support for routine vaccination, and for the scientists who have long held it up as a public health goal.
'This is a simultaneous process of increasing the likelihood that you will hear his voice and decreasing the likelihood that you'll hear other voices,' Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, said of Kennedy.
Advertisement
He is 'decertifying other voices of authority,' she said.
HHS disagreed that Kennedy was working against vaccines.
'Secretary Kennedy is not anti-vaccine; he is pro-safety,' Andrew Nixon, a department spokesperson said in a statement. 'His focus has always been on ensuring that vaccines are rigorously tested for efficacy and safety.'
The statement continued, 'We are taking action so that Americans get the transparency they deserve and can make informed decisions about their health.'
After attending the funeral of an unvaccinated child who died of measles in West Texas last Sunday, Kennedy endorsed the measles vaccine on the social platform X as 'the most effective way to prevent the spread of measles.'
But he has also described vaccination as a personal choice with poorly understood risks and suggested that miracle treatments were readily available. On Sunday, he praised two local doctors on social media who have promoted dubious, potentially harmful, treatments for measles.
Related
:
Even as cases of measles in the United States have surged past 600 in 22 jurisdictions, Kennedy has claimed in a recent interview that the measles vaccine causes deaths every year (untrue); that it causes encephalitis, blindness and 'all the illnesses that measles itself causes' (untrue); and that the vaccine's effect wanes so dramatically that older adults are 'essentially unvaccinated' (untrue).
According to an email obtained by The New York Times, HHS intends to revise its webpages to include statements like 'The decision to vaccinate is a personal one' and 'People should also be informed about the potential adverse events associated with vaccines.' (Vaccines are already administered only after patients provide informed consent, as required by law.)
Advertisement
Tensions with mainstream experts came into sharp focus last week, when Dr. Peter Marks, the top vaccine regulator, resigned under pressure from the FDA.
'It has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies,' Marks said in his resignation letter.
Kennedy's position on vaccines has raised alarm for decades. But it has become particularly notable now, against a backdrop of rising skepticism of vaccines and worsening outbreaks of measles and bird flu, experts said.
The MMR vaccine -- a combination product to prevent measles, mumps and rubella that has been available since 1971 -- has long been a target of anti-vaccine campaigns because of the disproved theory that it can cause autism. Kennedy has said that he would like to revisit the issue, in part to assuage parents' fears that the vaccines are unsafe.
Related
:
But he has hired David Geier to reexamine the data. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., a doctor and the chair of the Senate Health Committee, has sharply criticized the decision to spend tax dollars testing a discredited hypothesis even as the administration is cutting billions for other research.
'If we're pissing away money over here,' he said last month, 'that's less money that we have to actually go after the true reason.'
The refusal to accept scientific consensus is 'disturbing, because then we get into very strange territory where it's somebody's hunch that this does or doesn't happen, or does or doesn't work,' said Stephen Jameson, president of the American Association of Immunologists.
In interviews, Kennedy has downplayed risks of measles and emphasized what he sees as the benefits of infection.
Advertisement
'Everybody got measles, and measles gave you protected lifetime protection against measles infection -- the vaccine doesn't do that,' he said in an interview on Fox News.
Two doses of the MMR vaccine do provide decades-long immunity. And while immunity from the infection may last a lifetime, 'people also suffer the consequences of that natural infection,' Jameson said.
One consequence was discovered just a few years ago: A measles infection can destroy the immune system's memory of other invading pathogens, leaving the body vulnerable to them again.
Measles kills roughly 1 in every 1,000 infected people, and 11% of those infected this year have been hospitalized, many of them children younger than 5, according to the CDC. Two girls, ages 6 and 8, died in West Texas.
Related
:
By contrast, side effects after vaccination are uncommon. But Kennedy has suggested that people should apprise themselves of the risks before opting for the shot.
The phrasing implies that 'if you are more fully informed, you might make a different decision,' said Jamieson, of the Annenberg center.
Doctors have long expected health secretaries and the CDC to urge widespread vaccination unequivocally amid an outbreak, and in the past they have.
But Kennedy has spoken enthusiastically about cod liver oil, a steroid and an antibiotic that are not standard therapies. Some of those treatments may be making children more sick.
'The messaging I'm seeing is focused on potential treatments for measles,' said Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the infectious disease committee for the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spoke during his Senate confirmation hearing on Jan. 29.
KENNY HOLSTON/NYT
At his confirmation hearing, Kennedy promised that he would not change the CDC's childhood vaccination schedule. About two weeks later, he announced a new commission that would scrutinize it.
Advertisement
The schedule is based on recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a panel of medical experts who review safety and effectiveness data, potential interactions with other drugs and the ideal timing to maximize protection.
At his confirmation hearing, Kennedy claimed that 97% of ACIP members had financial conflicts of interest. He has long held, without evidence, that federal regulators are compromised and are hiding information about the risks of vaccines.
'It's frankly false,' said O'Leary, who serves as a liaison to the committee from the pediatric academy.
Kennedy's statistic came from a 2009 report that found that 97% of disclosure forms had errors, such as missing dates or information in the wrong section.
In fact, ACIP members are carefully screened for major conflicts of interest, and they cannot hold stocks or serve on advisory boards or speaker bureaus affiliated with vaccine manufacturers.
On the rare occasion that members have indirect conflicts of interest -- for example, if an institution at which they work receives money from a drug manufacturer -- they disclose the conflict and recuse themselves from related votes.
The committee's votes were public and often heavily debated.
'When I was CDC director, people flew in from Korea and all over the world to observe the ACIP meetings, because they were a model of transparency,' said Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, who led the agency from 2009 to 2017.
Kennedy has repeatedly promised greater transparency and accountability, but he has proposed ending public comment on health policies.
His department canceled a meeting of the ACIP in February at which members were set to discuss vaccines for meningitis and flu, rescheduling it for April.
Advertisement
The department also canceled a meeting to discuss the seasonal flu vaccine. Officials met later without the agency's scientific advisers.
'After all that conversation about how they want to be transparent, one of the first things he does is take things behind closed doors and diminish the amount of public input we're getting,' said Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association.
At his confirmation hearing, Kennedy repeated a fringe theory that Black Americans should not receive the same vaccines as others because they 'have a much stronger reaction.'
Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., who is Black, admonished him for his 'dangerous' opinion: 'Your voice would be a voice that parents would listen to.'
Two weeks later, at a clinic for teenage mothers in Denver, a 19-year-old woman refused all vaccines for herself and her 1-year-old son -- including the measles and chickenpox shots he was supposed to have that day.
She told the pediatrician, Dr. Hana Smith, who described the incident, that she had read online that vaccines were bad for people with more melanin in their skin.
There are reams of evidence to the contrary. Still, it quickly became clear to Smith that nothing was going to change her patient's mind.
'No matter how much information I can give to the contrary on it, the damage is already done,' Smith said.
Misinformation is particularly difficult to counter, Smith said, 'when it's someone that has a leadership position, especially within the health care system.'
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
41 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Why Florida is missing out on $200 million a year in Medicaid funding for schools
Florida lawmakers reached a rare consensus after the deadly Parkland school shooting: More money was needed for mental health counseling at schools. 'We haven't put enough resources into mental health issues,' said then-Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, R-Naples. 'And look what happens.' Two years later, lawmakers passed a bill allowing Medicaid dollars assigned to school districts to be used for more types of care for kids, including counseling. But state officials didn't adopt the changes. And they have refused to comply with federal guidelines that would help school districts provide that care. Florida schools have missed out on about $200 million a year in Medicaid funding — a total of $2.2 billion since 2014 — to support children's mental health counseling, physical therapy and other services, advocates say. Their calls to recoup funding come as schools face multimillion-dollar shortfalls in the budget year that began July 1 — and as kids struggle with the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. They say the problems lie with the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, which oversees Medicaid in the state and reports to Gov. Ron DeSantis. Documents show that for more than a decade, the agency hasn't followed federal reimbursement guidelines for school-based services — one of the few areas of Medicaid the Trump administration and Congress have not targeted for reductions. The federal program provides in-school medical care and instruction for school-age children with physical or developmental disabilities who qualify for Medicaid. About 2 million children in Florida are on Medicaid, which provides free or low-cost health care to people who qualify. Without the money, school districts have struggled to find therapists, nurses and others to treat children. Some kids experienced lower-quality care or had that care delayed during critical periods of their lives, observers say. The state agency strayed from federal guidelines in 2014, when the U.S. government changed its rules regarding the reimbursements. Experts consulted by the Times said Florida is one of the few states, and perhaps the only one, that is using the outdated payment method. The federal Center for Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program Services warned the agency in 2020 that it was 'not in compliance with current financing rules,' but no substantial action followed. Over that time, instead of collecting $2.2 billion from federal coffers to cover school-based expenses, the state received about $250 million. With money tight, school officials want the agency to make the necessary fixes. 'This is a significant agency failure,' said Ken Kniepmann, former state assistant deputy secretary for Medicaid Policy and Quality at the agency. He was hired in part to improve the system but said he was later instructed to stop. 'It's really unconscionable. Nobody should be OK with this.' A spokesperson for the agency said it did not have sufficient funding to update its reimbursement method until this year's legislative session, and it is committed to getting it done next year. Kniepmann said the agency had not asked the Legislature for permission to draw down the federal dollars needed to enact the changes until this year. The Hillsborough County school board held a workshop in April to address the Medicaid funding gap. Hillsborough received about $6 million in Medicaid reimbursements a year ago for the services it provided, specialist Deneen Gorassini told her board, but would have gotten about $10 million more if the state agency followed federal guidelines. It's money that could have expanded medical and mental health services in schools. Other districts experienced similar-sized gaps, according to Kniepmann's calculations. 'If we can get (the agency) to do their job and submit a (state plan amendment), we could start getting reimbursed based on our expenses, which are way more than what we are getting reimbursed now,' Gorassini told the board. Since 1997, the state has been reimbursing school districts for services — such as counseling or speech therapy — based on a flat rate. In 2014, the federal government required states to reimburse school districts based on the actual costs of those services, which is much higher. Five years ago, federal officials wrote Florida telling them it hadn't adopted the change, and the state had 90 days to comply. 'Please note that you may not pay a rate from a fee schedule and use this as a certification of cost,' Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services acting director Todd McMillion wrote Florida officials in March 2020. The center said it is working with the state to resolve the concerns listed in that letter. Florida is still paying schools a flat rate that has changed little since 1997. Karen Thomas, a Medicaid specialist for Leon County schools for more than 20 years, said that while the formulas are complex, the solution should be 'extremely simple.' 'We're 90% there, maybe 95% already, in the way we are doing things,' Thomas said of districts' processes for collecting receipts and monitoring providers' time. 'They have everything they need to be in compliance with federal payment methodology. They just need to change the invoice, one line on the invoice. ... The fault is squarely in the agency's failure to come into compliance.' The state has shown it can make the switch, Thomas said. She pointed out that when federal authorities ordered county health departments to start billing for actual costs instead of flat rates in 2020, the state quickly shifted. She noted that school-based services are 'a very niche portion' of the state's Medicaid budget — somewhere in the neighborhood of 1% — and that over time agency officials have paid less attention to them, decreasing communication with school districts and reducing staff dedicated to the service. The issue shouldn't be a side note, as it affects the lives of some of Florida's neediest children, she said. And the pandemic made kids' mental health a national crisis. 'Kids used to miss school because of asthma,' Thomas said. 'Now they're missing school because of anxiety and depression.' After the 2018 Parkland attack, state lawmakers wanted to make sure students were getting proper mental health assistance in schools. In 2020, they passed legislation allowing schools to use Medicaid dollars for other types of care. DeSantis signed it into law. But his Agency for Health Care Administration never rewrote the agency's rules to allow school districts to use the new law. 'The law was very clear,' said retired Sen. Bill Montford, D-Tallahassee, who sponsored the 2020 bill. 'Why they didn't do it I don't know.' Rep. Christine Hunchofsky, a Democrat who represents Parkland in the House, repeatedly has asked agency officials if the state is doing all it can to leverage federal money for student services. The issue comes up frequently on the Commission on Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder, to which Hunchofsky was appointed by the Republican House speaker. She said the agency has provided few clear answers. Meanwhile, she's heard plenty from the school districts, and said she plans to pursue the questions further. Montford, also executive director of the state's superintendents association, said agency officials have told his group that they are preparing a rule revision to go into effect in mid-2026. That's when states are supposed to comply with an updated 2023 federal guidance on school-based services. But Kniepmann, who worked as associate director for health at the Florida Conference for Catholic Bishops before moving to the health agency, argued the state is stalling for reasons that remain unclear to him. He said the 2023 guidance was not intended to be a way for Florida to further delay implementing rules put in place more than a decade ago. Every holdup, he and others said, means less money available to pay for medical and related services. 'Eleven years and $2.2 billion is not a little thing,' he said. Hillsborough district officials, also leery of the state's ability to pull off a new rule by mid-2026, said they are looking into a different approach to bring in more Medicaid money. Gorassini told the board that her department would conduct a rate study for each service it provides and submit the updated amounts to the state for inclusion on the existing reimbursement schedule. Kniepmann said it's a long-shot effort that requires a lot of work at the district level, adding that the agency has discouraged such an approach. It's worth a shot, though, Gorassini told the Hillsborough school board. 'We'll never get what we spend,' she said. 'But in the meantime we're going to try to maximize our reimbursement.' What's really at stake is student health, said Thomas, the Leon County Medicaid specialist who also serves on the National Alliance for Medicaid in Education leadership team. Her district stands to reap about $2 million more per year if the change is made. 'That is the difference between being able to hire actual medical professionals who have the ability to recognize actual medical issues, and purchase medical equipment, actual things that could help the children that are most medically needy in this county,' she said. 'When I can't afford to pay for a nurse, all kids suffer.'
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
New tool can remove nearly all of a cancer-causing ‘forever chemical' from water — in just 5 minutes
Your tap water's dirty little secret might have just met its match. Scientists have engineered a high-tech filter that strips toxic 'forever chemicals' from drinking water in a matter of minutes. Better yet, the new tool glows on contact with contamination, serving as both a purifier and an real-time monitoring system. 4 Research suggests the majority of Americans have 'forever chemicals' in their drinking water. sebra – Forever chemicals — officially known as per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) — are tiny, man-made compounds that break down very slowly and accumulate in people, animals and the environment over time. They've been used since the 1940s in everything from non-stick cookware and grease-resistant food packaging to waterproof fabrics and personal care products. But concerns are mounting over the potential health effects of PFAS, with some experts likening them to 'slow poison.' One of the most widely used forever chemicals, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), has been linked to higher risks of certain cancers, liver damage, immune system issues, high cholesterol and even developmental delays in fetuses and children. It has been detected across a range of environments and products — from soil and rainfall to seafood, human blood and drinking water. 4 While PFOA was previously used in the manufacturing of non-stock cookware, it has largely been phased out due to concerns about potential health and environmental risks. Dina – In fact, a 2020 study estimated that more than 200 million Americans are drinking water contaminated with PFOA or PFOS, another notorious forever chemical formally known as perfluorooctane sulfonate. Now, researchers at the University of Utah may have found a way to help reduce that exposure. The scientists recently developed a lab-engineered, crystalline substance known as a metal-organic framework (MOF) that functions like a molecular sieve. When water flows through the material, it snags and traps PFOA molecules, effectively removing the forever chemical. 4 The work builds on past research from the team that created a porous material that fluoresces in the presence of PFAS. THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH In lab tests, the MOF cleared out more than 99% of the toxic substance in just five minutes. 'This sort of rapid treatment is crucial for real-world applications,' the study authors wrote in their report. The material also worked in the presence of other PFAS compounds, salts, and natural organic matter found in drinking water supplies, suggesting it could perform well in a variety of real-world environmental conditions. Better yet, the MOF can be reused, with researchers finding it retained 93% of its adsorption efficiency after five wash cycles. That's a big deal, since current methods for removing PFAS are often slow, costly, inefficient and don't hold up well after repeated use. 4 PFAS in drinking water are estimated to contribute to more than 6,800 cancer cases each year. WESTOCK – An added bonus: when PFOA molecules bind to the material, it glows fluorescent — providing instant, on-the-spot confirmation of contamination. 'This MOF represents a major leap forward for PFAS remediation,' Rana Dalapati, the study's lead author, said in a statement. 'Its ability to both selectively capture and sensitively detect PFOA in real time makes it a versatile and practical solution for water treatment and environmental monitoring,' she added. Looking ahead, the team believes this material could one day be adapted to capture other PFAS chemicals, not just PFOA. Wondering if you should be concerned about forever chemicals in your drinking water? The Environmental Working Group's Tap Water Database is a good place to start — just enter your ZIP code to see what's in your local supply. While the newly developed MOF may one day offer a powerful solution, it will likely be a while before it's available for public use. In the meantime, if you live in an area with known PFAS contamination, consider getting a water filter. Look for one certified by the National Sanitation Foundation to reduce levels of PFOA and PFOS to help limit your exposure.
CNBC
5 hours ago
- CNBC
Are 2 to 3 cups of coffee a day too much? It's complicated, experts say: 'It's different for each person'
Two-thirds of Americans drink coffee every single day, according to data collected by the National Coffee Association in 2022, and the debate about how much is too much and whether or not any amount of caffeine is safe persists. But recent research shows that the answer is more complicated than you'd think. A Harvard study, that followed nearly 50,000 women over the course of 30 years and published in June, found that drinking coffee every day may lead to healthy aging in women. One to three cups a day was also linked to heart health benefits and lower mortality rates. But research also shows that high coffee consumption can increase your likelihood of dementia. And a 2022 paper published in the Journal of the American Heart Association found a link between heavy coffee consumption and an increased risk of dying from cardiovascular disease in people with hypertension. Benefits, drawbacks, and the right amount all depend on your individual lifestyle and overall health. And health experts consistently advise that, like with most things, moderation is key for your daily coffee. Deepak Chopra, author, speaker and proponent of alternative medicine, told CNBC Make It in 2023 that he drinks two to three cups of coffee each day before noon. While that may sound like too much caffeine for the average person, it's actually within a healthy range. "Drinking two to three cups before noon is safe to do," registered dietitian Roxana Ehsani said in an interview with CNBC Make It last year. "As long as they don't greatly surpass 400 milligrams of caffeine." Ehsani's suggestion follows the Food and Drug Administration's recommendation of consuming no more than 400 milligrams of caffeine a day, which can include the caffeine found in teas, energy drinks, sodas and chocolate. Certain people may benefit from consuming much less caffeine than is recommended by the FDA. Caffeine tolerance varies from person to person, with some people feeling anxious or jittery after just one or two cups of coffee. "Within those milligram or cup of coffee recommendations, if you start feeling overly tired and the caffeine is not helping, then you've got to stop [drinking it]," dietitian Jessica Sylvester told NBC News. "If your heart starts beating incredibly fast, you've got to stop. It's different for each person." Pregnant people should consider cutting back on caffeine. And people who have diabetes or cardiovascular disease should be mindful of their sugar intake when having coffee, Nikki Cota, a dietitian at the Mayo Clinic, told NBC News. Expert opinion also varies on if teens should drink coffee, but "avoiding caffeine is the best choice for all kids," according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. But for everyone else, if you're having two to three cups, or more, "be mindful of what you're experiencing," registered dietitian Maddie Pasquariello says. And make sure you're not replacing meals with caffeine. Ehsani recommends drinking water or having a meal before reaching for coffee since caffeine suppresses appetite. And if you notice your sleep is affected when you have a coffee in the afternoon, experts suggest a mornings-only rule for your daily latte or macchiato.
