No need for policing experience to apply as campaign begins to find new Garda Commissioner
Minister for Justice, Jim O'Callaghan TD, said the Public Appointments Service had begun the competition to be the next head of An Garda Síochána – known as 'Number One' in the organisation.
Candidates from outside of Ireland will be welcomed,
a Public Jobs advert states
, and there is no need for policing experience.
The advert on public jobs states: 'Applications are welcomed from candidates of an appropriate calibre from policing, security or civilian backgrounds'.
It also states that an honours degree or postgraduate qualification in a relevant discipline would be 'desirable'.
O'Callaghan said it is the first recruitment campaign under the controversial new Policing, Security and Community Safety Act.
'The new Garda Commissioner will lead the organisation at a time of ongoing growth, change and reform as the organisation starts to operate under the provisions of the Policing, Security and Community Safety Act which implemented the recommendations of the Commission on the Future of Policing in Ireland.
'The Government is committed to ensuring that An Garda Síochána has the resources it needs to fight crime. A strengthened, well-resourced Garda organisation is central to this policy. €2.48 billion for this year, a 27% increase since 2020, which is supporting the continued recruitment of Garda members and staff.
'I expect to be in a position to make a recommendation to the Government in late July,' he said.
Advertisement
Drew Harris, has agreed to extend his term of office to facilitate the competition to appoint his successor. His retirement was due to take effect before the competition was complete.
The Minister consulted with the new Bord an Garda Síochána and the Policing and Community Safety Authority in developing the selection criteria and recruitment process for this competition.
The new Commissioner will be appointed to a five-year term or until the retirement age of 62. The garda leader will lead a total workforce of nearly 18,000 people, comprising sworn Gardaí, Garda staff and Garda Reserves, the Department of Justice said.
The successful candidate will have a wage packet which will be negotiable up to €314,512.00, 'subject to the individual's pension arrangements'.
The mention of pensions is key because under pension-related tax regulations, most Garda top brass would face a very significant tax liability on retirement.
This would increase significantly if they became Garda Commissioner and served a full term.
It is understood that this liability for most senior officers would be in the region of half a million euros. it would increase to in excess of €1m if they became Commissioner.
The issue has been identified in recent years and efforts to lobby the Department of Public Expenditure, NDP Delivery and Reform have fallen on deaf ears.
The pension related exposure has its origin in rules under the Standard Fund Threshold (SFT). It is specific to large pensions that set a ceiling on what tax reliefs a person can obtain on pensions during their working life in public or private sectors.
The problem has also been identified for senior department heads across Government.
The issue already led to a protracted and repeat failure to hire a Deputy Commissioner – which was ultimately filled by Justin Kelly after a rerun of the campaign.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
40 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Louth student avoids prison sentence for storing and dealing drugs
Josh Cole, Townley Manor, Tullyallen, Drogheda, pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of drugs for sale or supply at his home address, charges which stemmed from a Garda search which yielded cannabis worth more than €30,000 and cocaine valued €299. Judge Dara Hayes sentenced him to two concurrent terms of three-and-a-half years and suspended both for three-and-a-half years. Last April, the court heard that the defendant is studying Music and Computer Science at Maynooth University. He had been struggling for money after failing first year and having to pay full fees. He was holding most of the drugs for someone else. He was given money and some drugs to sell himself as payment for storing them. He was aged 19 at the time. Gda Emma Kilroe testified that on July 25, 2023, gardaí searched Mr Cole's home at Townley Manor where he lived with his brother and sister. In an upstairs bedroom a sports bag was found. It contained 1.51kg of cannabis valued €30,228 and 4.27g of cocaine worth €299.32. Gardaí also discovered a weighing scale and bags. The accused was present at the search and following his arrest made admissions during interview at Drogheda Garda Station. He wouldn't name other people involved. There were no previous convictions, nor had he come to adverse attention since. It was submitted by counsel that the accused had been prevailed upon to hold these drugs for 'more sinister elements in the community'. The case had been put back to allow him complete exams. ADVERTISEMENT On the adjourned date the court had 11 urinalysis reports from January 9 last to July 3 and all were negative, as well as the defendant's exam results. Judge Hayes said that the Probation Service had assessed Mr Cole at low risk of reoffending. A report noted that he was the youngest of three children, worked part-time in a local shop and had strong ties to his church. The judge remarked that by any measure it was a substantial quantity of drugs. The defendant had been dealing to a small scale as well as storing drugs. He remained a very young man. There was a very positive probation report and testimonials. Judges Hayes said that an immediate custodial sentence was not required. Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Elizabeth Plunkett: How murdered woman's family discovered they were not ‘relevant victims' in serial killer case
When something false is repeated often enough, it has a tendency to become accepted fact. At some point a seed of incorrect information takes root in the public discourse before spreading through newspaper articles, books and political statements. Eventually, the actual truth becomes almost impossible to discern. It is a phenomenon known to researchers as the illusory truth effect. The family of Elizabeth Plunkett came face to face with this effect in 2023 after getting a call from the Parole Board. Elizabeth was a 23-year-old woman from Ringsend in Dublin who, in 1976, was kidnapped and murdered by two English men. The killers, John Shaw and Geoffrey Evans, had come to Ireland with the aim of murdering one woman every week. A month after Elizabeth's death, they murdered another young woman, Mary Duffy, from Co Galway , before being caught by gardaí and confessing to their crimes. READ MORE Shaw and Evans became known as Ireland's first serial killers. Both received life sentences and Evans died in custody in 2012 at the age of 72. Shaw (78) remains in Arbour Hill Prison. He is Ireland's longest-serving prisoner. He sought to change that in 2023 by applying for parole, having already been granted release for two days a year. Under a new parole act passed in 2019, the Plunkett family had an automatic right to express their views on Shaw's parole bid. Elizabeth Plunkett was 23 when she was murdered by John Shaw and Geoffrey Evans in 1976 When the family were contacted by the Parole Board, it was decided two of Elizabeth's sisters, Bernadette Barry and Kathleen Nolan, would speak for all of the siblings. They spent hours drafting their submissions, explaining the ongoing trauma of Elizabeth's murder and the effect it had on their parents who both died a few years afterwards. Shaw should not be released under any circumstances, they said. 'I poured my heart and soul into that,' said Kathleen this week. 'It was like slicing me open, with the trauma of remembering.' They repeated the process later in person during a meeting with two members of the Parole Board who would decide Shaw's future. 'We got emotional, we got angry – it was gruelling,' recalled Bernadette. Afterwards, the family put the matter to the back of their minds and prepared for the wedding of Kathleen's daughter that summer. That August, the sisters got a call from the solicitors representing them in the parole process and were asked to come into the office on a Saturday morning. Their solicitor, James McGuill, informed them that the Parole Board had made a serious mistake. It had been discovered the Plunkett family were not 'relevant victims' and therefore had no right to take part in Shaw's parole process. This was because Shaw had in fact never been convicted of Elizabeth's murder. Bernadette and Kathleen could not believe what they were hearing. For decades, newspaper articles and books had repeated the same 'fact': that John Shaw and Geoffrey Evans – 'Ireland's first serial killers' – were serving life for the murders of Elizabeth Plunkett and Mary Duffy. Elizabeth Plunkett: In 1979 the DPP dropped the charges against John Shaw relating to the Ringsend woman's rape and murder. To date, nothing has emerged to explain this decision More than that, various State agencies were under the same impression. Over the years, every time Shaw or Evans was moved out of the prison, for example for hospital appointments, the Irish Prison Service (IPS) contacted the Plunkett family 'as relevant victims' to let them know. Similarly, the Parole Board had contacted the family in the belief that Shaw had been convicted of Elizabeth's murder, only to realise belatedly its mistake. 'There's retired judges on the Parole Board,' said Kathleen. 'The highest echelons of Irish society get these jobs on these boards. They're highly educated people, and yet no one checked this out.' How did this illusory truth take hold? A look through the archives provides a few clues. Shaw and Evans confessed to raping and murdering both women shortly after their capture. However, the prosecution was a convoluted affair. First, a judge granted a defence application that the men be tried separately, as each one was blaming the other for the murders. For reasons that remain unclear, the judge also ordered the men be given separate trials for each of the murdered women, meaning a total of four trials. The hearing began in July 1977, when Shaw went on trial for Mary Duffy's rape and murder. To the surprise of many onlookers the jury became deadlocked on a verdict. He was retried and subsequently convicted. [ The late summer murders: Two men on a mission to kill Irish women Opens in new window ] The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) then successfully appealed the original judgment mandating separate trials, meaning they could try Evans for both of the murders at the same time. Following the trial, he was convicted of Mary Duffy's murder but, for reasons that are also unclear at this remove, the judge ordered the jury to find him not guilty of Elizabeth Plunkett's killing. Both men were sentenced to life for Mary Duffy's murder. Then, in 1979, the DPP dropped the charges against Shaw relating to Elizabeth's rape and murder. To date, nothing has emerged to explain this decision. It is possible the DPP believed Shaw would never be released so there was no point in going through the expense of another trial. Like the rest of Irish society, Bernadette and Elizabeth, who were teenagers at the time, went through their life believing Shaw was in prison for their sister's murder. They explained that during the trials, their father went to great lengths to shield the family from the trauma of the process. 'The way it was in the house, it wasn't discussed. My father would just shut down any conversation about it because it set my Mammy off. It was all about trying to keep us together because we were all ready to just lose the plot,' said Bernadette. 'When you see somebody going to jail and there was a court case, you just automatically live your life thinking, yeah, they were found guilty,' said Kathleen. After being informed about the Parole Board's mistake in August 2023, the sisters decided they would refuse to accept the label of 'not relevant victims'. Their solicitor hired two barristers to examine the case. After searching through the records, the lawyers found that not only had there been no conviction for Elizabeth's murder, no inquest had been held either. It would later emerge that a death certificate had not even been issued for the young woman. It felt like Elizabeth had been erased, the sisters said, and they were determined to address that. The sisters wrote to the Garda, the DPP and the Government but got nowhere. At that point they decided to go public and made contact with the RTÉ Documentary on One team, having been impressed by their investigation into abuse in Blackrock College. 'I said to Kathleen: they're meticulous. They have to be. Because they can't afford to be sued after all the Ryan Tubridy thing,' joked Bernadette. The sisters have nothing but praise for the documentary team, and in particular its producer Liam O'Brien. Last month RTÉ started publishing a six-part podcast on the case called Stolen Sister. Earlier this year, thanks to the sisters' campaign, an inquest was finally held into Elizabeth's death which recorded a verdict of unlawful killing. However, officially, no one has been convicted of her death and the Plunkett family still have no say in Shaw's parole. [ From the archive: State's longest-serving prisoner in fresh bid to secure temporary release Opens in new window ] His last parole bid was rejected. He is expected to apply again early next year. James McGuill, their solicitor, has called on the Garda to reopen the murder investigation with a view to securing a murder conviction against Shaw. The Garda has said its investigation concluded in 1976 and the matter is one for the DPP. The family have received legal advice that, in rare cases, it is possible to reopen a case after charges are dropped. One path being pursued by McGuill and the two sisters is gathering enough new evidence to allow prosecutors to reopen the case. They have had some success to date. After the inquest, and particularly after the start of the RTÉ series, multiple women have come forward to say they believe they were also targeted by Shaw and Evans during the men's 1976 crime spree. [ Eight women come forward with information on being targeted by 1976 killers of Elizabeth Plunkett Opens in new window ] This includes a woman who was knocked down by a car very close to where Elizabeth was abducted in Co Wicklow. These testimonies will be passed on to the Garda and DPP, McGuill said. Looking back, Kathleen says she can understand her father's desire to protect them from the trial and why he 'hid the newspapers behind the sideboard'. 'When anyone would it bring up, he'd say: 'Let Elizabeth Rest in peace', because he couldn't cope,' she said. Nevertheless, they are determined to keep up their campaign for Elizabeth's case to be reopened by authorities. 'They thought these two auld ones would just go away, said Bernadette. 'But no, sorry, not when you're fighting for your family.'


Irish Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Double rapist Simon McGinley back on the streets just days after prison release
This is notorious double rapist Simon McGinley out and about in a Co Louth town just days after he was released from prison. Evil McGinley, 52, walked free from the Midlands Prison on Wednesday after completing a sentence he received last year for breaching the conditions of the Sex Offenders Act. Our exclusive photos show the cowardly double rapist, dressed in a striped t-shirt, a grey zip-up jumper and black trousers and carrying a mobile phone and blue disposable vape, as The Irish Mirror tracked him down in Dundalk. The sicko sex fiend, who is now subject to Garda monitoring as he has been described as a dangerous individual, was in prison since August 2023 after he was sentenced at Dundalk Circuit Court for the breaches. As part of his release conditions, he is also under the supervision of the Probation Service for the next 12 years. He has also been placed on the Sex Offenders Register for the rest of his life. In October 2022, the sex beast was released from Arbour Hill Prison, having served 13 years behind bars of an overall 21-year sentence for the brutal and shocking rape of an 85-year-old woman in her Co Monaghan home in 2008. A drunken McGinley had broken into her home and raped her repeatedly during the night and put his hand over her mouth. The elderly woman had been unfit to give evidence during the trial due to worsening dementia. But, a statement she had given at a previous district court hearing was read to the jury. The evil rapist was previously sentenced to 12 years in 1998 after pleading guilty to raping a 13-year-old girl in August 1997 — in a controversy known as the 'C Case'. The young girl at the centre of the infamous 'C Case' against him was involved in a legal battle over whether she was allowed to travel to the UK to have an abortion. Speaking out in 2009, the victim told RTÉ Radio how the brutal attack left her pregnant and forced her into a succession of care homes and how she was caught at the centre of an infamous legal battle over her right to have an abortion. 'He ruined my life and I am still coming to terms with that. My life is destroyed,' said the woman. 'I never got schooling or anything like that. I don't know how many times I tried to kill myself but I have a little five-year-old son now so he keeps me going.' Dangerous rapist McGinley has also previously been compared to infamous beast Larry Murphy and is considered a highly volatile sexual predator. And he was once deemed a person of interest in the case of missing JoJo Dullard. During his trial in 2009 for the rape of the elderly woman, Mr Justice Birmingham said he could find no mitigating circumstance. 'Rape is always a serious offence but within the spectrum of rapes this, in my view, is at the top of the upper end. This case is just about as bad as it gets,' he said. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week