Kremlin calls minister's death ‘tragic' but gives no clues on apparent suicide
It comes amid media speculation that he was potentially facing corruption charges.
Mr Starovoit, who served in his post for a little over a year, was found dead from a gunshot wound – news that broke hours after a decree was issued on Monday by Russian President Vladimir Putin that dismissed the 53-year-old cabinet member.
Mr Starovoit's body was found in the Odintsovo district just west of the capital that is home to many members of Russia's elite, according to the Investigative Committee, the country's top criminal investigation agency.
It said that a criminal probe was launched into his death and investigators saw suicide as the most likely cause.
The agency said Mr Starovoit's body was found in his car, but Russian media that carried images from the scene later reported that he was found dead in a small park next to a parking lot where he left his Tesla and a pistol presented to him as an official gift was at his side.
The reports said Mr Starovoit's personal assistant was asked to identify his body and she was seen weeping afterwards.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov refused to comment on the circumstances of Mr Starovoit's death, saying that investigators will have to determine the details.
'Such information is always tragic and sad,' Mr Peskov said, noting that Mr Putin was immediately informed about it.
'Naturally, we were shocked by it.'
Russian media reported that Mr Starovoit's dismissal and his death could have been linked to an investigation into the embezzlement of state funds allocated for building fortifications in the Kursk region, where he was governor for five years before becoming transportation minister.
Mr Starovoit's successor as governor, Alexei Smirnov, stepped down in December and was arrested on embezzlement charges in April.
Some Russian media have claimed that Mr Smirnov had told investigators about Mr Starovoit's alleged involvement in the corruption scheme and his arrest appeared inevitable.
Some commentators even alleged that Mr Starovoit's associates in higher echelons could have ordered his killing to avoid exposure.
The alleged embezzlement has been cited as one reason behind the Russian military's failure to stem a surprise August 2024 incursion in the region by Ukrainian troops that quickly overwhelmed lightly armed Russian border guards and inexperienced army conscripts.
The incursion humiliated the Kremlin — the first time the country's territory was occupied by an invader since the Second World War.
The Russian military announced in April that its troops had fully reclaimed the border territory nearly nine months after losing chunks of the region.
Ukraine had disputed that assertion.
On July 1, former deputy defence minister Timur Ivanov was convicted on charges of embezzlement and money laundering and sentenced to 13 years in prison in a high-profile case that exposed rampant military corruption widely blamed for Moscow's military setbacks in Ukraine.
Mr Ivanov was the most visible figure in a far-ranging probe into alleged military graft that also targeted several other top officials who were close to former defence minister Sergei Shoigu.
Mr Shoigu, a veteran official who had personal ties to Mr Putin, survived the purge of his inner circle and was given a high-profile post of secretary of Russia's Security Council.
Mr Ivanov, 49, was named deputy defence minister in 2016 and oversaw military construction projects, as well as property management, housing and medical support for the troops.
He was known for his lavish lifestyle that outraged many in Moscow just as the fighting in Ukraine exposed glaring deficiencies in Russian military organisation and supplies that resulted in battlefield setbacks.
Mr Putin named Andrei Nikitin, who served as deputy transport minister, to replace Mr Starovoit.
Legislators in the lower house of Russian parliament quickly endorsed his appointment on Tuesday.
Mr Starovoit, who was divorced, is survived by two teenage daughters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
23 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The Real Trouble With America's Flip-Flop on Ukrainian Weapons
These days, you could forgive Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for feeling like an American CEO being whipsawed by President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs. But the Ukrainian president is not trying to maximize profits. He wants to win a war, and needs a consistent, predictable flow of American weapons to do that. He's not getting it. Late last month, the administration suspended a promised shipment of much-needed arms to Ukraine, saying the U.S. needed them for its own stockpiles. Then on Monday, following a frustrating call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump flipped that stance, announcing that the U.S. would be sending the weapons after all. But he left ambiguous whether more aid would be forthcoming. Like their corporate counterparts trying to prepare for tariffs, Zelensky and the Ukrainian military are struggling because they don't know what U.S. policy will look like. Military planners and former U.S. officials who have worked on weapons deliveries to Ukraine told me that sudden changes create a series of logistical, political, and military challenges that could hamper Ukraine's grip on its territory as it battles a larger, better-armed foe. In some ways, the U.S. vacillation has a bigger impact than the lack of the weapons themselves, the officials said. A single shipment of arms—even one that included dozens of Patriot missiles, hundreds of Hellfires, and thousands of rounds of 155-millimeter artillery–does not make or break Ukraine's war effort. But uncertainty could: Without a clear picture of the assistance it's getting from what has been its single most important backer, Ukraine can't design its war plans or effectively respond to attacks. That's a perilous situation to be in at a time when Russia is dramatically scaling up the quantity of missiles and drones it's launching Ukraine's way. Anne Applebaum: The U.S. is switching sides A senior Ukrainian official compared the halting flow of weapons to a game of roulette and joked that he would be putting his money 'on zero.' 'We have to be prepared for the next pause of shipments,' the official told my colleague Shane Harris, speaking on the condition of anonymity to candidly share his frustrations. Unable to rely on Washington, Ukraine is looking to ramp up joint weapons production with European Union countries and to expand its own national production. The drama over this particular round of weapons deliveries may have been short-lived, but it's in keeping with the way Trump has approached Ukraine for years. He was impeached, after all, for withholding military support as he tried to pressure Zelensky into helping dig up dirt on the opponent he feared most in the 2020 election, Joe Biden. After failing to end the war within hours of his inauguration, as he had repeatedly vowed he would, Trump dressed down Zelensky in the Oval Office. The Ukrainian leader has learned the hard way that Trump's promises come with an asterisk. Transporting U.S.-provided weapons from Pentagon stockpiles to Poland and then to Ukraine so they can be distributed locally is a huge logistical feat, military planners have repeatedly said, one that takes weeks, if not months, of planning. Once the U.S. announces it is no longer sending a particular system, Ukrainian commanders have to quickly modify their battlefield strategy to find new ways to defend themselves. When Patriot missiles stop arriving from the U.S., for example, Ukraine has to adjust its air defense, 'including pulling resources from other operations,' Josh Paul, who worked on U.S. military sales for the State Department during the Biden administration, explained to me. Those shifts can also mean rushing systems from one part of the country to another or ending the effort to defend a vulnerable area altogether. Because the United States also provides replacement or repair for weapons systems it supplies, a halt in aid may require Ukraine to scramble to find a replacement part from another country or make one themselves. That all takes time. The U.S. oscillation comes as Russia has escalated its use of drones, in some cases launching more in a single day of strikes than it did for much of last year. Russia could interpret American indecision as an opening to be more militarily aggressive and 'grow hopeful that U.S. security assistance will at some point die on the vine,' Michael Kofman, a senior fellow in the Russia and Eurasia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told me. Tom Nichols: It was an ambush Such divisions between Ukraine and the U.S also affect the prospects of diplomacy. Why should Russia negotiate if it believes support for Ukraine is waning? Last week, Trump said that his phone call with Putin 'didn't make any progress' in ending the war. The next day, Russia launched a drone attack on Kyiv that injured at least 14 people. Trump's approach to Ukraine mirrors how he has talked about tariffs. He has described the more than $31.7 billion worth of U.S. stockpiles that the U.S. has provided Ukraine, according to a May Government Accountability Office report, as unfair to the U.S., in the same way he has said America has been taken advantage of by its trading partners. In April, the U.S. and Ukraine entered a minerals deal that the administration, in keeping with Trump's transactional approach to foreign policy, has described as 'payback' by Kyiv for American support during the war. Reports that the Pentagon had suspended a shipment of weapons to Ukraine emerged on July 1. Although administration officials initially identified Elbridge Colby, the undersecretary of defense for policy, as the one who had advised freezing shipments, defense officials told me that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made the decision without consulting the White House. He relied instead on an internal Pentagon review that raised concerns about the state of U.S. air-defense stockpiles. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said there was coordination across government. But when a reporter asked Trump this week who made the decision to suspend the shipment, he replied: 'I don't know. Why don't you tell me?' It would not be the first time Hegseth has made such a change. Just weeks into the job, the defense chief ordered a halt to flights carrying munitions and artillery to Ukraine. That also caught the White House by surprise, officials told me. Within days, he lifted the order. Just after Hegseth's suspension of arms shipments late last month, Trump had his call with Putin, followed by a call with Zelensky, which the Ukrainian leader described in a social-media post as an 'important and fruitful conversation.' By Monday, during a dinner with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump vowed to send weapons to Kyiv: 'We have to; they have to be able to defend themselves.' A Pentagon spokesperson later said that 'at President Trump's direction, the Department of Defense is sending additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace and ensure the killing stops.' But there is no reason for Ukraine to be optimistic that it will keep receiving U.S. weapons shipments. All weapons that have been provided to Ukraine since Trump took office were approved under President Biden; the delivery of those already approved weapons is expected to run out by the end of the summer. The Trump administration has not asked Congress to fund supplies beyond that. Instead, Ukraine will depend on U.S.-provided funding to build new weapons supplies through contracts with American companies, a years-long process. And although Trump said this week that he would continue to supply Ukraine with defensive weapons, the administration hasn't provided any details about what kind or how long that will last. Ukraine has successfully produced drones and can get some weapons systems from its European allies. But there are other weapons, particularly those used to defend Kyiv and to target Russian military assets, that only the U.S. can provide, such as Patriot missiles. Even if Ukraine agrees to buy them, getting them to the battlefield could take years. The best Zelensky can do now is hope that whatever the ups and downs of recent weeks, the latest change of heart by the U.S. portends more support in the future. 'We now have the necessary political statements and decisions' from the U.S., Zelensky said in a social-media post Tuesday. Now, he added, 'we must implement them as quickly as possible to protect our people and our positions.'
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK and France order more Storm Shadow missiles and step up military co-operation
Britain and France are to order more Storm Shadow missiles, as they step up work to replace the weapon as part of a refreshed defence pact. Storm Shadow, or as the French call it SCALP, is a long-range missile which has been supplied by both the British and French to Ukraine, allowing Kyiv to strike targets deep inside Russian territory. The two countries have discussed co-operation on a replacement for years but, as French president Emmanuel Macron visits the UK, the nations will commit on Thursday towards the next phase of the project for Storm Shadow's successor. The joint development will help to sustain more than 1,300 jobs in the UK, according to the Government. On the third day of Mr Macron's UK state visit, he and Sir Keir Starmer will also agree to deepen nuclear ties. Britain and France, the only two nuclear powers in Europe, will state in a declaration that their nuclear deterrents – while independent – can be co-ordinated, with the aim of deterring threats like Russia from attacking Europe. The declaration comes at a time when Donald Trump's US administration is calling on European Nato powers to take on a larger role in the alliance. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: 'From war in Europe, to new nuclear risks and daily cyber-attacks – the threats we face are multiplying. 'As close partners and Nato allies, the UK and France have a deep history of defence collaboration and today's agreements take our partnership to the next level. 'We stand ready to use our shared might to advance our joint capabilities – equipping us for the decades to come while supporting thousands of UK jobs and keeping our people safe.' Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'The UK and France are stepping up together to meet today's threats and tomorrow's challenges. We are committed to driving defence as an engine for growth, delivering better fighting capabilities faster, and ensuring our armed forces can operate side by side – from the High North to the Black Sea. 'This partnership strengthens our leadership in Europe, ensures continued support for Ukraine, and sends a clear signal to our adversaries that we stand stronger, together.' Building on the 2010 Lancaster House treaties between France and the UK, the two countries will also bolster a shared military venture, known as the Combined Joint Force. They also plan to forge closer military industrial ties, including in AI and direct energy weapons, as part of a programme dubbed the 'Entente Industrielle' by the UK Government.
Gizmodo
25 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk's Space Baby Is Ignoring His Drama
It hasn't been a great summer for Elon Musk's empire. The billionaire has been making headlines not for rockets or robots, but for explosive political drama. After pouring nearly $290 million of his own money into the 2024 election cycle to help Donald Trump return to the White House, Musk has now formed his own 'America Party.' This unprecedented move has accelerated a public and bitter end to his one-time bromance with Trump. The fracture deepened after Musk sharply criticized Trump's signature 'One Big Beautiful Bill' as a massive spending disaster and publicly accused the administration of a cover-up involving the Jeffrey Epstein files. Trump, for his part, hit back hard, famously calling Musk a 'train wreck' and threatening his companies with federal action, escalating what has become a high-stakes feud. Tesla, the jewel of Musk's public holdings, has paid the price. The electric vehicle company has shed over $350 billion in market cap since the start of the year. X, formerly known as Twitter, hasn't fared much better: its AI chatbot Grok has been caught spewing antisemitic content, and CEO Linda Yaccarino just announced her resignation on July 9. But while Musk's political stunts and tech misfires dominate headlines, SpaceX is quietly thriving. X CEO Linda Yaccarino: My Work Here Is Done The rocket company is reportedly in talks to raise new funding that would lift its valuation to around $400 billion, according to Bloomberg. If the deal goes through, SpaceX would further cement its status as one of the most valuable private companies in the world. That's a long way from where it started. Founded in 2002 by Musk with the goal of making humanity multi-planetary, SpaceX is now the undisputed leader in commercial spaceflight. It has launched hundreds of rockets, carried NASA astronauts to the International Space Station, and built the Starlink satellite internet service, which now boasts over 6 million users globally as of June 2025. Its current CEO is still Elon Musk, but day-to-day operations are largely overseen by Gwynne Shotwell, the long-serving President and COO widely credited with keeping the company focused and functional amid Musk's distractions. Shotwell has been with SpaceX since 2002 and is widely credited with overseeing the company's operational successes, customer relations, and ensuring the execution of its ambitious development programs. This established management structure allows the company to maintain focus on its core mission, even as its founder navigates external controversies. This latest fundraising effort isn't unusual. SpaceX typically holds two tender offers per year, allowing employees to sell shares while bringing in new capital. These discussions are still ongoing, and the final valuation could shift depending on market conditions. In October 2021, SpaceX was valued at $100 billion. That number surged to $350 billion in December 2023. Now, just seven months later, the rocket company appears poised to jump again even as Musk's other ventures are weighed down by scandal. Elon Musk Accuses Trump of Epstein Coverup With Clown Meme SpaceX declined to comment. A $400 billion valuation despite the external 'Musk effect' demonstrates that investors view SpaceX as a fundamentally strong, independent entity with robust business fundamentals. They are betting on its technology, its contracts (including lucrative government deals with NASA and the Pentagon), and its long-term vision for space exploration and global internet connectivity, rather than being deterred by the controversies surrounding its founder. The capital raised will fuel SpaceX's colossal projects, including the development of Starship, its next-generation fully reusable rocket system designed for missions to the Moon and Mars, and the continued expansion of the Starlink constellation. This funding is critical for achieving Musk's long-term vision of making humanity multiplanetary.
