SC dismisses plea against slum demolition in Ahmedabad
However, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to submit a comprehensive representation to the competent authority seeking "sympathetic reconsideration" for a larger alternative accommodation.
A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh heard the matter. Earlier, while ordering the status quo, the Court had directed Advocate-on-Record (AoR) Sumitra Kumari Choudhary, representing the petitioner, to obtain instructions regarding relocation requirements for the redevelopment project.
The Court had also suggested the petitioner accept the alternative accommodation being offered and assured it would consider the issue of any rent differential.
During the hearing today, Choudhary submitted that the petitioner had not been informed why their objections to a Public Notice concerning the slum area were rejected.
Justice Kant, however, pointed out that 508 beneficiaries had already shifted to alternative accommodation under the rehabilitation scheme. "You allow this project to continue," Justice Kant told Choudhary.
Government Pleader Gursharan H. Virk, appearing for the State, informed the Court that out of 741 occupiers of unauthorised slum structures, 740 had accepted the rehabilitation offer, and only the petitioner's family continued to object.
Highlighting the grievance, Choudhary argued that the alternative accommodation being provided was merely 225 sq ft compared to the petitioner's existing 2,000 sq ft residence, questioning, "How is it rehabilitation fit for human...?" Justice Kant responded, "That, we can't satisfy everybody's claim."
Dictating the order, the Court said, "We are not inclined to interfere with the ongoing project. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it will not preclude the petitioners from submitting a comprehensive representation to the competent authority for sympathetic reconsideration of the requirement of a larger area to be offered to them. Such representation shall be examined in accordance with the rehabilitation scheme."
The matter pertains to 49 slum dwellers occupying premises in Chharanagar, Ahmedabad, who had approached the Gujarat High Court challenging a Public Notice dated January 29, 2025.
The notice had directed the slum dwellers to vacate within 30 days under Sections 11 and 13 of the Gujarat Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance, and Redevelopment) Act, 1973.
The petitioners sought quashing of the notice, application of the State's Slum Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy to their cases, and action against officers responsible for demolitions carried out on March 20, 2025.
They alleged that notices were not served individually, but only published generally, and claimed insufficient time was provided to vacate, violating the Slum Act.
The State countered that the area had been declared a "slum area" in 2019 due to unsafe living conditions. Following this, a redevelopment project was initiated, objections were invited and duly considered, and the Chharanagar area was declared a "Slum Clearance Area."
It was contended that the petitioners approached the Court belatedly to delay the project, whereas most residents had already accepted rehabilitation.
The Gujarat High Court, rejecting the plea, found that the action taken was in accordance with the Slum Act, noting that 508 beneficiaries were already residing in rented accommodations awaiting permanent housing.
The High Court emphasised that construction of new residential blocks was well underway, and eligible slum dwellers would receive quality housing post-redevelopment.
Nevertheless, showing some indulgence, the High Court had granted 30 days to the slum dwellers willing to vacate voluntarily, provided they submitted an undertaking to the competent authority. UNI SNG SSP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Several complaints on illegal sand mining but none made to TGPCB: Centre
HYDERABAD: Despite persistent complaints by locals living in the Godavari river basin area about illegal sand mining, not a single formal complaint has been lodged with the Telangana Pollution Control Board (TGPCB), the Centre informed Parliament on Monday. In a reply to a starred question raised by Warangal MP Kadiyam Kavya, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change stated that there is no record of any complaint regarding illegal sand mining along the Godavari riverbank in the erstwhile Warangal district. It also confirmed that no specific study has been undertaken by the inistry on the environmental impact of such mining in the region. The ministry clarified that the regulation and monitoring of minor minerals such as sand fall under the purview of state governments as per the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. While the Centre has issued various guidelines, including the Sustainable Sand Mining Guidelines (2016) and Enforcement & Monitoring Guidelines for Sand Mining (2020), their implementation is the responsibility of the states.


New Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Would you let your kids sleep on floor?: Andhra HC raps officials over poor conditions in hostels
VIJAYAWADA: The Andhra Pradesh High Court, comprising Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Justice Cheemalapati Ravi, expressed strong displeasure over the negligence of officials in providing basic amenities in social welfare, BC, and Gurukul hostels across the state. The court, hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Kakinada resident Keethineedi Akhil Sriguru Teja in 2023, criticised the lack of regular inspections by district-level officials and the deplorable conditions in these hostels. The court questioned how officials could remain unaware of the dire situation in hostels and demanded accountability for the crores of rupees allocated annually for their maintenance. 'Are works being carried out solely for the benefit of contractors?' it enquired. The bench expressed dismay over the absence of basic facilities like beds, forcing students to sleep on the floor, and rhetorically asked if officials would allow their children to endure such conditions.


News18
16 minutes ago
- News18
Relief To UP Govt: SC Declines To Address QR Code Issue For Kanwar Yatra Route Eateries
News18 In a major relief to the Uttar Pradesh government, the Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to address the issue of QR Code for eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route. The development came after the top court issued notices to the Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments on a plea challenging orders to eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route to display QR code stickers with details of the owners, with a specific focus on their religious identity. A bench of Justice MM Sundresh and Justice N Kotiswar Singh granted a week's time to the state governments to file their replies. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.