logo
South Floridians spend more on transportation than almost anyone else in U.S.

South Floridians spend more on transportation than almost anyone else in U.S.

Miami Herald8 hours ago
Driving in South Florida can be harrowing — and costly. Of residents in the 10 largest U.S. metropolitan areas, Miamians tie Houstonians for spending the most on transportation.
Roughly 20% of what people residing in Greater Miami spend each year goes toward getting around, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. On average, that's more than $14,400 per household in the tri-county area of Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach.
Americans in general are spending more on cars now than almost ever before. According to Kelley Blue Book, new car buyers paid almost $50,000 per purchase at the end of 2024, just under 2022 highs, when supply chain disruptions led to shortages of new vehicles on the market.
And that number doesn't yet take into account the Trump administration's 15% tariffs on auto imports from Japan and the European Union, said Debt.com Chairman Howard Dvorkin.
Those costs hit especially hard in Greater Miami, where residents generally earn less than their counterparts across the country.
Tri-county residents' net automobile expenditures — the difference between what they paid for their cars and what they recouped by selling their old ones — accounted for nearly half of Miamians' transportation costs and 9% of their total annual expenses, again tying Houston, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Necessity explains part of that expenditure, said Cathy Dos Santos, director of Transit Alliance Miami, a local nonprofit promoting walkability, bikeability and better public transit. Greater Miami, she noted, offers few practical alternatives to driving.
'We're asking people to choose between paying really high costs for transportation by having to own or lease their car,' Dos Santos said, 'versus spending sometimes twice as long using public transit to get around.'
Unsurprisingly, most stick to their cars. And given how far many South Floridians have to travel to get to work, it's hard to blame them.
Census data shows that more than half of tri-county workers commute at least 10 miles to get to work. Nearly 15% have a 50-plus mile commute. Compounding those distances is often-grinding traffic. According to INRIX, a traffic-data analytics company, Miami is the 14th most car-congested city on Earth, with local drivers spending the equivalent of nearly three days a year stuck in traffic.
And those cars, whether they're actually moving or idling, need fuel — another big line-item for locals. Gas eats up roughly 4% of Greater Miamians' annual household spending, one of the highest shares among major U.S. metro areas, according to the Census Bureau.
They also need to be insured. Due largely to the higher risk of severe weather conditions and rates of uninsured drivers, Floridians pay more than $3,200 in car insurance premiums — the second most in the country behind Louisianians — according to MarketWatch.
But beyond necessity, culture can explain some of those high costs, says Dvorkin. 'A lot has to do with image,' he said, observing that South Floridians tend to 'like fancy cars,' even if their checking accounts are dwindling.
Fancy or not, South Floridians need cars to get around because much of where they live is built for and around automobiles, said Dos Santos. That's something local governments can take steps to correct. Low-density, sprawling housing — a large portion of the tri-county's housing stock — makes it difficult for people to live within walking or biking distance of work, or even regular errands, she said.
Denser, multi-use zoning can make it easier for people to meet their needs within a walk or short public transit commute of where they live, Dos Santos noted. That, along with investment in capital projects that can improve public transit across South Florida, could ultimately reduce what residents pay.
But they're longer-term projects.
In the immediate future, Dos Santos said, local governments can invest in cheaper, high-impact 'small infrastructure' — bike lanes, sidewalks and improved pedestrian street crossings to make non-car transit, which is the cheapest way to get around, more attractive, especially for short trips.
But for those who drive dozens of miles just to get to work, as many South Floridians do, their employers can play an important role in reducing transportation costs, said United Way of Florida CEO Melissa Nelson.
By providing gas or bus cards — if employees have convenient access to mass transit — for example, employers can help ease their workers' transportation cost burdens.
For workers receiving government assistance, those perks can help offset costs without increasing their taxable income.
That distinction is crucial. Sometimes, slight increases in income can cost assistance recipients thousands of dollars in lost benefits by pushing them over eligibility thresholds — a phenomenon known as a 'benefits cliff.'
But perhaps most critically, offering flexibility — especially for work that doesn't necessarily need to be done in person or at a specific time — is key to reducing time and money spent on transportation, Nelson said. Such adaptability is especially invaluable for families with children that need to be picked up from childcare or school.
Ultimately, she said, helping workers remove transportation barriers opens doors to personal and professional development.
'People who are stuck in their car for three hours a day' can't invest in themselves, said Nelson. 'They're not doing any continuing education, which means they're not training for the job that you might like them to move into.'
This story was produced with financial support from supporters including The Green Family Foundation Trust and Ken O'Keefe, in partnership with Journalism Funding Partners. The Miami Herald maintains full editorial control of this work.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

American Eagle jumps most since 2000 after Trump praises Sydney Sweeney ad
American Eagle jumps most since 2000 after Trump praises Sydney Sweeney ad

Miami Herald

time15 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

American Eagle jumps most since 2000 after Trump praises Sydney Sweeney ad

American Eagle Outfitters Inc. shares jumped the most since 2000 on Monday after U.S. President Donald Trump touted the company's ads - pushing the retailer's stock into meme stock territory. The shares spiked 24% on Monday after Trump said in a social media post that American Eagle's recent marketing blitz with actress Sydney Sweeney is the "HOTTEST ad out there." He said American Eagle jeans are "flying off the shelves." It's not yet clear whether the ad campaign – which controversially celebrates Sweeney's genetic traits as well as her jeans – is actually convincing shoppers to buy the company's apparel. Analysts say the real test will be how American Eagle performs during the crucial back-to-school season as consumers begin to stock up on jeans and other autumn essentials. So while Trump's comments on Monday don't reveal any new information about the company's performance, they do add to the hype around American Eagle shares. And that's drawn investors betting on the hype itself – a telltale sign of a meme stock. "What are meme stocks for the most part? Individual investors chasing after the hottest stock," said Matt Maley, chief market strategy at Miller Tabak & Co. Monday's move pared the stock's year-to-date decline to 20%. The company has been battered by sluggish demand and last quarter it registered a $75 million charge related to a writedown of its spring and summer merchandise. Some traders who drove up the shares on Monday are probably betting that the spotlight on the company will translate into greater sales. But that alone doesn't explain the magnitude of the share move, Maley said, adding that American Eagle executives should seize on the interest by, for example, issuing more shares. Meme stock darlings AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. and GameStop Corp. have done this in the past. Representatives for American Eagle didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. "In the short term, traders are very adept at chasing hype," said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. "If one believes that the more this is talked about, the better it is for the stock, then that certainly is a boon." "Whether or not that translates into more or fewer people buying the actual products" after Trump weighed in won't be clear for "days, weeks or quarters," he added. The interest in American Eagle is likely to continue, even if there's not another major precipitating event like a social media post by the U.S. president. "The momentum is there," Maley said. "Today's marketplace with algorithmic trading, not only does it create buyers, but it eliminates sellers." While Sweeney, a sought-after face for brands, has provided a pop for stocks in the past, those gains haven't always endured. A year ago, footwear company Crocs Inc. disclosed Sweeney as a global spokesperson for its HEYDUDE line. The stock rose 4.1% on the day of the announcement, but since then, shares are down nearly 30%. (With assistance from Janet Freund.) Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Capital Allocation Trends At Koyo International (Catalist:5OC) Aren't Ideal
Capital Allocation Trends At Koyo International (Catalist:5OC) Aren't Ideal

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Capital Allocation Trends At Koyo International (Catalist:5OC) Aren't Ideal

Explore Koyo International's Fair Values from the Community and select yours What underlying fundamental trends can indicate that a company might be in decline? Businesses in decline often have two underlying trends, firstly, a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining base of capital employed. Basically the company is earning less on its investments and it is also reducing its total assets. So after we looked into Koyo International (Catalist:5OC), the trends above didn't look too great. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE) For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Koyo International is: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.0012 = S$24k ÷ (S$47m - S$26m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2024). Therefore, Koyo International has an ROCE of 0.1%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Construction industry average of 9.1%. View our latest analysis for Koyo International While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you're interested in investigating Koyo International's past further, check out this free graph covering Koyo International's past earnings, revenue and cash flow. What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us In terms of Koyo International's historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 0.5% that they were earning five years ago. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect Koyo International to turn into a multi-bagger. While on the subject, we noticed that the ratio of current liabilities to total assets has risen to 56%, which has impacted the ROCE. Without this increase, it's likely that ROCE would be even lower than 0.1%. And with current liabilities at these levels, suppliers or short-term creditors are effectively funding a large part of the business, which can introduce some risks. What We Can Learn From Koyo International's ROCE In summary, it's unfortunate that Koyo International is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 50% over the last five years, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. With underlying trends that aren't great in these areas, we'd consider looking elsewhere. Koyo International does have some risks, we noticed 6 warning signs (and 5 which are a bit concerning) we think you should know about. While Koyo International may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Coca-Cola makes sweetener change. Is corn syrup or cane sugar healthier?
Coca-Cola makes sweetener change. Is corn syrup or cane sugar healthier?

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Coca-Cola makes sweetener change. Is corn syrup or cane sugar healthier?

Coca-Cola will be adding cane sugar to its ingredients list after all. 'We're going to be bringing a Coke sweetened with US cane sugar into the market this fall, and I think that will be an enduring option for consumers,' Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey said on a second-quarter call with investors and analysts on July 22. The company initially declined to comment on its intentions to use cane sugar after President Donald Trump claimed it would do so in July. 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' Trump wrote in a July 16 Truth Social post. 'I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!' Coke didn't confirm the claim at the time, saying in a statement shared with USA TODAY that it would share details on new offerings soon and appreciated Trump's enthusiasm for its product. Rather than replace high-fructose corn syrup as the sweetener in its flagship line, however, the sugar will be used in a drink that 'complements' and 'expands' its product range, Quincey said in the earnings call and subsequent report. USA TODAY has reached out to Coca-Cola for comment. High-fructose corn syrup is one of the ingredients the Trump administration has pushed companies to remove from food and beverages as part of its 'Make America Healthy Again' initiative. But is cane sugar actually 'healthier' for you? Here's what to know. What is high-fructose corn syrup? High-fructose corn syrup is a viscous, sweet substance made from cornstarch. When broken down into individual molecules, it becomes corn syrup, virtually a 100% glucose product, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Enzymes are then added to make some of the glucose into fructose, another simple sugar that naturally occurs in fruits. The resulting product is higher in fructose compared to the pure glucose in plain corn syrup, hence the 'high' in the name. High-fructose corn syrup is used in a large number of processed and packaged foods. Because it is cheaper to produce and more shelf-stable than regular sugar, it is widely used in the food manufacturing industry, according to the Cleveland Clinic. What is cane sugar? Cane sugar is derived from the natural byproduct of sugarcane − a tall, perennial, tropical grass from which liquid is extracted to create sugar. Corn is in the same plant family as sugarcane, which allows for the extraction of sweetener from both. The way raw sugarcane is processed and refined determines the product it ultimately yields. It can be made into a syrup, juice or crystallized and refined further into products like white sugar, brown sugar, molasses or jaggery, according to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and WebMD. Cane sugar consists of sucrose, which is one-half glucose and one-half fructose. Is cane sugar better for you than high-fructose corn syrup? Like all types of added sugar, both cane and high-fructose corn syrup can have negative health effects, like weight gain, diabetes and heart disease, if consumed in excess. The FDA says it is 'not aware of any evidence' of a difference in safety between foods containing high-fructose corn syrup and 'foods containing similar amounts of other nutritive sweeteners with approximately equal glucose and fructose content, such as sucrose, honey, or other traditional sweeteners.' Dr. Wesley McWhorter, spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, told USA TODAY that high intakes of any added sugar can cause health issues, but that our bodies break down some types differently. 'High fructose corn syrup and cane sugar are both forms of added sugar, and both contain glucose and fructose; cane sugar is sucrose, which is 50% fructose, while high fructose corn syrup typically contains about 55%,' he said. 'Your body processes them similarly, but fructose is primarily metabolized in the liver. When consumed in excess, especially from sugary drinks and other concentrated sources, fructose can promote fat accumulation in the liver, a key contributor to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.' He hopes the conversation around Coke's change sparks a larger conversation about reducing the amount of added sugar Americans consume in general, regardless of the type. 'Long-term health isn't about swapping one sweetener for another; it's about making meaningful changes to cut added sugar and improve the overall quality of the foods we eat,' he said. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Cane sugar vs. high-fructose corn syrup: Which one is healthier?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store