Battle for Burlington City Council President develops
Carter Neubieser, a Progressive Councilor from Ward 1, announced in City Hall that he is hoping to take the role from current President Ben Traverse, a Democrat from Ward 5 who's held it for the past year. Traverse was widely expected to keep the presidency uncontested going into next Monday's Organization Day meeting, but the last-minute challenge from Neubieser turns that surefire reappointment into something the council will have to vote on.
'Today, I'm incredibly excited to announce my intent to seek the position of City Council President this year,' Neubieser said in Contois Auditorium Wednesday afternoon. 'If given the chance to serve in this role, I'd be laser focused on decreasing the partisanship and personal attacks and increasing the collaboration on council.'
Organization Day marks the first meeting of the new Burlington City Council, and a big part of the night will also be the swearing in of newly-elected councilors who won their races on Town Meeting Day. This year, two new councilors will be sworn in: Allie Schachter, a Democrat from Burlington's East District, and Ranjit 'Buddy' Singh, a Democrat from the city's South District.
Once the two new Democrats are appointed, the council split will be seven Democrats to five Progressives. That means Neubieser will need to get at least two Democrats to flip and vote for him to have any chance at winning the presidency.
That fact is giving current President Traverse confidence that he will get a second term.
'I will say that I too am seeking reelection to the council presidency,' Traverse said in an interview Wednesday afternoon. 'I can also tell you that I have the support of the majority of the city council, and will be reelected as council president at the meeting on Monday. That said, I respect any councilor throwing their hat in the ring.'
Traverse added that although he respects Neubieser and his right to run, he questions his decision to create a race for the presidency now if decreasing partisanship truly is one of his goals.
'If the stated reason for throwing his hat in the ring is building more collaboration and collegiality, I question whether or not teeing up this political fight right out of the gate at our first meeting is the best way to do that,' Traverse said.
Other councilors from both parties are weighing in ahead of the vote as well, including veteran Progressive Melo Grant from Burlington's Central District. She shared strong words against Traverse Wednesday afternoon, writing in part in a statement: 'It is regrettable to say, but Council President Traverse has shown an epic failure in leadership. Despite the same concerns being brought to his attention multiple times, he failed to make improvements that would help … Personal attacks and interruptions have occurred too often under Councilor Traverse's leadership. As the only black councilor, this is a huge concern for me, as it also shows disrespect for my constituents.'
Evan Litwin, a Democratic Councilor from Ward 7, also weighed in Wednesday afternoon, questioning what Neubieser offers that Traverse doesn't already. Litwin wrote: 'Carter and I haven't had the opportunity to speak yet, and so I'd need to hear more about his vision for our collective body and what he believes he brings to the table that President Traverse is not providing. With that said, I've grown to like working with Carter on committee and on council, and value his approach to the work and his collegiality. I also think President Traverse does an excellent job in a challenging role.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
California Republican to introduce bill banning mid-decade redistricting
Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) said he plans to introduce legislation on Tuesday that would ban all mid-decade redistricting efforts nationwide and nullify any new maps approved before the 2030 census. In a statement Monday, Kiley took aim at his own governor, Democrat Gavin Newsom, who has said he is exploring several options for California to take on its own redistricting push, in response to Texas Republicans' move to redraw its maps. Newsom said he is working with the legislature to bring a new map directly to voters for approval in a special election this November. 'Gavin Newsom is trying to subvert the will of voters and do lasting damage to democracy in California,' Kiley said in his statement. 'Fortunately, Congress has the ability to protect California voters using its authority under the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution. This will also stop a damaging redistricting war from breaking out across the country,' he continued. Kiley, in his statement, did not mention Texas, which has proceeded with a midcycle push to approve new maps that would give Republicans in the state five more pickup opportunities ahead of the 2026 midterms. Texas Republicans proceeded with that plan at President Trump's urging. Any similar initiative in California could leave Kiley vulnerable, as a Republican congressman in a Democratic state. Newsom, who met with Texas Democrats late last month, said any move would be 'predicated on Texas moving forward.'
Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
What Abbott can do about Texas Dems leaving the state
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) vowed to remove quorum-busting lawmakers from their seats — and even waved the possibility of felony charges — but legal experts say the governor's pronouncements lean more toward political theater than legal certainty. Why it matters: Abbott's threats reflect the growing tension over legislative gridlock in Texas, in this case about a rare effort to draw new congressional districts midway through the decade. State of play: More than 50 Democrats have once again broken quorum, denying Republicans the numbers they need to advance their redistricting process. In a letter to Democrats on Sunday, Abbott argued that their quorum break "amounts to an abandonment or forfeiture of an elected state office," pointing to a non-binding opinion from Attorney General Ken Paxton. The governor also said any Democrat who "solicits, accepts or agrees to accept" funds to assist their absence "may have violated bribery laws." What they're saying: Andrew Cates, a campaign finance and ethics attorney based in Central Texas, says those threats are largely toothless without court action. "The letter was useful for the governor in its shock value and not so much in its legal ramifications," Cates tells Axios. "There's no executive power that allows the governor or the attorney general to simply declare a seat vacated." How it works: Texas House rules allow absent legislators to be arrested by the sergeant-at-arms, but the enforcement powers apply only within the state. "That's why they always flee to places like Oklahoma or Illinois," Cates said. "There's no mechanism to force their return from out of state." Flashback: Democrats last broke quorum in 2021, when more than 50 lawmakers flew to D.C. during a special session to try to kill a wide-ranging GOP election bill, which ultimately passed. Zoom in: Paxton's non-binding opinion, which suggests that lawmakers who leave the state could be considered to have vacated their seats, acknowledges that the decision must be made by a judge. The attorney general would need to initiate a quo warranto suit and prove that a lawmaker committed an act that "by law, causes a forfeiture of office," Cates said. But it could be difficult to prove in court that Democrats have intentionally vacated their seats because of the law's definition of abandonment, Cates says, adding: "They're using the House rules to make a legislative maneuver." Yes, but: The real test for Democrats will likely come down to cost and public opinion. Democrats will incur a fine of $500 per day for their absence. "More than anything, all of this is a (public relations) battle," Cates says. "As soon as they see people saying, 'This is no longer productive. You guys need to get back to work,' then they'll come back."
Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
GOP effort forms to shut down Texas vs. California redistricting war
A House Republican said Monday that he plans to introduce legislation to ban mid-decade redistricting efforts nationwide — which would stymie his own party's push to create more GOP-leaning seats in Texas. Why it matters: For Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.), the effort is personal as Democrats in California vow to draw Republicans like him out of their seats in retaliation for the Texas effort. The bill would "stop a damaging redistricting war from breaking out across the country," Kiley said in a press release previewing the measure. Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), who previously told Axios he is uneasy with both parties' redistricting efforts, said he would "consider" supporting the bill. Reality check: Though it could become a rallying point for lawmakers in both parties uneasy with the partisan redistricting tit-for-tat, the bill is highly unlikely to pass the House — let alone become law. President Trump, with support from House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), has urged Republicans to use all the tools at their disposal to gain a leg-up in the 2026 midterms. Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), asked if he would support Kiley's legislation, expressed skepticism towards "a bill that the speaker won't hear." Spokespeople for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) did not immediately respond to requests for comment. State of play: Texas Republicans are hoping to net as many as five additional House seats by packing their state's Democrats into as few districts as possible while spreading Republican voters across more seats. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has promised to respond in kind if Texas passes its proposed map — though his state's constitution would need to be amended first. Democrats in Texas' state legislature fled to Illinois on Sunday to deny Republicans the quorum they need to pass the map, with Republican Gov. Greg Abbott threatening to remove them from office in response. What they're saying: Kiley, in a statement, only called out Newsom, saying the governor is "trying to subvert the will of voters and do lasting damage to democracy in California." "Fortunately, Congress has the ability to protect California voters using its authority under the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution," he said. That focus on Newsom is fueling Democratic skepticism, with Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), a co-chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, telling Axios: "If Mr. Kiley directs the same passion equally towards what's going on in Texas, we might have something to talk about."
