Air India survivor details harrowing escape from the wreckage
However, he feels 'terrible' he could not save his brother Ajay and now feels racked with guilt over his death. The 40-year-old from Leicester told The Sun : 'It's a miracle I survived. I am OK physically but I feel terrible that I could not save Ajay.' Vishwash had tried to book two seats next to each other on flight AI171, which crashed into a densely populated part of the city of Ahmedabad shortly after takeoff.
Vishwash, who was sitting next to one of the plane's emergency exits, was able to crawl through a hole in the twisted fuselage of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. His brother Ajay, who was sitting in seat 11J, tragically died alongside a further 240 passengers and crew. Footage exclusively obtained by MailOnline showed Vishwash tried going back to the site of the inferno to save his brother.
Vishwash, who had plasters on his face, today carried his brother's coffin at a ceremony in Gujarat. He was later seen crying in anguish and had to be taken away. Last week's crash was one of the deadliest plane accidents in terms of the number of British nationals killed.
The aircraft struck a medical college hostel in a residential part of Ahmedabad last week, killing 241 of the 242 people on board, 52 of whom were British. Investigators are yet to determine the cause of the crash.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Air India jet plunged 900ft during flight just two days after crash
An Air India plane plunged 900ft during its flight just two days after the disaster crash that killed 241 people onboard and dozens more on the ground, the airline has revealed. The plane, flying from Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport for Vienna, dropped 900ft in midair during a flight on June 14. It landed safely in Vienna following a nine-hour flight, but both pilots onboard have since been grounded pending an investigation by India's air watchdog, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), into the incident, Air India said. A spokesperson told local media: 'Upon receipt of the pilot's report, the matter was disclosed to DGCA in accordance with regulations. 'Subsequently, upon receipt of data from the aircraft's recorders, further investigation was initiated. The pilots have been off-rostered pending the outcome of the investigation.' It comes as aviation accident experts probing the devastating Air India flight 171 crash revealed they are investigating whether sabotage played a part in the doomed aircraft's fate. There were 53 Britons onboard the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner that exploded shortly after taking off from the western Indian city of Ahmedabad on June 12. All 242 passengers but one were killed - the sole survivor being Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, 40, a British father who lost his brother in the tragic incident. The aircraft spent less than 40 seconds in the air before exploding upon impact and numerous explanations have been put forward for the plane's premature descent. India's minister of state for civil aviation, Murlidhar Mohol, confirmed that sabotage is among the possible causes being explored by crash investigators. Speaking with NDTV's Jitendra Dixit, he described the crash as an 'unfortunate incident' but said that India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) were not ruling out any theories. He added: 'The AAIB has begun a full investigation into it. It is being probed from all angles, including any possible sabotage. 'The CCTV footage are being reviewed and all angles are being assessed, several agencies are working on it.' The Aircraft Accidents Investigation Bureau is now pouring over the footage that should enable them to create a second-by-second reconstruction of events as they unfolded. The Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) captures all audio from the cockpit, including pilot conversations, radio transmissions, warning alarms and ambient mechanical sounds. It will allow investigators to finally understand what happened in the moments leading up to one of the world's worst aviation disasters in a decade. Planes usually carry two black boxes - one records flight data, such as altitude and speed and the other records sound from the cockpit, so investigators can hear what the pilots are saying and listen for any unusual noises. Besides sabotage, some analysts have suggested a catastrophic technical fault could be responsible for the crash. The Ahmedabad disaster was the first time a Boeing Dreamliner has crashed since the models introduction in 2011. However, there has been concerns about the model's engines, including a mid-air drive on a LATAM Airlines flight last year which was reportedly caused by a faulty seat in the cockpit and left more than 50 passengers injured. During hearings in Washington last year, a former Boeing engineer turned whistleblower urged the aerospace giant to ground all Dreamliners. Ed Pierson, a former high-level Boeing manager who testified at the congressional hearings, said it was 'possible' safety concerns raised by himself and others in 2019 could have affected the Gatwick-bound aircraft. At the time, his fellow whistleblower Sam Saklephour voiced concerns about the air giant's manufacturing of 787 aircrafts - claims Boeing refuted and said it had full confidence in the model. When asked if concerns could flagged by Salehpour could have been present in other 787s in general, Mr Pierson said: 'It is possible. 'Because the problems he identified that's how the planes were being built for a long time so the testimony that he gave and I gave that day all proceeded this India accident.' Mr Pierson, who previously spoke of manufacturing concerns of the company's 737 Max aircraft told NDTV production facilities for that plane in particular, were 'chaotic and dangerous'. 'There were a lot of indications of chaotic and dangerous manufacturing. We were rushing to build the planes to get them out of the door. Employees were pressured to get their work done.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Air India flight plunged 900ft during flight just two days after disaster crash
An Air India plane plunged 900ft during its flight just two days after the disaster crash that killed 241 people onboard and dozens more on the ground, the airline has revealed. The plane, flying from Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport for Vienna, dropped 900ft in midair during a flight on June 14. It landed safely in Vienna following a nine-hour flight, but both pilots onboard have since been grounded pending an investigation by India's air watchdog, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), into the incident, Air India said. A spokesperson told local media: 'Upon receipt of the pilot's report, the matter was disclosed to DGCA in accordance with regulations. 'Subsequently, upon receipt of data from the aircraft's recorders, further investigation was initiated. The pilots have been off-rostered pending the outcome of the investigation.' It comes as aviation accident experts probing the devastating Air India flight 171 crash revealed they are investigating whether sabotage played a part in the doomed aircraft's fate. There were 53 Britons onboard the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner that exploded shortly after taking off from the western Indian city of Ahmedabad on June 12. All 242 passengers but one were killed - the sole survivor being Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, 40, a British father who lost his brother in the tragic incident. The aircraft spent less than 40 seconds in the air before exploding upon impact and numerous explanations have been put forward for the plane's premature descent. India's minister of state for civil aviation, Murlidhar Mohol, confirmed that sabotage is among the possible causes being explored by crash investigators. Speaking with NDTV's Jitendra Dixit, he described the crash as an 'unfortunate incident' but said that India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) were not ruling out any theories. He added: 'The AAIB has begun a full investigation into it. It is being probed from all angles, including any possible sabotage. 'The CCTV footage are being reviewed and all angles are being assessed, several agencies are working on it.' The Aircraft Accidents Investigation Bureau is now pouring over the footage that should enable them to create a second-by-second reconstruction of events as they unfolded. The Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) captures all audio from the cockpit, including pilot conversations, radio transmissions, warning alarms and ambient mechanical sounds. It will allow investigators to finally understand what happened in the moments leading up to one of the world's worst aviation disasters in a decade. Wreckage: People look at the debris of an Air India plane that crashed in Ahmedabad, located in India's Gujarat state Planes usually carry two black boxes - one records flight data, such as altitude and speed and the other records sound from the cockpit, so investigators can hear what the pilots are saying and listen for any unusual noises. Besides sabotage, some analysts have suggested a catastrophic technical fault could be responsible for the crash. The Ahmedabad disaster was the first time a Boeing Dreamliner has crashed since the models introduction in 2011. However, there has been concerns about the model's engines, including a mid-air drive on a LATAM Airlines flight last year which was reportedly casued by a faulty seat in the cockpit and left more than 50 passengers injured. During hearings in Washington last year, a former Boeing engineer turned whistleblower urged the aerospace giant to ground all Dreamliners. Ed Pierson, a former high-level Boeing manager who testified at the congressional hearings, said it was 'possible' safety concerns raised by himself and others in 2019 could have affected the Gatwick-bound aircraft. At the time, his fellow whistleblower Sam Saklephour voiced concerns about the air giant's manufacturing of 787 aircrafts - claims Boeing refuted and said it had full confidence in the model. When asked if concerns could flagged by Salehpour could have been present in other 787s in general, Mr Pierson said: 'It is possible. 'Because the problems he identified that's how the planes were being built for a long time so the testimony that he gave and I gave that day all proceeded this India accident.' Location: The siblings had been a few seats apart onboard the plane, with survivor Vishwash sitting at 11A and his younger brother positioned at 11J on the other side of the aisle Mr Pierson, who previously spoke of manufacturing concerns of the company's 737 Max aircraft told NDTV production facilities for that plane in particular, were 'chaotic and dangerous'. 'There were a lot of indications of chaotic and dangerous manufacturing. We were rushing to build the planes to get them out of the door. Employees were pressured to get their work done. 'There was parts issues. We had aircraft systems issues that I remembered we were having difficulty with. And I remember being very concerned that we were taking unnecessary risks,' he added. Air India flight 171's crash came just weeks after Boeing came to a £1.1billion settlement with the US justice department to avoid prosecution over two crashes in 2018 and 2019 involving its 737 MAX model.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Pilots suspended after another Air India flight struggles during takeoff hours after Ahmedabad crash
On 12 June, just 38 hours after the deadly Air India flight 171 crashed in Ahmedabad, killing over 260 people, another flight from the same airline from Delhi to Vienna faced a serious safety scare. During takeoff, the Boeing 777 flight AI187 reportedly lost about 900ft in altitude and triggered multiple warnings, including a 'stall alert' and 'don't sink' Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS), a report in The Times of India claimed. Both the 'stall' and 'don't sink' warnings signal a dangerous loss of lift and altitude shortly after takeoff – requiring immediate corrective action to avoid a crash. Although the pilots managed to stabilise the aircraft and complete the flight to Vienna, both have reportedly since been suspended from flying duties pending an investigation by India's aviation regulator. The Boeing 777, which took off amid thunderstorms in Delhi at 2.56am on 14 June, according to flight tracing sites, reportedly lost about 900ft in altitude and triggered the critical warnings. The Indian aviation regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), has launched a probe, summoning Air India's head of safety and grounding both pilots pending investigation. Officials familiar with the incident told the outlet that the aircraft experienced multiple in-flight alerts shortly after takeoff. 'The aircraft was involved in an inflight occurrence of stick shaker and GPWS caution. Soon after takeoff, stick shaker warning and GPWS don't sink caution appeared. Stall warning came once and GPWS caution came twice,' an unidentified official was quoted as saying by the outlet. The official added: 'There was an altitude loss of around 900ft during climb. Subsequently, the crew recovered the aircraft and continued the flight to Vienna.' Notably, the initial flight report only cited 'stick shaker due to turbulence', omitting the more serious alerts, the report said. A deeper review of the flight data recorder later revealed that a stall warning and GPWS 'don't sink' caution had also occurred – findings that emerged amid heightened DGCA scrutiny following the AI171 crash. Both pilots have since been grounded, and AI's head of safety has reportedly been summoned as India's aviation regulator investigates. The DGCA earlier had ordered enhanced inspections of the airline's Boeing 787 and 777 fleets. In the wake of the incident, Air India has also cut its international wide-body operations by 15 per cent to accommodate intensified safety inspections. An Air India spokesperson said in a statement: 'Upon receipt of the pilot's report, the matter was disclosed to DGCA in accordance with regulations. Subsequently, upon receipt of data from the aircraft's recorders, further investigation was initiated. The pilots have been off-rostered pending the outcome of the investigation.'
