RFK Jr.'s vaccine advisory panel to review shots for children
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) will also weigh recommendations for vaccines that have long been on the market, including measles and hepatitis B.
Martin Kulldorf made the announcement at the start of the first meeting of the ACIP since Kennedy dismissed all 17 previous members less than two weeks ago, accusing them of conflicts of interest.
Kennedy appointed a new group of eight members two days later. One withdrew just before Wednesday's meeting during a review of his financial holdings, leaving seven members to vote on vaccine recommendations during the meeting.
'Secretary Kennedy has given this committee a clear mandate to use evidence based medicine. We're making vaccine recommendations and that is what we will do. Vaccines are not all good or bad,' Kulldorf said Wednesday.
The health chief, who co-founded the anti-vaccine group Children's Health Defense and served as its chairman before being confirmed to lead HHS, has long called for an investigation into the number of childhood shots, saying they have been inadequately studied.
The review will be undertaken by two new ACIP work groups, Kulldorff said, though it's not clear if they have been staffed yet. One group will be focused on the childhood and adolescent vaccine schedules and the other will focus on shots that have been approved for seven or more years.
He specifically mentioned the recommendation for giving newborns the hepatitis B vaccine as well as the combination measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) and chickenpox shots.
The panel chair added that the group will also consider religious objections to MMR vaccines derived from fetal cell lines and may look at an MMR vaccine approved in Japan.
'The number of vaccines that our children and adolescents receive today exceed what children in most other developed nations receive, and what most of us in this room received when we were children,' Kulldorf said.
He added that it is also important 'to evaluate the cumulative effect of the recommended vaccine schedule. This includes interaction effects between different vaccines, the total number of vaccines, cumulative amounts of vaccine ingredients and the relative timing of different vaccines.'
For decades, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) independent advisory panel recommended which shots Americans should get and when.
The Affordable Care Act requires all insurance companies to cover, for free, the vaccines recommended by the panel. Those recommendations also help states decide which shots should be mandated for schoolchildren.
Kennedy's shakeup is throwing that system into chaos. Outside physician and public health groups have been pressuring insurance companies to continue covering vaccines, no matter what ACIP does.
'Part of the role of ACIP is to look at vaccines across the lifespan,' said Chrissie Juliano, executive director of the Big Cities Health Coalition. 'I think the important thing to note is we need to reevaluate vaccine recommendations based on whether science has changed, not based on whether the people who sit on a committee change, or in administration changes. And I think that's where we start to lose the public's trust.'
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) announced Wednesday that it would no longer take part in ACIP hearings.
'We won't lend our name or our expertise to a system that is being politicized at the expense of children's health,' AAP President Susan Kressly said in a video posted on social platform X.
Ahead of the meeting, the insurance industry trade group America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) issued a statement that its plans are 'committed to ongoing coverage of vaccines to ensure access and affordability for this respiratory virus season.'
'We encourage all Americans to talk to their health care provider about vaccines,' the group wrote.
As the meeting kicked off, President Trump's nominee to lead the CDC, Susan Monarez, was on Capitol Hill testifying in front of the Senate Health, Education Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee during a confirmation hearing.
Monarez said she does not see a causal link between vaccines and autism, and told Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) she hopes experts will step up and volunteer to fill the panel's remaining slots.
'These are not easy positions to fill. It takes a lot of time and commitment from some of these highly trained technical experts to want to participate,' Monarez said. 'They need to have a depth and a breadth of technical experience to be able to understand immunological processes, to understand statistical analysis.'
Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), HELP Committee, lamented the 'rushed' meeting with a diminished panel.
'Given that there is no confirmed CDC director, along with an ACIP panel which has very few members, many of whom lack broad vaccine and immunology immunological expertise, there are concerns about the rushed nature of this process,' Cassidy said.
The Louisiana Republican also expressed concern that Thursday's ACIP schedule will feature a presentation on thimerosal given by Lyn Redwood, a longtime anti-vaccine activist. Redwood is president emerita of Children's Health Defense.
Thimerosal is a preservative used in some influenza vaccines, and anti-vaccine leaders have long linked it to autism in children, a claim that's been debunked.
'I will note that there are people who are critics of thimerosal who've been asked to testify, but no one speaking of the substantial evidence that in the amounts used in vaccines, thimerosal is safe,' the senator said.
Prior to the meeting, a document was posted to ACIP's website summarizing that all available evidence shows thimerosal is safe and is not linked to autism or other neurological issues. That document was no longer available on Wednesday.
'I will say going forward, if the ACIP hearing today is being used to sow distrust, I would ask as you go forward that you would make sure that there really was a balanced perspective,' Cassidy said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. says cancer screenings are too 'woke' now. As an actual doctor, I disagree.
A 6-centimeter mass. These are the words that shattered my patient's heart, but ultimately gave her a chance at saving and prolonging her life. Weeks earlier, without any worries about her health, she had seen a doctor for a checkup. Following the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations, her doctor found out she was a former smoker and ordered a scan. Lung cancer was found, which is how she ended up in my hospital for chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Without the task force guidelines, my patient's primary care doctor may not have ordered this scan, and her cancer may not have been caught before it spread to Stage 4, or it was uncurable. The task force has released screening recommendations for patients over the past 40 years that have caught infections, detected cancers and otherwise saved lives countless times. However, it is now reported that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is considering removing and replacing all 16 expert members of this task force for purely political and culture war reasons. This would be a disaster for public health. RFK Jr. thinks preventing curable disease is too 'woke' The Preventive Services Task Force is tasked with providing screening recommendations for finding diseases before they become deadly. These guidelines are evidence-based and updated frequently as new scientific studies are released. Primary care doctors rely on these as they approach which diagnostic tests are most impactful and highest yield for their patients. Insurance companies use the task force's recommendations to know what studies to cover. Their work is important and essential. But we'll be in danger if RFK Jr. wants to upend this institution. Opinion: RFK Jr. is an unserious man. But his misinformed vaccine policy will be deadly. He has already done it once. In June, Kennedy fired all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a committee that makes recommendations on vaccine schedules, for reasons that made little sense. He replaced them with known vaccine skeptics, hampering both sound scientific work and public trust in the organization. This, by the way, at a time when measles cases in the U.S. are at their highest in 30 years. Now it's reported that Kennedy might make these removals within the Preventive Services Task Force because the members are too "woke.' Don't make America backward again in public health Keep in mind, these are individuals who are recommending things like cervical cancer screening is good, or look for post-partum depression in pregnant persons. Opinion: I'm a doctor. Trump's crusade against universities undermines the future of your health. These are sound recommendations that should be noncontroversial. What is woke in that? Some point to things like the word choice of 'persons' instead of 'women'? Don't be a snowflake, and get over yourself. These are important recommendations that are meant to reach all Americans. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Even if he doesn't go through with this purge, RFK Jr. is instilling a distrust in our expert medical and scientific institutions. If he does go through with it, he will undermine the pillar of public health that is preventative services at the same time that another pillar, access to care for the vulnerable, has been hacked away at by the Medicaid cuts in the Big Beautiful Bill. Taking these actions will not make America healthy again. It'll make America backward again in public health, and backward in the fight against cancer and disease. We need to sound the alarm to stop all these actions that are harming our fellow Americans. Dr. Thomas K. Lew is an assistant clinical professor of Medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine and an attending physician of Hospital Medicine at Stanford Health Care Tri-Valley. All expressed opinions are his own. Follow him on X: @ThomasLewMD You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Kennedy is making a culture war out of cancer prevention | Opinion Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Indefinitely Postponed A Critical Meeting — And It Could Have 'Devastating Effects' On All Of Us
It's hard to keep track of the funding cuts, layoffs, vaccine recommendation changes and other major shake-ups happening within the country's federal public health organizations at the hands of the Trump administration and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health and human services secretary. One of the latest changes is RFK Jr's postponement of a preventive health panel meeting by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), which was scheduled for July 10 and the rumored dismissal of all task force members, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. The USPSTF sets guidelines for preventive health screenings for conditions such as diabetes, depression and cancer in children and adults. Insurance companies are then required to cover these screenings based on the USPSTF's guidelines. This news comes not long after Kennedy postponed the meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which sets vaccine recommendations, and replaced the entire committee with individuals known to spread vaccine and health misinformation, according to earlier HuffPost reporting. The changes to the USPSTF meeting and task force members is worrisome for a few reasons and could directly impact your health. Here's what doctors want you to know: This task force sets preventive screening recommendations. Changes or delays to the meeting schedule can mean missed diagnoses or changes to what insurance companies cover. The United States Preventive Services Task Force, which was formed in 1984, is a group of non-partisan volunteers who are 'nationally recognized experts' in the fields of primary care, prevention and evidence-based medicine, according to the USPTF website. All members are screened for biases, are chosen through public nomination and appointed by the Health and Human Services secretary. They serve four-year terms with new task force members rotating in each year. 'The cancellation of this specific task force ... is going to affect every American if [Kennedy and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services does] what they did to the ACIP and fire or remove the 16 independent medical experts who really scour the literature and then grade the evidence for each of their recommendations,' Dr. Anita Patel, a pediatric critical care doctor in Washington, D.C., told HuffPost. Once again, this hasn't been done yet, but it is allegedly in the works. One of the significant roles of the task force is to make recommendations and guidelines for preventative care services such as mammograms, colonoscopies, depression screenings and more, said Patel. Insurance companies are then required to cover these screenings and services as part of the Affordable Care Act. Doctors across the country also follow these guidelines when recommending health services for patients. In response to the reports of the dismissal of current task force members, the American Medical Association sent a letter to RFK Jr. in support of the task force in which they said, 'USPSTF plays a critical, non-partisan role in guiding physicians' efforts to prevent disease and improve the health of patients by helping to ensure access to evidence-based clinical preventive services.' Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) also backed the task force by introducing a resolution that underscores the importance of the group, according to NPR. 'If the [task force] is unable to continue its work, this could have devastating effects on access to preventive services,' Dr. Oni Blackstock, a primary care physician and executive director of Health Justice, a racial and health equity consultancy, told HuffPost via email. 'We [already] know millions of Americans are at risk for losing their Medicaid,' Blackstock said, referring to the nearly $1 trillion cuts in Medicaid as part of the so-called Big, Beautiful Bill. 'Now, many others who have insurance coverage will be at risk for losing no-cost coverage of preventive care services,' added Blackstock. It's worth knowing that the meeting is currently postponed; it's not clear when it will happen instead, and who will be part of the task force when that time comes. But, as of now, what the task force recommends hasn't changed. 'Canceling the USPSTF meeting without a clear plan to reschedule puts essential, evidence-based health guidance at risk, including continued access to preventive services that millions of Americans rely on, from cancer and diabetes screenings to depression checks to support for breastfeeding,' Dr. David Higgins, a pediatrician and preventive medicine specialist at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, told HuffPost via email. Any delays to the task force's meeting schedule can also cause issues. 'Delays or disruptions can mean delayed diagnoses, missed opportunities for early treatment, and ultimately, worse health outcomes,' added Higgins. Not only do these changes threaten the guidance from the task force, but they 'affect whether a patient catches their cancer early enough or a person with chronic heart disease gets optimal treatment,' he noted. The task force was recently criticized for being 'woke,' which some experts think is why it's being targeted now. 'Unfortunately, this [postponement] fits a troubling pattern of political interference in scientific and public health processes,' Higgins said. Just a few days after Kennedy told panel members that the preventive health meeting was postponed, 'The American Conservative' published an essay titled 'Time for Kennedy to Kill the USPSTF.' The article claimed the task force is 'woke' and follows 'left-wing ideological orthodoxy' and is part of the 'deep state,' among other things. 'The claim that the task force is driven by 'woke' ideology is a political talking point, not a reflection of how the USPSTF actually operates,' said Higgins. 'Their work is based on a rigorous review of scientific evidence. Identifying and addressing disparities in health outcomes is part of delivering high-quality care,' Higgins added. It's well-established that certain demographics do have worse health care outcomes; Black people have higher rates of maternal mortality than other groups, upward of 50% of Latinx folks are predicted to be diagnosed with diabetes, Black people are 30% more likely to have asthma than white people and the list goes on. The task force should be considering how race and gender impacts health outcomes. Blackstock noted that USPSTF hasn't always done this, but that is changing. 'It's lacked community voices and, for a long time, didn't focus on health equity or racism's impact on health and was not focused on ensuring diverse representation among its members,' Blackstock said. Recently, though, this has changed, and the task force has worked to address these issues, Blackstock added. 'It has taken steps to formalize the use of inclusive language, and to flag if data is missing for a population, particularly those that are minoritized,' Blackstock said. The group is also piloting an equity checklist that helps integrate equity throughout the screening recommendation process, Blackstock noted. These recent steps put a target on USPSTF's back, she said. 'I believe this is why the [task force] is being targeted, because it is paying attention to health inequities and racism's harmful effects on health,' Blackstock said. Patel added that USPSTF isn't taking care away from white Americans. Instead, it's 'trying to level the playing field so that everyone got equal care,' Patel noted. 'But, of course, [critics of the task force] saw the term 'diversity' or 'equity' and really tried to blow up one part of a much larger organization to play to their base and say, 'Hey, these guys are woke idiots,'' Patel said. USPSTF is now trying to advance medicine and make sure everyone, no matter where they live or what they look like, has access to preventive health screenings. The task force is here to 'take out the inherent racism that we've had in medicine for decades that has been really unduly perpetuated,' Patel noted. While racism does certainly still exist in medicine, awareness allows medical professionals to address any biases and make sure everyone gets the care they deserve regardless of their race, socioeconomic background or ethnicity, Patel noted. 'It's an evil thing to walk back all of these medical and diversity advancements that we've made in the past decade just because they want to pander to their base. It's unconscionable,' Patel said. Related... Experts Say Trump's Big Bill Will Shut Down This 1 Type Of Hospital — And It'll Impact Multitudes COVID Cases Are Rising This Summer, But Not All The Data Shows It — Here's Why RFK Jr. Keeps Telling A Flat-Out Lie About Childhood Vaccines — And Doctors Are Sick Of It Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will health insurance pay for Covid vaccines this fall?
If you want a Covid shot this fall, will your employer's health insurance plan pay for it? There's no clear answer. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime anti-vaccine activist, has upended the way Covid vaccines are approved and for whom they're recommended, creating uncertainty where coverage was routine. Agencies within HHS responsible for spelling out who should get vaccinated aren't necessarily in sync, issuing seemingly contradictory recommendations based on age or risk factors for serious disease. But the ambiguity may not affect your coverage, at least this year. 'I think in 2025 it's highly likely that the employer plans will cover' the Covid vaccines, said Dr. Jeff Levin-Scherz, a primary care doctor who is the population health leader for the management consultancy WTW and an assistant professor at Harvard's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. They've already budgeted for it, 'and it would be a large administrative effort to try to exclude coverage for those not at increased risk,' he said. With so much in flux, it's important to check with your employer or insurer about coverage policies before you roll up your sleeve. Here's what we know so far, and what remains unclear. How have the recommendations changed? What used to be straightforward is now much murkier. Last year, the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccines were recommended for anyone at least 6 months old. This year, the recommendation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is narrower. Although the vaccines are broadly recommended for adults 19 and older, they are no longer recommended for healthy pregnant people or for healthy children 6 months through 17 years old. Kennedy announced the changes in a video in May, citing safety risks for young people and pregnant people as justification. But his claims have been widely disputed by experts in vaccines, pediatrics, and women's health. An analysis by found that the secretary 'misrepresented scientific research to make unfounded claims about vaccine safety for pregnant people and children.' In addition, recently announced changes to the vaccine approval framework have further chipped away at eligibility. Moderna announced July 10 that the Food and Drug Administration had fully approved its Spikevax Covid vaccine — but approval is restricted to adults 65 and older, and for people from 6 months through 64 years old who are at increased risk of developing a serious case of Covid. Two other Covid vaccines expected to be available this fall, Novavax's Nuvaxovid and Moderna's mNexspike, are also restricted. They are approved for people 65 or older and those 12 to 64 who have underlying health conditions that put them at higher risk of developing severe Covid. Notably, Pfizer's Comirnaty Covid vaccine is still approved or authorized for people 6 months of age and older without any restrictions based on risk factors for Covid — at least for now. But the FDA could change that at any time, experts said. Increasing restrictions 'is definitely the direction they are moving,' said Jen Kates, a senior vice president at KFF who authored a KFF analysis of vaccine insurance coverage rules. KFF is a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. HHS did not provide an on-the-record comment for this article. How might these changes alter my insurance coverage for the vaccine? That's the big question, and the answer is uncertain. Without insurance coverage, people could owe hundreds of dollars for the shot. Most private health plans are required by law to cover recommended vaccines, whether for Covid, measles, or the flu, without charging their members. But that requirement kicks in after the shots are recommended by a federal panel — the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — and adopted by the CDC director, according to the KFF analysis. The committee hasn't yet voted on Covid vaccine recommendations for this fall. Its next meeting is expected to occur in August or September. Still, employers and insurers can opt to cover the vaccines on their own, as many did before the law required them to do so. But they may require people to pay something for it. In addition, the narrower recommendations from different HHS agencies might result in some health plans declining to pay for certain categories of people to get certain vaccines, experts said. 'I don't think an employer or insurer would deny coverage,' Kates said. 'But they could say: You have to get this product.' That could mean a 45-year-old with no underlying health conditions raising their covid risk might have to get the Pfizer shot rather than the Moderna version if they want their health plan to pay for it, experts said. In addition, up to 200 million people may qualify for the vaccines because they have health conditions such as asthma or diabetes that increase their risk of severe disease, according to a commentary published by FDA officials in the New England Journal of Medicine. Health care professionals can help people determine whether they qualify for the shot based on health conditions. Tina Stow, a spokesperson for AHIP, which represents health plans, said in a statement that plans will continue to follow federal requirements for vaccine coverage. What are the options for people who are pregnant or have children they want to have vaccinated? Many parents are confused about getting their kids vaccinated, according to an Aug. 1 KFF poll. About half say they don't know whether federal agencies recommend healthy children get the vaccine this fall. Among the other half, more say the vaccine is not recommended than recommended. Meanwhile, Kennedy's recommendation that healthy children not get vaccinated has a notable caveat: If a parent wishes a child to get a Covid vaccine and a health care provider recommends it, the child can receive it under the 'shared clinical decision-making' model, and it should be covered without cost sharing. Some policy experts point out that this is the way care for kids is typically provided anyway. 'Outside of any requirements, vaccines have always been provided through shared decision-making,' said Amanda Jezek, senior vice president of public policy and government relations at the Infectious Diseases Society of America. There's no similar allowance for pregnant people. However, even though Kennedy has stated that Covid vaccines are no longer recommended for healthy pregnant people, pregnancy is one of the underlying medical conditions that put people at high risk for getting very sick from Covid, according to the CDC. That could make pregnant people eligible for the shot. Depending on the stage of someone's pregnancy, it could be difficult to know whether someone should be denied the shot based on their condition. 'This is uncharted territory,' said Sabrina Corlette, co-director of Georgetown University's Center on Health Insurance Reforms. How will these changes affect access to the vaccine? Will I still be able to go to the pharmacy for the shot? 'If far fewer are expected to be vaccinated, fewer sites will offer the vaccinations,' Levin-Scherz said. This could be an especially notable hurdle for people looking for pediatric doses of a covid vaccine, he said. In addition, pharmacists' authority to administer vaccines depends on several factors. For example, in some states they can administer shots that have been approved by the FDA, while in others the shots must have been recommended by the ACIP, said Hannah Fish, senior director of strategic initiatives at the National Community Pharmacists Association. Since ACIP hasn't yet recommended covid shots for the fall, that could create a speed bump in some states. 'Depending on the rules, you still may be able to get the shot at the pharmacy, but they might have to call the physician to send over a prescription,' Fish said. What do these changes mean long-term? It's impossible to know. But given Kennedy's vocal skepticism of vaccines and his embrace of long-disproven theories about connections between vaccines and autism, among other things, medical and public health professionals are concerned those views will shape future policies. 'The recommendation changes that were made with respect to children and pregnant women were not necessarily made in good science,' Corlette said. It's already a challenge to convince people they need annual covid shots, and shifting guidelines may make it tougher, some public health experts warn. 'What's concerning is that this could even further depress the uptake of the covid vaccines,' Jezek said. KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword
