Indiana man, 77, calmly calls cops to report he had just killed his wife, mother-in-law and stepson and injured 4th victim: ‘I shot them all'
Patrick Waite is facing three counts of first-degree murder for the shooting deaths of his wife, mother-in-law and stepson and one count of attempted murder for gravely wounding his other stepson, according to a police affidavit and reports.
Waite is accused of methodically shooting his 61-year-old wife Alma and her family, going from room to room to blast each victim in the Haubstadt home they shared, police said.
Patrick Waite is facing three counts of first-degree murder for the shooting deaths of his wife, mother-in-law and stepson
Gibson County Sheriff
After he opened fire on all four victims, Waite called 911 to explain what he had done, where he would be when officers arrived and where investigators could find the .45-caliber Smith & Wesson he used to gun down his relatives, according to reports.
'I shot them all. I'm certainly not proud of that fact,' he said in a chilling but casual confession, according to an affidavit acquired by the Courier & Press.
In addition to his wife Alma, Waite allegedly killed her 81-year-old mother Gloria Tapia and her 39-year-old son Fernando Tapia Ramirez Sr. He allegedly shot Alma's other son, 44-year-old Juan Tapia Ramirez, in the neck and chest.
'There have been multiple individuals shot at this time,' a 911 operator can be heard relaying to officers. 'I believe it's four individuals. This is still an active situation. We are talking to the shooter now.'
Waite reportedly hurried the 911 operator off the phone so that he would have enough time to call his children and 'tell them what he did' before the cops arrived to arrest him, Det. Jennifer Loesch wrote in the affidavit.
The alleged killer surrendered peacefully, according to reports.
Four other people were in the home when he went on his murderous rampage and survived the shooting unharmed, including a child, The Herald reported.
Waite had gone out to shoot a watersnake near a lake on his 1.5-acre property that afternoon, and when he came back inside the house, he had his gun in his back pocket, officials said.
That's when an ongoing and wide-ranging argument between him and his wife – who had recently been asking for a divorce – reignited, authorities said.
Waite said his wife of two years told him 'he needed to leave' because he brought a gun into the house, detectives wrote.
Initially, the disagreement was about his attendance at bible study, then how he was neglecting his bedridden mother-in-law, and finally it became about who owned the home, according to reports.
'Patrick Waite said Alma Waite told him she filed a quitclaim deed and put their home in her daughter's name,' the affidavit states. 'Patrick Waite stated he told her he wouldn't leave the house because he had lived there for 27 years.'
That's when Waite started shooting. He told investigators that he knew what he did was wrong and that God would never forgive him, according to reports.
'I'm as guilty as guilty can be,' he reportedly said.
Veronica Valenzuela, a cousin of the victims, told Bakersfield Now that she was shocked by the murders, and added that Waite had always seemed like a kind person. She and her family spent a month in the house with them in the last year.
Patrick Waite, 77, surrendered to police peacefully after calling 911 to tell them that he had shot four people — killing three — in the house where they lived together, police said.
Christopher Sadowski
'He catered to us,' she said of Waite. 'He wouldn't let us get up to get a cup of coffee. He took us out to dinner. He took us out to casinos.'
'He was, I can't lie. Man was a very nice person, but never imagined something like this to happen. Alma was his world,' she added.
Her aunt Gloria, Alma's mother, had recently suffered a stroke and was in her medical bed when Waite shot her, Valenzuela said.
The surviving stepson, Juan Ramirez, remains sedated in critical condition, Valenzuela told Bakersfield Now.
Valenzuela started a GoFundMe to help with the funeral costs.
Waite made his first appearance in court Monday morning by video at the Gibson County jail.
Waite, who has no prior arrests or criminal convictions listed in Indiana court records, is being held without bond, according to reports. He pleaded not guilty to all the counts.
His attorney, Scott Danks, told local news outlets that he had no comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Student-loan borrowers on Biden's SAVE plan are struggling to plan for higher payments: 'We're all in limbo'
Mary Smith is considering bankruptcy. "I don't have it," Smith said, referring to the extra money she would need to afford the higher student-loan payments she's facing in the coming year. "Everything we've done, we've done ourselves," Smith said. "Nobody handed me anything. I didn't grow up in a rich family. We live paycheck to paycheck, like most of the country." The 50-year-old nurse is enrolled in former President Joe Biden's SAVE plan, an income-driven repayment plan that offers cheaper monthly payments and a shorter timeline to debt relief. The plan is now on its last legs — it has been blocked since July 2024 due to legal challenges, and Trump's spending law eliminated the plan, replacing it with two less generous options that will go into effect next summer. In addition, the Trump administration restarted interest charges on SAVE balances on August 1 after a yearlong pause. This means Smith and the 8 million other borrowers enrolled in SAVE can either switch to a new plan and likely face higher monthly payments or remain on SAVE for now and watch their balances grow. Smith said that she asked her servicer for an estimate on her interest charges, and she was told it would be about $468 a month. "I did vote for Trump," Smith said, "I am a Trump supporter, but there are a couple of things I don't really agree with, and this is one of them." On the SAVE plan, Smith said her payments were around $150. Federal Student Aid's loan simulator predicted that her payments could surge to nearly $1,000 off the SAVE plan, which Smith said she "definitely cannot afford." Business Insider heard from dozens of student-loan borrowers enrolled in SAVE who are concerned about interest charges restarting and eventually having to move to a different repayment plan. Some borrowers are balancing their agreement with Trump that loans should be repaid with the reality of the financial strain that comes with losing SAVE. Linda McMahon, Trump's education secretary, said in a statement announcing the interest charges restart that the administration is focused on "strengthening the student loan portfolio and simplifying repayment to better serve borrowers." "As part of this effort, the Department urges all borrowers in the SAVE Plan to quickly transition to a legally compliant repayment plan — such as the Income-Based Repayment Plan," McMahon said. "Borrowers in SAVE cannot access important loan benefits and cannot make progress toward loan discharge programs authorized by Congress." Smith is hoping she'll be able to cover the interest charges, but she doesn't have a plan for potentially much higher payments down the road. "It's a struggle. I do agree we have to pay them, but it's really hurting us," Smith said. "It's a shame." 'A wait and see game' Justin Krull's goal is to pay off his student-loan balance. He was never trying to find a way out of repayment, and he wants a concrete plan to fit monthly student-loan payments into his budget. The constantly changing student-loan policies make that difficult. "We're not trying to cheat, we're not trying to not pay our bills," Krull, 42, told BI. "We want to take care of our responsibilities. We just want a system in place that we can rely on and be able to financially plan for our futures and endeavors that exist out there." Krull went back to school in his late 20s on the pre-law track with the goal of earning a law degree, but his priorities changed. He got married and had children, and once the pandemic hit, he lost his job as a retail manager and now works in operations at a factory. He said he qualified for $0 monthly payments on the SAVE plan, and he's been unable to get an estimate of his new payment on a different repayment plan. He plans to see how much interest starts building on his balance and determine at that point whether it makes the most sense for him to remain on SAVE and pay off the interest or take action to get on a new plan. Either way, the uncertainty is taking a toll. "At this point, I'm playing a wait-and-see game and making the move that makes the most sense financially once I can determine what those finances are going to be," Krull said. He added that he's worried he'll have to scale back on his retirement and health savings should his payments surge. Alannah is in a similar boat. Working in public health, she said the SAVE plan halved her payments from around $800 a month to just over $400, which allowed her to put more money into savings and put a down payment on a house. The uncertainty with SAVE has been frustrating, she said, because she planned her budget around her lower monthly payments. Additionally, she heeded the administration's advice and submitted an application to switch to an income-based repayment plan earlier this year, but she said the application is still processing, keeping her in limbo. The Department of Education also posted a notice that loan forgiveness through IBR plans is paused to comply with a court order. Alannah said she plans to hold off on making any student-loan payments until she has certainty that the plan she is on will count toward debt relief. She said that if she paid off her loans aggressively, she would run through her savings — and be left with nothing for retirement. 'Everything right now is backlogged' The changes to SAVE come as the Department of Education itself is undergoing a major overhaul. Trump signed an executive order earlier this year to begin dismantling the department, and the Supreme Court recently ruled that the agency can proceed with firing 1,400 workers, about half of its staff. McMahon said following the ruling that it was "a significant win for students and families" and allows the department the " authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations." Still, it leaves the department with fewer resources to manage major tasks, including creating a new repayment system and processing millions of borrowers' applications. It has Holly Atkinson, a 57-year-old nurse who voted for Trump, concerned. "It's such a hot mess over there," Atkinson told BI. "Everything right now is backlogged as it is, and if they lay off these people at the Department of Education, it's going to make the situation worse." Atkinson said she was enjoying low monthly payments on the SAVE plan before it was blocked. With her repayment future up in the air, she's now unsure if she'll ever be able to retire with student loans hanging over her head, while also managing a separate private student-loan balance and mortgage payments. "I just feel like it's a weight on my shoulder that's never going to get lifted," she said. "And I see people my age planning to retire and go on vacations and travel, and I don't see any of that happening for me." The department said it would be communicating with SAVE borrowers over the next few months regarding their options to switch to a new repayment plan. Atkinson wishes there was more clarity upfront. "I don't regret voting for him, but what I'm seeing right now makes me very uncomfortable," Atkinson said. "We're all in limbo right now, and I don't like being in limbo."
Politico
15 hours ago
- Politico
Office of Special Counsel to probe potential Hatch Act violations by former Special Counsel Jack Smith
Trump and his allies have argued that Smith — who was chosen by former Attorney General Merrick Garland to lead the federal criminal investigations into Trump for his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election and his handling of classified documents — was conducting a 'witch hunt.' Two weeks before the election, Trump said that Smith should be 'thrown out of the country.' 'Jack Smith should be considered mentally deranged and he should be thrown out of the country,' Trump said on a radio show in October. The Justice Department has focused much of its resources and time — as it deals with the fallout and criticism from its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein saga — on the alleged wrongdoings of former Biden DOJ officials, including Smith. Earlier this year, it launched the 'Weaponization Working Group,' which is tasked with, among other things, reviewing efforts by Smith's team during the Biden administration. The investigation was first reported on Friday by the New York Post. Neither the White House nor a representative for Smith immediately responded to requests for comment. Since Smith is a former government employee, it's not entirely clear what action the independent agency could take if it finds he violated the Hatch Act. When asked about potential actions against Smith, an OSC spokesperson declined to comment.
Hamilton Spectator
15 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Watchdog agency investigating ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith for alleged illegal political activity
BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — An independent watchdog agency responsible for enforcing a law against partisan political activity by federal employees has opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the Justice Department special counsel who brought two criminal cases against then-candidate Donald Trump before his election to the White House last year. The Office of Special Counsel confirmed Saturday that it was investigating Smith on allegations he engaged in political activity through his inquiries into Trump. Smith was named special counsel by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland in November 2022 and his special counsel title is entirely distinct from the agency now investigating him. The office has no criminal enforcement power but does have the authority to impose fines and other sanctions for violations. It was not clear what basis exists to contend that Smith's investigations were political in nature or that he violated the Hatch Act, a federal law that bans certain public officials from engaging in political activity. Sen. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican, had earlier this week encouraged the office to scrutinize Smith's activities and had alleged that his conduct was designed to help then-President Joe Biden and his vice president Kamala Harris, both Democrats. Smith brought two cases against Trump, one accusing him of conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and the other of hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. Both were brought in 2023, well over a year before the 2024 presidential election, and indictments in the two cases cited what Smith and his team described as clear violations of well-established federal law. Garland has repeatedly said politics played no part in the handling of the cases. Both cases were abandoned by Smith after Trump's November win , with the prosecutor citing longstanding Justice Department policy prohibiting the indictment of a sitting president. There was no immediate indication that the same office investigating Smith had opened investigations into the Justice Department special counsels who were appointed by Garland to investigate Biden and his son Hunter. The White House had no immediate comment on the investigation into Smith, which was first reported by The New York Post. The office has been riven by leadership tumult over the last year. An earlier chief, Hampton Dellinger, was abruptly fired by the Trump administration and initially sued to get his job back before abandoning the court fight. Trump's trade representative, Jamieson Greer, is also serving as acting special counsel. Trump selected as his replacement Paul Ingrassia, a former right-wing podcast host who has praised criminally charged influencer Andrew Tate as a 'extraordinary human being' and promoted the false claim that the 2020 election was rigged. A Senate panel was set to consider his nomination at a hearing last month, but it was pulled from the agenda. ___ Tucker reported from Washington. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
