
Tourists are trickling into Afghanistan and the Taliban government is eager to welcome them
KABUL, Afghanistan — By plane, motorbike, camper van and even on bicycles, tourists are beginning to discover Afghanistan, with solo travelers and tour groups gradually venturing into a country that until recently was wracked by war.
And the country's Taliban government, which seized power more than three years ago but has yet to be formally recognized by any other nation, is more than happy to welcome them.
'The Afghan people are warm and welcoming and wish to host tourists from other countries and engage with them,' Deputy Minister of Tourism Qudratullah Jamal told The Associated Press in an early June interview. 'Tourism brings many benefits to a country. We have considered those benefits and aim for our nation to take full advantage of them.'Tourism is a vital, multi-billion-dollar industry for many countries.
Afghanistan's isolation on the international stage, largely because of the Taliban's restrictions on women and girls, has left much of its 41 million people mired in poverty. As it struggles to attract foreign investment, the lucrative potential of tourism is far from lost on the government.
'We are currently earning a considerable amount of revenue from this industry, and we are hopeful it will grow even more in the future,' Jamal said, noting money spent by visitors can reach more layers of society than revenue from other industries. 'We are optimistic this sector will evolve into a large economy, bringing significant benefits. It plays an important role in strengthening our national economy.'
Tourist visas are quick and easy to obtain and flights from major transit hubs such as Dubai and Istanbul operate several times a week. The government has even set up a training institute for men — and it is only for men — seeking jobs in the hospitality and tourism sector.
While visitor numbers are still very much a trickle rather than a flood, they are increasing. Nearly 9,000 foreign tourists visited Afghanistan last year, while nearly 3,000 people visited in the first three months of this year, Jamal said.
Four decades of near-continuous conflict kept nearly all vacationers away from this landlocked country of towering mountains, deep gorges and millennia of history.
The Taliban's takeover from a U.S.-backed government in August 2021 stunned the world and sent thousands of Afghans fleeing. But with the insurgency over, the bloodshed from frequent bombings and suicide attacks all but ended too.
Attacks still occur, however. An Islamic State affiliate in Afghanistan remains active and gunmen killed six people, including three Spanish tourists, in a May 2024 attack in Bamiyan, one of the country's main tourist attractions where centuries-old giant Buddhas carved into the cliffs were blown up by the Taliban in 2001.
While Western countries still advise against travel to Afghanistan, a drop in violence from the two decades of U.S.-led military presence is indisputable, as the government is keen to point out.
'Afghanistan has gone through many years of war and hardship. Now, we want tourists to come and see the true traditions and customs of Afghans, to understand Afghan life, creativity and resilience,' Jamal said, noting there was 'comprehensive security across Afghanistan.'
Critics question the ethics of foreigners visiting Afghanistan for pleasure when its government discriminates so heavily against half the country's population.
Education beyond primary school level is banned for girls and women and few professions are open to them. Women cannot enter parks, gardens or gyms.
Beauty salons are forbidden. Authorities dictate how women dress and have demanded they cover their faces in public, a decree still flouted by many, particularly in Kabul.
Some visitors say they contemplated the ethics, but ultimately wanted to see the situation for themselves.
French-Peruvian Illary Gomez said she and her British partner, James Liddiard, debated for about a year whether to drive through Afghanistan as part of their U.K.-to-Japan camper van journey.
'Some things didn't feel morally right,' she said.
But once here, they said they found a warm, hospitable and welcoming people and beautiful landscapes. They didn't feel their presence was any form of support for the Taliban.
By traveling, 'you put money in the hands of the people, not the government,' Liddiard said.
The treatment of women is particularly sensitive for government officials. Jamal declined to comment on the subject beyond saying male and female visitors were welcome.
'Those who respect our laws and traditions have already come and can continue to come,' he said.
While most restrictions are strictly enforced on Afghan women, they are far more relaxed for foreigners. Although they must still wear a headscarf in public, foreign women are more likely to gain entry into some restricted areas such as parks and are rarely asked to cover their faces in public.
Opening the country to foreign visitors was also a way of building bridges, Jamal said.
'It is a great way to promote interaction between the people of different countries. It helps build international relations and is also beneficial for trade,' he told the AP. 'When foreigners come here, Afghans also learn a lot from them. In addition to expanding commerce, tourism also helps foster mutual understanding, cultural exchange and strengthens talents as people learn from one another.'
A foreign traveler seeing the country with his own eyes 'creates closeness, builds connections and fosters trust among people,' Jamal said. 'They will respect each other's culture and the distance between peoples will diminish.
'So this is not just economic development; it also brings spiritual and political benefits,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 Insightful Analyst Questions From Figs's Q1 Earnings Call
Figs' first quarter results were met with a negative market reaction, despite revenues coming in ahead of Wall Street expectations. Management cited a return to growth in the U.S. market, improved average order value, and successful reactivation of lapsed customers as key factors underlying the period's performance. CEO Trina Spear highlighted, 'The start of the year, Q2, repeat frequency is up. U.S. business is up. Scrubwear is up, non-scrubwear is up. We had a record quarter of AOV at $119.' However, executives acknowledged ongoing cost pressures—particularly higher fulfillment and shipping expenses—and a dynamic macro environment as persistent headwinds. Is now the time to buy FIGS? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $124.9 million vs analyst estimates of $119.2 million (4.7% year-on-year growth, 4.8% beat) Adjusted EBITDA: $9 million vs analyst estimates of $8 million (7.2% margin, 12.5% beat) Operating Margin: -0.2%, in line with the same quarter last year Active Customers: 2.7 million, up 99,000 year on year Market Capitalization: $957.4 million While we enjoy listening to the management's commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls are the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Matt Koranda (ROTH Capital): Asked about why price increases were not included in the outlook despite tariff headwinds. CFO Sarah Oughtred explained the company is focused on internal cost mitigation and sees price hikes as a last resort due to customer sensitivity. Brooke Roach (Goldman Sachs): Inquired whether tariffs and supply chain volatility would impact Figs' Fit Initiative. CEO Trina Spear confirmed the project remains on track, with no anticipated delays related to trade disruptions. Rick Patel (Raymond James): Sought clarity on international growth trends and the impact of fewer promotions on guidance. Oughtred noted healthy demand outside the U.S., with the back half slowdown tied to reduced promotional cadence. Dana Telsey (Telsey Group): Asked about inventory planning and the growth trajectory for the B2B TEAMS segment. Oughtred described strategic inventory positioning, while Spear outlined an expanding pipeline and simplified ordering technology for TEAMS. Lorraine Hutchinson (Bank of America): Questioned whether competitors are adjusting prices in response to tariffs and if Figs can take share. Spear indicated only small players have raised prices and believes Figs' scale and supply chain flexibility provide a competitive advantage. In the quarters ahead, the StockStory team will be watching (1) how effectively Figs mitigates tariff-related cost increases through supply chain and operational adjustments, (2) the pace and profitability of international and TEAMS business expansion, and (3) traction from new Community Hub retail locations. Execution in these areas will determine whether Figs can sustain growth and defend margins amid ongoing macro uncertainty. Figs currently trades at $5.91, up from $5.03 just before the earnings. Is there an opportunity in the stock?See for yourself in our full research report (it's free). Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election sent major indices to all-time highs, but stocks have retraced as investors debate the health of the economy and the potential impact of tariffs. While this leaves much uncertainty around 2025, a few companies are poised for long-term gains regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate, like our Top 5 Strong Momentum Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Kadant (+351% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Sign in to access your portfolio


Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Planet Green, Inc. Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Review Amazon's Section 230 Defense in Cartridge Mislabeling Case
Planet Green asks Supreme Court to review Amazon's Section 230 immunity over alleged role in distribution of falsely advertised printer cartridges WASHINGTON DC, CA, UNITED STATES, June 30, 2025 / / -- Planet Green Cartridges, Inc., a U.S.-based remanufacturer of printer ink cartridges, has filed a petition for writ of certiorari ( Docket #23-4434 ), asking the Supreme Court of the United States to review lower court rulings that dismissed its claims against Amazon under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. According to the petition, filed on June 18, 2025, Planet Green alleges that Amazon continued to list and distribute printer cartridges labeled as 'remanufactured' even after receiving formal complaints that the products were inaccurately described. The petition contends that these products were newly manufactured replicas of original equipment manufacturer (OEM) cartridges, not professionally remanufactured used OEM products. The case, which originated in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ( Case No. 2:23-cv-06647-JFW-KS ), centers on whether Amazon's actions, as alleged, fall outside the protections of Section 230 when the platform is made aware of and continues to list disputed third-party products. Planet Green asserts that it provided Amazon with detailed documentation over a period of more than a year, identifying 45 brands and sellers allegedly marketing newly made cartridges as remanufactured. The petition states that despite these efforts, the listings remained active and Amazon cited Section 230 immunity in its defense. 'This case tests whether e-commerce platforms like Amazon can invoke Section 230 immunity when they are sued for allegedly facilitating the sale of misrepresented products,' said John Ulin, legal counsel for Planet Green at TroyGould. 'We believe the statute does not support broad immunity when platforms are knowingly involved in these kinds of sales. We're asking the Supreme Court to clarify the limits of that protection.' The petition presents two main legal questions: 1. Whether Section 230 provides immunity to online platforms that allegedly permit and profit from the sale of third-party products misrepresented in violation of consumer protection laws. 2. Whether platforms are immune from civil claims based on their own conduct, such as recommendation algorithms and advertising practices. Planet Green argues that the continued availability of the disputed listings and products, after notice, raises questions about the extent to which Section 230 protects platforms that play an active role in the promotion or sale of such products. 'By continuing to host and distribute the misrepresented products after being notified, Amazon has used the statute as a shield while continuing to benefit commercially,' Ulin added. Planet Green's filings estimate that annual sales of products labeled as 'remanufactured' ink cartridges on Amazon exceed $3 billion. The petition also references broader national concerns regarding product mislabeling and safety on online marketplaces. 'We went to great lengths to avoid litigation,' said Sean Levi, Founder and CEO of Planet Green. 'We had hoped Amazon would take corrective action once we made them aware of the 45 brands and their sellers we named in our lawsuit. It is nearly impossible for any U.S. company to hold all unlawful Amazon sellers accountable who operate outside U.S. jurisdiction.' Founded in 1999, Planet Green is one of the few remaining U.S.-based printer cartridge remanufacturers. The company attributes the decline of the industry—once valued at $7 billion—to increased competition from imported products, some of which it claims are marketed in misleading ways. 'Regardless of how the Court rules, we will continue working to raise awareness around anti-competitive challenges facing American manufacturers,' Levi said. Planet Green's filings also highlight environmental concerns associated with non-recycled cartridges that are marketed as remanufactured. The company notes that most overseas producers of aftermarket cartridges do not offer recycling or take-back programs, resulting in increased landfill waste in the U.S. The petition asks the Court to grant a jury trial to evaluate the facts and determine whether Section 230 applies in cases where a platform is alleged to have both knowledge of and commercial interest in disputed product listings. 'In our view, Congress never intended Section 230 to shield large platforms from accountability when they knowingly allow the sale of questionable or misrepresented products,' stated Levi. 'If the courts do not address this issue, we believe lawmakers must. Otherwise, U.S. businesses face increasing challenges competing against overseas sellers who may not be subject to the same legal and regulatory standards.' About Planet Green Founded in 1999 and based in Chatsworth, California, Planet Green is a U.S. printer cartridge recycler and remanufacturer. The company remanufactures used OEM cartridges and sells surplus OEM stock as an environmentally sustainable alternative to newly manufactured products. For more information, visit John Ulin Attorney Troy Gould 310-553-4441 Eric Sherman - Media Contact Planet Green + +1 800-377-1093 email us here Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.


Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Auna Provides an Update From Its Controlling Shareholder Enfoca Regarding Its Sponsor-Level Financing
LUXEMBOURG--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Auna S.A. (NYSE: AUNA) ('Auna' or the 'Company'), a Latin American healthcare company with operations in Mexico, Peru and Colombia, announced today that its controlling shareholder, Enfoca Sociedad Administradora de Fondos de Inversión S.A. ('Enfoca'), has notified the Company about the status of its sponsor-level financing. According to Enfoca, its 'sponsor-level financing which had a final maturity of October 5, 2025, has been successfully refinanced. The new facility benefits from improved economic terms for the sponsors and other pre-IPO shareholders of Auna, and the new maturity date has been extended until the end of June 2027.' Like Enfoca's prior sponsor-level financing, Auna is not a party to, nor does Auna guarantee, nor is Auna otherwise liable with respect to the debt under the new sponsor-level financing. Enfoca's refinancing reinforces the long-term alignment between Auna and its pre-IPO shareholders, and helps support the continued execution of Auna's strategic growth initiatives in Spanish-speaking Latin America. About Auna Auna is a leading healthcare platform in Latin America with operations in Mexico, Peru and Colombia, prioritizing prevention and concentrating on high-complexity diseases that contribute the most to healthcare expenditures. Our mission is to transform healthcare by providing access to a highly integrated healthcare offering in the underpenetrated markets of Spanish-speaking Americas. Founded in 1989, Auna has built one of Latin America′s largest modern healthcare platforms that consists of a horizontally integrated network of healthcare facilities and a vertically integrated portfolio of oncological plans and selected general healthcare plans. As of March 31, 2025, Auna's network included 31 healthcare network facilities, consisting of hospitals, outpatient, prevention and wellness facilities with a total of 2,323 beds, and 1.4 million healthcare plans. For more information visit Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements often are proceeded by words such as 'believes,' 'expects,' 'may,' 'anticipates,' 'plans,' 'intends,' 'assumes,' 'will' or similar expressions. The forward-looking statements contained herein include statements about the Company's strategic growth initiatives. These expectations may or may not be realized. Some of these expectations may be based upon assumptions or judgments that prove to be incorrect. In addition, Auna's business and operations involve numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of Auna, which could result in Auna's expectations not being realized or otherwise materially affect the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Auna. Some of the factors that could cause future results to materially differ from recent results or those projected in forward-looking statements are described in Auna's filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, including its annual report filed on Form 20-F on April 10, 2025. The forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and Auna does not undertake any obligation to (and expressly disclaims any obligation to) update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date such statements were made, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, and the potential for variation of actual results from the assumptions on which certain of such forward-looking statements are based, investors should keep in mind that the results, events or developments disclosed in any forward-looking statement made in this document may not occur, and that actual results may vary materially from those described herein, including those described as anticipated, expected, targeted, projected or otherwise.