Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress.
But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims.
He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims.
The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Donald Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.'
The agency's appointed acting director then placed many agency staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board.
However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the museum and library services institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
26 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump considers skipping G20 summit, slams South Africa's 'very bad' policies
United States President Donald Trump has indicated he may not attend the upcoming G20 summit scheduled to take place in South Africa this November, citing his disapproval of the country's policies. President Trump may skip the upcoming G20 summit in South Africa due to policy disagreements. Tensions between the U.S. and South Africa have escalated over issues including land reform laws, foreign policy stances, and relations with BRICS nations. Trump's potential absence highlights growing diplomatic friction, which could impact U.S.–Africa relations long-term. Trump's remarks come amid a deepening strain in U.S.–South Africa relations, fueled by long-standing disagreements over a range of issues including South Africa's land reform laws, its pro-Palestinian stance in the Israel–Gaza conflict, and its growing alignment with BRICS nations. These tensions have prompted the Trump administration to impose multiple sanctions on South Africa, including a 30% tariff on selected South African goods, a move that has further deteriorated bilateral relations. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, 'I think maybe I'll send somebody else because I've had a lot of problems with South Africa. They have some very bad policies.' South African officials have yet to issue a formal response to the statement. However, analysts warn that Trump's comments could escalate diplomatic friction ahead of the summit, which many see as a pivotal opportunity for developing countries to press for more inclusive global governance. Trump's policy dispute with South Africa Since the start of his second term in 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump has intensified tensions with South Africa, reviving a diplomatic chill driven by ideological rifts and competing global alliances. His administration has openly criticized South Africa's growing ties with Russia and China, its opposition to Western foreign policy, and its leadership role in BRICS and the Global South. The strain deepened earlier this year when US Secretary of State, Senator Marco Rubio declined an invitation to a G20 preparatory meeting in Johannesburg, citing South Africa's alignment with anti-Western regimes. Soon after, the White House instructed the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria to avoid making logistical arrangements for the G20 summit, signaling a potential boycott unless South Africa altered its stance. The friction reflects Washington's broader frustration with Pretoria's increasingly independent foreign policy, including support for Palestine, resistance to U.S.-backed sanctions, and its decision to host Russian President Vladimir Putin despite an ICC warrant. With the G20 summit now in focus, Trump's administration sees South Africa as part of a rising bloc challenging U.S. influence. What began as diplomatic friction has grown into a full-blown policy standoff that could redefine U.S.–Africa relations for years to come. Trump's potential absence from the summit could have diplomatic implications, as it would mark a rare snub of a major global economic forum hosted on African soil.
Associated Press
26 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Australia bans YouTube accounts for children under 16 in reversal of previous stance
MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — The Australian government announced YouTube will be among the social media platforms that must ensure account holders are at least 16-years-old from December, reversing a position taken months ago on the popular video-sharing service. YouTube was listed as an exemption in November last year when the Parliament passed world-first laws that will ban Australian children younger than 16 from platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and X. Communications Minister Anika Wells released rules Wednesday that decide which online services are defined as 'age-restricted social media platforms' and which avoid the age limit. The age restrictions take effect Dec. 10 and platforms will face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for 'failing to take responsible steps' to exclude underage account holders, a government statement said. The steps are not defined. Wells defended applying the restrictions to YouTube and said the government would not be intimidated by threats of legal action from the platform's U.S. owner, Alphabet Inc. 'The evidence cannot be ignored that four out of 10 Australian kids report that their most recent harm was on YouTube,' Wells told reporters, referring to government research. 'We will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids.' Children will be able to access YouTube but will not be allowed to have their own YouTube accounts. YouTube said the government's decision 'reverses a clear, public commitment to exclude YouTube from this ban.' 'We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms. Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media,' a YouTube statement said, noting it will consider next steps and engage with the government. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would campaign at a United Nations forum in New York in September for international support for banning children from social media. 'I know from the discussions I've had with other leaders that they are looking at this and they are considering what impact social media is having on young people in their respective nations,' Albanese said. 'It is a common experience. This is not an Australian experience.' Last year, the government commissioned an evaluation of age assurance technologies that was to report last month on how young children could be excluded from social media. The government had yet to receive that evaluation's final recommendations, Wells said. But she added the platform users won't have to upload documents such as passports and driver's licenses to prove their age. 'Platforms have to provide an alternative to providing your own personal identification documents to satisfy themselves of age,' Wells said. 'These platforms know with deadly accuracy who we are, what we do and when we do it. And they know that you've had a Facebook account since 2009, so they know that you are over 16.' Exempt services include online gaming, messaging, education and health apps. They are excluded because they are considered less harmful to children. The minimum age is intended to address harmful impacts on children including addictive behaviors caused by persuasive or manipulative platform design features, social isolation, sleep interference, poor mental and physical health, low life-satisfaction and exposure to inappropriate and harmful content, government documents say.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Attack on military base in Burkina Faso kills about 50 soldiers, residents say
LAGOS, Nigeria (AP) — An attack by an armed group on a military base in northern Burkina Faso has left about 50 soldiers dead, according to accounts by a community leader and a resident on Tuesday. The Jama'at Nasr al-Islam wal-Muslimin group, or JNIM, was suspected of carrying out the attack Monday on the base in Dargo in Boulsa province in the northern region of the landlocked West African nation. The two sources, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they feared repercussions from the military, said about 100 militants participated in the attack, and that the gunmen burned and looted the base after the killings. The military government has yet to publicly acknowledge the attack. JNIM, one of several armed groups conducting attacks across West Africa, has been blamed for hundreds of civilian and military deaths. Burkina Faso is witnessing a surge in attacks by armed groups who are in control of most of the country, especially outside of the capital. The deteriorating security situation has led to political shifts in the country and served as the pretext for back-to-back coups. The military leader, Ibrahim Traore, has been unable to rein in the Islamist groups despite his redrawing of political and military allies.
