logo
U.S. Passport Drops 2 Places To No. 10 In World's Most Powerful List

U.S. Passport Drops 2 Places To No. 10 In World's Most Powerful List

Forbes20 hours ago
Topline
The United States blue book continues its decade-long slide to the 10th spot on the Henley Passport Index, a ranking of the world's passports according to the number of destinations their holders can access without a prior visa.
The U.S. blue book is tied for No. 10 in a new ranking of the world's most powerful passports—a ... More continuation of its slide from No. 1 in 2014. getty
Key Facts
Americans can travel visa-free to 182 countries around the world—four fewer than one year ago, when the U.S. was ranked No. 8.
In January 2025, the U.S. dropped one spot to No. 9.
Americans can access 11 fewer countries visa-free than holders of the No. 1 passport, Singapore.
A decade ago, in 2014, the U.S. jointly held the No. 1 position with the United Kingdom, which has slid to No. 6 in the 2025 ranking.
'Notably, the U.S. is now on the brink of exiting the Top 10 altogether for the first time in the index's 20-year history,' Henley & Partners noted in a statement.
What Makes One Passport More Powerful Than Another?
Since 2006, Henley & Partners has monitored which of the world's passports deliver the most and least global mobility, based on exclusive data provided by the International Air Transport Association (IATA). Global mobility is a key measure of soft power for a nation's citizens when they go abroad. Citizens of Singapore—the No. 1 passport in the ranking—enjoy access to 193 travel destinations out of 227 around the world visa-free. The second most powerful passports in the world are Japan and South Korea, which each provides access to 190 destinations without a visa. A U.S. passport gives holders access to 182 destinations visa-free—putting the blue book on equal standing with Iceland and Lithuania. 'Your passport is no longer just a travel document—it's a reflection of your country's diplomatic influence and international relationships,' Dr. Juerg Steffen, CEO of Henley & Partners said in a statement.
Why Has The U.s. Passport Fallen In The Power Rankings?
The United States is held back by its lack of reciprocity, according to how Henley & Partners calculates its ranking. While American passport holders can access 182 out of 227 destinations visa-free, the U.S. itself allows only 46 other nationalities to pass through its borders visa-free, putting it way down the Henley Openness Index in 80th place (compared to 10th place on the Henley Passport Index), barely outpacing Iraq.
Which Passports Have Made The Biggest Power Gains So Far In 2025?
Two Asian countries are the ranking's biggest movers and shakers since January. India jumped eight spots in six months, from No. 85 to No. 77, after adding two destinations and bringing its visa-free tally to 59. Over the same period, Saudi Arabia's citizens gained visa-free access to four countries, bringing its total to 91 countries, which lifts the kingdom four places to No. 54.
Which Passports Have Gained The Most Power Over The Past Decade?
Taking a longer view, two other Asian countries stand out as winners in the ranking since 2015. The United Arab Emirates shot up 34 places over the last 10 years from No. 42 to No. 8. Another notable climber is China, also rising 34 places from No. 94 to No. 60 since 2015, which Henley & Partners characterizes as 'particularly impressive considering that, unlike other top risers, China has not yet gained visa-free access to Europe's Schengen Area.' The report attributes China's rise to its significant move towards greater openness, with the country granting visa-free access to over a dozen new passports since January. In 2025, passport holders from 75 nations have visa-free entry to China, a remarkable shift from fewer than 20 countries just five years ago.
Here Are The Top 10 Most Powerful Passports
As ranked by the Henley Passport Index (countries accessible visa-free):
Singapore (193) Japan, South Korea (190) Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Span (189) Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden (188) Greece, New Zealand, Switzerland (187) United Kingdom (186) Australia, Czechia, Hungary, Malta, Poland (185) Canada, Estonia, U.A.E. (184) Croatia, Latvia, Slovakia, Slovenia (183) Iceland, Lithuania, U.S. (182)
Crucial Quote
'Americans are now leading the demand worldwide for alternative residence and citizenship options'… as the U.S. adopts 'increasingly inward-looking policies,' Steffen noted in a statement.
Further Reading
Millionaires Are On The Move—Here Are The Countries Winning And Losing Wealthy Residents (Forbes)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Researchers: How do we help America's national parks? Make global visitors pay more.
Researchers: How do we help America's national parks? Make global visitors pay more.

Chicago Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Researchers: How do we help America's national parks? Make global visitors pay more.

This summer, millions of people from around the world will visit America's national parks, eager to marvel at iconic landscapes such as the Grand Canyon, Yosemite Valley and Old Faithful. These places aren't just national treasures — they're global ones. But the growing crowds and aging infrastructure in many parks tell a difficult story: Awe has an upkeep cost, and we're not keeping up. That's why a recent presidential executive order calling for differential pricing for nonresident visitors to national parks couldn't come at a better time. By increasing entrance fees for international visitors — many of whom are already accustomed to paying more to visit parks in other countries — we can generate millions of dollars dedicated to helping our national parks sustain operations, handle routine maintenance and protect the resources that make these places extraordinary in the first place. This isn't a punitive measure. It's a smart strategy to sustain our most treasured public lands for visitors of all types. Many national parks are under real strain. Visitation is soaring — topping 331 million recreation visits last year, a figure nearly equal to the U.S. population — while for years and across many presidential administrations, park budgets have been stagnant and gradually eroded by inflation. Trails and roads, bathrooms and visitor centers, and water systems and other essential infrastructure are aging and overburdened. Nationwide, parks face an estimated $23 billion backlog of overdue maintenance. Without adequate support, even basic maintenance becomes harder to fund. While Congress provided a critical infusion of funding to address some of the most pressing deferred maintenance needs through the Great American Outdoors Act's Legacy Restoration Fund, parks still need reliable resources to avoid digging that hole deeper. International visitors can and should be part of the solution. They represent a meaningful share of park tourism — particularly at marquee destinations such as Yellowstone, Yosemite and Glacier. Yet under the current fee structure, they pay the same standard $35 per vehicle entrance fee as U.S. residents — or even less. Visitors arriving by commercial tour bus, for example, often pay just a fraction of that amount: The fee is $300 per bus, which can be spread across 50 or more passengers. Meanwhile, American taxpayers contribute to the national park system not only through entrance fees, which are retained by parks, but also through federal income taxes that help fund park operations. In effect, international visitors, who are typically one-time or infrequent guests, often pay less than the U.S. citizens who help sustain the system year after year. The concept of differential pricing is already common in countries from Costa Rica to South Africa and beyond, where foreigners pay more to help subsidize local access, maintain quality visitor experiences, and even fund community development and conservation projects outside park boundaries. And in other aspects of U.S. outdoor recreation, such as state park entry fees, campground reservations, and hunting and fishing licenses, pricing varies depending on whether you're a local or nonresident. Our national parks should be no exception, and that's now changing. The executive order from President Donald Trump directs the Interior Department to establish differential pricing for nonresidents to generate revenue to improve and enhance parks. The strategy aligns park funding with usage while preserving affordable access for American families. And it helps provide a sustainable, user-supported funding stream that will be reinvested directly into park stewardship, not siphoned off for unrelated uses. Some might worry that the policy will make international tourists feel unwelcome or deter their travel. But a crumbling park does far more to make international visitors feel unwelcome than a surcharge ever could. Moreover, if the goal is to generate as much revenue as possible for parks from the proposal, then the best strategy would be to welcome as many foreign visitors to our national parks as possible. And evidence suggests that paying an entrance fee doesn't dampen visitors' enjoyment of their visit. Indeed, the vast majority of international visitors would not be deterred by higher gate fees. Recent research from the Property and Environment Research Center estimates that a $100 surcharge per foreign visitor to Yellowstone would raise an additional $55 million — roughly four times the current entry fee revenue — while reducing total visitation by just 1.3%. The reality is that many international visitors are not only able but also happy to pay a reasonable fee to help protect the places they visit, especially when they know the money stays in the park and supports its management and conservation, and when they seek an experience available nowhere else such as taking in the awe-inspiring view from the rim of the Grand Canyon. Rather than relying solely on taxpayer appropriations, which are subject to change, differential pricing gives parks a more sustainable, user-supported revenue stream. The next steps will be to implement the policy thoughtfully, with clear and strategic communication to visitors. Research shows that highlighting visitor benefits, such as better-maintained trails, and showing improved outcomes can increase visitor support for fee increases. In the bigger picture, this shift reflects a welcome turn toward stewardship-focused strategies. Parks offer an incredible value to Americans: $35 for a week at Yellowstone is less than a family in most U.S. cities pays for a two-hour trip to the movie theater. And by asking those who come from far away — often with higher travel budgets — to contribute a bit more, we can ensure that America's national parks remain beautiful, accessible and resilient for generations to come. National parks are a gift to the world, but they're also a responsibility. If we want future generations — American and international — to enjoy the same sense of wonder that draws millions to our parks each year, we need to find smart ways to fund their care. Asking international visitors to contribute a fair share is a reasonable and long-overdue step in that direction.

1 in 6 Americans planning World Cup road trips
1 in 6 Americans planning World Cup road trips

Axios

time3 hours ago

  • Axios

1 in 6 Americans planning World Cup road trips

More than 18% of Americans are planning road trips to next year's FIFA World Cup matches. Why it matters: That could mean big traffic jams for host cities. By the numbers: Among modes of travel to the World Cup cities, the top choice highlighted in a survey from ParkMobile was traveling by car (47%), followed by plane (30%), train (3%), and bus (2%). State of play: City officials are guiding fans toward public transportation as improvements are made ahead of next summer's tournament.

US slips again in passport power rankings
US slips again in passport power rankings

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US slips again in passport power rankings

Sign up for Unlocking the World, CNN Travel's weekly newsletter. Get news about destinations, plus the latest in aviation, food and drink, and where to stay. The United States is on the brink of dropping out of the top 10 ranking of the world's most powerful passports. In the latest quarterly update of the Henley Passport Index, created by the London-based global citizenship and residence advisory firm Henley & Partners, the US — which held the No. 1 position back in 2014 — has slipped down to the 10th place in the rankings. It's the lowest position ever for the US in the 20-year history of the index, which tracks the global freedom of movement for holders of 199 passports to 227 countries and territories around the world, using exclusive data from the International Air Transport Association (IATA). And because Henley counts multiple countries with the same score as a single spot in its standings, there are actually 33 countries that outrank the US on the list. As we enter the second half of the year, Singapore has held onto its No.1 position as the world's most powerful passport for 2025. Holders of this most desirable of travel documents enjoy visa-free access to 193 out of 227 destinations worldwide, more than citizens of any other place on the planet. Naturally, Singapore isn't handing out passports to foreign nationals like candy. Applying for Singaporean citizenship requires at least two years of permanent residency, a review of 'economic contributions' and other qualifications, and compulsory national service for male applicants. South Korea has climbed to join Japan at No.2 in the ranking, with an open door to 190 destinations, ensuring that Asian nations have a solid lead in the global mobility race. The EU member states of Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, and Spain are all at No.3 behind them, in the third tier, along with Finland, with access to 189 destinations with no prior visa needed. Europe holds sway over the fourth position in the rankings, too, which belongs to seven countries: Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Sweden. All enjoy visa-free access to 188 destinations. Squeaking into fifth place are Greece, Switzerland and New Zealand, all of which have visa-free access to 187 destinations. The mobility gap At the opposite end of the list, at No. 99, Afghanistan remains locked in bottom place, with visa-free access to just 25 destinations, one fewer than at the start of this year. Syria is at No. 98 (with 27 destinations) and Iraq is at No. 97 (with 30 destinations). That's a yawning mobility gap of 168 destinations between the top- and bottom-ranked passports. The UK has dropped one spot to No. 6 in the rankings, with visa-free access to 186 destinations. Australia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta and Poland are tied at No. 7, while Canada, Estonia and the United Arab Emirates are at No. 8. The UAE is one of the biggest success stories on the index, having risen 34 places in the past decade, from No. 42 to eighth place. China has also jumped from No. 94 to No. 60 since 2015, a rise that's been achieved even without visa-free access to the 29 countries in Europe's Schengen Area. 'Active and strategic diplomacy' Ninth place is shared by Croatia, Latvia, Slovakia and Slovenia, while No.10 is held by Iceland, Lithuania and the United States. The US now has visa-free access to 182 destinations worldwide. In a provision in the Trump administration's recently enacted domestic policy bill, the United States will soon require international visitors to pay a new 'visa integrity fee' of at least $250, added to existing visa application costs. The fee will apply to all visitors who are required to obtain nonimmigrant visas to enter the United States. Critics including the U.S. Travel Association, a national nonprofit organization aimed at increasing travel to the United States, have panned the new visa fee as discouraging to visitors. Christian H. Kaelin, chair of Henley and Partners, said in a release that the latest Henley Passport Index reveals an increasingly competitive landscape in global mobility. 'The consolidation we're seeing at the top underscores that access is earned — and must be maintained — through active and strategic diplomacy,' he said. 'Nations that proactively negotiate visa waivers and nurture reciprocal agreements continue to rise, while the opposite applies to those that are less engaged in such efforts.' Henley & Partners' list is one of several indexes created by financial firms to rank global passports according to the access they provide to their citizens. Arton Capital's Passport Index takes into consideration the passports of 193 United Nations member countries and six territories — Taiwan, Macao, Hong Kong, Kosovo, the Palestinian territories and the Vatican. Territories annexed to other countries are excluded. It's also updated in real-time throughout the year and its data is gathered by close monitoring of individual governments' portals. Arton's Global Passport Power Rank 2025 puts the United Arab Emirates in the top spot, with a visa-free/visa-on-arrival score of 179. Second place is held by Spain, with a score of 176. The most powerful passports for 2025 Singapore (193 destinations) Japan, South Korea (190) Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain (189) Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden (188) Greece, New Zealand, Switzerland (187) United Kingdom (186) Australia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta, Poland (185) Canada, Estonia, United Arab Emirates (184) Croatia, Latvia, Slovakia, Slovenia (183) Iceland, Lithuania, United States (182) Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store