
In Mumbai train blasts case, many questions: LeT or IM, household utensils or pressure cookers?
In court, the ATS chargesheet only mentioned household utensils were used in the blasts, and the use of pressure cookers surfaced only during the trial.
The ATS theory that pressure cookers were used also raised some questions since the shopkeeper from where eight of these were purchased was not called for a test identification parade and no sketches of the suspect were prepared and circulated based on his description.
You Can Also Check:
Mumbai AQI
|
Weather in Mumbai
|
Bank Holidays in Mumbai
|
Public Holidays in Mumbai
Besides recovery of some pressure cookers and related accessories at the instance of the accused, there is no mention of these in his statement, according to the Bombay high court judgment acquitting the accused.
Another accused mentioned the use of RDX and timers for the blasts, but there was no mention of pressure cooker.
In 2008, the crime branch, headed by Rakesh Maria, arrested Sadiq Shaikh, an alleged member of the IM, for the Delhi and Ahmedabad blasts, along with others.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
15 most beautiful women in the world
Topgentlemen.com
Shaikh allegedly told officials of the crime branch that the IM was responsible for all the blasts, including the train blasts. The trial court while convicting the accused rejected the defence claim of IM module involvement.
An investigation by the Delhi police's special cell, alongside the interrogation of Yasin Bhatkal of th IM, too had found that the train bombings were carried out by IM operatives. The IM had claimed responsibility for the Mumbai blasts along with three other strikes in an email sent to media houses in Nov 2007, said sources.
The Delhi police even came on record to state this after the arrest of IM's shadowy co-founder, Abdul Subhan Qureshi, also known as Tauqeer, on Jan 20, 2018. Tauqeer was the one who used to sign off as 'al-Arabi' on the emails sent by the IM after every blast.
The Delhi police said both Yasin Bhatkal and Shaikh disclosed the role of Atif Amin, who went to Mumbai specifically for this task along with other members who were later found at Batla House in Delhi in 2008.
The module, comprising Shaikh, Amin, and Bhatkal, met once again in Mumbai at a McDonald's restaurant in Andheri before the Ahmedabad blasts, an officer said. "The use of pressure cooker bombs was another IM signature style at the time," he said.
In Mumbai, though, some senior police officers said the LeT claim by the ATS and the differing, IM claim by the crime branch may have been a case of one-upmanship.
After the train blast, the then Mumbai police commissioner A N Roy stated at a press conference that bombs were planted in pressure cookers and were the handiwork of LeT.
At the time — Vilasrao Deshmukh was the Maharashtra chief minister and R R Patil the deputy chief minister, who also held the home portfolio — the Mumbai crime branch was not connected to the case, but after the 2008 blast in Ahmedabad, a suspicious vehicle stolen from the Mumbai region became part of the case when it was found parked outside a civil hospital in Ahmedabad. Through CCTV footage, the vehicle thief, Afzal Usmani was traced and it was found that he had stolen four vehicles from Navi Mumbai which were used in the blast in Ahmedabad.
It led to the arrest of Shaikh and his other IM group members.
Shaikh had claimed that he, along with Riyaz Bhatkal, Arif Badruddin Shaikh, Amin, Shahnawaz, with the help of other members, carried out the blasts on the instruction of Amir Raza at Mominpura in Delhi, Sankatmochan Mandir in Varanasi, on the Shramjeevi Express, and on Mumbai train from Feb 2005 to Sept 2008.
He had claimed in his initial statement that Raza sent explosives and materials for this purpose with help from Riyaz Bhatkal or his men, while Arif Badar prepared the clock timer circuit. He, Badar, Bhatkal and Amin knew how to prepare bombs and circuits. The trial court found the statements "vague".

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Myntra under ED lens: Indian government issues Rs 1,654 crore FEMA notice for FDI violation
Myntra, one of India's largest fashion e-commerce brands, has received a notice from the country's financial crime watchdog for allegedly violating the country's foreign investment rules. On Wednesday, July 23, the Enforcement Directorate stated that Flipkart-owned e-commerce platform Myntra received foreign investment worth Rs 1,654.35 crore by claiming to operate a 'wholesale cash and carry' business, but instead sold most of its goods to Vector E-Commerce Pvt Ltd, which then sold them to the consumers. According to the Enforcement Directorate, Vector E-Commerce Pvt Ltd and Myntra Designs Pvt Ltd belong to the same group of companies. India has a policy that prevents foreign companies from participating directly in wholesale business and making direct sales to consumers, in order to protect local retailers. While foreign-owned e-commerce platforms like Myntra, Amazon and Flipkart are allowed to act as marketplaces to connect buyers and sellers, government policies prevent these giants from stocking goods or selling them directly to consumers. In the last few years, the Walmart-backed online fashion retailer has been expanding its quick commerce market and controls almost half of India's fashion e-commerce market. It is also venturing into social commerce by partnering up with influencers and celebrities on platforms like Instagram, Amazon Live and YouTube. In a statement to Reuters, Myntra said that it is yet to receive any documents related to the case from Indian authorities and that it remains 'fully committed to cooperating with them at any point of time.' 'At Myntra, we are deeply committed to upholding all applicable laws of the land and operating with the highest standards of compliance and integrity', a company spokesperson added. Founded in 2007, Myntra, the Bengaluru-based e-commerce platform, was acquired by Flipkart in 2014 and later bought by US-based Walmart as part of its Flipkart acquisition. The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has emphasised that foreign-backed online retailers have been violating FDI norms and has urged the Indian government to take action against malpractices like deep discounting and predatory pricing. Myntra isn't the first e-commerce giant to face heat from India's financial crime watchdog. Last year, an Indian antitrust investigation found that foreign-backed e-commerce platforms – Amazon and Flipkart have been violating local laws by giving preference to select sellers and colluding with smartphone makers like Samsung and Xiaomi by restricting their products to their websites, which breaches the country's antitrust laws. Similarly, food delivery platforms like Zomato and Swiggy are also facing heat for breaching competition laws by giving select restaurants preferential treatment. The Enforcement Directorate has also asked Walmart-backed Flipkart to explain why the e-commerce platform should not be slapped with a Rs 11,656,47 crore fine for violating its foreign investment laws.


Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Go home…': Swaminarayan Temple in Australia vandalised with racist graffiti
The Swaminarayan Temple in Australia's Melbourne was defaced with racist graffiti on July 21, according to reports in the local media. The words 'Go Home Brown…' were spray painted on the walls of the Hindu Temple located on Wadhurst Drive in the eastern suburb of Boronia. Similar graffiti was also seen on the walls of two nearby Asian-run restaurants. Condemning the incident, the President of the Hindu Council of Australia, Makrand Bhagwat, said that the targeted attack feels like an attack to 'our identity, our right to worship and freedom of religion.' 'Our temple is meant to be a sanctuary of peace, devotion and unity,' Bhagwat told Australia Today. He added, 'Seeing it vandalised with hateful words was heartbreaking for volunteers and worshippers alike.' Victoria Police is investigating the four linked incidents in Boronia. 'Graffiti was discovered on a temple on Wadhurst Drive in Boronia about 9.30 am. Two further restaurants were located with graffiti on Boronia Road,' the police said. The report further claimed that Victoria's Premier Jacinta Allan had sent a private letter to the temple authorities condemning the attack. 'What happened this week was hateful, racist and deeply disturbing. It wasn't just vandalism – it was a deliberate act of hate, designed to intimidate, isolate, and spread fear. It was an attack on your right to feel safe and to belong, and on the values that bind us together. There's no place for it anywhere in Victoria. And it must be called out for what it is,' she said in the letter. 'Jackson Taylor raised this with me directly. He is a strong voice for your community, and I want you to know that we both stand with you. I'm advised that Victoria Police are taking this matter seriously, as they should. Soon, the Minister for Multicultural Affairs will visit the Shree Swaminarayan Temple to offer the support of our Government, and to listen to you and your community directly,' the letter added. Recently, a 23-year-old Indian man was assaulted and left unconscious in central Adelaide in what authorities and the victim described as a racially motivated attack over a parking dispute. The man, Charanpreet Singh, sustained severe injuries, including brain trauma and facial fractures, after being repeatedly punched by a group of unidentified assailants. The incident occurred near Kintore Avenue, a busy stretch in the heart of the city.


India.com
25 minutes ago
- India.com
Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court stays High Court order acquitting 12 accused
Supreme Court news, Supreme Court reverses custody order, Supreme Court cases today New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the Bombay High Court verdict acquitting all 12 accused in the 2006 Mumbai train bomb blasts case. The court, however, said there was no question of bringing the 12 back to prison and emphasised that the high court judgement shall not be treated as a precedent. A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh issued notice to all the accused in the case and sought their response on the appeal filed by the state government. 'We have been informed that all the respondents have been released and there is no question of bringing them back to the prison. However, taking note of the submission made by the Solicitor General on the question of law, we are inclined to hold that the impugned judgment shall not be treated as a precedent. To that extent, there shall be a stay of the impugned judgment,' the bench said. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared for the Maharashtra government. The Maharashtra government has assailed a Bombay High Court judgment acquitting all 12 convicts in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case in the Supreme Court on grounds, including that the recovery of RDX from an accused, was disbelieved on a 'hyper-technical ground' that the seized explosives were not sealed with a lac seal. The state government, in its appeal, has raised several serious objections to the high court's order of acquittal. The plea has asserted that due procedural safeguards under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) were observed, including proper sanctioning by senior officers like prosecution witness (PW) no. 185 Anami Roy. It said the high court overlooked the validity of these approvals despite no substantial contradiction in the prosecution's evidence. On Monday, a special high court bench of Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak acquitted all the 12 accused, saying the prosecution utterly failed to prove the case and it was 'hard to believe the accused committed the crime'. Of the 12, five had been sentenced to death and seven to life imprisonment by the special court. One of the death row convicts died in 2021. More than 180 people were killed when seven blasts ripped through Mumbai local trains at various locations on the western line on July 11, 2006. The high court allowed the appeals filed by the accused challenging their conviction and sentences imposed on them by a special court in 2015. The high court verdict came as a major embarrassment to the Maharashtra ATS which probed the case. The agency claimed that the accused were members of the banned outfit Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) and hatched the conspiracy with Pakistani members of the terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT).