USL liable to pay entry tax under Madhya Pradesh local area rule, holds Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has ruled that United Spirits (USL) is responsible for paying entry tax in Madhya Pradesh on goods entering local areas for use, consumption, or sale. The court upheld the High Court's decision, stating that USL's sales to warehouses triggered the entry of goods, justifying the entry tax levy.
IANS United Spirits Limited The Supreme Court on Monday held that United Spirits (USL) is liable to pay entry tax under the Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam 1976, which levied such tax on the entry of goods into a local area for use, consumption or sale.Upholding the Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision which favoured the state, the bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Vishwanathan said that '…it is clear that the appellants (USL) by the sale to the warehouse caused to be affected the entry of goods and the entry was occasioned on the account of the sale into the local area for consumption, use or sale therein.'It is also not disputed that USL is a dealer as defined under the Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002, the SC said, adding that the company's only contention that the State warehouse was also a dealer 'makes no difference' since it cannot be disputed that the company certainly occasioned the entry of goods and the levy of entry tax on them, which could always be passed on, was perfectly justifiable in law.According to the judges, we have no manner of doubt that there were two independent transactions, one between USL (manufacturers) and the State Warehouse and the other between the State warehouse and the retailers. 'Hence, it will be difficult to accept the contention of the State that the role of the State is only supervisory and the warehouses didn't purchase beer and IMFL from the manufacturer,' they said.However, the top court said that this does not resolve the issue in favour of USL as under Section 3 of the M.P. Entry Tax Act 1976, the incidence of taxation is on the entry in the course of business of a dealer of goods specified in Schedule II, into each local area for consumption, use or sale therein. The further requirement is that such tax was to be paid by every dealer liable to tax under the VAT Act who hasd effected entry of such goods.
USL had contended that no direct sales could be made by the manufacturer to the retailers and there was "no privity of contract" between them and the retailers and it was the state government warehouse which sold the goods to the retailers. It is the warehouse which caused the movement of the goods into the local area, it argued.However, the State government contended that it neither purchased nor sold liquor. The HC had correctly found that the warehouses neither purchased or sold liquor and that the department only supervised the sale made by the manufacturer to the retail contractors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
There's still hope: Delhi's old vehicle ban to be reviewed by Supreme court
In a major development that could reshape how Delhi balances clean-air mandates with evolving vehicle technology, the Supreme Court will hear a crucial plea on July 28 regarding the absurd ban on older petrol and diesel vehicles in the Delhi-NCR region. The hearing comes in light of a petition filed by the Delhi government seeking a review of the court's 2018 order enforcing end-of-life restrictions, particularly on Bharat Stage VI (BS VI)-compliant matter will be heard by a bench led by Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran, and is expected to explore whether the existing rules, originally designed for older, more so-called polluting vehicles, are still justified in an era of advanced emission norms.A ban rooted in air quality emergencyThe ban traces back to a 2015 order by the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which prohibited diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years from operating in Delhi-NCR. The Supreme Court upheld this directive in 2018, citing public health and environmental protection. Recently, the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) sought to enforce a related measure by halting fuel supply to these 'end-of-life' vehicles from July 1, an order that has now been deferred to November due to public backlash and logistical petition: Science over age In its application, the Rekha Gupta-led Delhi government argues that the blanket age-based restriction is 'no longer scientifically or technically justified' in light of significant advancements in vehicle emissions technology, especially with the implementation of BS-VI norms in April 2020. These vehicles emit up to 80% less particulate matter and 70% less nitrogen oxides than BS IV the ban 'disproportionate and impractical,' the government emphasises that many well-maintained BS-IV and BS-VI vehicles with up-to-date Pollution Under Control (PUC) certificates and limited usage patterns contribute negligibly to overall pollution. The petition stresses that roadworthiness and emissions should be evaluated scientifically, through regular testing mechanisms under the Motor Vehicles Act and Central Motor Vehicles Rules, rather than being dictated by arbitrary age on the publicThe Delhi government warns that the current ban disproportionately affects middle- and lower-income groups who rely on used vehicles for essential mobility. For many, these vehicles remain roadworthy and compliant with emissions standards, yet face de-registration and denied access to fuel purely due to Minister Majinder Singh Sirsa underlined the government's position, stating, 'We need data-backed policy, not blanket bans. Pollution needs to be tackled, yes, but in a way that is fair and scientifically accurate.'Call for a scientific reviewadvertisementThe Delhi government has urged the Supreme Court to direct either the Centre or the CAQM to conduct a comprehensive scientific study to assess the actual environmental benefits of the age-based ban. The petition also highlights that vehicular emissions are only one of many contributors to Delhi's hazardous air quality, alongside stubble burning, industrial pollution, construction dust, and unfavourable weather lies ahead?If the Supreme Court acknowledges the merits of this review plea, it could pave the way for a landmark shift from age-based scrappage policies to more nuanced, emission-centric regulations. Such a move would not only protect cleaner vehicles from premature "death" but also bring India closer to adopting international best practices in pollution control and sustainable outcome of the July 28 hearing will be closely watched by policymakers, environmentalists, automakers, and millions of vehicle owners across Delhi-NCR, potentially setting a national precedent for the future of vehicle regulation in to Auto Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Higher pension: These central government employees to get pension hike due to minor salary increase
ET Online Pension The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) has issued an official clarification regarding the provision of notional increments to employees who retired a day prior to their due date, i.e. June 30 or December 31. This clarification follows previous orders and is issued subsequent to the Supreme Court's final directives given on February 20, 2025. This move will significantly impact pension calculations for eligible retired employees and serve as a welcome relief to many who have been awaiting clarity following court interventions. The notional increment is for the purpose of calculating pensionary benefits. Although monetary increments are not paid during service, they are taken into account when calculating pensions. The benefit of a notional increment for pension purposes will be available to officials retiring or who have retired on June 30 or December 31 on or after January 1, 2006, contingent upon meeting the conditions outlined in the DoPT's Office Memorandum dated February 20, 2025. Read more: Central govt employees will get notional increment if they are retiring a day before annual pay hike On February 20, 2025, the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) issued a detailed clarification regarding the granting of notional increments on July 1 or January 1 to central government employees who retire on June 30 or December 31, respectively, and have completed the required qualifying service with good conduct and satisfactory performance by the date of their retirement, specifically for the calculation of their pension. This increment will be considered only for pension calculation, not for any other pensionary benefits. Effective date for monetary benefit Effective May 1, 2023, all eligible pensioners who retire on or before April 30, 2023, will receive the actual financial benefits resulting from the increased pension (due to the notional increment). The specific instructions from the court will be applicable to individuals who currently hold court orders in their favour. 8th Pay Commission: Has govt received any suggestions on Terms of Reference for 8th Pay Commission? Check the Parliament statement, suggestions According to the DoP order on July 17, 2025, 'The actual monetary benefit of higher pension based on this notional increment will be paid with effect from 01.05.2023 to all eligible employees who retired on or before 30.04.2023, except those who already have a court order in their favour. In such cases, the specific directions of the court shall apply.' Special cases with legal proceedings The Department of Posts order issued on July 17, 2025, stated, 'If an eligible retired employee has filed an application for intervention, impleadment, writ petition, or original application before a CAT, High Court, or the Supreme Court, the enhanced pension by including one increment will be payable for the period of three years prior to the month in which the application for intervention/impleadment/writ petition/original application was filed.' Conflicting lower court orders to be challenged If any lower court orders contradict the Supreme Court's February 20, 2025, decision or violate the conditions mentioned, they shall be challenged before the higher judiciary to maintain consistency. Re-opening of cases decided in the past The cases which have already been implemented need not be re-opened, the DoP order said. N.R. Narayana Murthy Founder, Infosys Watch Now Harsh Mariwala Chairman & Founder, Marico Watch Now Adar Poonawalla CEO, Serum Institute of India Watch Now Ronnie Screwvala Chairperson & Co-founder, upGrad Watch Now Puneet Dalmia Managing Director, Dalmia Bharat group Watch Now Martin Schwenk Former President & CEO, Mercedes-Benz, Thailand Watch Now Nadir Godrej Managing Director, of Godrej Industries Watch Now Manu Jain Former- Global Vice President, Xiaomi Watch Now Nithin Kamath Founder, CEO, Zerodha Watch Now Anil Agarwal Executive Chairman, Vedanta Resources Watch Now Dr. Prathap C. Reddy Founder Chairman, Apollo Hospitals Watch Now Vikram Kirloskar Former Vice Chairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Watch Now Kiran Mazumdar Shaw Executive Chairperson, Biocon Limited Watch Now Shashi Kiran Shetty Chairman of Allcargo Logistics, ECU Worldwide and Gati Ltd Watch Now Samir K Modi Managing Director, Modi Enterprises Watch Now R Gopalakrishnan Former Director Tata Sons, Former Vice Chairman, HUL Watch Now Sanjiv Mehta Former Chairman / CEO, Hindustan Unilever Watch Now Dr Ajai Chowdhry Co-Founder, HCL, Chairman EPIC Foundation, Author, Just Aspire Watch Now Shiv Khera Author, Business Consultant, Motivational Speaker Watch Now Nakul Anand Executive Director, ITC Limited Watch Now RS Sodhi Former MD, Amul & President, Indian Dairy Association Watch Now Anil Rai Gupta Managing Director & Chairman, Havells Watch Now Zia Mody Co-Founder & Managing Partner, AZB & Partners Watch Now Arundhati Bhattacharya Chairperson & CEO, Salesforce India Watch Now
NDTV
7 hours ago
- NDTV
Delhi Govt Seeks Supreme Court Review Of Age-Based Vehicle Ban
The Delhi government has approached the Supreme Court seeking a review of the 'End-of-Life-Vehicles' (ELVs) ban. The government argues that it penalises middle-class vehicle owners without any scientific backing. It is to be noted that the government is required to phase out petrol vehicles older than 15 years and diesel vehicles older than 10 years in the national capital region under a 2018 Supreme Court order and a National Green Tribunal follow-up. Delhi government officials argued that these age-based standards overlook advancements in vehicle emissions technology, especially considering the April 2020 introduction of Bharat Stage VI (BS-VI) standards. Also Read: Tata Waiting Period Extends Over 6 Months; Check Details As per Indian Express, the application filed by Rekha Gupta government said, "the road-worthiness of a vehicle is a technical and scientific issue that must be linked to actual emissions as tested and recorded by mechanisms as set out under the Motor Vehicles Act, the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, etc., as opposed to blanket ban on the basis of age which is unlinked to actual emissions." Taking the argument further, Environment Minister Majinder Singh Sirsa mentioned that the government's review application emphasizes the need for data-backed assessment, rather than broad limitation, on the actual emissions produced by each vehicle, regardless of its age. Additionally, the government argues that owners of properly maintained vehicles are unfairly affected by the ban, which is implemented without considering maintenance, usage patterns, or PUC compliance, according to the plea. The Delhi government's petition highlights that around 2.8 million BS-IV and BS-VI vehicles are registered in the city. It argues that the current age-based ban could exclude compliant vehicles and calls for a scientific analysis by the Commission for Air Quality Management to assess if these bans effectively improve air quality in Delhi-NCR. This comes after a campaign targeting a fuel ban for older cars faced public backlash and was halted due to operational challenges.
