logo
We put our 'healthy' dogs to sleep - here's why

We put our 'healthy' dogs to sleep - here's why

Metro25-04-2025
It was the moment Tom caught sight of his dog's white fur covered in blood that he realised they'd reached the point of no return. Next to the Wheaten Terrier, which was lovingly called Mr Pickles, was Tom's partner Zay, also covered in blood.
On that sunny summer's day in 2024, it would be the final attack the couple would endure.
The vet had warned them that this time would come. 'How bad does it have to get?' he implored.
Mr Pickles had been bought as a puppy from a breeder by Tom and Zay three years earlier, during one of the lockdown waves of the pandemic in 2021.
'We'd named him Mr Pickles because we thought it would make people laugh,' Tom tells Metro over Zoom from the couple's home in south London. They were 'dog people', he adds, gesturing at the picture wall behind him and Zay, featuring art prints of various dogs. 'But now we're wary.'
The first 'incident' came when Mr Pickles was just five months old in July 2021. 'He became so obsessed with a crisp packet when we were out on a walk. I was worried he'd suffocate,' explains Zay. She tried to prise it away from him by offering treats, but he bit her.
Her injuries were so bad that she had to go to the hospital to get them seen and have a tetanus shot. At first, the couple were sure it was a one-off – but then Mr Pickles attacked again, and many more times. It got to the point where he had to wear a muzzle. It was even worn at home, as it was the only way they could spend time together.
In a bid to curb their pet's aggression, Zay and Tom took Mr Pickles to several behaviourists and, on their vet's instruction, fed the dog a cocktail of drugs to calm him – but nothing worked.
Most of the time, it was Zay who was on the receiving end. 'Around 80% of the time it was me,' she remembers. It was often around food, but standing too close or making a minor movement could also send Mr Pickles into overdrive.'
The incident with Mr Pickles and all that blood in June 2024 was the end of the road for the couple. Zay had been walking the dog on a grassy patch in front of their home when she noticed there was some dirt – possibly faeces – on some of his face. When Zay tried to clean Mr Pickles up, he attacked her – it was prolonged and violent. 'I'd shove him away, but he'd just charge back at me,' she remembers.
According to a survey by welfare charity People's Dispensary for Sick Animals (PDSA), 60% of vets noted a rise in dog behaviour problems in 2024.
Meanwhile, research from the Royal Veterinary College (RVC) showed that many owners who got a puppy during the Covid lockdown struggled with their dogs' behaviour by the time their pet reached 21 months. According to another 2021 RVC study, 26,676 (91.5%) dogs who died in one year did so via euthanasia. 'Undesirable behaviour' (encompassing a range of behaviours considered 'unwelcome', such as severe aggression) was one of the main reasons.
Dr Rowena Packer, a lecturer in companion animal behaviour at the RVC explains that one of the most common reasons for euthanasia now is 'aggression' rather than old age or illness. She adds that dogs under three years of age are at a proportionately high risk of death due to 'undesirable behaviours', and males are more likely than females to die in this way.
'Most people don't anticipate that when they get their puppy, that in three years, they might put it to sleep because they're aggressive,' says Dr Packer. 'It's unthinkable for the average owner, but it's wildly common.'
Vet RVC researcher Dr Bree Merritt Vet Dr Bree Merritt has spent most of her career in animal shelters. 'Like the human world, the vet world is very focused on physical health. Emotional health is almost seen as separate, but it's just as critical,' she tells Metro.
Although she believes that the vast majority of dogs she's treated are just 'terrified', Dr Merritt cautions that these dogs can also be terrifying for the people caring for them. 'Sometimes the best option is to put these dogs to sleep,' she admits.
Looking back on Mr Pickles' life, Zay feels she may have missed some warning signs – his pinned back ears and tense body. But not every attack went that way. Some days, he would sit happily between the couple, then suddenly lunge. 'He was like Jekyll and Hyde,' she remembers.
The first time the word 'euthanasia' was uttered by a vet to Tom and Zay was when Mr Pickles was under a year old. '[The vet] made it about us. He was like, you guys don't seem like you're in a good place – this is clearly distressing for you. And he put it on the table: Mr Pickles would just have a nice sleep. He wouldn't know any better,' Tom remembers.
Then the vet said something that hit a chord with the couple. 'Having a pet should be a mutually beneficial relationship, and, at the moment, you're not benefiting.'
The sentiment stuck with them until the end of Mr Pickles' short life.
'We talked about it progressively. We couldn't do it for the rest of his life,' remembers Zay. 'I'd have absolute adrenaline fear running through my body on a daily basis.'
Describing one of Mr Pickles' growls, she remembers: 'It was so menacing – it's when he flicked, in those moments, he wasn't our loving dog.'
Briony and her husband Harry adopted their rescue puppy in September 2019. 'He was already called Neo and we kept the name because it suited him,' she tells Metro.
At first, the pup slotted into their lives perfectly. Briony had loved Neo, who they later found was a mix of 22 breeds, from the moment she set eyes on him when he was four months old. He was a happy boy who loved his walks and she even documented their journey on Instagram.
But slowly, the dog became wary of people coming to the house and barked at men on walks. When Neo turned two, things escalated. He would lunge and bark at Harry when he tried to go near Briony, or nip at his legs when he got out of bed during the night.
Neo had even sunk his teeth into a woman riding her bike in the park. The couple did everything they could for him – sectioned off their home to make it safe for Neo, kept him in a crate at night and gave him a muzzle for walks.
But every time they got over one problem, they were hit with another. 'We even worked with a trainer who refused to take our money, because I'd been doing everything they would,' remembers Briony. 'It got to a point where Neo ruled our entire life. We put his comfort before our own.'
Briony knew things needed to change when she discovered she was pregnant, and the couple spent nine months getting Neo ready for it. He had safe spaces just for him and Briony even walked around with a doll, so the dog could get used to another little creature sharing his home.
When the baby was born, they made the introductions very slowly, as advised, and were hopeful. 'But then Neo tried to attack our baby,' recalls Briony.
The couple weighed up the idea of rehoming Neo, discussing it in depth with canine professionals and the rescue centre they'd adopted him from. But Neo was looking for a 'unicorn' home; one so vanishingly rare that it's unlikely to exist – he'd have needed somewhere in the middle of nowhere with a woman who had absolutely no visitors.
The couple reasoned it would also be unethical to keep him in kennels while he waited, as his behaviour would deteriorate even more, and they didn't want another family to go through what they'd experienced.
When it comes to the reasoning behind an aggressive dog's behaviour, it often focuses on genetics or breed. Notoriously, the XL bully has been banned, but Dr Packer explains that it is actually 'multifaceted'. A dog can be affected by their history, their trauma and how they're treated by people.
'We'll often hear, for example, that dogs have bitten 'out of the blue' and, biologically, that's unlikely, because they will display a spectrum of subtle behaviours [such as lip licking, yawning, turning their heads or tucking their tail] to show their discomfort in situations that could precipitate a bite before they actually bite,' she explains.
'Dogs learn from every interaction, including negative ones. If one has, for example, shown aggression in a context – they might have snarled, shown their teeth, growled – and a person or dog moved away, they've learned that's an effective strategy, so they're more likely to use it, then potentially escalate if it's ignored. Learning early signs of stress in dogs before they escalate to later stages – like a bite – is key.'
The dog training world is unregulated, so finding the right kind of trainer can be difficult, says Jade Nicholas, a clinical animal behaviourist and dog trainer. She explains there's a massive divide in approaches – hers is science backed and reward based (no punishment or pain); whereas another school of thought uses 'aversive' techniques – such as prong collars, which have metal prongs that apply pressure to a dog's neck and shock collars, often marketed online as 'anti-bark' tools that provide 'mild electrical stimulation.'
But these products cause pain and, according to Jade, are not 'ethical'.
Dr Packer adds that owners who got dogs during the pandemic tend to lean towards 'aversive techniques' thanks to social media. 'But these techniques don't resolve issues, they make them worse,' she explains.
When given the choice of prong collars or death, Jade is certain. She'd rather a dog went to sleep peacefully in their owner's arms, than have them spend the rest of their life with their behaviour brutally suppressed and their needs ignored.
Despite everything, Tom and Zay loved Mr Pickles and Briony and her husband adored Neo. 'There were little pockets of moments where we had a normal dog,' remembers Zay. Both couples revelled in those joyous moments. 'When Neo cuddled me, it made me feel like he'd chosen me,' adds Briony.
Before they died, Mr Pickles and Neo were given beautiful final moments.
Zay and Tom took their dog on a beach holiday. 'It was June, and it was miserable grey weather, so there was no other soul in sight,' says Tom. 'It was just us three and we got to walk for hours uninterrupted and have a beautiful few days to say goodbye.'
Briony and Harry booked a secure field for Neo so he could run around without a muzzle or lead. 'He loved squirty cream, so I brought a can with us and I didn't have to worry about how much I gave him,' says Briony. 'We cried an awful lot and I remember saying to Harry 'Why can't it always be like this?'' More Trending
Neo's ashes are now in an urn in their home. 'I like him being there,' says Briony. Two days after Neo went to sleep, she and Harry were on the sofa – 'it was the first time we'd sat together for months' – their baby in a bouncer by their feet, and Briony began to sob. 'What's wrong?' her husband asked. 'We're safe,' replied Briony.
'It was such a bizarre feeling to feel safe in my home, and that shouldn't be a bizarre feeling,' she remembers.
Briony always called Neo 'reactive', 'difficult' or 'challenging', but since his death, she's realised the right word is 'dangerous'.
'He doesn't fit that stereotype, he's not an XL Bully – he doesn't match what you expect a dangerous dog to look like,' she explains. 'But at least I know he's finally at peace.'
MORE: Toddler in hospital after dog attack at child's birthday party
MORE: Woman scarred for life after best friend glassed her face in argument about a dog
MORE: Jack Russell puppy gets stoned after eating bag of weed he found on walk
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The pandemic aged our brains, whether we got Covid or not, study finds
The pandemic aged our brains, whether we got Covid or not, study finds

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

The pandemic aged our brains, whether we got Covid or not, study finds

Brain aging may have sped up during the pandemic, even in people who didn't get sick from Covid, a new study suggests. Using brain scans from a very large database, British researchers determined that during the pandemic years of 2021 and 2022, people's brains showed signs of aging, including shrinkage, according to the report published in Nature Communications. People who got infected with the virus also showed deficits in certain cognitive abilities, such as processing speed and mental flexibility. The aging effect 'was most pronounced in males and those from more socioeconomically deprived backgrounds,' said the study's first author, Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad, a neuroimaging researcher at the University of Nottingham, via email. 'It highlights that brain health is not shaped solely by illness, but also by broader life experiences.' Overall, the researchers found a 5.5-month acceleration in aging associated with the pandemic. On average, the difference in brain aging between men and women was small, about 2.5 months. 'We don't yet know exactly why, but this fits with other research suggesting that men may be more affected by certain types of stress or health challenges,' Mohammadi-Nejad said. Brains shrink as people age. When gray matter shrinks prematurely, it can lead to memory loss or judgment problems, although the pandemic study doesn't show whether people with structural changes will eventually develop cognitive deficits. The study wasn't designed to pinpoint specific causes. 'But it is likely that the cumulative experience of the pandemic—including psychological stress, social isolation, disruptions in daily life, reduced activity and wellness—contributed to the observed changes,' Mohammadi-Nejad said. 'In this sense, the pandemic period itself appears to have left a mark on our brains, even in the absence of infection.' An earlier study on how teenagers' brains were affected by the pandemic discovered a similar result. The 2024 research from the University of Washington found that boys' brains had aged the equivalent of 1.4 years extra during the pandemic, while girls aged an extra 4.2 years. In the new study, Mohammadi-Nejad and his team turned to the UK Biobank, a massive database which launched in 2006, to determine whether the pandemic had any impact on people's brains. The database has been keeping track of anonymous health data from 500,000 volunteers who were recruited between 2006 and 2010, when the participants were between 40 to 69 years old. Thus far, the biobank has collected 100,000 whole body scans. To develop a baseline model of normal aging, to compare with what might have occurred during the pandemic years, the researchers used imaging data from 15,334 healthy individuals that had been collected prior to the pandemic. 'We used this large dataset to teach our model what typical, healthy brain ageing looks like across the adult lifespan,' Mohammadi-Nejad explained. Next the researchers turned to a group of 996 participants who had two scans, the second taking place on average 2.3 years after the first. Of these participants, 564 had both scans prior to the pandemic, which helped the artificial intelligence learn how the brain changes when there is no pandemic. The other 432 had a second scan after the start of the pandemic, mostly between 2021 and 2022, allowing the researchers to investigate how the pandemic might have affected brain aging. Although these second scans were done later in the pandemic, 'they reflect brain changes that likely happened during the height of the pandemic, when people experienced the most disruption,' Mohammadi-Nejad said. Other research has suggested that environmental factors might cause a person's brain to age prematurely. One study conducted in the Antarctic tied living in relative isolation to brain shrinkage. 'The most intriguing finding in this study is that only those who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 showed any cognitive deficits, despite structural aging,' said Jacqueline Becker, a clinical neuropsychologist and assistant professor of medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. 'This speaks a little to the effects of the virus itself.' And that may eventually help explain syndromes, such as long Covid and chronic fatigue, she said. What we don't know from this study is whether the structural brain changes observed in people who didn't get Covid will amount to any observable changes in brain function, Becker said. Adam Brickman, a professor of neuropsychology at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, said the study is a compelling narrative, but 'still a hypothesis.' It doesn't show whether the accelerated aging seen in people who didn't get Covid will persist long term, said Brickman, who was not involved with the study. If the brain indeed was changed by the pandemic in meaningful ways, then people might counter those changes by doing things that are healthy for the brain, he said. 'We know that exercise is good for the brain and keeping blood pressure at a healthy level, for example. We know that sleep and social interactions are important.'

This alarming health problem makes children miss school - and how we fix it
This alarming health problem makes children miss school - and how we fix it

Metro

time4 hours ago

  • Metro

This alarming health problem makes children miss school - and how we fix it

Scientists are warning about a simple health issue causing hundreds of thousands of children to miss extra days of school. Tooth decay and other dental issues mean pupils lose hours of valuable lesson time – with the poorest kids worst affected. The problem has been revealed by researchers in Scotland, but they warn that the tooth fairy could be even busier in England. Their study of over 260,000 Scottish children found that children with tooth decay missed on average five more half-days of school per year than those with healthy teeth. A staggering third, more than 85,000 children, were suffering from poor oral health. School absences got longer with worsening dental problems. Children who needed emergency treatment for their teeth or had to have them removed under general anaesthetic lost more than three days of lessons. Mariel Goulart, a dentist who led the research for Glasgow University, told Metro: 'Missing school, even just half-days, can hurt a child's learning 'This study shows that fixing tooth decay isn't just about health – it's about giving kids a fair chance in school, especially in deprived communities.' The study, which looked at kids aged 4 to 7 years old, was published on July 7 this year. Of the children being studied who had tooth decay, they missed on average22 half days, or 11 full days at school. Those without tooth decay missed only 15 half-days or 7 full days. When researchers adjusted these results to account for other factors, they found children with caries experience (tooth decay) missed on average five more half-days of school per year. The most concerning finding, however, was how children from poorer backgrounds could miss even more school due to dental hygiene. Researchers found that school kids in the poorest areas missed nearly twice as many days due to teeth problems compared to those in wealthier areas. Goulart said of this result: 'I honestly didn't think it would be this much. 'Child poverty is something that is really important for oral health and education outcomes are related to income levels.' Government research shows that pupils who performed better both at the end of primary and secondary school missed fewer days than those who didn't perform as well. Goulart says, however, that poor oral hygiene could be impacting learning even if kids turn up to lessons. She explained: 'What about the days when children were at school but in pain? Were they paying attention to the classroom? I don't think so.' As a result, the researcher is calling for free school meals to be rolled out more widely across the UK. 'Free school meals should be available for every child despite personal income,' she said. 'If you have a healthy meal, it is one time less a day that you eat sugar, biscuits or anything that's harmful for your teeth.' Over 380,000 pupils in Scotland will be eligible for free school meals in the coming school year. Scotland also introduced a supervised toothbrushing programme, called Childsmile in nurseries and schools from 2008. Goulart acknowledged Childsmile had successfully brought down rates of tooth decay. Indeed, the latest National Dental Inspection Programme results show 73 per cent of Primary 1 children (reception in English education) have no obvious tooth decay compared with 58% in 2008, when Childsmile was introduced. A similar toothbrushing programme was only rolled out in England in March 2025. Goulart told Metro the delay in introducing a toothbrushing scheme meant the number of children missing school due to dental issues could be higher in England than across the border. The government's new scheme aims to give 600,000 children in the most deprived areas access to supervised toothbrushing. Health minister Stephen Kinnock said in March: 'It is shocking that a third of 5-year-olds in the most deprived areas have experience of tooth decay – something we know can have a lifelong impact on their health. 'On top of this, we will reform the dental contract to get dentists providing more NHS work as we fundamentally reform the sector through our Plan for Change so it is there for patients once again. 'It's why we're delivering supervised toothbrushing to young children and families who are most in need of support as part of our wider plans to revive the oral health of the nation. 'This includes providing 23 million free toothbrushes and toothpastes through our partnership with Colgate-Palmolive to reach up to 600,000 children each year. 'We're already rolling out 700,000 extra urgent dental appointments for those who need treatment, but by focusing on prevention we can help children have the best start in life.' More Trending According to Department for Education data, the absence rate in state-funded primary schools was 5.2 percent in the 2024/25 academic year to date. Of these, 3.8 per cent of these absences were authorised while 1.4 per cent were unauthorised. A Scottish Government spokesperson praised the 15% improvement in dental hygiene since the introduction of Childsmile. They told Metro: 'Every child should be able to attend school feeling comfortable, confident, and ready to learn, and this research highlights the importance of oral improvement programmes in education settings.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Boy, 10, killed in coach crash back from Somerset zoo trip named by police MORE: At least 16 dead after fighter jet crashes into school in Bangladesh MORE: 'I'm flying them abroad while I work': How parents are entertaining kids this summer

Covid crisis was ‘detrimental to brain health'
Covid crisis was ‘detrimental to brain health'

Rhyl Journal

time4 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Covid crisis was ‘detrimental to brain health'

Academics suggest the strain on people's lives – from isolation for weeks on end to the uncertainty surrounding the crisis – may have aged the brains of the nation. They found that brain ageing during the pandemic was 'more pronounced' among men, older people and people from deprived backgrounds. Brain ageing models were trained on more than 15,000 healthy people. These were then applied to almost 1,000 people taking part in the UK Biobank study – a long-term study tracking the health of middle and older aged adults. Half of the group had brain scans before the pandemic while the others had brain scans before and after the global crisis. After looking at the scans, academics said that the pandemic 'significantly' accelerated brain ageing. This was assessed by their brain age, as determined by the scans, compared with their actual age. The research team found that, on average, the scans taken after people had lived through the crisis had a '5.5-month higher deviation of brain age gap'. 'We found that the Covid-19 pandemic was detrimental to brain health and induced accelerated brain ageing… regardless of SARS-CoV-2 infection,' the experts from the University of Nottingham wrote in the journal Nature Communications. Dr Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad, who led the study, said: 'What surprised me most was that even people who hadn't had Covid showed significant increases in brain ageing rates. 'It really shows how much the experience of the pandemic itself, everything from isolation to uncertainty, may have affected our brain health.' The research team also examined whether having Covid-19 affected someone's cognitive performance by examining the results of tests taken at the time of the scans. They found that people who were infected with the virus appeared to perform more poorly on cognitive tests when they were assessed again after the pandemic. Professor Dorothee Auer, professor of neuroimaging and senior author on the study, added: 'This study reminds us that brain health is shaped not only by illness, but by our everyday environment. 'The pandemic put a strain on people's lives, especially those already facing disadvantage. We can't yet test whether the changes we saw will reverse, but it's certainly possible, and that's an encouraging thought.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store