
New York's surging new Leftist tide is a chilling warning to the West
Many pundits, both Right and Left, express dismay about the surge of Right-wing populists, not only in America but across much of Europe and, now, under Nigel Farage, in the UK as well. Yet rather than a powerful, inexorable shift to the Right, we could just as likely be at the beginning of a new surging red tide.
To be sure, as long as the Left clings to issues like transgender sports, slavery reparations, racial quotas and the defunding of police support, the Right seems likely to prevail. But in a host of key economic and demographic areas, we could see a shift not to the mild Clinton or Blair centre-Left, but to something far more radical, and openly anti-capitalist.
The reason for this shift lies in economics. Even as neo-liberalism has delivered brilliantly for the elite classes, and the highly educated middle classes, it has never worked well for the aspirations of most middle and working class Westerners. Across the 36 wealthier countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the middle class 'looks increasingly like a boat in rocky waters', according to a report by that organisation.
Critically, home ownership, the ultimate symbol of middle class respectability, is fading out of sight for many. In the United States, the chance of middle-class earners moving up to the top rungs of the earnings ladder has dropped by approximately 20 per cent since the early 1980s, while life expectancy in the US has been declining.
So even as the vast majority of Americans reject the Left's cultural agenda, they also, by roughly four-to-one, favour higher taxes on the rich and government-imposed reductions on drug prices. Indeed a strong majority of people in 28 countries, according to an Edelman survey, believe capitalism does more harm than good. More than four in five worry about job losses, most particularly from automation. Inequality and general fear of downward mobility naturally lead to a rise in support for expanded government and greater re-distribution of wealth.
Current economic changes, notably artificial intelligence, seem likely to boost the ranks of the downwardly mobile educated classes. In the US, some 40 per cent of recent graduates are underemployed, working in jobs where their college credentials are essentially worthless. In the UK, roughly a third of young people doubt that they will reach their career goals. In the US, close to half of adults under 30 still live with their parents.
Low unemployment numbers hide the growing percentage of young working class people who now remain outside the labour pool entirely. In Europe, up to a fifth of the population under 30 is neither in school or a job, most resoundingly in Italy, the EU's third largest economy. In the UK, one out of seven aged under 25 is on the economic sidelines, the highest level in a decade.
This younger, economically marginalised new proletariat – sometimes called the precariat – constitutes the base of Mamdani's drive. His positions resonate here, notably frozen apartment rents, free buses and childcare – all paid by a rise in taxes on the wealthy.
New York may be the most alluring city in America for the wealthy with elite degrees, but it faces very high levels of inequality. Job growth has been weak and concentrated in low wage sectors like hospitality and tourism. And as incomes for most stagnate, housing costs have not done the same, rising to record levels this year.
But rising proletarianisation is not just a New York phenomenon. Radical redistributionism describes the policies of one potential future Democratic presidential candidate, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC). AOC, a House representative, is also the person cited as the true face of the Democratic Party in some polling. Ocasio-Cortez, also considering a run to dethrone Charles Schumer, the Senate Minority Leader, recently endorsed Mamdani, with whom she shares not only a political base but radical economic, anti-Israel and extreme green views.
The other beacon for the new Left lies in California. Home to the most billionaires as well as the highest levels of poverty in the nation, the Golden State has become a field of dreams for socialist groups like the Democratic Socialists of America. This openly Marxist group now has several seats on the LA City Council and seems on the verge of becoming a dominant force in California's largest city. Due to its more proletarian population, LA has replaced more prosperous and professional San Francisco as the centre of California economic radicalism.
Similar phenomena can be seen in Europe, where an alliance of Leftist activists and Muslims made Trotskyite Jean-Luc Melenchon a favourite among younger voters. German working class voters have embraced the hard-right AfD, with almost 40 per cent, but also Die Linke, which is thought to have won a quarter of the youth votes in the latest elections, more than the Social Democrats and Greens combined. Others embraced the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance, which mixes socialism with a strong anti-immigrant twist.
In the end, New York will likely not elect Mamdani, in large part due to fear of crime, economic dislocation, as well as the opposition of the city's still large Jewish population, roughly one in seven Gothamites. But Mamdani is only in his early 30s, and his rise suggests the potency of a coalition of young people, immigrants, and lower wage workers favourable to the radical redistribution of wealth and stomping out capitalism.
Unless proponents of capitalism awaken to these dangers, and address these concerns, the Left may yet rise again to the shock and consternation of those who so blithely celebrate its current demise.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump swears he's hearing ‘great reviews' after White House Rose Garden leveled
President Donald Trump has insisted he is hearing 'great reviews' for his makeover of the White House Rose Garden, which has seen its famous manicured lawn paved over to make way for a stone patio. 'We're getting great reviews of the Rose Garden, and we had to do it,' the president told reporters on Sunday as he returned to Washington, D.C. 'When we had a press conference, you'd sink into the mud. It was grass and it was very wet, always wet and damp and wet and if it rained it would take three, four, five days to dry out and we couldn't use it really for the intended purpose. 'It's a beautiful white stone and it's a stone that's the same color as the White House itself. And because it's very white, it's going to reflect the heat and it's not going to be very hot. Yeah, we've got great reviews of the Rose Garden.' The president's assessment does not match that of social media users, who complained over the weekend that he had turned a cherished piece of American history into a 'parking lot' and a 'concrete jungle' that looks 'devoid of life.' The garden was first opened in 1913, was planted up with roses by then-first lady Jackie Kennedy in the early 1960s and has hosted receptions for visiting dignitaries for decades, also serving as a venue for annual ceremonies like the Thanksgiving turkey pardon and occasional policy announcements, most recently Trump's swiftly-reversed 'Liberation Day' tariff unveiling in April. The redesign leaves its signature rose bushes pushed to the periphery to accommodate a design much closer to the president's Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Florida. The cost of the 'upgrade' has not been released although it is known that the work was paid for by the Trust for the National Mall, a nonpartisan nonprofit that has raised $75m in private funding for D.C. restoration projects since 2007. The president has enjoyed imposing his idiosyncratic taste on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue since returning to office and last week announced the construction of a new $200m ballroom. He has already had the Oval Office redecorated, wasting no time in switching the pictures, busts and ornaments around and introducing as much gold as possible. As CNN noted earlier this year: 'There is gold everywhere: new gold vermeil figurines on the mantle and medallions on the fireplace, gold eagles on the side tables, gilded Rococo mirrors on the doors, and, nestled in the pediments above the doorways, diminutive gold cherubs shipped in from Mar-a-Lago.' Trump also tripled the number of pictures of his predecessors on the walls, adding portraits of George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D Roosevelt, Thomas Jefferson and Ronald Reagan, amongst others. He further reinstated his signature Diet Coke button on the Resolute Desk and a bust of Sir Winston Churchill last seen during his first term.
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Musk's $29bn Tesla payout is a blessing in disguise
It is commonly believed that Elon Musk owns the Tesla car company. He doesn't. First, Musk only owns about 16 per cent of the company's shares – even with the approximately $29bn additional share allocation he's just received – so he is actually a minority shareholder. Second, Tesla isn't strictly a car company, even though it obviously makes them. It is principally a tech company, and its valuation and business model is radically different, and based on its lead on autonomous or self-driving transportation. Only recently Tesla boasted that a customer in Austin, Texas had their Model Y delivered to them directly from the assembly line, with the car driving itself for the half-hour trip. Tesla is built on self-driving technology, and that, in turn, is predicated on the continuing genius of Elon Reeve Musk. So that explains a lot about this headline-grabbing story about his '$29bn pay packet'. Such an outrageous package was proposed for and by Musk some years ago but, in the objections of some shareholders, a court ruled it out. It actually amounted to some $50bn in 2018, but times change and it seems Musk and his company has been devalued by his more recent adventures in Magaland. In any case, a more ingenious method of turning capital into income was devised so that the richest person in the world could be just that little bit more loaded. Before the share deal, he was worth around $400bn, so he's going to be a bit less than 10 per cent better off once the new shares have been sorted out. Enough to rub along. This story, then, tells us a few things about Musk and Tesla. It certainly seems to be a further signal that he is moving away from politics and back to business. The Doge episode and the association with Donald Trump didn't serve him or his business interests well. Contrary to hopes/fears that having him hanging around the Oval Office and Mar-a-Lago as 'First Buddy' would lead to some lucrative government contracts, now Trump is threatening to cut him off – especially bad news for SpaceX. Musk has also gone a bit quiet about the 'America Party' he has been planning to block Trump's ruinous budget by winning key seats in Congress in elections next year. Maybe Musk will press on with that, but it seems less likely he'll do much more than provide lavish funding. It's just as well. The Doge project, for all the hype, is over, and it may have done more harm than good to the wellbeing of the American people and, undeniably, the wider world in destroying the US international aid agency. The ill-advised salutes, the nutty tweets (as some of us still insist on calling them), and all the whooping about at the Trump rallies made Musk look more idiotic than evil, and were a grievous distraction. Not even he was able to help run the US, SpaceX, Tesla and whatever else is going on simultaneously. popular at those Trump-Musk rallies – goes, 'You Can't Always Get What You Want'.


Reuters
6 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil slips as OPEC+ output hikes counter Russia disruption concerns
LONDON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Oil slipped about 1% on Tuesday as rising OPEC+ supply and worries of weaker global demand countered concern about U.S. President Donald Trump's threats to India over its Russian oil purchases. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, together known as OPEC+, agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September, a move that will end its most recent output cut earlier than planned. Brent crude futures were down 70 cents, or 1%, to $68.06 a barrel at 1052 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude slipped 79 cents, or 1.2%, to $65.50. Both contracts fell by more than 1% on Monday to settle at their lowest in a week. Trump on Monday again threatened higher tariffs on Indian goods over the country's Russian oil purchases. New Delhi called his attack "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening a trade rift between the two countries. Oil's move since Trump's threat indicates that traders are sceptical of a supply disruption happening, said John Evans of oil broker PVM in a report. He questioned whether Trump would risk higher oil prices. "I'd call it a stable market for oil," said Giovanni Staunovo, analyst at UBS. "Assume this likely continues until we figure out what the U.S. president announces in respect to Russia later this week and how those buyers would react." India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million bpd from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. Trump's threats come amid renewed concerns about oil demand and some analysts expect faltering economic growth in the second half of the year. JPMorgan said on Tuesday the risk of a U.S. recession was high. Also, China's July Politburo meeting signalled no more policy easing, with the focus shifting to structural rebalancing of the world's second-largest economy, the analysts said.