I'm not keen on the Clooneys' ‘no phones' rule for guests
Hmm. I'm fine with shoes-off households (although you reap what you sow when it comes to the state of my socks or my toes). But the phone basket is reminiscent of those aggressively jocular pub signs that say: 'No wifi – talk to each other.' What if you're dealing with a family or work situation, need to hide in the loo and stroke your shiny pocket rectangle to recharge your social batteries, or want to show George a cool meme of an anteater posing? Yes, the Clooneys are the A-est of A-list, with attendant privacy concerns and young children. But if you can't trust people to behave properly, what are they doing in your home?
Most house rules imposed on guests feel iffy to me. My husband still recalls, horrified, a sign he saw at an acquaintance's that read: 'In this home, we eat, we clear away and then we talk.' Isn't hospitality about being expansively welcoming and tolerant? If you can't manage that, don't have people over (as someone with the relaxed and patient forbearance of a wounded honey badger, this is my default option).
But having talked it through with friends, I'm coming round. Clooney food would probably be excellent, as one said, and fellow guests fascinating – I wouldn't want to be distracted by junk WhatsApps from 'recruitment consultants' when I should be committing every detail of the menu, interior, conversation and outfits to memory for future boasting. So, on balance, I think I'm pragmatically, if not philosophically, OK with it. I'm sure Amal will be thrilled. I look forward to my kitchen supper invitation.
Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
David Squires on … his boxing forebear who died on the Titanic
Our cartoonist tells the story of his great-great-uncle David John Bowen, a champion who lost his life on the way to New York
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pamela Anderson breaks silence on Meghan Markle's 'rip off' Netflix cooking show
Pamela Anderson has finally spoken out on viral claims Meghan Markle 'ripped off' her cooking show with Netflix series, With Love, Meghan. Fans of the Baywatch bombshell, 58, were left incensed when the former working Royal, 44, debuted her latest TV venture - which bore eerie similarities to Pamela's Cooking With Love, which premiered earlier this year on Prime Video. The Naked Gun star Anderson opened up on Sunday's Watch What Happens Live! with host Andy Cohen asking her: 'On a scale from one to 10, how much of a rip-off did you feel like With Love, Meghan was of your show, Pamela's Cooking with Love?' Anderson, who was appearing alongside new love and co-star Liam Neeson responded: 'One. I didn't - I didn't really look, but I mean, I didn't invent cooking shows' adding that Markle 'is just doing her thing.' The drama erupted when Prince Harry 's wife gave People magazine some of her top domestic tips ahead of the release of With Love, Meghan, in March. These included how to 'elevate' a normal dinner – such as after ordering a takeaway. Citing Chinese as a favorite delivery option, Markle told the US magazine: 'I like being able to do a hybrid, but even when I get a takeout I will try to plate it beautifully.' And discussing her new trademark As Ever – after she failed to secure copyright branding for her original name, American Riviera Orchard – she insisted: 'It's a learning curve. 'I appreciate everyone who gave me the grace to make mistakes and figure it out and also be forgiving with myself through that.' The two former TV stars live more than a thousand miles apart, yet both were smiling and giggling in brightly lit country kitchens, filming aspirational cooking with photogenic friends and famous celebrities. Both are seen carrying wicker baskets of fruit and vegetables picked from their gardens, dancing with joy, and gleefully high-fiving their celebrity guests. Both series are even the same length: eight episodes. When Meghan's first episode was shown, it prompted withering complaints that she had copied Pamela's winning formula. 'So similar it's freaky,' said one reviewer, while others branded Meghan's series 'inauthentic' and 'copycat'. More charitable observers might put this down to coincidence, as neither show seems to deviate from the wholesome template of many an aspirational cookery program. However, while Markle filmed her series last summer, with the first trailer making its debut in January, Anderson's was commissioned back in February 2023 by Canadian broadcaster Flavour Network. And its trailer has been available for all to see since last October. Last month it was claimed Markle and Prince Harry's hopes of a new Netflix deal are 'dead' after their two most recent shows flopped, Meghan's lifestyle show failed to break into Netflix 's top 300 programs for the first half of 2025 and was even thrashed by multiple seasons of Suits. A second season of With Love, Meghan, was announced by the Duchess herself as the first season came out in March this year as part of the couple's $100million deal with the streaming giant, which expires this year
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The View's co-host slams Kamala Harris, citing out-of-touch interview
A co-host of The View and former supporter of Kamala Harris explained how the vice president made a major mistake by appearing on the late night show of Trump's biggest hater: Stephen Colbert. Alyssa Farah Griffin (pictured) torched Harris' recent interview with Colbert — whose controversial show has been canceled — as emblematic of the Democratic Party's failure to learn from its 2024 defeat. She slammed the party's messaging on democracy, and accused Democrats of being tone-deaf to the voters they've lost. Griffin described Harris' Colbert interview as a political misfire - and the perfect metaphor for the party's ongoing collapse. Harris, who has kept a low profile since her crushing loss in the 2024 election, reemerged in a sit-down interview to promote her upcoming book 107 Days, documenting what she called 'the shortest presidential campaign in modern history.' But the decision to appear on CBS, the very network that just canceled Colbert's show, seemed to raise more eyebrows than applause. 'I was struck by… I'm going to try not to be too harsh on this,' Griffin started. 'I'm going to CBS and this sort of trying to make a point that they fired Stephen Colbert, which many on the left called an attack on democracy - a man who was making $20 million a year, someone I hold in high esteem - but the economics of his show were not working.' CBS announced in July that it was ending The Late Show next May citing financial losses. But Colbert's allies on the left allege his firing was politically motivated, coming just days after he criticized CBS parent company Paramount for its legal settlement with Donald Trump. But Griffin wasn't buying the narrative. 'If everyone who was advising her told her this was a good idea… that is not where I would have made the grand comeback,' she said. 'He was losing $40 million a year. He was in the Ed Sullivan Theater, which is expensive, to talk about the plight of democracy at CBS, a network that's having its own struggles right now, rather than talking about the economics of the situation, and playing to something - a shrinking audience that is network television, not realizing it's not where the American voters are.' During Thursday night's interview Harris suggested that she had no current plans to run for governor of California. 'Recently, I made the decision that I just - for now, I don't want to go back in the system. I think it's broken.' But CNN data analyst Harry Enten (pictured) called foul. 'Oh, please. Not a chance on God's green earth that that's necessarily the case,' Enten said, adding that Harris is 'looking at the numbers' and seeing just how grim they are. 'She would be the weakest front-runner since 1992.' Griffin echoed such skepticism saying Harris' comments about democracy and the 'broken system' reeked of desperation. 'I think she genuinely believes what she's saying about the threats to democracy — I had, I raised concerns ahead of the election, some of which I share with her. But I also think that Democrats can go too far in these concerns,' Griffin said. 'Every time I hear something like Stephen Colbert losing his job as a threat to democracy, that makes people just roll their eyes.' Griffin's critique didn't stop there. She hammered Democrats for failing to adapt to the new political climate, saying Harris' rhetoric ignores why Donald Trump's message still resonates with millions. 'Donald Trump did talk about abolishing the Department of Education. He was open about what he was going to do. And the fact that Democrats couldn't listen to the American public and think, "Okay, something he's saying is resonating. What can we do to beat him?" - that's where I kind of, they lose it for me.' Harris' new book, 107 Days, set for release in September , is expected to detail her short-lived presidential run and offer lessons learned. In a video posted to social media, Harris framed the memoir as a path forward. 'I believe there's value in sharing what I saw, what I learned, and what I know it will take to move forward,' she said. But with polling showing her approval ratings near historic lows and Democrats still reeling from their 2024 defeat, critics argue Harris may be the wrong messenger at the wrong time.
