Anthony Albanese praised in editorial in Chinese state media
The editorial in the China Daily, however, took a shot at previous prime minister Scott Morrison for not having clear 'judgment and understanding' of the country.
Titled 'Common ground prevails over differences', the editorial was published in China Daily, an English-language news organisation owned by the Chinese Communist Party's Central Propaganda Department.
The release of the editorial coincides with Mr Albanese's planned meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing's Great Hall of the People.
'Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's ongoing visit to China is not only of significance for the bilateral and trade relations between the two countries, it also sends a message amid the changing global trade landscape,' the editorial started.
'Albanese's visit, which began on Saturday and will last until Friday, is notably long for a state leader, highlighting Australia's commitment to deepening ties and fostering stability amid the uncertain global landscape.'
It continued on to highlight rising tensions with the US and makes a point of criticising former prime minister Scott Morrison.
'Albanese's visit shows that the Australian side has a clearer judgment and understanding of China than it had under the previous Scott Morrison government,' it said.
Australia's relationship with the superpower soured under the Morrison government after Australia called for an investigation into the origins of Covid.
Tariffs were placed on some of Australia's most significant exports to China, including coal, barley, copper and wine.
The editorial noted that tension but praised the 'positive upturn' in China-Australia relations under the Albanese government as 'desirable' to restart negotiations on a free-trade agreement.
Mr Morrison responded to the comments in a statement made to The Australian.
'Having a character reference from the China Daily was never one of my foreign policy aspirations,' he said.
The China Daily editorial highlighted 'difference in terms of geopolitics' between the two nations but welcomed Mr Albanese's trip.
'Albanese's visit, his second since becoming prime minister, is intended as a 'friendly gesture' to ensure the positive development of bilateral relations on a stable track, according to his office,' it said.
'China, on its part, stands ready to work with Australia to take this visit as an opportunity to strengthen communication, enhance mutual trust, expand practical co-operation and push forward the two countries' comprehensive strategic partnership, as the Chinese Foreign Ministry indicated.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
7 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Four dead as Bangladeshi forces, ex-PM supporters clash
Bangladeshi security forces have clashed with supporters of ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina, leaving at least four people dead and scores injured, a hospital official and local media say. The violence erupted in the morning and spread as a new political party formed by students who led the uprising against Hasina in August last year announced a march toward southwestern Gopalganj district, Hasina's ancestral home, and her Awami League party's stronghold. Authorities later imposed an overnight curfew in the district. Earlier TV footage showed pro-Hasina activists armed with sticks attacking police and setting vehicles on fire as a convoy of about 20 vehicles carrying the leaders of the National Citizen Party arrived as part of commemorations of the uprising. Party leaders took shelter in the office of the local police chief as footage showed some of them were being escorted by soldiers to an armoured vehicle for safety. They later left for a neighbouring district with security escorts. Jibitesh Biswas, a senior official of a state-run hospital, told reporters that the bodies of at least three people had been brought in. The English-language Daily Star newspaper reported that four people died. The interim government said on Wednesday said the attackers would not go "unpunished". The use of violence in Gopalganj is "utterly indefensible," a statement issued on behalf of interim leader Muhammad Yunus said. Hasina's Awami League party issued several statements on X condemning the violence. It blamed the government for killing and injuring the "civilians". "We urge the world to take note of this blatant use of security apparatus ... and violent use of mob to exterminate dissenters for their ideals and political belief," one Awami statement said. Nahid Islam, convener of the National Citizen Party, issued a 24-hour ultimatum to the interim government to arrest those responsible for the Gopalganj attacks. He raised the prospect of another march in the neighbouring district of Faridpur on Thursday. The conservative Jamaat-e-Islami party condemned the attacks on the student-led party leaders and announced a country-wide protest in all districts and metropolitan cities for Thursday. Bangladesh has been in political turmoil since Hasina was toppled and fled to India. Nobel Peace Prize laureate Yunus took over three days after her ouster and pledged to restore order. He said a new election would be held in April next year. Gopalganj is a politically sensitive district because Hasina father's mausoleum is located there. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the country's independence leader, was buried there after he was assassinated along with most of his family members in a military coup in 1975. The National Citizen Party launched its "July March to Rebuild the Nation" on July 1 across all districts in Bangladesh as part of its drive to position itself as a new force in Bangladeshi politics, which as been largely dominated by two dynastic parties - Hasina's Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, or BNP, headed by Hasina's rival and former prime minister Khaleda Zia.
ABC News
7 minutes ago
- ABC News
New Chinese criminal software 'Darcula' tricking consumers into falling for fake websites
Peter Davis was unwinding with friends and red wine on a Friday evening in October last year when everyone got hungry. "We soon started to think about pizza," he said. The 55-year-old looked up his favourite pizza joint — Crust Pizza — via Google and clicked on the first result, which happened to be a sponsored result. He logged into his Crust account, and the site showed him he had earned a free pizza for his loyalty. Mr Davis ordered two pizzas for about $25. It took so long that he thought the transaction would time out, and he would have to do it all over again. "At that moment, my ANZ bank app sprang to life and notified me of a transaction to authorise," he said. He quickly clicked on the app and approved the transaction. But the payment processing wheel kept spinning on the website. Another notification from his ANZ app told him his payment had gone through. Except it was a payment of $570.93, and it had gone to a business called Soax Ltd London. The ANZ app gave him the option to dispute the transaction, but a message told him the payment was pending and could not be disputed until it was complete, which he thought was good news. "If it's pending, surely I can contact ANZ staff and they can stop the scam from completing," Mr Davis said. He spent the next few hours ringing any ANZ support number he could find, with little success. "I got through to a human in one instance, and she reiterated that she could do nothing while the transaction was pending, but gave me another emergency number," he said. "This other number did not answer, did not have a message bank, and just rang out when called." Mr Davis said he had to give up eventually and go to bed. On Sunday, the $570.93 transaction went through. He immediately raised the dispute in the ANZ app and explained he had been scammed via a Crust Pizza website. His theory at the time was that Crust Pizza had been hacked. The ANZ disputes team replied to Mr Davis a few days later and said that, because the transaction was authenticated using 'Verified by Visa' and approved with the ANZ Plus app, the bank could not "classify the above transaction as fraudulent" and was "unable to return the money". "Because I had authorised the transaction, that was the end of it," Mr Davis said. But he wouldn't let it go. He found Visa's merchant guidelines document that listed the accepted grounds and circumstances for a charge-back. "While it did seem my grounds were somehow not sufficient for a charge-back, in another respect, they were very sufficient," he said. He figured out that if he had disputed the charge based on 'payment made, but goods not received', he could get his money back. So, he opened a new dispute with ANZ. ANZ called him, he said, to warn him about changing his story. "At the time of the transaction, I genuinely thought I paid for pizzas that would be delivered. Later, I learned [it was a scam], but it was all still theory at [that] stage, so my new dispute was based on what I knew at the time of the transaction," he said. The bank agreed to process the dispute with Visa. But he needed to show evidence he had contacted the merchant for a refund. "The problem here is that there was no merchant, only scammers," he said. He tried to find the scam website again, but it had disappeared. Instead, the URL sent people to a YouTube video of Rick Astley singing Never Going To Give You Up. His bank account showed he had paid the almost $571 to a company called Soax Ltd London, which was a real company providing software services in the United Kingdom. The company had a website with an email address on it. A few days later, a response dropped into his inbox that said the company had found the account associated with the pizza payment, and it was going to refund Mr Davis the full amount. ANZ said it would not comment on the case. Mr Davis said he was left with lingering questions about the responsibility of Google when it came to fake website scams. They took money from a scammer to list a fake website at the top position in their search results. He also sent a complaint to Google's support team about the scam site being the first search result he was offered, but only received back a message that said: Google "has received information that your credit card details may have been compromised and you should remove this card from your Google wallet". A spokesperson from Google wrote in a statement that the company investigated the domain and could not find ads associated with it. They said on average, 90 per cent of ads on Google results were from verified advertisers, and the company reviewed ads for violations using artificial intelligence and human reviewers. The Soax company in the UK had been used by the scammers to hide their IP address and location, which allowed them to evade detection. It would have also helped the scammers harvest data from the legitimate Crust Pizza websites to make their fake site look authentic. It is a scam technique that has become easier for criminals to pull off thanks to Chinese software provider 'Darcula V3', a sophisticated subscription service that uses the software Magic Cat to duplicate legitimate websites. Brett Winterford, head of global threat intelligence at data security company Okta, said Darcula was an example of new and sophisticated 'phishing-as-a-service'. "[It's] marketed in cybercrime forums that provide attackers with rented access to phishing infrastructure required to launch phishing campaigns," he said. Phishing is when a scammer uses fake websites, texts, or emails to persuade someone to give up personal information. It's also called "social engineering" and is one of the top five scams targeting Australians. Mr Winterford said Darcula was one of several phishing-as-a-service kits that used generative artificial intelligence to mimic real websites. "Darcula [offers] a DIY phishing kit that can clone any brand's website," he said. Mr Winterford said the latest phishing software was challenging to defend against. "Organisations cannot rely exclusively on email content filtering or the services of telecommunications providers to block phishing lures," he said. "Darcula lures are sent to targets using messaging services like Rich Communication Service (RCS) and iMessage, rather than email or SMS." Using RCS and iMessage allows scammers to bypass SMS firewalls and spam filters and reach more potential victims. The only reliable defence against these services is password-less, phishing-resistant authentication. Mr Winterbone said passkey protection was a reliable way people could protect themselves against fake websites because passkeys only worked with the original domain and would not work with a fake domain. "If I registered my key with myGov, for example, my passkey will only work for and not for any other domain," he said. "Every Australian should demand that their online service providers introduce passkeys as an optional method of authentication, with a long-term plan to phase out passwords altogether."
ABC News
7 minutes ago
- ABC News
Albanese's China visit was predictable — and a stark contrast to Donald Trump's chaos
In a sea of global uncertainty, the one thing that stood out from the Prime Minister's visit to China this week was its predictability. There were no real surprises on either trade or security. Which is exactly what both leaders wanted. This stands in stark contrast to the rolling shocks and surprises coming from the court of Donald Trump. Whether it's constantly changing tariff threats, off-again on-again support for Ukraine, or uncertainty over what Australia will be asked to do to keep AUKUS alive, it's difficult to know what to expect from Washington. Capitalising on the current anxiety of US allies, Xi Jinping is hoping to present as a paragon of certainty and stability. He's hoping memories of the trade punishments and "wolf warrior" diplomacy dished out to Australia only years ago, fade. That doesn't mean disagreements aren't still there. In his lengthy meeting with the Chinese president, Anthony Albanese raised concerns about the lack of notice before Chinese warships conducted live firing exercises and a lap of Australia in February. He also raised, once again, the plight of detained Australian citizen Yang Hengjun. There's no sign China will change its approach on either front. Beijing has its own complaints about Australia, primarily over foreign investment rules. But in a clear sign Xi wants nothing to derail the strengthening relationship, he didn't even raise the Albanese government's pledge to end Chinese ownership of the Port of Darwin. Nor was it raised by Premier Li Qiang in a separate two-hour meeting. China, it appears, doesn't want to kick up too much dust as it presents a friendlier face to the major US allies in this region: Australia, Japan and South Korea. There is, of course, a much bigger point of difference that looms far larger than naval exercises or port ownership: The fate of Taiwan. China's president has repeatedly pledged to achieve "reunification" with Taiwan, by force if necessary. Xi wants his military ready for a potential invasion by 2027. Australia is holding onto hope that won't come to pass. The government's formal position is to support a "One China policy" (which means not formally recognising Taiwan's independence), while also calling for "no change to the status quo". Albanese repeated this position yesterday, while standing on that great symbol of enduring Chinese power and national identity, the Great Wall. He also pointed out this position has been held by successive Australian governments "for a long period of time … and is still a bipartisan position in Australia". This long-held position, however, is now being tested. Bipartisanship over Taiwan is showing signs of cracking. Reports over the weekend that Trump's hand-picked Defence Under Secretary Elbridge Colby wants Australia and Japan to "pre-commit" to joining any US conflict over Taiwan drew a swift rejection from Albanese. This rejection appeared to be bipartisan, at least initially. Two of the Coalition's leading national security figures backed Labor's response. "I do agree with the prime minister that Australia could never publicly pre-commit to a particular course of action in a particular conflict," Shadow Finance Minister James Paterson said. He strongly argued no current government could "bind the hands" of a future government on such matters. Shadow Home Affairs Minister Andrew Hastie agreed "it's unreasonable for Australia to declare a position for a hypothetical". Angus Taylor, however, had a different view. Taylor, who's relatively new to the national security space as shadow defence minister, put forward an entirely new position for the Coalition. He argues both Australia and the United States should commit to protecting Taiwan. "We should have a joint commitment with them to the security of Taiwan," Taylor told 7.30. This is not something previous Liberal leaders Scott Morrison or Peter Dutton ever suggested. Quite the opposite. Nor has the idea of Australia committing to protect Taiwan's security been something current leader Sussan Ley has mentioned either. For the record, Trump hasn't gone there either. His position on providing any military support to defend Taiwan remains unclear, in line with the US position of "strategic ambiguity". But Taylor was adamant. While arguing this wouldn't necessarily "codify every scenario" when it comes to a potential conflict, he insisted a security commitment for Taiwan should be a "priority" and should "underpin what we're doing in AUKUS". Most observers would agree that much of the AUKUS plan appears motivated by the potential for a conflict with China over Taiwan. So too, the build-up of Australia's northern bases. But neither the current Labor government, nor its Coalition predecessors ever explicitly said this. They have maintained their own strategic ambiguity. Taylor is now advocating something new. And he's doing so at a time of growing doubt over how committed a Trump-led America would be to going to war over Taiwan. Long-time defence analyst and Emeritus Professor of Strategic Studies Hugh White sits on the other side of the Taiwan debate. He argues Australia should be bluntly telling the US that Australia will not be involved in any conflict over Taiwan, because it's plainly not in our interests. In his most recent Quarterly Essay, the former Defence Department deputy secretary cuts through the hypotheticals to lay out what's at stake. "The conflict would quickly escalate into a very intense and highly destructive conventional — non-nuclear — air and naval war, with massive losses on both sides. After a few weeks, if not before, it would be clear to both Beijing and Washington that neither had any chance of winning," he argues. "Both sides would soon consider using nuclear threats." While some China hawks in his administration may have other ideas, White does not believe Trump is at all interested in taking such risks over Taiwan. Rather, he argues "America's withdrawal from Asia has accelerated", as has the shift from a US-led to a multi-polar world order. Albanese, for his part, isn't taking up Angus Taylor's suggestion. Nor is he following Hugh White's advice. The prime minister is sticking to Australia's long-held position. Predictably. David Speers is national political lead and host of Insiders, which airs on ABC TV at 9am on Sunday or on iview.
