logo
Conspiracy theorists spot baffling ‘proof' new Space Station clip is FAKE & say: ‘They are NOT in zero gravity'

Conspiracy theorists spot baffling ‘proof' new Space Station clip is FAKE & say: ‘They are NOT in zero gravity'

The Sun17-06-2025

CONSPIRACY theorists have claimed that a space station video is fake - because of a glass of water.
Online sceptics blasted a video of China's Tiangong Space Station which showed a glass of water in zero gravity behaving in a so-called unnatural manner.
3
3
In the viral footage, three astronauts are seen standing on board the station, with a glass of water on a table to their left.
The glass and the water inside it appear to be completely still - despite the microgravity environment.
Tin foil hat-wearing social media users poured out online - slamming the "unbelievable" footage and calling the whole thing a stunt.
Many speculated that water's behaviour on a space station should see the liquid rising into spheres and floating around the room.
Rather than stay in its glass, the water should be able to fly around the room in bubbles just like in the movies, baffled theorists said.
One confused user said on X: "Call me crazy but if I was orbiting the Earth at 17,500 mph in Zero Gravity surrounded by complex computers…I probably wouldn't risk an unconcealed glass of water resting on the table."
Another suggested: "The water wouldn't stay in the glass. It would be floating."
Although the online hysteria sent many conspiracy theorists into a debunking frenzy - there is actually a simple explanation for the water's seemingly unnatural behaviour.
But this didn't stop others jumping on the bandwagon, with another user saying: "That water should be floating around like bubbles."
Scores of curious viewers came to the conclusion that the video must have been filmed on Earth.
Incredible video shows how US will mine the MOON to help humans establish new home in space
One user said: "Apparently they are not in zero gravity as water stays in the glass."
Another weighed in: "Yep, it's fake. They are not in zero gravity."
A third user even asked: "So, they're not in space?"
Theorists were then sent down an even deeper rabbit hole after Elon Musk's Grok AI system started misinforming users in response to their questions.
In one response, Musk's AI chatbot claimed: "Yes, water would float out of a glass in a space station due to microgravity."
Still puzzling viewers, the video confused even more users who then seemingly lost their temper.
One raged: "This is ridiculous. The water wouldn't stay in the glass. Why do they insist in surrounding us in a sea of lies?"
Another blasted: "They are not in zero G it's an act. They are walking on an uneven surface to create a slight floating effect by they are still grounded."
While another fumed: "At this stage I think they are doing it on purpose, to wake people up.
"You can't tell them, you have to show them."
However, there is a rational explanation for the water's behaviour in the video.
The most important thing to note is that according to science, this is exactly how an open glass of water in microgravity should act.
Space historian Jordan Bimm told AP: "Water molecules like to stick to glass and also to other water molecules more than they like to disperse in the air.
"So if there is no external force, water remains in 'clumps' in the weightless environment, and in this case inside the glass."
How does zero gravity affect water?
by Harvey Geh
Water is composed of slightly positive hydrogen atoms and slightly negative oxygen atoms.
These pull towards each other, much like opposite ends of a magnet.
In zero gravity, water can form into floating blobs that drift freely.
But this effect also gives water a strong surface tension, which helps it stick to surfaces and hold its shape.
The liquid sticks to surfaces like glass because water molecules naturally cling to each other and whatever they touch.
When the surface tension kicks in, it acts like an invisible skin that keeps the water in a neat, round shape.
With no gravity to pull it down, tipping a glass won't make the water move.
That's why astronauts use sealed pouches and straws to drink, instead of open containers.
Water does not float out of glasses in space because of how its molecules behave in microgravity.
The molecules in water are strongly attracted to each other and to the glass, which keeps the liquid clumped together and stuck to the inside of the cup.
This effect, known as surface tension, means the water can sit still and appear as if it's behaving normally — even without gravity holding it down.
In fact, astronauts often struggle to pour liquids in space.
That is why they are usually seen drinking from squeezable pouches and using straws, not open containers.
It can actually be very hard or even impossible to get water out of an open container in microgravity.
The glass of water seen in the video was part of a lesson.
The clip was taken from a broadcast called Tiangong Class, where Chinese astronauts perform science demos for schoolkids back on Earth.
In this case, they were showing how buoyancy works differently in space, using water and a ping-pong ball to explain the science.
Another video posted on Chinese site Weibo shows one astronaut carefully filling the same glass with a straw before carefully sticking it to the table with Velcro.
One sharp-eyed viewer hit back at the theorists saying: 'It's not like you couldn't just spend five minutes researching this stuff.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gut bacteria linked to fertility issues in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, research indicates
Gut bacteria linked to fertility issues in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, research indicates

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Gut bacteria linked to fertility issues in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, research indicates

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have lower levels of a gut microbe, new research suggests. PCOS is the most common hormonal condition in women of reproductive age and yet, despite being a leading cause of infertility, very little is known about what causes it or how to treat it. It can cause irregular or missed periods, excessive hair growth, weight gain and put women at higher risk for type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, heart problems and endometrial cancer. Aixia Liu at Zhejiang University in China and her colleagues monitored 220 women across 44 cities in China, half of whom had PCOS. All were under the age of 35 and provided samples of blood, stool and inner lining of their uterus. Both those with PCOS and those without experienced similar pregnancy rates, yet the group with PCOS were twice as likely to experience complications, including miscarriage, preterm birth and gestational diabetes. The research also found those with PCOS had around half the amount of a gut bacteria called Parabacteroides Merdae. P Merdae helps convert a nutrient present in the gut called isoleucine into a healthy substance called short-chain fatty acids, which are good for reproductive health. Those with PCOS, had too much isoleucine in their blood and uterus because they had less of the gut bacteria to change into the helpful short-chain fatty acids. When scientists gave extra isoleucine to cells from the uterus, they also found it caused them to age and stop working properly. This research suggested a lack of the P Merdae gut bacteria meant it was harder to get pregnant, because the excess isoleucine was damaging reproductive cells. 15:55 But while this may suggest changing the gut microbiome could improve fertility outcomes, some doctors are sceptical. Andrea Dunaif, from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, told the New Scientist her research suggested fertility often improved for women with PCOS in their 30s, rather than causing early ageing of the cells as this new research would suggest. Yet, the findings may still lead to improved treatments for those with the condition. "The microbiome is something [where] you could intervene with different probiotics to alter the [bacteria]," she said. "So that is nice to have a potential target to treat because we don't really have any specific treatments for PCOS."

Is it OK to read Infinite Jest in public? Why the internet hates ‘performative reading'
Is it OK to read Infinite Jest in public? Why the internet hates ‘performative reading'

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Is it OK to read Infinite Jest in public? Why the internet hates ‘performative reading'

I consider no activity more luxurious than posting up at a bar solo with a good book. The creasing of a paperback in one hand, the weight of a wine glass in the other, the feeling of being alone in a crowd of people all make for a lovely evening. Or at least, I thought so, until recently, when two twentysomethings approached me during this ritual. 'Are you reading alone?' one asked. 'I could neverrrr,' the other said, and then uttered the universal mean girl slight: 'I wish I had your confidence.' Reading in public – not cool. Or at least 'performative reading', as it's been dubbed on social media, is worthy of ridicule. Not long ago, during the peak years of corny millennial humor, we celebrated @HotDudesReading, an Instagram account-turned-book that showed attractive men toting books on trains and park benches. Now, god forbid anyone (hot dudes included) enjoy a moment of escapism during the capitalist grind, or else they might end up in someone's mocking post. To quote the caption of one popular meme depicting an anonymous train passenger reading a Brit lit classic: 'Poser art himbo on the subway barely 10 pages into his performative copy of Frankenstein.' It's called performative reading not just because someone might be pretending to read, but rather that they want everyone to know they read. The presumption is that they're performing for passersby, signaling they have the taste and attention span to pick up a physical book instead of putting in AirPods. And we're not talking about Colleen Hoover's latest or a romantasy title; the books that qualify are capital 'L' literature: Faulkner, Nabokov, Franzen. The heavier the better. Of course, it requires a deeply broken brain to be this bothered by a stranger's summer reading list. Chalk this obsession with performative reading up to a wariness of personal branding. We can't even indulge in an innocent hobby without it being considered some sort of aesthetic curation. Last month, Hailey Bieber poked fun at her vapid image in a Vogue TikTok, in which she pulled out The Portable Nietzsche ('I love this one, probably my fourth or fifth time reading it, so good') and Kant's Critique of Pure Reason ('been taking a lot of notes from this one'). The hosts of the Run-Through, Vogue's official podcast, later called the post 'satire'. Another win for the books-as-props community. Ten years ago, John Waters's famous quote about how if you go home with someone and they don't have books, 'don't fuck 'em' came printed on tote bags. Now, is the prevailing wisdom that anyone who dares read the newborn-sized Infinite Jest during their lunch break an absolute loser? I decided to find out in my own personal mini-odyssey. The performative reading canon spans many titles and genres, and I thought about using Robert Caro's The Power Broker, Moby Dick or The Bell Jar in this experiment. Ultimately, I chose Infinite Jest, because it clocks in at over just 1,000 pages, I've never met a person who had finished it, and at many times I've considered picking it up but reconsidered simply because I did not want to be the dude on the subway reading Infinite Jest. I found a $9 copy at my neighborhood bookstore in Brooklyn and braced myself for what I was sure would be abject humiliation courtesy of the gen Z cashier. Instead, she asked if I needed a bag. 'I think so – it's kind of heavy,' I said, propping it on my hip dramatically as if it were a small child. She nodded for the person behind me in line to step forward with the apathy of someone who's not being paid enough for this. On the train, I held the behemoth in front of my face, angling so the woman with groceries across from me could not help but notice that I was Better Than Her. As I peeked over the page, I tried to clock any annoyance. But, tragically, she had things to worry about other than my reading list. When I got to Washington Square Park, the unofficial campus center of New York University and general young person shenanigans hub, I awaited to be caught in the act, secretly filmed for a TikTok ridiculing my performance. Again, no one cared – except for a gen X man who sat on the park bench next to me, exactly the type of guy who might consider David Foster Wallace a modern-day saint. He politely asked how I was doing with the book. I told him I was 20 pages in and hadn't quite hit footnote hell yet. He said to keep going and suggested that I literally cut the book into thirds to make it more manageable. (Apparently this is common knowledge among Wallace support groups that have popped up through the years.) After I thanked him and went back to reading, a crazy thing happened: I enjoyed myself. One of life's simplest pleasures is falling into a story and tuning the world out. But to get there, you have to stop worrying about what someone's going to think of you – or whether you'll unwittingly end up in a bitchy TikTok. And as far as I know, I didn't. All the finger-wagging about performative reading begs the question: where are we supposed to read the classics? Can it only be done at home, like a secret bad habit? For people who take public transit, especially trains with spotty wifi, commuting can be the only time when we have an hour or so to totally focus on a book (and on not missing our stop). So the next time you see one of us reading at a bar, coffee shop or the park, please leave us alone. This is not for you; we're just enjoying the vibes. It's a scary time to be someone who cherishes the written word. The country is in the midst of a literary crisis. We're told by college professors that students can't read entire books anymore, that gen Z parents don't like reading to their kids, that smartphones ruined our ability to focus on anything longer than 30 seconds, that AI slop will take over publishing. Don't be a chump. Read everywhere, and read often. And maybe there's still some steeze that comes from flexing an 'important' book. When I posted on Instagram about reading Infinite Jest in public, a friend told me she once went to a 'nudist' spa in Portland where she encountered a guy reading the book in a jacuzzi. 'He had the biggest penis I've ever seen in my life,' she wrote. 'It wasn't a performance, it was promotion.'

Pitiful Chinese ‘footie robots' stumble through match in hilarious scenes – & one ‘injured' droid taken off on stretcher
Pitiful Chinese ‘footie robots' stumble through match in hilarious scenes – & one ‘injured' droid taken off on stretcher

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Pitiful Chinese ‘footie robots' stumble through match in hilarious scenes – & one ‘injured' droid taken off on stretcher

TEAMS of football-playing robots have been filmed fumbling around the pitch as part of a new tournament in China. The Beijing-based ROBO League football tournament saw teams of humanoid robots kicking, scoring and tumbling through matches on Saturday. 2 Four teams faced off in a series of three-on-three games, with the robots operating autonomously using artificial intelligence (AI). Visual sensors in the robots act as their eyes, so they can identify the ball navigate the field. Using AI in the robots means they can kick, dribble, plan, make decisions, cooperate and shoot completely on their own. Human research teams sat on the sidelines watching robots exercise their abilities in motion control, visual perception, positioning and navigation, decision-making, and multi-robot collaboration. The matches went ahead with little human intervention – besides a near pile-up when one robot fell over and nearly took out two others. But despite being designed to pick themselves up after falls, two robots still required stretchers from staff after 'injuries'. Other robots struggled to kick the ball. It is touted as China's first AI football competition. It offers a glimpse into the upcoming World Humanoid Robot Games in August, which will also be held in Beijing. China is actively investing in AI and robotics, which is increasingly being utilised in sports. AI robot nurse with creepy 'face' taking over hospital jobs as it patrols halls, delivers meds and tracks patient vitals Cheng Hao, CEO of Booster Robotics, which supplied the robots, said competitions like these will help improve the robots more quickly. He also said that robots playing football with humans safely could build public trust in the future. Booster Robotics provided the robot hardware, while university research teams developed their own AI algorithms for perception, decision-making, and game strategies. In the final match, Tsinghua University's THU Robotics defeated China Agricultural University's Mountain Sea team 5-3. 2

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store