Doppel Raises $35 Million Series B to Fuel Enterprise Momentum in Social Engineering Defense and Digital Risk Protection
'We'll use these funds to double down on our core products, serve the rapidly growing demand from enterprises across all sectors, and build the first social engineering defense platform.'
'Doppel is quickly emerging as the market leading social engineering defense company by leveraging its proprietary AI-powered approach that is critical in today's environment as these new threats become increasingly sophisticated for corporation's brands, executives and employees,' said Elliott Robinson, partner, Bessemer Venture Partners. 'We've been blown away by the company's rapid growth and product efficacy in curbing the hyper-personalized attacks that challenge their customers, and look forward to seeing the company continue to roll out new offerings for the enterprise.'
'At Secure Consult, we view Executive Protection not just as a service, but as a cornerstone of modern risk management,' said David M. Gordon, CEO and Founder of Secure Consult, a Doppel partner enabling a full-spectrum approach to security management. 'Our transformative partnership with Doppel allows us to stay ahead of emerging threats, delivering real-time, intelligence-driven solutions that span the entire threat lifecycle—from discovery to resolution. Together, we're redefining what proactive protection means in an increasingly complex world.'
From domains to social media, email to apps, the Doppel Vision platform provides visibility and takedowns across all attack surfaces. It maps and dismantles attacker infrastructure at its source, unifying threat insights in a single grid. By combining advanced LLM technology and expert human analysis, Doppel eliminates blind spots, removes digital threats, and protects organizations at every level. And the proof is in the numbers.
Since its Series A funding round in January 2024, Doppel has seen 400% growth in enterprise customers, and 90% growth in customers overall, including 3X growth in annual recurring revenue (ARR) and 8X growth in expansion revenue with existing customers. Since 2022, Doppel has maintained a 230% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), signaling consistent and sustainable growth.
In addition, Doppel has been working alongside OpenAI to deploy their AI models and fine tune them on thousands of decisions made by its cybersecurity experts. The result is the first cybersecurity AI agent capable of autonomously identifying obscure social engineering threats and neutralizing them at scale.
Within months of deployment, Doppel doubled the efficiency of its operations team, with upcoming releases set to accelerate this trend.
'We're really excited to partner with Bessemer Venture Partners, a firm that understands what it takes to build a generational, category-defining company,' said Doppel CEO, Kevin Tian. 'We'll use these funds to double down on our core products, serve the rapidly growing demand from enterprises across all sectors, and build the first social engineering defense platform.'
About Doppel
Our enterprise-ready security platform is built to neutralize social engineering threats targeting your executives, employees, and third parties before they damage your business. Doppel Vision doesn't just play whack-a-mole with individual attacks, it links threats together, showing you threat actors' malicious infrastructure, protecting your brand and your customers against everything from phishing and fraud to deepfakes and brand impersonation.
About Bessemer Venture Partners
Bessemer Venture Partners helps entrepreneurs lay strong foundations to build and forge long-standing companies. With more than 145 IPOs and 300 portfolio companies in the enterprise, consumer and healthcare spaces, Bessemer supports founders and CEOs from their early days through every stage of growth. Bessemer's global portfolio has included Pinterest, Shopify, Twilio, Yelp, LinkedIn, PagerDuty, DocuSign, Wix, Fiverr, and Toast and has more than $18 billion of assets under management. Bessemer has teams of investors and partners located in Tel Aviv, Silicon Valley, San Francisco, New York, London, Hong Kong, Boston, and Bangalore. Born from innovations in steel more than a century ago, Bessemer's storied history has afforded its partners the opportunity to celebrate and scrutinize its best investment decisions (see Memos) and also learn from its mistakes (see Anti-Portfolio).
Series B Investors
Bessemer Ventures
a16z
South Park Commons
9Yards Capital
Sozo Ventures
Strategic Cyber Ventures
Script Capital
Sabrina Hahn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
The Merchant Banking Evolution In Venture Capital
Sign at office park for venture capital firms in Silicon Valley, Menlo Park, California, including ... More Bessemer Venture Partners, Signia Venture Partners, Montgomery and Hansen and Mitsui, November 14, 2017. (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images) The venture capital playbook is getting a major rewrite. After decades of the traditional model (write checks, offer advice, make introductions), a growing number of funds are morphing into something that looks more like merchant banks than passive investors. They're building internal engineering teams, offering shared services, and getting their hands dirty in the operational trenches of their portfolio companies. Will Manidis's recent observations about this shift toward a merchant banking model aren't just theoretical musings, they're describing a fundamental transformation already underway across Silicon Valley and beyond. The question isn't whether this change is coming; it's whether it will deliver the outsized returns that justify the operational complexity. The Great Unbundling of Venture Capital The traditional VC model worked beautifully when capital was scarce and networks were everything. But today's reality looks starkly different. With over six hundred seventy seven billion dollars in dry powder sitting across U.S. venture funds, according to PitchBook data, money has become a commodity. The real differentiator isn't the size of your check, it's what comes with it. This shift manifests in several ways. Some funds are hiring full-time engineers to help portfolio companies with technical challenges. Others are building shared marketing and sales operations teams. Still others are creating proprietary infrastructure that multiple portfolio companies can leverage simultaneously. The appeal is obvious: in a world where every startup has access to capital, the fund that can genuinely accelerate growth through operational support has a meaningful competitive advantage. But the execution proves far more complex than the theory suggests. The Pioneers: Who's Leading the Charge Several funds have already embraced this model with varying degrees of success. Andreessen Horowitz stands as perhaps the most visible example, having built what resembles a multi-billion-dollar professional services firm wrapped around a venture fund. Their vertical-specific teams, go-to-market support, and crypto infrastructure represent a full-scale commitment to the merchant banking approach. Lux Capital takes a different tack, focusing intensively on science and industrial technology with deep operational involvement that sometimes borders on co-founding. Their approach works particularly well in sectors where technical expertise provides genuine value creation beyond capital allocation. On the earlier-stage side, firms like Atomic and Pioneer Square Labs have built entire business models around hands-on company creation, complete with internal shared services and operational support. These aren't traditional VCs at all, they're closer to startup studios with venture arms attached. Meanwhile, AI-focused funds like Conviction and Prompt VC are betting that providing specialized infrastructure and engineering capabilities will become table stakes for investing in artificial intelligence companies. Their thesis: founders need more than money, they need technical co-pilots who understand the unique challenges of building AI systems at scale. The Economics Don't Always Add Up The financial reality of merchant banking-style venture capital presents significant challenges. Traditional VC economics rely on portfolio diversification, make thirty to forty investments, expect two or three massive wins to drive returns. The merchant banking model flips this equation, requiring funds to make fewer, larger bets with deeper involvement. This concentration creates both opportunity and risk. On the positive side, funds can potentially drive better outcomes in their portfolio companies through genuine operational support. The mathematics are compelling: if you can meaningfully improve the success rate of your investments through hands-on involvement, you can generate superior returns even with fewer shots on goal. But the cost structure tells a different story. Building internal teams, maintaining shared services, and providing ongoing operational support requires substantial overhead. Traditional VC funds might employ ten to fifteen people to manage a two hundred million dollar fund. Merchant banking-style funds often need twice that headcount to deliver on their value proposition. "The unit economics are challenging," admits a managing partner at a fund that has experimented with this model. "You're essentially running a consulting business alongside your investment activities. The question becomes whether the improved portfolio outcomes justify the additional operational costs." The Limited Partner Dilemma Perhaps the biggest challenge facing merchant banking-style VCs comes from their own investors. Limited partners (pension funds, endowments, and sovereign wealth funds) have traditionally viewed venture capital as a relatively passive asset class. They allocate capital to VCs precisely because they don't want to be involved in the day-to-day operations of startups. The merchant banking model disrupts this comfortable arrangement. LPs find themselves essentially funding what looks like a hybrid between a venture fund and an operating company. The increased operational expenses, the complexity of the business model, and the concentration risk all run counter to traditional institutional investor preferences. Some LPs have embraced the change, recognizing that the venture landscape demands evolution. Others remain skeptical, preferring funds that stick to traditional investing approaches. This divergence is creating two distinct tracks within the venture industry. The venture capital industry now effectively operates on two parallel tracks. Traditional funds continue to pursue the classic model of diversified investing with strategic advice and network access. Merchant banking-style funds concentrate their efforts on fewer companies with deeper operational involvement. Neither approach has proven definitively superior. Traditional funds benefit from diversification and operational simplicity, while merchant banking funds can potentially drive better outcomes through hands-on involvement. The competitive dynamics between these models will likely define the next decade of venture investing. Early evidence suggests that merchant banking-style funds may have advantages in certain sectors, particularly deep tech, artificial intelligence, and enterprise software, where operational expertise provides genuine value. Traditional funds may maintain advantages in consumer technology and other areas where network effects and market timing matter more than operational support. The Founder's Perspective: Partnership or Dependence? From the founder's standpoint, the merchant banking model presents both opportunities and concerns. The promise of genuine operational support can be incredibly appealing, especially for first-time entrepreneurs who lack infrastructure and experience. Having access to shared engineering resources, compliance expertise, or go-to-market support can accelerate growth in meaningful ways. But this support comes with strings attached. Founders must navigate the complex dynamics of working with investors who are also service providers. The potential for conflicts of interest is real, what happens when the fund's advice serves their interests more than the company's? How do founders maintain independence when their primary investor is also their primary operational partner? "It's a double-edged sword," explains a founder who has worked with both traditional and merchant banking-style VCs. "The operational support can be incredibly valuable, but you have to be careful about becoming too dependent on your investors. There's a fine line between partnership and control." The Global Perspective: Beyond Silicon Valley While much of the merchant banking evolution has centered on Silicon Valley, the model is gaining traction globally. European funds like Plural, founded by former operators like Taavet Hinrikus from Wise, are embracing deep involvement with fewer portfolio companies. Asian funds are experimenting with similar approaches, particularly in markets where operational expertise provides significant advantages. The global adoption of merchant banking-style venture capital suggests that the trend reflects fundamental changes in the startup ecosystem rather than regional preferences. As entrepreneurship becomes more global and technical barriers to entry continue to rise, the demand for operational support appears to be universal. Looking Forward: The Future of Venture Capital The merchant banking evolution raises fundamental questions about the future of venture capital. Will the industry split into two distinct models, traditional financial investors and operational partners? Or will some hybrid approach emerge that combines the best of both worlds? The answer likely depends on several factors. First, the performance data: if merchant banking-style funds consistently deliver superior returns, more capital will flow in their direction. Second, the scalability question: can these models work at the scale required for major institutional investors? Finally, there's the human element. The merchant banking model requires a different type of general partner -one who combines investment acumen with operational expertise. The venture industry will need to develop new talent pools and compensation structures to support this evolution. The Verdict: Revolution or Evolution? The shift toward merchant banking-style venture capital represents more than a tactical adjustment, it's a fundamental reimagining of how venture funds create value. The traditional model of passive investing with strategic advice is giving way to active operational partnership. Whether this transformation succeeds depends on execution. The funds that can genuinely improve portfolio outcomes through operational support will thrive. Those that add complexity without corresponding value will struggle. The market will ultimately decide which approach delivers better risk-adjusted returns. What's certain is that the venture capital industry is in the midst of its most significant transformation since the dawn of the modern VC model. The winners will be those who can navigate the operational complexity while delivering superior returns. The losers will be those who mistake activity for value creation. As the dust settles on this transformation, one thing remains clear: the days of venture capital as purely financial intermediation are numbered. The future belongs to those who can combine capital with genuine operational value creation. The question isn't whether change is coming, it's who will lead it.
Forbes
7 days ago
- Forbes
Hidden Insight Blocking Healthcare AI Adoption Right In Front Of You
Viraj Narayanan is the CEO of Cornerstone AI. In May 2025, Sam Altman compared AI to "magic intelligence in the cloud." Indeed, AI promises to rewrite the rules of healthcare delivery and research, yet most pilots aiming to improve the healthcare system stall long before they reach everyday clinical workflows. An April 2025 report by Bessemer Venture Partners suggested that only 30% of pilots reach production. The reason is rarely the performance of a model or algorithm. It's the incumbent position: the mix of people, spreadsheets and legacy vendors already doing the job. Unfortunately, many innovative healthcare technology companies, excited about the "magic intelligence in the cloud," overlook this key driver. Why The Incumbent Matters The Bessemer report pointed out that 64% of healthcare executives are willing to co-create solutions, particularly those that show clear and attributable ROI. To get a sense of what ROI is and to build trust, organizations need to lean into their customers and ask questions about the current state (such as how performance is measured) to inform product build. At the extreme, if you ignore the incumbent position, you risk developing a brilliant tool that no one buys because you're likely not addressing your potential customers' issues with the solution they've already invested time in learning to use, data to make it run and, most importantly, financial resources to acquire and deploy. By understanding the incumbent in a deep way, you can frame your AI-powered solution as a painless no-brainer to upgrade rather than a disruptive threat. In my experience working with customers, I've found that mapping the incumbent trims sales cycles, clarifies product road maps and accelerates impact. Answering a few key questions can help you succeed in relatively short order: 1. Who owns the workflow today? Who are the internal and external stakeholders? Characterize these buckets and estimate the split to get a sense of who you will be most often competing against. 2. How is success or performance measured? Quality? Turnaround time? Revenue capture? Compliance? Once you have them, try to rank them in terms of importance. 3. Is the problem a discrete one or contained in a bigger set of workflows? This is key to understanding how the problem you solve fits into the bigger picture. These conversations surface not just requirements but politics—budget owners, champions and potential blockers. Knowledge is power, and fully understanding this landscape will serve you well as you seek to replace existing solutions. Turn Insight Into Traction Now, what should you do with this information? I recommend breaking things down into two distinct buckets: product insights and sales insights. If internal teams are building a model on their own, try to open a dialogue about what performance means to them (i.e., time savings, quality, productivity) and experiment with a version of your product that is contained to the discrete problem. This opens the door for you to do a head-to-head comparison of the internal model versus your solution. If you can address product performance in an objective manner, you will earn trust and demonstrate value in a new relationship. If multiple vendors stitch together a fragile or fragmented process, offer an integrated alternative with a single solution. Simplicity is perhaps the best way to earn champions. If implementing a new tool or service is viewed as easy rather than requiring a time-intensive complete overhaul of systems or requiring users to toggle between multiple applications, you tip odds strongly in your favor. Don't tout another percentile of model accuracy if CFOs care about net new sales. Consider what matters to them, not just what you can do. Otherwise, you risk devaluing your solution in their eyes and having it come across as something that adds fluff. Change‑management playbooks are needed for productivity gains. To the extent you can, make an ROI calculator or demonstrate an explicit performance improvement across operational, product and business drivers. Hearing a pitch about something that works is one thing, but to have metrics to back it up removes risk. Pro tip: Tying at least one outcome to a metric executives already track (e.g., days to deliver analytics, percent reduction in manual review, revenue capture) can help your proposal land in the next board deck instead of the pilot graveyard. Call To Action The "magic in the cloud" is real, but healthcare won't change for the better because of another AI press release on model performance. We need real solutions that respect and then outperform the status quo. Healthcare vendors have to get serious about improving the lives of customers to make a meaningful impact. Once you've built a killer product that addresses a clear need, get out there by mapping the incumbent. The insights required for market penetration and scale are hiding in plain sight. By delivering intelligent tools, we can transform healthcare and save or improve lives. It's time to move boldly forward with precision and purpose. Patients are waiting. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Bloomberg
10-07-2025
- Bloomberg
MaintainX Funding Values Manufacturing Startup at $2.5 Billion
MaintainX Inc., a startup whose software helps monitor and maintain industrial manufacturing, raised $150 million at a valuation of $2.5 billion in a funding round co-led by existing investors Bain Capital Ventures and Bessemer Venture Partners. The San Francisco-based company said it will use the new funds to accelerate research and development, to launch its business providing software to the US government, and to speed an expansion into South America and Europe.
