Fears for vulnerable children as social media ban grows
The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure.
While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees.
"This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP.
"We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them."
This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said.
Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges .
From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube.
Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million.
Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media.
"It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP.
"But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey."
The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account.
Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices.
"They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said.
"Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry."
Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban.
The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure.
While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees.
"This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP.
"We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them."
This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said.
Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges .
From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube.
Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million.
Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media.
"It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP.
"But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey."
The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account.
Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices.
"They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said.
"Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry."
Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban.
The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure.
While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees.
"This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP.
"We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them."
This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said.
Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges .
From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube.
Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million.
Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media.
"It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP.
"But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey."
The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account.
Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices.
"They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said.
"Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry."
Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban.
The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure.
While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees.
"This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP.
"We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them."
This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said.
Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges .
From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube.
Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million.
Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media.
"It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP.
"But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey."
The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account.
Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices.
"They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said.
"Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
7NEWS The Issue Podcast: MP and competitive shooter Dan Repacholi shares 34kg weight loss journey
Hunter MP and competitive shooter, Dan Repacholi, has lost more than 30kg after he tipped the scales at 152kg in the months after missing the Paris Olympics. The Labor politician has shared his story with The Issue Podcast by 7NEWS, in the hope that more men will see their doctor. 'I ate a lot and drank a lot and enjoyed too much and got to 152 kg,' Repacholi said. 'I walked past a shop in Cessnock and saw myself in the reflection there and said some harsh words about me being fat, and a few four letter words.' The Special Envoy for Men's Health says he searched for a quick fix but a trip to the GP got him on the right path. Repacholi is on GL-1 injectable, appetite-suppressing drugs. 'I was embarrassed to talk to my doctor about how big I had got, and this is the doctor I had seen for the last 10 years,' he said. 'The food noise kept coming in my head and I wanted to eat and eat and eat. 'It is something we should talk about. It isn't something we should be ashamed of.' The former coal miner admits he still enjoys a burger and is known for releasing an annual calendar featuring the best hamburger joints in his NSW electorate. 'The 2026 edition will come out in October,' Repacholi says. 'I still eat burgers. I just don't eat three at a time. I now have one. 'Physical health and mental health are all connected, and we just need to go and see our GPs, to make sure we knock those barriers down.' If you need help in a crisis, call Lifeline on 13 11 14. For further information about depression contact beyondblue on 1300224636 or talk to your GP, local health professional or someone you trust.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Younger voters put negative gearing back on the agenda
Productivity is shaping up to be the word of the month for the federal government. With the big economic reform roundtable fast approaching, is it time for Labor to show some progress and make a move on changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax reform? And two years after the failure of the Voice referendum, the Prime Minister has a new plan for First Nations Australians. But what was left off the agenda at Garma? Patricia Karvelas and Jacob Greber break it all down on Politics Now. Got a burning question? Got a burning political query? Send a short voice recording to PK and Fran for Question Time at thepartyroom@
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Opposition leader slams pro-Palestine protesters for ‘throwing Sydney into chaos', diverting vital resources
Opposition leader Sussan Ley has slammed pro-Palestine protesters who shut down Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday for 'throwing the city into chaos' and diverting vital resources. The bridge closed down after the Supreme Court gave the protest - which attracted more than 90,000 people, the greenlight despite opposition from NSW Premier Chris Minns and the State's police force. 'It's not reasonable that we have protests that shut down a major arterial road,' she said. 'It's not reasonable that we throw Sydney into chaos for hours and hours, and I just wonder about the people who genuinely needed emergency services and had to wait or couldn't actually get them. 'I want to say a big thank you to our police and emergency services - over a thousand were diverted at the last minute. 'We can't continue to have these protests that shut down such an important area of a major city.' Premier Minns has since declared to examine the court ruling — raising concerns it could set a dangerous precedent for protests in NSW. 'We're examining the judgment to determine whether this is a precedent or there are circumstances in relation to the judgment that specifically make it applicable to just that form 1 application,' he told reporters on Monday. NSW Acting Police Assistant Commissioner Adam Johnson told breakfast TV on Monday the force had feared a 'crowd crush' and believed it had become close during a bottleneck on the day. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, however, was less critical of protesters — saying it was a 'peaceful' rally and natural for a democracy. 'In a democracy, it is a good thing people peacefully express their views. Yesterday's march was peaceful and an opportunity for people to express their concern about what is happening in Gaza,' he said. 'It is not surprising so many Australians have been affected… (and) want to show their concern.' While the Labor leader was supportive of the movement, former Labor MP Joel Fitzgibbon accused the protesters of acting like they have a 'monopoly on compassion' and called for greater acknowledgement of the role Hamas has played in the war. The ex-Defence Minister acknowledged that people across Gaza were suffering from starvation but questioned what messages pro-Palestine protesters were sending to the terrorist organisation. 'How many people walking across the bridge yesterday could name the leaders of Hamas? There seemed to be a lot of experts on the Harbour Bridge. But how much do they know? There's plenty of blame to go around,' Mr Fitzgibbon told Sky on Monday. He suggested that protesters 'seem to be marching for Hamas' and 'seem to want to persuade us they have the monopoly on compassion'. 'They do not,' he added. Richard Marles said the sheer numbers which attended made 'a very powerful statement' that Australians are 'rightly appalled' by the Gaza war. The Defence Minister on Monday said Australia would continue to call for a ceasefire and thanked protesters and organisers for being 'peaceful'. 'I think Australians are rightly appalled by the tragedy that they see unfolding on their screens, playing out in Gaza. It's a tragedy that we all want to see stop. It's why the government has been calling for a ceasefire for a very long period of time now,' he said. Sydney Major Clover Moore said closing a bridge was a small price to pay compared to the pain and suffering in Gaza. 'Compare that with what's happening in Gaza where all those people have lost their homes and they're either starving or getting killed when they're going to get food. What's happening in Gaza must stop and we stand with them and support them,' she said.
