Virtual Venue Selection and AI Walkthroughs: The New Standard for Wedding Planning in Miami
Thanks to new immersive tech platforms like VenueScope AI, RealityWed, and 360Knot, wedding planners in Florida can now offer clients stunning, hyper-detailed digital walkthroughs of venues — complete with live personalization, budget integration, and AI-generated setup previews based on the couple's tastes.
And for Miami couples planning luxury weddings in high-demand venues, this isn't just convenient — it's essential. Real-Time Personalization : As you 'walk' through the venue using a VR headset or even a phone, AI alters the lighting, floral setup, table arrangements, and even drapery color to match your wedding theme in real time.
: As you 'walk' through the venue using a VR headset or even a phone, AI alters the lighting, floral setup, table arrangements, and even drapery color to match your wedding theme in real time. Budget-Aware Previews : Want to see how the space looks with a $20,000 décor budget vs. a $5,000 one? The AI engine will instantly regenerate the layout and ambiance to match what you can afford — removing the fear of surprise costs later.
: Want to see how the space looks with a $20,000 décor budget vs. a $5,000 one? The AI engine will instantly regenerate the layout and ambiance to match what you can afford — removing the fear of surprise costs later. Multi-Venue Comparison : Within minutes, couples can compare venues across Coral Gables, Wynwood, Miami Beach, and even out-of-state locations side-by-side — without a single Uber ride or sweat-stained site visit.
: Within minutes, couples can compare venues across Coral Gables, Wynwood, Miami Beach, and even out-of-state locations side-by-side — without a single Uber ride or sweat-stained site visit. Guest Flow Simulation: AI even simulates how guests will move through the space — helping couples (and planners) optimize seating, dance floor size, and bar placements.
Vanessa Cruz, a rising luxury wedding planner Miami is calling this the 'biggest efficiency shift' she's seen in a decade:
'My clients used to spend 10+ hours venue-hopping. Now, I send them curated digital walkthroughs based on style, mood board, and budget. They only visit the top one or two — and by the time they arrive, they've already seen the layout fully decorated with their vision.'
Even better, these AI previews can be shared with family members or bridal parties remotely — perfect for international guests or parents living out of state.
Chris Farrow, co-founder of RealityWed, adds:
'Couples can walk through a venue at sunset, at night with uplighting, or during rain — and see exactly how their wedding would look. It's not just VR — it's predictive planning with emotional immersion.'
And let's talk pricing. One of the most frustrating early questions for couples is: What's the actual wedding planner cost Miami couples should expect — especially if they want help with venue selection? With this tech, planners are saving 20–30 hours per client on in-person tours and revisions — allowing them to offer more competitive rates or reallocate those hours into décor planning, timelines, and honeymoon coordination. Miami traffic and venue demand make in-person visits inefficient
AI helps couples see what they're actually paying for — no surprises
It enables out-of-town couples to plan South Florida weddings remotely
Reduces emotional fatigue from indecision and guesswork
Whether you're considering a rooftop wedding in Downtown Miami, a vineyard in Homestead, or a private estate in Palm Beach, virtual venue selection puts the power back in your hands — with clarity, control, and style.
If you're meeting with wedding planners in Florida, or reviewing portfolios for a luxury wedding planner Miami, make sure to ask: Can I preview my dream venue without leaving my couch?
Because in 2025, if your venue scouting doesn't come with AI walkthroughs — you're planning in the past.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Uber Technologies (UBER) Earnings Expected to Grow: Should You Buy?
Wall Street expects a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when Uber Technologies (UBER) reports results for the quarter ended June 2025. While this widely-known consensus outlook is important in gauging the company's earnings picture, a powerful factor that could impact its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates. The stock might move higher if these key numbers top expectations in the upcoming earnings report, which is expected to be released on August 6. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower. While management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call will mostly determine the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations, it's worth having a handicapping insight into the odds of a positive EPS surprise. Zacks Consensus Estimate This ride-hailing company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.62 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +31.9%. Revenues are expected to be $12.46 billion, up 16.4% from the year-ago quarter. Estimate Revisions Trend The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period. Investors should keep in mind that an aggregate change may not always reflect the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise Earnings Whisper Estimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. Our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction) -- has this insight at its core. The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier. Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive power is significant for positive ESP readings only. A positive Earnings ESP is a strong predictor of an earnings beat, particularly when combined with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold). Our research shows that stocks with this combination produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time, and a solid Zacks Rank actually increases the predictive power of Earnings ESP. Please note that a negative Earnings ESP reading is not indicative of an earnings miss. Our research shows that it is difficult to predict an earnings beat with any degree of confidence for stocks with negative Earnings ESP readings and/or Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) or 5 (Strong Sell). How Have the Numbers Shaped Up for Uber? For Uber, the Most Accurate Estimate is higher than the Zacks Consensus Estimate, suggesting that analysts have recently become bullish on the company's earnings prospects. This has resulted in an Earnings ESP of +0.20%. On the other hand, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of #3. So, this combination indicates that Uber will most likely beat the consensus EPS estimate. Does Earnings Surprise History Hold Any Clue? Analysts often consider to what extent a company has been able to match consensus estimates in the past while calculating their estimates for its future earnings. So, it's worth taking a look at the surprise history for gauging its influence on the upcoming number. For the last reported quarter, it was expected that Uber would post earnings of $0.51 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.83, delivering a surprise of +62.75%. Over the last four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates four times. Bottom Line An earnings beat or miss may not be the sole basis for a stock moving higher or lower. Many stocks end up losing ground despite an earnings beat due to other factors that disappoint investors. Similarly, unforeseen catalysts help a number of stocks gain despite an earnings miss. That said, betting on stocks that are expected to beat earnings expectations does increase the odds of success. This is why it's worth checking a company's Earnings ESP and Zacks Rank ahead of its quarterly release. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported. Uber appears a compelling earnings-beat candidate. However, investors should pay attention to other factors too for betting on this stock or staying away from it ahead of its earnings release. Stay on top of upcoming earnings announcements with the Zacks Earnings Calendar. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Stifel and Piper Sandler Raise PT on Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)
Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) is included in our list of the . A close up view of a hand holding a smartphone, using a ride sharing app. Ahead of its upcoming Q2 earnings release, Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) received multiple bullish updates in the past week. On July 24, 2025, Piper Sandler raised its price target on Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) from $95 to $103. The investment firm cited UBER's 31% six-month return, improving foreign exchange trends, and confidence in the company's affordability initiatives to retain customers. Piper Sandler expects $46.5 billion in Gross Bookings and $2.1 billion in EBITDA, aligning with Q2 consensus estimates. Meanwhile, on July 29, 2025, Stifel increased its price target on Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) to $117 from $110, maintaining a 'Buy' rating. The analyst anticipates strong Q2 results across consumer platforms, expressing growing confidence in the company's sustained growth and operational strength. Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER), headquartered in San Francisco, offers ride-hailing, food delivery, and freight services with its global platform. It is included in our list of the unstoppable stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of UBER as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 12 Cheap Value Stocks to Buy Now According to Warren Buffett and 7 Best Potash Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. Disclosure: None. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
Why 5.3% Of Workers Now Hold Multiple Jobs: The Full Story
The president brags about how many jobs he has created, goes an old joke. Someone in the audience says, 'I have three of them.' The implication, obviously, is that the economy is so poor that people have to find multiple part-time jobs to support themselves. The actual data show good news: a declining trend in multiple job holding over decades, with a recent upturn. And that upturn may reflect opportunity rather than need. The data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics begin in 1994. The chart shows a general downward trend from 1995 through 2014, with a slight increase in the years leading up to the pandemic. After the worst of the pandemic, the percentage of employed people with multiple jobs rose from 4.4% to 5.3%, the steepest increase in 30 years. (The data are not adjusted for seasonal fluctuations, so the chart begins in 1995 to show 12-month moving averages.) Multiple job holding is usually associated—as the old joke reflects—with difficult times. But we see no increase at the time of the 2001 recession and only a small uptick in the 2008-2009 recession. (Recessions are shaded in gray on the chart.) Perhaps the hard-times story must be combined with a good-opportunity story. Economist Daniel Culbertson of the Indeed Hiring Lab observed that the rise of the gig economy (as embodied by Uber, DoorDash and other contract work) may have provided opportunities that people found appealing. Years ago, a job almost always involved a schedule and a location where the worker would report. The gig economy provides opportunities for people to work their preferred hours—even if that means different hours one week than the next. And the employee may not have to go into a fixed location but rather can start working from wherever he or she happens to be at the moment. (The conversation occurred during Talivity's Talent Market Index briefing.) There is probably truth in both the need story and opportunity story (which is my interpretation of Culbertson's remarks). And there may be middle ground where a person in need looks at different options, such as work full time in one job or part-time at two jobs with different characteristics. A variety of ride-share (Uber and Lyft) conversations I have had point to both ends of the spectrum. Two former taxi drivers shifted to ride-share driver because their preferred job—taxi driver—was no longer paying good money. They both shared bad feelings about the change. (A propensity to tell customers about their bad feelings may have led to disappointment with a system in which riders rate their drivers.) Several ride-share drivers, however, enjoyed the opportunity. One worked remotely as a tech writer, but wanted or needed some extra income. He kept his ride-share app open while he worked at home. One day it started raining and surge pricing kicked in. His app alerted him, so he shut his laptop and got in his car. He only drove customers when he would be well-rewarded. Similarly, another work-at-home person would only accept long drives on the ride-share apps. He would take someone from the distant suburb where he lived to the airport, then take someone else from the airport to the driver's suburb, and then he resumed work from home. He didn't care to do short trips, and he didn't have to. Several female drivers told me they didn't feel comfortable picking up late-night bar hoppers. Their ride-share contract did not require them to work hours or locations they disliked. And some drivers don't speak English, but can do the job thanks to the rideshare app and map app working in their native language. Thinking over economic questions often leads to stereotypes. 'A typical job seeker is looking for ….' Or, 'A typical employer is looking for ….' A deeper insight, though, is that the world is populated with widely varying people and businesses. Yes, a majority may prefer regular hours, but some want to vary their hours, and others are willing to be on call as the need arises. Many organizations need their workers to show up on time every scheduled workday (think stores and fire departments) but others just need the work done in some reasonable time range. We also have some companies that experience wide fluctuations in demand while others have very predictable needs. With great diversity of employers and businesses, no single work model will be good in all instances. Business leaders may be able to take advantage of some opportunities to get better employees at lower cost. Most people would prefer to have some flexibility in their work hours to accommodate commuting delays or family obligations. A company that does not really need employees to show up on a fixed schedule can get some good workers by offering flexibility. Another example: Companies that have varying needs might be better off paying high wages for people who agree to show up on short notice, working only as needed. That could be cheaper than paying people a moderate wage to stand around just in case they are needed. There are many retirees who would like to do something outside the home but don't want to commit to a daily job. Their flexible schedules might fit well with on-call work. The business analysis begins by looking at specific jobs and determining what the company really needs, plus what would be nice to have but not absolutely necessary, and what is not needed at all. Then look for employees whose particular interests aligns with the company's need. And as companies such as Uber, DoorDash and Upwork have learned, there might even be a business in serving that narrow need. People interested in public policy should consider that some multiple job holders are happy with their situation.
