Children's mental health harmed by excessive screen time: help for parents
Globally, excessive screen use has become so widespread that 'brain-rot' — a term used to capture concerns about the effect of consuming excessive amounts of low-quality online content, especially on social media — was named the Oxford Dictionary's Word of the Year.
The effect on children is alarmingly evident, the society said.
Adolescents who spend more than five hours per day on digital devices are 70% more likely to have suicidal thoughts or actions than those who spend less than an hour a day. Even adolescents with moderate screen time of 4-6 hours per day are more likely to report symptoms of anxiety and depression than those with two hours less screen time per day.
A study in 14 countries reviewing children from pre-primary to high school found mobile phones consistently distracted pupils from learning. Simply having a phone nearby, especially with notifications coming through, is enough to break their attention. Another study showed that once distracted, it can take up to 20 minutes for children to refocus.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
22 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Should the constitution be amended to deny illegal foreigners access to public health care?
The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) has received backlash after raising concerns over the growing trend of illegal foreigners being denied access to public health-care services. The SAHRC said all South Africans, including documented and undocumented migrants, have a right to access health-care facilities, citing section 27(1) of the constitution, which states that: 'Everyone has the right to have access to health-care services, including reproductive health care.' The commission emphasised denying foreigners access to clinics and hospitals is unlawful and unethical, despite challenges faced by the public health system. This sparked outrage among social media users. ActionSA condemned the 'abuse' of South Africa's public health-care system by illegal foreigners, citing stricter laws in other countries that require proof of medical insurance before entering. It said the constitution must be rebalanced to put South Africans first while honouring basic humanitarian obligations in a lawful manner. 'It is unconscionable that a public clinic in Johannesburg can report that more than 70% of its patient records belong to foreign nationals,' ActionSA MP Lerato Ngobeni said. 'South Africa's constitution must reflect the reality of our limited capacity and place the wellbeing of its citizens at the centre.'
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
SAHRC faces sharp criticism amid debates over healthcare access for foreign nationals
The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) is facing backlash over its recent reaffirmation of the right to access healthcare services as a universal right for everyone within the Republic, a principle enshrined in the South African Constitution. The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) is facing backlash over its recent reaffirmation of the right to access healthcare services as a universal right for everyone within the Republic, a principle enshrined in the South African Constitution. The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) has come under fire for asserting the universality of healthcare access within the country's borders, a stance that has spurred heated debate among political parties. In its recent communication to stakeholders, the SAHRC reaffirmed that every individual, including illegal foreign nationals, is entitled to healthcare services as enshrined in the South African Constitution. This position, however, has led to criticism from various corners, including the political party ActionSA. The party vehemently opposes what it terms the 'abuse' of the public healthcare system by illegal foreigners, arguing that this influx strains an already overburdened system. It claims that Section 27 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to access healthcare, has been misapplied, creating a scenario where the rights of South African citizens are compromised. The statement also details that this misinterpretation not only places pressure on healthcare resources but also dilutes the quality of care available to law-abiding South Africans. In May, ActionSA took a proactive step by proposing a set of constitutional amendments aimed at reforming these provisions, which they believe have been exploited to exacerbate the crisis of illegal immigration. The party also highlights that while the intentions of the Constitution are noble, its current application leads to an untenable situation where hospitals are overwhelmed and lacking essential resources. It further questioned why healthcare responsibilities seem to fall disproportionately on South Africa, suggesting that other nations enforce stricter regulations regarding medical insurance for incoming foreigners. 'No South African can enter another country legally without providing proof of medical insurance. This is because responsible governments do not budget to provide public services to foreign nationals without limits. Yet in South Africa, we are expected to carry this burden indefinitely,' argued ActionSA. Adding to the chorus of criticism, local activist and politician Anele Mda voiced concerns on social media, suggesting the SAHRC's actions represent an unconstitutional infringement on South Africans' rights. 'We definitely need to petition Parliament to address the unconstitutional infringement of SAHRC on the rights of South Africans, acting as an unrepentant demagogue to consistently use its power as a Chapter 9 institution to advance/conceal acts of criminality by foreigners,' said Mda. The SAHRC says it is engaging with healthcare administrators and relevant departments to foster better conditions for all healthcare users. In a public statement, the SAHRC urged both the Department of Home Affairs and the South African Police Service (SAPS) to fulfil their roles diligently to prevent citizens from taking matters into their own hands. [email protected] Saturday Star
eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
A new medical aid built on the values that matter
What if we could rethink how medical aid works in South Africa? Not just a tweak here or there, but meaningful changes that reflect how modern South Africans live and what they truly need from a medical aid scheme. That's exactly what Fedhealth Medical Scheme and Sanlam are setting out to do with the launch of a bold new scheme. Following Sanlam's endorsement of Fedhealth as its open medical scheme of choice, the new scheme isn't just a new medical aid product, but rather a new philosophy: a medical aid scheme that truly meets the needs of South Africans. Asking the difficult questions First, Fedhealth and Sanlam asked the big questions to avoid building just another medical scheme. Questions like: Why is medical aid so rigid? So confusing? So expensive? And why does it feel like it was never made for people like… you and me? As of 2023, only 15.7% of South Africans belonged to a medical aid scheme, which translates to only around 9.8 million people out of a population of over 63 million. So, there's definitely room for improvement. Exploring the biggest pain points led to the creation of something new entirely. A different kind of scheme - with a blueprint of real values at its core to serve as guidelines, not just vague promises. Here are the values the new scheme is built on: Affordability - so you only pay for what matters to you. By tailoring a plan specifically to your circumstances, you will be able to pay for the benefits you truly need. Customisation - so your plan fits YOUR life, not the other way around. This means the cover you need at a fair price, rather than paying for extras you don't use. Inclusivity - because medical aid should work for more people, more of the time. Simplicity - because you deserve to know exactly what you're getting. No more decoding benefits or unexpected surprises. Trust - so when you need support most, you know your scheme will be there. A commitment to ensuring members know what to expect in terms of their cover. This isn't medical aid as you know it, It's medical aid built for the world we live in. Built on these values, Fedhealth and Sanlam will launch this bold new scheme in October that will turn the concept of medical aid on its head. The new scheme will be available to join from 1 January 2026. Change is coming, South Africa The partnership between Fedhealth, a trusted name since 1936, and Sanlam, one of South Africa's most established financial institutions, creates a synergy of strengths when it comes to medical cover and insurance. With its five core values, the new medical scheme is set to be a true evolution in the world of medical aid, with an offering that's transparent, trustworthy, affordable and straightforward. So, get ready South Africa. The change you wanted is coming. Follow the journey at
