logo
Rachel Reeves gets Keir Starmer's backing after she was seen crying in the Commons

Rachel Reeves gets Keir Starmer's backing after she was seen crying in the Commons

Rachel Reeves will be Britain's Chancellor for a 'very long time to come', Keir Starmer has said after she was seen crying during Prime Minister's Questions.
The British prime minister said it was 'absolutely wrong' to suggest the Chancellor's visibly tearful appearance in the House of Commons related to the welfare U-turn, which put an almost £5bn black hole in her plans.
'It's got nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week. It was a personal matter for her.
'I'm not going to intrude on her privacy by talking to you about that. It is a personal matter,' he added while speaking to the BBC's podcast Political Thinking with Nick Robinson.
Asked if Ms Reeves would remain in her post, Mr Starmer said: 'She will be Chancellor by the time this is broadcast, she will be Chancellor for a very long time to come, because this project that we've been working on to change the Labour party, to win the election, change the country, that is a project which the Chancellor and I've been working on together.'
The Chancellor has done a 'fantastic job', Mr Starmer also told the BBC, adding: 'She and I work together, we think together. In the past, there have been examples — I won't give any specific — of chancellors and prime ministers who weren't in lockstep. We're in lockstep.'
Markets took fright after scenes of Ms Reeves's tears spread, with the value of the pound and long-term Government bonds slumping sharply.
Kemi Badenoch said the Chancellor looked 'absolutely miserable' (House of Commons/UK Parliament)
In the Commons, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Ms Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and challenged Mr Starmer to say whether she would keep her job until the next election.
Mr Starmer dodged the question about whether Ms Reeves would be in place for the remainder of the Parliament, saying Mrs Badenoch 'certainly won't'.
Downing Street then insisted Ms Reeves was 'going nowhere' and will remain as Chancellor.
Allies, meanwhile, said she was dealing with a 'personal matter' when asked about her tears.
Mr Starmer, who stumbled on his way out of Downing Street for Prime Minister's Questions, faced questions over his handling of a welfare reform package, which has been stripped of key elements to limit the scale of a Labour revolt.
Changes to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) were abandoned on Tuesday, just 90 minutes before MPs voted on them, wiping out the savings that Ms Reeves had counted on to help meet her goal of funding day-to-day spending through tax receipts rather than borrowing.
As Ms Reeves left the Commons after Prime Minister's Questions, her sister, Ellie Reeves, took her hand in an apparent show of support.
Reports suggested Ms Reeves had been involved in an altercation with Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle shortly before Prime Minister's Questions.
Mr Hoyle was said to have censured Ms Reeves for her approach to Treasury Questions earlier in the week, and the Chancellor reportedly responded that she had been 'under so much pressure'.
A spokeswoman for Mr Hoyle said: 'No comment.'
Asked why Mr Starmer did not confirm in the Commons that he still had faith in Ms Reeves, his press secretary told reporters: 'He has done so repeatedly.
'The Chancellor is going nowhere. She has the prime minister's full backing.
'He has said it plenty of times, he doesn't need to repeat it every time the Leader of the Opposition speculates about Labour politicians.'
Asked whether Ms Starmer still had confidence in Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, the press secretary said: 'Yes.'
Labour has promised that income tax, employee national insurance contributions and VAT will not be increased, restricting Ms Reeves's options for raising money if she does look to hike taxes.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies's incoming director, Helen Miller, said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely.
'This will doubtless intensify the speculation over the summer about which taxes may rise and by how much.'
Mr Starmer declined to rule out tax rises later this year, telling MPs: 'No prime minister or chancellor ever stands at the despatch box and writes budgets in the future.'
Read More
Europe's heatwave moves east as row erupts in France over air conditioning
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Airline with UK flights increases free hand luggage allowance in rare move
Airline with UK flights increases free hand luggage allowance in rare move

The Irish Sun

time7 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

Airline with UK flights increases free hand luggage allowance in rare move

AN airline with flights to and from the UK has increased its cabin luggage allowance to what is being dubbed as "class-leading" dimensions. Aurigny - Guernsey's airline - has increased its 3 A British airline has increased its cabin luggage allowance to what is being dubbed as "class-leading" dimensions Credit: Alamy 3 Aurigny - Guernsey's airline - has increased its baggage allowance from 55x36x20cm to 55x40x23cm Credit: Alamy Travellers are allowed to bring one small personal item, such as a laptop bag or handbag, as well. This takes the total combined weight of carry-on baggage to 10kg. Aurigny Airlines - which connects the The new size restrictions are for flights from Read more on airlines According to the "We understand that people's personal items and belongings matter. "Whether it's a laptop, medication, or just the things that make you feel at home, you shouldn't have to fight for space to bring them." In comparison, easyJet allows a free small bag measuring 45cm x 36cm x 20cm and passengers can then purchase a cabin bag that can measure up to 56cm x 45cm x 25cm. Most read in News Travel Then for Ryanair, passengers can have a free small bag measuring 40cm x 20cm x 25cm and can also purchase a cabin bag, which can measure up to 55cm x 40cm x 20cm. Aurigny's main competitors, which include Loganair, Eastern Airways, Blue Islands and Aer Lingus, all offer less baggage allowance. I tested the viral £17.99 Amazon underseat cabin bag to see how many outfits I could fit in Loganair offers a six-kilogram cabin bag and a handbag, Both Aer Lingus and Eastern Airways offer just a cabin bag up to seven kilograms. And then, Blue Islands offers just a cabin bag too, but up to 10kg. The budget carrier currently allows travellers to have a free bag measuring 40cm x 25cm x 20cm into the cabin. But now, new rules will change this to 40cm x 30cm x 15cm. The new rules are expected to be rolled out later this month. Plus, five great hacks to master hand luggage packing and save serious cash on plane tickets. 3 Aurigny's main competitors, which include Loganair, Eastern, Blue Islands and Aer Lingus, all offer less baggage allowance Credit: Alamy

Ashling Murphy's partner 'finally free' as he settles defamation case against BBC
Ashling Murphy's partner 'finally free' as he settles defamation case against BBC

Extra.ie​

time9 hours ago

  • Extra.ie​

Ashling Murphy's partner 'finally free' as he settles defamation case against BBC

Ryan Casey – the partner of murdered schoolteacher Ashling Murphy – said ­yesterday he is 'finally free' to advocate for a 'better and safer Ireland' after ­settling his High Court claim for defamation against the BBC. Mr Casey, 27, sued the British broadcaster following an episode of political programme The View that was shown live on November 30, 2023, and on which Irish Times journalist Kitty Holland appeared. He alleged it contained criticism of the victim impact statement he had given at the sentencing hearing of Jozef Puska, with a suggestion it could excite anti-migrant sentiment. Ashling Murphy and Ryan Casey. Pic: Facebook Puska, originally from Slovakia, stabbed 23-year-old Ms Murphy 11 times in the neck in a random attack in January 2022 along the Grand Canal in Tullamore, Co. Offaly. Mr Casey is understood to have received substantial damages, as well as a contribution towards his costs, amounting to a six-figure sum. In his victim impact statement, he had said: 'It just sickens me to the core that someone can come to this country, be fully supported in terms of social housing, social welfare, and free medical care for over ten years, never hold down a legitimate job and never once contribute to society in any way, shape or form [and] can commit such a horrendous, evil act of incomprehensible violence on such a beautiful, loving and talented person.' Ashling Murphy and Ryan Casey. Pic: Facebook He added: 'This country needs to wake up; this time, things have got to change.' In a statement read to the High Court by barrister Alan Keating, the BBC said it acknowledged Mr Casey's personal tragedy, but it stood by the journalism involved. It said the programme had discussed Mr Ryan's victim impact statement and had debated serious issues of public interest. Ashling Murphy and Ryan Casey. Pic: Collect 'The BBC, however, is happy to clarify that it does not consider Ryan Casey to be a criminal or a racist, or someone guilty of or attempting to incite racial hatred, or someone seeking to pose as a hero of the far right,' the broadcaster said. 'The statement clarifies any unintentional inferences that could have been drawn from the broadcast and has enabled the BBC and Ryan Casey to resolve the matter amicably.' Ronan Lupton, Mr Casey's barrister, said the case could be struck out by Judge Alex Owens. Speaking outside court ­yesterday, Mr Casey – who met Ms Murphy at an underage disco in 2013 – said: 'Today marks the end of a long and difficult chapter of frustration and censorship. I took this legal action against the BBC not solely out of anger, but out of a need for accountability and dignity for Ashling, for myself, our families, and for all victims who deserve to have their voices heard without such harsh criticism or judgment.' Thanking those people who had supported him, he continued: 'This was never just about me, it was about truth, fairness and decency. 'I now move forward, finally free to use my voice again, to honour Ashling and to advocate for the changes we desperately require in this country, for the increased safety measures we so clearly need, and for a society that listens to its people, free of gaslighting, blacklisting or censorship. We all have a lot more in common than what separates us. Let's honour Ashling by building a better and safer Ireland. We all know we can do so much better.' Jozef Puska's brothers, Marek and Lubomir Jr, were convicted last month of withholding information, while his sisters-in-law, Jozefina Grundzova and Viera Gaziova, were found guilty of burning his clothes after the ­murder. All four family members were living with Jozef Puska, his wife and 14 children in Co Offaly at the time. Puska's wife, Lucia Istokova, pleaded guilty to withholding information. The DPP said the two brothers misled gardaí and withheld 'crucial, relevant and significant' information when they gave voluntary interviews in Tullamore two days after Ms Murphy's death. They did not tell gardaí that Jozef Puska returned home on the night of the murder with visible injuries, admitted to killing or seriously injuring a woman with a knife and subsequently travelled to Dublin. In her closing speech, prosecutor Anne Marie Lawlor told the jury that all the defendants knew what Jozef Puska had done shortly after 9.30pm on the night of the murder. She said the killer told Lubomir Jr and Marek, who then relayed it to the others in the house. Ms Lawlor said in her closing address that the only reason for the withholding of evidence or the burning of clothes was that the defendants didn't want Jozef Puska to be apprehended or prosecuted for murder.

Eir's UK arm sues BT over Northern Ireland contract
Eir's UK arm sues BT over Northern Ireland contract

Irish Independent

time10 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Eir's UK arm sues BT over Northern Ireland contract

©Press Association A telecommunications company lost millions of pounds of profit due to "unlawful conduct" by BT in a contract battle, the English High Court has been told, in what is claimed to be one of the first cases of its kind to be heard in British courts. Eircom UK Limited, part of the Eir group, is suing BT over the tendering of the Northern Ireland Public Sector Shared Network contract (NIPSSN), which was awarded to BT in 2018 and is worth up to £400m. Register for free to read this story Register and create a profile to get access to our free stories. You'll also unlock more free stories each week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store