Safest places to live in UK in nuclear attack as expert issues dire warning
Following US attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran, fears over escalating nuclear conflict are being felt across the globe, including the UK. And many have expressed concerns over where exactly would be safest, in the event of a catastrophe closer to home.
Iran 's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has warned there will be "everlasting consequences" following US President Donald Trump's confirmation that "great American Warriors" had carried out a "very successful attack" on the sites of Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
Taking to social media platform X, Mr Araghchi wrote: "Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour. In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests, and people."
And as fears over the potential for "World War III" continue to rumble, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has issued the following statement: "Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.
"The situation in the Middle East remains volatile, and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis."
Here, the Mirror looks at the safest places to live in the UK, should the worst come to pass.
According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP): "The best way to protect you and your family before, during, and after a nuclear blast is getting inside the centre of a building or basement. On August 6, 1945, Mr Eizo Nomura was in the basement of a building in Hiroshima, about 170 meters from ground zero. He survived the atomic bombing and died in 1982 at the age of 84. Most people within a few hundred metres of a nuclear detonation are not likely to survive, especially if unprepared.
"Be inside before the fallout arrives. After a detonation, you will have 10 minutes or more to find an adequate shelter before fallout arrives. If a multi-story building or a basement can be safely reached within a few minutes of the explosion, go there immediately. The safest buildings have brick or concrete walls. Underground parking garages and subways can also provide good shelter."
With this in mind, many would automatically assume that London, with its vast underground network, would be the safest location, with the tube tunnels allowing citizens some protection from the blast. This is, of course, where many Londoners sought refuge during the dark days of the Blitz.
However, there are mixed opinions on this front with experts fearing that modern nuclear weapons could penetrate much further than the bombs of World War II, meaning even the 58-metre-deep Hampstead station may still be too close to the surface.
Andrew Futter, a Professor of International Politics at the University of Leicester, previously advised My London that the Underground "probably wouldn't be deep enough if there was a direct hit".
Therefore, in the event that a nation targets one of the UK's major cities - from London to Edinburgh - Brits would need to be outside of the blast zone to have the best chance of survival.
When it comes to the reach of nuclear blasts, there are several factors to bear in mind including a radiation radius of 153 km2, a fireball radius of approximately 197 km2, an air blast radius between 321 km2 and 1,420 km2 and a thermal radiation radius of 12,960 km2.
Although these distances can vary depending on weather conditions, property researchers have previously put together a list of places which should be safer than the cities. These 20 locations, listed by property portal EMoov back in 2017, are outside of the immediate range of blasts on major cities...
Cornwall
Weymouth
Folkestone
Dover
Margate
Clacton-on-Sea
Felixstowe
Brixworth
Bideford
Aberystwyth
Skegness
Isle of Anglesey
Barrow in Furness
Lancaster
Whitby
Carlisle
Dumfries
Berwick-upon-Tweed
Inverness
However, some of these areas are still close enough to blast sites to be affected by radiation swept over by winds. Therefore, the remote island Foula, on the Shetland Isles, could well be the safest place in the UK in this instance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
27 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Industrial firms to face £685m property tax hit after energy support pledge
Just a week after the Government's industrial strategy revealed electricity costs for about 7,000 energy-intensive businesses would be cut by scrapping green levies, estimates suggest many of the larger firms are set to see their business rates bill soar. Around 4,300 large-scale industrial properties in England – across manufacturing sectors such as automotive, aerospace and chemicals – will face a new business rates levy costing them around £685 million a year, according to tax and software firm Ryan. The levy, which comes into effect in April, is part of next year's business rates revaluation and is being used to fund tax breaks for high street retail, leisure and hospitality sectors, Ryan said. Alex Probyn, a practice leader of property tax at Ryan, said that while the industrial strategy move to reduce energy bills was welcome, 'it's perverse to then ask those very same businesses to foot the bill for high street tax cuts through higher business rates from 2026, a year before the energy support will come into effect'. He added: 'If the goal is to boost UK competitiveness, we need a coherent strategy that tackles the total burden of fixed costs — not one that gives with one hand and then takes with the other.' It follows Sir Keir Starmer's 10-year industrial strategy, which includes a measure to cut bills by up to 25% to help firms compete with foreign rivals. Under the new plans, a new British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme from 2027 will cut costs by up to £40 per megawatt hour for over 7,000 manufacturing firms by exempting them from levies on bills including the renewables obligation, feed-in tariffs and the capacity market. Around 500 of the most energy-intensive firms, including the steel industry, chemicals and glass-making, will also see their network charges cut. They currently get a 60% discount through the British Industry Supercharger scheme, which will increase to 90% from 2026. But Ryan is calling for more coherence in strategy from the Government, cautioning that any benefit from lower energy bills risks being undermined by increased property taxation. UK firms already face the highest property taxes in the developed world and more than double the European Union average, according to the firm. Mr Probyn said: 'We're seeing two opposing policies rolled out simultaneously. One aims to support industry by reducing energy costs. 'The other increases a key fixed operational cost — property tax — on the very same businesses to subsidise other sectors. 'There is no coherent strategy; it's a contradiction.' A government spokesperson said: 'We are making it easier and quicker for businesses to invest and grow by cutting British industrial electricity costs with unprecedented new support which will cut electricity costs by around 20-25% for thousands of businesses. 'Our reform to the business rates system will also create a fairer business rates system that protects the high street, supports investment and levels the playing field. 'A new, permanently lower business rates in 2026 will benefit over 280,000 retail, hospitality and leisure business properties and will be sustainably funded by a new, higher rate on the 1% of most valuable business properties.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump threatens to cut off New York City funds if Mamdani ‘doesn't behave'
Donald Trump on Sunday threatened to cut New York City off from federal funds if favored mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, 'doesn't behave himself' should he be elected. Mamdani, meanwhile, denied that he was – as the president said – a communist. But he reaffirmed his commitment to raise taxes on the wealthiest New Yorkers while saying: 'I don't think that we should have billionaires.' In an interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Trump argued that a Mamdani victory was 'inconceivable' because he perceived the candidate to be 'a pure communist'. He added: 'Let's say this – if he does get in, I'm going to be president, and he's going to have to do the right thing, or they're not getting any money. He's got to do the right thing or they're not getting any money.' More than $100bn flows to the city from the federal government through different entities and programs, according to the city's comptroller last year. Speaking Sunday with NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday, Mamdani said, 'no, I am not' a communist. He also said that he had 'already had to start to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am – ultimately because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for'. Mamdani said he was inspired by the US civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr, who once remarked: 'Call it democracy or call it democratic socialism. There has to be a better distribution of wealth for all of God's children in this country.' He then reiterated his intent to raise taxes on New York's wealthiest as part of a campaign pledge 'to shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods'. 'I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality – and ultimately what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' Mamdani said. 'And I look forward to work with everyone, including billionaires, to make a city that is fairer for all of them.' Mamdani said the proposal reflected 'a description of what we see right now'. 'It's not driven by race,' he said. 'It's more of an assessment of what neighborhoods are being undertaxed versus overtaxed. 'It is not to work backwards from a racial assessment of neighborhoods or our city. Rather, it's to ensure that we actually have an equal playing field.' Many New Yorkers and moderate Democratic politicians have expressed concern over Mamdani's win over former governor Andrew Cuomo in the 24 June primary for the Democratic nomination. Among those to endorse him was progressive congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. But he has not been endorsed by many other prominent Democratic party figures, including the New York governor, Kathy Hochul, who said coolly after his win: 'Obviously, there's areas of difference in our positions, but I also think we need to have those conversations.' Mamdani said on Sunday that he was looking forward to discussions with Hochul, saying: 'Ultimately, my policies, my vision, it's driven by an assessment of what's actually happening.' Asked if he thought moderate Democrats were afraid of him, Mamdani said: 'I think that people are catching up to this election. 'Ultimately what we're showing is that by putting working people first, by returning to the roots of the Democratic party, we actually have a path out of this moment where we're facing authoritarianism in Washington DC' under the Trump administration. In his comments on Mamdani's having secured the Democrats' nomination in the heavily Democratic city, Trump said: 'It's shocking.' 'I used to say we will never have a socialist in this country,' the president said, in part. Asked about Mamdani's proposals to oppose his administration's immigration crackdown and to arrest Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he sets foot in New York, Trump said the mayoral candidate would 'be very unsuccessful' on both counts. 'He's a radical left lunatic,' Trump said. Mamdani, for his part, said Democrats 'need to be a party that's not just against Donald Trump – but also for something'. 'And our campaign was for working people, bringing dignity back into those lives,' Mamdani said.
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
British Israeli soldier killed in Gaza, reports say
A British Israeli soldier has been killed while fighting in northern Gaza, according to reports in Israel. He was named locally as 20-year-old Sergeant Yisrael Natan Rosenfeld from the city of Ra'anana. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said it is 'looking into reports that an IDF soldier who died in combat in Gaza is a British national'. The IDF soldier, of the 601st Combat Engineering Battalion, was killed by an explosive device on Sunday, the Times of Israel reported. The paper said Mr Rosenfeld moved to Israel from London with his family 11 years ago. Israel has been operating in Gaza since the Hamas militant group's October 7 2023 attack on Israel. More than 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began, including more than 400 during the fighting in Gaza. US-led ceasefire efforts have repeatedly stalled. The Israeli offensive has devastated Gaza and killed more than 56,000 people, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, a branch of the Hamas government.
