Key anti-Assad groups pledge support for Syria's new administration
Representatives of the Syrian National Coalition and the Negotiation Commission voiced support for new interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who commanded an Islamist-led rebel offensive that deposed al-Assad in December, ending years of bloody civil war.
Both groups met with al-Sharaa in Damascus on Tuesday and handed over files associated with their work, the Syrian presidency said late on Tuesday evening, amid speculation that the two blocs will announce their dissolution.
Last month, the new administration announced it would abolish the 2012 constitution, dissolve parliament, disband all armed factions and integrate them into the state institutions.
The Syrian National Coalition (SNC) was founded in Qatar in 2012 as an umbrella opposition organization and soon gained recognition by several countries as the legitimate representative of the Syrian people.
The Negotiation Commission was created in 2015 as an umbrella political body of the opposition forces in Saudi Arabia that initially supported the rebellion against al-Assad's rule.
The two blocs on Tuesday expressed support for Syria's new leadership to "reunify the country, achieve security and stability" and implement a transitional map leading to "fair and free elections," the Syrian presidency added in a statement, according to state news agency SANA.
Private broadcaster Syria TV, which is close to Syria's new rulers, reported that SNC has closed its office in Istanbul.
SNC is currently holding meetings with the new Syrian administration to discuss the fate of its employees and the possibility of integrating them into state institutions amid a likely move to disband the group, the broadcaster added.
After his appointment as Syria's interim president last month, al-Sharaa promised to form an inclusive government, build strong state institutions in the war-shattered country and pave the way for free elections.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Secret Service halts ex-director Kimberley Cheatle's security clearance renewal
Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle — under fire over the Pennsylvania assassination attempt against President Trump — won't have her top-level security clearance renewed, The Post has learned. The Secret Service decided not to extend Chealte's clearance after opposition from Republicans in Congress, namely Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). 'Director [Sean] Curran has been modernizing the intelligence apparatus within the agency,' a spokesperson told The Post. 'During that process, he has determined that not all former directors will have their clearances renewed.' Advertisement The decision to end Cheatle's security clearance came after RealClearPolitics inquired about Johnson's opposition to renewal, claimed the outlet, which was the first to report the change. Johnson, who helms the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, had probed the Secret Service's failures leading up to the Trump assassination attempt in Butler, Pa. 3 Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle was at the center of controversy over the security failures preceding the assassination attempt against President Trump. The Washington Post via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Sen. Ron Johnson had opposed Kimberly Cheatle getting her security clearance renewed. AP He had been fiercely critical of Cheatle, who led the agency from 2022 to 2024, before resigning about 10 days after a bullet grazed the president's right ear during a rally in July of last year. 'The U.S. Secret Service sponsors security clearances for all the former directors for their knowledge of operational and national security matters,' a Secret Service spokesperson explained. 'The purpose for this was so the agency could maintain formal and protected communication, including potentially sensitive and classified matters with former officials.' Advertisement Trump later tapped Curran, who previously led his detail, to helm the agency. Cheatle, who was picked by former first lady Jill Biden, has taken heat for a variety of security failures leading up to the chilling attempt on Trump's life. Multiple GOP-led probes into the assassination attempt cited sources who alleged Cheatle's team had turned down Curran's petitions for more security assets during the 2024 cycle. Last month, on the first anniversary of the July 13, 2024, assassination attempt, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused her of lying to Congress when she denied accusations she turned down requests for more resources for Trump's security. Advertisement 'Any assertion or implication that I provided misleading testimony is patently false and does a disservice to those men and women on the front lines who have been unfairly disciplined for a team, rather than individual, failure,' she fired back in a statement provided by her attorney. During his second term, Trump has repeatedly moved to ax security clearances for former officials in key posts. In most cases, he's gone further than Curran and outright revoked access. This includes his January executive order to revoke clearances for the infamous 'spies who lied' — the 51 intelligence officials who signed onto a letter claiming The Post's bombshell story on Hunter Biden's laptop had the 'classic earmarks of Russian disinformation.' 3 The Butler, Pa., rally attack marked the closest a gunman had gotten to killing a US president since 1981. AP Despite his terrifying brush with death, Trump has taken a charitable approach to the Secret Service. 'They should have had communications with the local police, they weren't tied in, and they should have been tied in. So there were mistakes made,' Trump told his daughter-in-law Lara Trump on Fox News' 'My View' last month. 'But I was satisfied in terms of the bigger plot, the larger plot, I was satisfied,' he added. 'And I have great confidence in these people. I know the people. And they're very talented, very capable.' Advertisement 'But they had a bad day. And I think they'll admit that. They had a rough day.' Last month, the Secret Service faced another security snafu when an agent attempted to sneak his wife onto an Air Force One jet during Trump's trip to Scotland.
11 hours ago
Democratic governors throw support behind Newsom, back partisan redistricting
MADISON, Wisc. -- -- A number of high-profile Democratic governors are ready to fight -- ardently throwing support behind their colleagues who have said they will draw new Congressional maps to favor Democrats before the 2026 midterm elections in order to directly counter Texas Republicans' moves to do the same for their party. Texas GOP lawmakers just this week released their first draft of the state's new congressional map that could flip three to five Democratic seats in next year's midterms. On Thursday, California Gov. Gavin Newsom promptly responded, saying he'd spoken with state legislators and members of Congress about holding a special statewide election on Nov. 4 for Californians to vote on new congressional maps -- ones that would likely favor Democrats. Convening later in the week for a summer policy retreat on the shores of Madison, Wisconsin, a number of leading Democratic governors have backed Newsom and any other blue state leaders who are taking an offensive position on redistricting. The Democrats each did so reluctantly, calling Texas Republicans' efforts "unconstitutional' and 'un-American' with hopes that the courts intervene before any new maps steered by either party are implemented. In the meantime, they said it's time to fight against the Trump-championed GOP redistricting, especially now that other Republican-led states, including Missouri, might follow suit. 'That is so un-American, and it's a constant threat to our democracy,' Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers said about Republican proposals. 'So I'm really pissed, frankly, and we are going to do whatever we can do to stop this from happening.' Gov. Laura Kelly of Kansas, the Chair of the Democratic Governors Association, explicitly got behind Newsom, Kathy Hochul of New York, JB Pritzker of Illinois and any other governors who are weighing counteraction through special elections, special sessions or additional means of redrawing congressional maps. 'I have never believed in unilateral disarmament, and so while I may not want to participate in certain activities, if I have to, in order to level the playing field, I would support my Democratic colleagues who decide to answer in kind,' Kelly said in an interview. 'If the other side is going to pursue this, regardless of the obvious unconstitutionality of it, then I don't think we have any other choice but to go there. You just don't go to the front lines without your bullets,' Kelly said. Kelly said her strong 'preference' would still be for courts to intervene. 'In fact, it might actually work to our benefit, you know, to play like this. Okay, we'll play this game too, and we all go to court.' Then, Kelly said, 'we all lose.' The process of redistricting could prove to be an uphill battle for Democrats, who have less of an opportunity to gerrymander nationwide than their peers across the aisle because of the varied rules of each state. It's the responsibility of partisan legislatures in many Republican-led states to draw the boundaries of all electoral districts. Many more Democratic states use independent citizen-redistricting commissions -- a practice used to maintain fairness and combat gerrymandering. 'I do worry,' Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said during the press conference in Madison, about the outcome for Democrats if they decide to get in the redistricting fight. But, Kelly jumped in, 'there's a bigger risk in doing nothing.' 'You know, we can't just let this happen and act like it's fine and hope that the courts fix it. We have no idea, quite honestly, at this point, what the courts might do, but by virtue of us responding in kind, we do send a message,' Kelly added. 'We will put up a fight.' Evers, who campaigned for governor twice on ending gerrymandering in Wisconsin -- culminating with their Supreme Court's decision to strike down the state's non-contiguous state legislative maps as unconstitutional -- said that Wisconsin would not be making any changes to their maps. Other states, though, who may be 'up against the wall' should make modifications, Evers said. 'We're not changing our maps. Here in the state of Wisconsin, we worked hard to get fair maps, and we're going to continue to do so … in my heart of hearts, this is where we have to be. But when ... you have a gun against your head, you got to do something,' Evers said. Govs. Kelly, Walz, and a number of other Democratic governors also said they'd steer clear of redrawing their maps this cycle, either because they lead predominantly Republican states or because their redistricting processes wouldn't allow for a swift process to combat current GOP efforts. The idea of retaliating against Republicans on the matter of redistricting is a notable shift in strategy for Democrats, who have long touted their reverence for 'playing by the rules' on constitutional issues. For years, Democrats have championed independent redistricting, rules and others meant to encourage fairer maps are now holding them back in some areas and making it more challenging for them in certain districts. 'Democrats are expected to have the decorum. We're expected to protect the institution. We're expected to follow the rules on this,' Walz said, saying time for the party to go aggressively on offense to combat the Trump administration. 'We're not playing with a normal administration. We're playing one that is throwing all the rules out of there, and if the courts that he has packed aren't going to do that, then I think it is incumbent upon states that have the capacity or the ability to make sure that we are responding in kind," said Walz. "It is a terrible spot we're in as a country, but not responding is going to make it even worse."
Epoch Times
12 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Judge Declines to Block National Science Foundation From Ending DEI-Related Grants
A federal judge on Aug. 1 declined a request from 16 states to block the National Science Foundation (NSF) from terminating research funding awarded to universities for diversity-related projects. The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by 16 Democratic-led states seeking a preliminary injunction to block the implementation of NSF's priority directive that halted funding for projects aimed at increasing minority participation in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields.
