logo
The tyranny of party loyalty: how SA's politiccs is held hostage

The tyranny of party loyalty: how SA's politiccs is held hostage

IOL News6 days ago
HOLDING placards and singing 'Wenzeni uZuma?' (What has (President Jacob) Zuma done, uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party members attempted to interrupt President Cyril Ramaphosa's Imbizo in Mpumalanga on Thursday. Intra-party factionalism and party loyalty is wrecking South Africa's democracy, argues the writer | Video/Screenshot
Nco Dube
There is a peculiar malaise gnawing at the heart of South African democracy. It is not the overt corruption or the brazen incompetence that so often dominate headlines, but something more insidious, something that quietly undermines the very foundations of our political system.
This malaise is the cult of political party loyalty. In a country still wrestling with the ghosts of its past and the uncertainties of its future, blind allegiance to political parties and the toxic factionalism it breeds have become obstacles to genuine progress, independent thought, and the placing of the nation above narrow interests.
In this piece, I attempt to interrogate the negative impact of party loyalty and intra-party factionalism in South African politics. I explore how these phenomena suffocate independent thinking, erode impartiality among commentators and political actors, and ultimately betray the public interest. I attempt to offer a critical, unapologetic assessment, one that refuses to tiptoe around uncomfortable truths.
The Anatomy of Party Loyalty in South Africa
Party loyalty in South Africa is not merely a matter of preference or ideological alignment. It is a deeply entrenched, almost tribal phenomenon. For many, political identity is inherited, not chosen. The African National Congress (ANC), the Democratic Alliance (DA), the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) and other parties have cultivated bases that often view dissent as treason and critical engagement as betrayal.
This loyalty is reinforced by a history of struggle and liberation, particularly in the case of the ANC. For many South Africans, to question the ANC is to question the legitimacy of the very freedom they enjoy. But this sentiment is not unique to the ANC. Across the political spectrum, parties have weaponised loyalty, turning supporters into foot soldiers and critics into enemies.
At first glance, loyalty may seem virtuous. A sign of commitment and stability. But in the South African context, it has become a double-edged sword. The cost is measured in the stifling of independent thought, the erosion of accountability, and the prioritisation of party interests over the national good.
Intra-Party Factionalism: The Enemy Within
If party loyalty is the glue that binds, intra-party factionalism is the rot that festers beneath the surface. Nowhere is this more evident than within the ANC, where factional battles have become a permanent feature of the political landscape. But the DA, MKP, IFP and EFF are not immune; they too have seen their share of internal rifts and purges.
Factionalism thrives where loyalty is prized above principle. It is the inevitable result of a system that rewards sycophancy and punishes dissent. Intra-party factions form around personalities, patronage networks, and competing ambitions, rather than genuine ideological differences. The result is a politics of survival, not service. A contest for power, not principle.
The consequences for governance are dire. Cabinet reshuffles, policy paralysis, and endless infighting are the order of the day. Decisions are made not on the basis of what is best for the country, but what is expedient for the dominant faction. The public becomes collateral damage in a never-ending game of thrones.
Perhaps the most tragic casualty of party loyalty and factionalism is independent thought. In a healthy democracy, political actors and commentators should be able to engage critically with issues, challenge orthodoxy, and hold power to account. In South Africa, such independence is rare.
Party structures are designed to suppress dissent. Whips enforce discipline, and those who step out of line face ostracisation, demotion, or expulsion. The message is clear: toe the line or pay the price. This culture of conformity extends beyond politicians to the media and civil society. Commentators who criticise their 'own' party are branded sell-outs; those who criticise others are dismissed as partisans.
The Role of the Media
The media, which should serve as a bulwark against abuse of power, is itself not immune. Many commentators, analysts, and journalists are openly aligned with political parties or factions. Their analysis is often coloured by loyalty, leading to selective outrage and a reluctance to hold their own side to account. The result is a public discourse that is polarised, predictable, and impoverished.
Impartiality is the lifeblood of credible analysis and effective governance. Yet in South Africa, it is in short supply. Commentators, political players, and supporters alike are trapped in echo chambers, where loyalty trumps logic and partisanship overrides principle.
Social media has amplified the echo chamber phenomenon. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook have become battlegrounds for party loyalists, where nuance is sacrificed on the altar of outrage. Algorithms reward conformity and punish complexity. The result is a toxic feedback loop, where only the loudest, most extreme voices are heard.
Those who dare to be impartial, who criticise their own party or praise the opposition, are often vilified. They are accused of betrayal, subjected to harassment, and excluded from important conversations. This creates a chilling effect, discouraging others from speaking out and reinforcing the culture of conformity.
Putting the Country and the Public First: A Lost Ideal
The ultimate tragedy of party loyalty and factionalism is that they prevent political actors from putting the country and the public first. Decisions are made to protect party interests, secure positions, and settle scores, not to serve the people.
Public service has become a means to an end, not an end in itself. The language of 'the people' is invoked at every turn, but rarely honoured in practice. Policies are crafted to win votes, not solve problems. Appointments are made to reward loyalty, not competence. The result is a state that is often unresponsive, inefficient, and corrupt.
The public, for its part, is not blameless. Many voters continue to support parties out of habit, fear, or misplaced loyalty. They accept mediocrity and corruption as the price of belonging. In doing so, they perpetuate the very system that fails them.
The Way Forward: Reclaiming Independent Thought and National Interest
South Africa stands at a crossroads. The challenges we face like unemployment, inequality, corruption, and social unrest, are too great to be solved by party loyalists and factional warriors. What is needed is a new politics: one that values independent thought, impartiality, and the national interest above all else.
We must create space for critical engagement within parties and society at large. Political actors should be encouraged to challenge orthodoxy and question leadership without fear of reprisal. Parties must become forums for debate, not echo chambers for loyalty.
Party structures must be reformed to reward merit, not mediocrity. Internal democracy should be strengthened, and mechanisms for accountability put in place. Factionalism must be confronted head-on, with clear consequences for those who undermine unity and purpose.
The media and civil society have a vital role to play in holding power to account. Journalists and commentators must strive for impartiality, even when it is unpopular. They must resist the temptation to become cheerleaders for one side or another, and instead serve the public interest.
Ultimately, the public must take responsibility for the choices it makes. Voters must be educated to think critically, challenge party narratives, and demand better from their leaders. Blind loyalty must give way to informed citizenship.
Conclusion: The Courage to Choose Country Over Party
The time has come for South Africans to reclaim their democracy from the tyranny of party loyalty and factionalism. This will not be easy. The forces of conformity are powerful, and the incentives for loyalty are strong. But the stakes are too high to accept the status quo.
We must have the courage to put the country and the public first. To demand independent thought, impartiality, and genuine service from those who claim to lead us. Only then can we build a politics worthy of our people, and a future worthy of our hopes.
Let us remember: parties are vehicles, not destinations. They exist to serve the people, not the other way around. When party loyalty becomes an obstacle to progress, it is not loyalty at all, but betrayal. The time for euphemism and equivocation is over. South Africa deserves better and it is up to all of us to demand it.
(Dube is a political economist, businessman, and social commentator on Ukhozi FM. His views don't necessarily reflect those of the Sunday Tribune or IOL)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donor backlash over Gaza march halts Rise Up's blanket campaign
Donor backlash over Gaza march halts Rise Up's blanket campaign

The Citizen

time35 minutes ago

  • The Citizen

Donor backlash over Gaza march halts Rise Up's blanket campaign

Rise Up Movement founder Josha Daniel is facing donor pushback over his attempt to participate in the Global March to Gaza, forcing the organisation to cancel its winter blanket drive. Daniel, who travelled to Cairo on June 11, said he never expected that a humanitarian mission would provoke such strong criticism. 'Some perceived our involvement as taking sides. But our mission has always been about safeguarding life and dignity, irrespective of race, colour or belief,' he said. The Rise Up Movement, a non-profit focused on humanitarian aid and community upliftment, has long enjoyed local donor and business support. However, following Daniel's participation in the halted march, several sponsors pulled out. A long-standing partner also withdrew vital logistical support for the winter blanket drive, which assists hundreds of poor each year. Daniel believes the backlash stems from a misunderstanding of the organisation's neutral humanitarian stance. 'How can we say 'all lives matter' while justifying the killing of innocent women, children and aid workers? Human suffering isn't a political position – it's a call to conscience.' Daniel joined hundreds of international delegates in Egypt, aiming to peacefully advocate for humanitarian access to Gaza. But the situation deteriorated as delegates were detained, hostels raided and foreign nationals, including South Africans, were held without charge. With help from the South African Embassy, Daniel assisted in developing emergency safety protocols for fellow delegates, many of whom were first-time travellers. Though the march was cancelled, he stayed on to volunteer at the Red Crescent Hospital, supporting victims and documenting abuse cases now under review by international human rights bodies. One moment that stood out was meeting a father who had lost his entire family in an airstrike. 'He wasn't talking about politics, he wanted food, safety and dignity. That's what people need to understand.' The experience has had a lasting impact on both his personal outlook and the direction of The Rise Up Movement. While the criticism has been difficult, Daniel says it has also sparked important conversations about neutrality, morality and what it means to stand for justice in a divided world. 'It is easy to support causes when they are popular. But true humanity is tested when you stand with those who are unpopular, unseen and silenced.' Despite the financial setback, Daniel remains resolute. 'This experience has not broken my spirit. If anything, it's strengthened my resolve. We will continue to rise because every human life deserves to be valued.' Stay in the loop with The North Coast Courier on Facebook, X, Instagram & YouTube for the latest news. Mobile users can join our WhatsApp Broadcast Service here or if you're on desktop, scan the QR code below. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

ANC doesn't give a damn about the ordinary man and is foisting National Dialogue on us to divert attention
ANC doesn't give a damn about the ordinary man and is foisting National Dialogue on us to divert attention

IOL News

time36 minutes ago

  • IOL News

ANC doesn't give a damn about the ordinary man and is foisting National Dialogue on us to divert attention

National dialogue is disingenuous I endorse the views of all those who have criticised the National Dialogue in various media outlets. The problems South Africans face were created by corrupt, inept politicians who take home fat salaries every month. Now they want a costly diversionary side-show, ostensibly to solve the problems they created, but really intended to keep the naïve and gullible occupied instead of paying attention to the new revelations every they can't solve the problems how can the politically aligned people they have selectively co-opted manage to do it? How qualified or competent are they? Some might be. But certainly not all of them. Also President Ramaphosa used the word inclusive (or synonyms) repeatedly. Yet there are communities or faith groups not included in the co-opted men of example, I did not see a representative of the descendants of Indentured Indians. I stand to be corrected, but no Hindus were chosen, not that it matters if competent qualified people, regardless of race or faith, were chosen with the assurance they could solve the problems. Yes, I am aware Ela Gandhi is there, but she is not a Girmitya, nor a Hindu. Even if she were I would have a problem with her because when she was in parliament, what did she accomplish in a parliament with very skewed representation when it came to a heterogeneous 'Indian community'? This is especially so when it comes to the poor and disempowered in Chatsworth, Phoenix etc. Furthermore, she is a very inconsistent person or a hypocrite. According to a Post article (January 8-10, 2003): 'Ms Ela Gandhi has refused to participate in the PBD (Indian Diaspora get-together) saying it was racist. 'I feel anything based on race I would not like to identify with.' Yet in an inexplicable about-turn, she accepted the Padma Bhushan award from India in 2007, and the Pravasi Bharatiya Samman – the highest honour conferred on overseas Indians by India's Ministry of External Fatima Meer went one better: She reviled the notion of an 'Indian Diaspora' in 2003, yet received the Pravasi Bharatiya Samman Award at the same event in 2003. We don't need any flip-floppers representing us. | Kamini Prakash Umhlanga Trump governs by Art Of The Deal On a daily basis, the mainstream media disparage US President Donald Trump for his style of government, even claiming his actions are wittingly reckless. But if journalists and readers were familiar with Trump's book, Art of the Deal, they would understand. The premise of Trump's strategy is leverage. It's his key tool for achieving what he intends. To realise that, he has a range of tactics which he applies to suit the circumstances. Here they are:Walking away from the table; creating a sense of urgency; using his resources to manipulate; strategic timing; appearing unpredictable; doing nothing; delaying; creating uncertainty; keeping the opponent guessing; keeping options open; pivoting on positions; projecting confidence even when his position is insecure; pushing opponents into reactive mode; using information to manoeuvre opponents into positions that suit him or trap them. Government for Trump means practicing the art of the deal. In so doing he is more than the conductor. He is also the orchestra playing the instruments which is why the discordance he produces on occasions is intentional and why many think he is clueless about what he is doing. Wrong! We are witnessing an exceptional leader and a master tactician with virtuous intentions in vanquishing Orwellian globalism, salvaging America's sovereignty and its constitutional premise based on, 'We the people'. | DR DUNCAN DU BOIS Bluff ANC has no intention of saving South Africa All you have to do is to consider the record of the ANC and Cyril Ramaphosa regarding the success when it comes to commissions of inquiry. Yet, the general public and private sector is completely in the dark, and we have a resident who refuses to answer questions or be scrutinised. Not only was Ramaphosa implicated in two other major scandals, Marikana and Phala Phala, but he was second in charge under Jacob Zuma when State Capture version 1 took place. Now we have State Capture a'la Cupcake and a corrupt police force. The ANC president has seemingly built around him an impenetrable, bullet proof layer of protection, which consists of the police, the judiciary, his own cadres (at least some of them), the media and even political parties too damn scared to ruffle any feathers. The result is that the South Africa today is a broken, tired and failed state, captured by the 'untouchable' elites who pretended for 30 years to care about their own people, yet lied to them, abused them and used their votes to get into positions of immense power! | L Oosthuizen Durban DAILY NEWS

Trending: Dangerous Trump rejects heading our way
Trending: Dangerous Trump rejects heading our way

IOL News

time36 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Trending: Dangerous Trump rejects heading our way

Donald Trump is dumping the worst of the worst in our neighbour. How long before these violent criminals, who neither the US or their countries of origin will allow, cross the border into South Africa? There is a fear that violent criminals – illegal immigrants in the US, which is now deporting them to eSwatini as they their home countries have refused to take them back – will cross over in Mzansi and join the ranks of criminals here at home: @Oriana_RSA Basically, the US is treating eSwatini as its dustbin for criminals? The worst part is that these criminals will obviously end up in South Africa. We're doomed @AdvFanele I work near the eSwatini border and a good 30%- 40% of our resources go towards eSwatini citizens, but we foot the bill by paying insane amounts in tax. While I'm an advocate of free healthcare for all, I think billing the countries of origin for the immigrants would lessen the burden on the locals. @_sethuzuma The US dropping off immigrants in eSwatini is frustrating, because they're most likely going to relocate to the nearest economic hub for opportunities. @motsohi_thabang South Africa must now decisively intervene to control wild and irresponsible decisions by this mad despot (King Mswati) in eSwatini. @_tume1o Not to be dramatic, but this is a security issue for SA. It doesn't look like there's any guarantee that they will remain in eSwatini. @Wealth98478302 So, should we allow lawlessness from Lesotho, Botswana or eSwatini just because we might be relatives?! @KennedyWandera_ 'These criminal illegal aliens are so uniquely barbaric that their home countries refused to take them back,' a US Department of Homeland Security spokesperson says. The Trump administration has also sent migrants to El Salvador and South Sudan. @Cecilia_Mthwane As a SADC region, we need an urgent meeting with eSwatini. They need to tell us if they are on Nyaope or something. Labantu badinga iNduku straight. @Sello_Libram eSwatini cannot stop its own citizens from crossing illegally into South Africa, but is now accepting illegal Nigerians, Zimbabweans, Muslims, etc that America is illegals are being sent to eSwatini so that they can later cross into SA. @mztvar As a citizen of eSwatini, this is one of the reasons why I will teach the younger generation to despise US foreign policy with every last drop of their blood. Why should a first world-state, with all the instruments to deal with crime, send hardcore criminals to a third-world state? @TheSituationZA WTF! So, eSwatini is a dump will be crossing over to SA. @Truthonothing While South Africans are caught up with 'mabahambe', a new issue is emerging – get ready to receive more illegal immigrants, courtesy of the Trump administration. Meanwhile, African media remains disturbingly silent. @SegopotjeNkadi3 eSwatini govt is so smart! They accepted violent foreign criminals from Cuba Somalia, Yemen, Venezuela, Vietnam so they can get financial aid from Trump but they won't host them for long – they will secretly dump them at the border at night, then they will come to SA. @SS_Mogashoa The disrespect to eSwatini! The disrespect to Southern Africa! The disrespect to Africa! @RediTlhabi You know what this means akere? Hardened criminals, (rapists, paedophiles, murderers, robbers) unwanted by the USA and their home countries, being dumped in eSwatini, will end up in one place.... @MotsaZakhele What the hell is this? eSwatini government is a mess. This is really bad. Extremely bad. Deporting convicted criminals to us is appalling. Extremely appalling. DAILY NEWS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store