Mixed views on revised KL plan
SEVERAL key recommendations by stakeholders remain unaddressed in the revised draft Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 (KLLP2040), says Save Kuala Lumpur (SKL) coalition group.
Its chairman Datuk M. Ali said Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) had acknowledged some suggestions by ratepayers, including the plot ratios for green lungs and public halls.
However, he said, concerns remained over questionable and ambiguous categorisation of open spaces.
'Yes, they have made some adjustments to the plot ratios, but the larger concern is how easily public open spaces are being reclassified for private use.
'It feels like they are legitimising commercial development at the expense of green lungs.
'For instance, a Public Open Space (OS1) in Jalan Damansara has been reclassified to Private Open Space (OS3), effectively allowing a hotel's development.
'Similarly, in Jalan Maarof (Bangsar), a five-storey commercial building is now being legitimised despite standing amid predominantly low-rise residential structures,'' he said.
Photo at left: Kok (left) and her staff talking to DBKL staff on issues related to the plan.
Ali also voiced discontent over changes in Taman Tun Dr Ismail (TTDI), where land for a public hall was being rezoned for commercial purposes.
'We requested it be reinstated as institutional (use for public facility).
'If one request (to rezone) is allowed, everyone will start asking for it,' he said.
Ali was among many Kuala Lumpur residents who attended a three-day public inspection of the KL Local Plan, which ended yesterday.
The display of the plan at Menara DBKL was scheduled for 9.30am to 4.30pm, with a two-hour lunch break from 12.30pm to 2.30pm each day.
However, some participants claimed they were not aware that there would be a two-hour lunch break each day.
DBKL is planning to launch KLLP2040 this month.
When met at Menara DBKL, Seputeh MP Teresa Kok told StarMetro that many areas in her constituency and across the city had been earmarked for redevelopment.
She also voiced her frustration on learning that the police reserve land in Taman Desa had changed hands, with plans for a condominium.
She claimed that the 0.32ha plot was sold for RM1.9mil, a fraction of its RM14mil market value.
'It is shocking. The government is selling prime land in KL at such bargain prices,' Kok said, adding that these deals needed to be reviewed.
Happy Garden Residents Association secretary Evelyn Lau said that out of 20 pages of suggestions that they had submitted, only two were partially considered.
She said Jalan Kelang Lama was extremely congested, with cars clogging the roads and developments consuming valuable infrastructure.
She urged DBKL to take a closer look at the neighbourhood and prioritise sustainable development.
Meanwhile, business owner Allen Lim was happy to find out that premises on Jalan Abdullah, Lorong Abdullah and Lengkok Abdullah in Bangsar would be retained for commercial use.
The former houses-turned-businesses were categorised as residential in the initial KLLP2040.
This, Lim said, would have disrupted businesses in the area.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Resistance to Buntong market redevelopment
PLANS to demolish and redevelop the 70-year-old Buntong wet market in Ipoh, Perak, have sparked opposition from some traders there. A longstanding hub for fresh produce, spices, clothing and other essentials, Buntong market has been a mainstay in the community for decades. However, it faces issues such as outdated infrastructure and drainage problems, which have prompted the government to push for extensive renovations similar to those underway at Pasir Pinji market. Trader concerns Buntong assemblyman Thulsi Manogaran said the plan is to build a one-storey facility with modern facilities while maintaining the heritage value of the Buntong market. Traders will be relocated to a temporary market to be built at an open area at Jalan Kantan, between First Garden and Buntong. The Buntong wet market has about 190 active traders, who will be moved to a temporary site which will be built along Jalan Kantan. Despite the proposed benefits, many traders argue the redevelopment is unnecessary and a waste of resources. Noodle and drink seller Chow Yeoi Sing, who has operated at the market for nearly 50 years, is among those against the plan. 'This market is like a second home to me. There's no need to build a new market. 'A few repairs and upgrades are all that's needed. 'Repainting, upgrading the drainage and resurfacing the floor would suffice,' Chow insisted. He claimed that 50% of traders opposed the move, primarily due to concerns about business disruption during relocation to the temporary site. 'We've been briefed, but there's no clarity on how long it will take or what the conditions will be. 'We don't agree with the redevelopment as it stands,' he added. Jalan Kanthan in Kampung Baru Buntong. Chow also highlighted that the market underwent an upgrade a few years ago, which included roof repairs and fan installations. Market facelift Housing and Local Government Minister Nga Kor Ming had earlier this year said that the Buntong market would be given a facelift. This is part of the ministry's efforts to rejuvenate markets nationwide that are 50 years and older, modernising them and turning them into tourist attractions. Currently, the 66-year-old Pasir Pinji wet market in Ipoh is undergoing a RM14mil redevelopment, which was announced by Nga in January 2023. Once completed, the new Pasir Pinji market, scheduled to be reopened in 2027, will be able to accommodate 214 traders and boast environment-friendly features. The Pasir Pinji traders are currently operating from a temporary site about 1km away. Apart from the Pasir Pinji market, Ipoh Central Market in the city centre is also set to undergo a major upgrade, costing about RM15mil. Buntong market also attracts locals for its inexpensive hawker food. Work is expected to start some time this year. Unwilling to move Despite the expected benefits of a new building with better facilities, some traders at Buntong market expressed fears that they will lose customers during the relocation. They claim the temporary site is inconvenient and unsafe. 'The temporary location at Jalan Kantan is not suitable. 'It is too far and looks eerie, especially as we open our stalls before sunrise,' said Lim Kan Yoke, who sells brooms and household equipment. 'The place looks secluded and we fear that our regular customers may not want to go there, causing us to lose business,' added Lim, who has been operating at the market for about 40 years. Wong Yoke, who sells clothing at the Buntong market, is also concerned about moving. 'How are we going to move our wares and equipment?' asked Wong, who has been operating at the market for more than 40 years. Traders at Buntong market say only minor repairs, such as resurfacing of damaged floors, are needed. 'Most of the traders here are elderly. Some may not even live long enough to move back (to the new market),' she pointed out. Lim urged the government not to waste funds redeveloping the market. 'I think the money can be spent on other things, like improving the roads or drainage system (in Buntong), and carrying out pest control. 'If the market is really in a dilapidated condition, then we would have no qualms about redeveloping it, but for us, it is still in good shape,' she said. The disgruntled traders approached Perak Gerakan public service and complaints bureau deputy chief V. Subramaniam for help in stopping the redevelopment project. 'I advised the traders to approach their assemblyman,' Subramaniam said, adding that he was willing to facilitate the dialogue. 'I think the traders will have a meeting among themselves before making any further decisions, so we will wait and see. 'I do hope that the traders' grouses will be heard,' he added. When contacted, Thulsi defended the redevelopment, citing numerous systemic issues such as traffic congestion, pest infestations and outdated drainage systems that cannot be resolved with minor upgrades. 'Rebuilding is the only viable solution. The market's current condition is not safe or conducive, especially for the elderly community,' she said. She said Buntong had one of the many active markets in the city. 'There is still a vibrant economy there. I think in order to uplift the people, there needs to be a modern market, which will be better, safer and cleaner,' she added. Redevelopment model Thulsi also assured that the redevelopment would maintain the market's heritage while providing modern facilities. As for the temporary market, it is about 1km from the current location, she said. 'It's the nearest available state-owned land. Once the temporary market is set up, we can proceed with redevelopment bids,' she said. As for the redevelopment project, Thulsi said it would follow the Pasir Pinji market model. 'The current Buntong market has about 190 active traders, so the plan is to have about 200 lots at the new premises. 'The design has yet to be finalised and I believe a competition to determine it will be held,' she said. 'As for the cost, it should be about RM14mil,' she added. She also said that a temporary market would need to be built first. 'The plan is to build the temporary market this year, with the redevelopment project starting next year,' she added. Despite ongoing objections, Thulsi noted that some traders were supportive of the project as they recognised its potential benefits. 'I'm continuously engaging with traders, encouraging them to form an association to voice out their concerns,' she added. To assuage fears, Thulsi arranged visits for Buntong traders to the temporary Pasir Pinji market. 'The aim is to highlight the positive aspects of redevelopment,' she said, adding that the traders seemed receptive.
Malay Mail
4 days ago
- Malay Mail
Segambut MP urges DBKL to clarify EV charger placement guidelines after TTDI residents raise concern over parking loss
KUALA LUMPUR, July 2 — Hannah Yeoh has called on Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) to clarify its guidelines on the installation of electric vehicle (EV) chargers following complaints by Taman Tun Dr Ismail (TTDI) residents that the new units have reduced public parking spaces in the neighbourhood. In a media statement today, the Segambut MP said while she supported efforts to promote greener transport, she was concerned about whether the chargers — including those in areas like TTDI and Desa Sri Hartamas which fall under her constituency — complied with existing regulations related to public safety, urban planning and pedestrian access. 'From public observation, the installations appear to encroach upon pedestrian walkways and take up valuable space in areas that are already facing congestion and limited parking,' she said. Yeoh was responding to a Malay Mail report yesterday, in which the TTDI Residents Association raised objections to the new chargers placed along Lorong Rahim Kajai 13 and Jalan Tun Mohd Fuad. The group argued that the neighbourhood already suffers from parking shortages and questioned why DBKL had allowed the installations at the expense of public parking bays. Association spokesman Khairudin Rahim told Malay Mail that while residents welcomed EV infrastructure, the decision to use existing parking bays was 'not practical' and failed to consider that many EV owners in the area already have private home chargers. In response, Yeoh urged DBKL to disclose the guidelines governing EV charger placement and to confirm whether all relevant standards were being followed. 'As we move towards cleaner and greener transport, it is essential that infrastructure development is thoughtfully implemented. The rights, safety and daily needs of residents should not be compromised,' she said in her statement. Yeoh also reminded DBKL to consult the community through the Majlis Perwakilan Penduduk (MPP), which she said serves as a vital bridge between residents and city authorities. She called on DBKL to fully utilise the platform for dialogue and engagement on such matters.
The Star
4 days ago
- The Star
New KL high-rises fuel fears of worsening congestion
Taman Intan Baiduri residents gathered in front of the site (left) of the proposed high-rise housing project along Jalan Intan Baiduri 5D.— RAJA FAISAL HISHAN/The Star Residents of Taman Intan Baiduri want Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) to make it a requirement that new developments have direct access to Middle Ring Road 2 (MRR2). They are objecting to a 32-storey housing development in their area, citing fears of severe traffic congestion and lack of supporting infrastructure. The development, comprising 192 units under Federal Government's Public Housing for Civil Servants (PPAM) programme, is planned along Jalan Intan Baiduri 5D, a narrow access road that already serves several housing areas and three schools. 'This area is already under heavy strain,' said community activist Yee Poh Ping in a press conference at the site with some 30 residents. 'We are not against development. But there must be proper planning. 'We cannot keep building without traffic dispersal plans or alternative access routes.' The proposed site sits less than 100m from SK Intan Baiduri, SK St Mary and SMK St Mary. The stretch experiences daily bottlenecks during school hours, with residents reporting that it can take up to one hour to reach Kepong via MRR2. Yee said the congestion stemmed from the area's layout which only has two main exit points, both leading to already saturated roads heading towards Selayang, Kepong and Batu Caves. The situation is expected to worsen with the addition of two other high-density projects nearby – Rumah Belia Madani (1,048 units) and a private development with 558 condominium units and 239 low-cost units. A resident identified only as Low, who has lived in the neighbourhood for 30 years, said the roads were never designed to support such density. 'This access road to our homes and schools is being used by residents in nearby neighbourhoods. 'A high-rise here will overwhelm the system. 'We're already seeing spillover parking and daily jams,' Low added. Another resident who only wanted to be identified as Wong said, 'If they must build, then they need to build an access road that exits directly to MRR2.' She also questioned how a 32-storey building could be proposed on what she said was just 0.4ha of land. 'What is the plot ratio? We have the right to know,' she said, pointing to lack of information on a notice board at the site. Resident Sharifah Fairuz urged DBKL to prioritise proper traffic planning. 'Young people need affordable homes, yes, but not at the cost of others' quality of life,' she said. 'Hold a public hearing and engage with us before finalising anything.' Yee said the root problem was that the stretch of MRR2 near Taman Intan Baiduri lacked proper U-turn access points. He proposed DBKL and Gombak Public Works Department to build two new U-turn interchanges along the stretch from Taman Daya to the Batu Caves roundabout. Yee said a protest letter has been submitted to DBKL, calling for a public hearing and engagement with stakeholders.
