logo
Alaska House approves broader list of Permanent Fund dividend exceptions

Alaska House approves broader list of Permanent Fund dividend exceptions

Yahoo22-04-2025
Rep. Jeremy Bynum, R-Ketchikan, speaks Feb. 21, 2025, on the floor of the Alaska House of Representatives. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
Members of the federal government's ocean-mapping corps and Alaskans training for the merchant marine would continue to receive Permanent Fund dividends while away from the state, under a bill approved last week by the Alaska House of Representatives.
House Bill 75, from Rep. Jeremy Bynum, R-Ketchikan, is the first piece of legislation from a freshman lawmaker to pass either the House or Senate this year.
If approved by the Senate and signed by Gov. Mike Dunleavy, it would create new exceptions to the requirement that Alaskans be within the state in order to receive the dividend.
HB 75 would keep college students' spring breaks and fall breaks from counting against their allowable absences from the state, and members of the 'uniformed services,' rather than just the U.S. military, would receive exceptions as well.
That changed definition would allow members of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Corps, which operates the federal government's fleet of mapping ships and conducts other scientific missions, to continue receiving dividends even if deployed away from the state.
HB 75 also allows the Permanent Fund Dividend Division to fingerprint its employees for federal criminal background checks and allows the general public to opt out of paper mailers for notices.
The House passed the bill 35-5, with five members of the Republican House minority opposed. None explained their reason during an eight-minute-long bill debate. It advances to the Senate for consideration.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CNN Data Chief Flags Exactly How GOP Is Playing 'Hardball' Ahead Of Midterms
CNN Data Chief Flags Exactly How GOP Is Playing 'Hardball' Ahead Of Midterms

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CNN Data Chief Flags Exactly How GOP Is Playing 'Hardball' Ahead Of Midterms

CNN's chief data analyst Harry Enten on Thursday broke down how Texas Republicans' new congressional redistricting proposal could prove to be a 'huge difference' as they look to maintain control of the House of Representatives ahead of the midterms. 'They are playing hardball at this particular point. And right now it seems to me that Democrats are actually playing closer to Little League pee wee,' said Enten in a segment with CNN's John Berman. GOP lawmakers in the state shared their draft of a new congressional map Wednesday — a rare move to occur in the middle of a decade. The new map, per the Texas Tribune, targets Democratic districts in the chamber and could result in five seats being flipped in the GOP's favor in next year's elections. The proposed map in Texas — which could see changes before it makes its way to the desk of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) — falls in line with GOP efforts togain House seats in other states. Enten, when asked by Berman what Texas' five House seats would do for Republicans 'overall' in the chamber, stressed the importance of such a gain. He added that Democrats had four House seats to spare for the majority after the 2020 elections. Republicans then had four seats to spare for the majority following the 2022 midterms and, after the 2024 elections, Republicans had two seats to spare. 'Five seats can make all the difference in the world,' Enten said. Related... Trading Partners Scramble To Reach Deals With U.S. Ahead Of Trump's Looming Deadline For New Tariffs Trump Is Tearing Up Part Of The White House To Build A $200 Million Ballroom Trump Lobs All-Caps Insults At Jerome Powell For Refusing To Lower Interest Rates Once Again

Van Hollen blocks FBI funding bill from floor debate over Trump headquarters dispute
Van Hollen blocks FBI funding bill from floor debate over Trump headquarters dispute

Politico

time32 minutes ago

  • Politico

Van Hollen blocks FBI funding bill from floor debate over Trump headquarters dispute

The simmering dispute over the FBI's future headquarters derailed Senate efforts Thursday night to launch floor debate on the legislation that funds the agency, as well as the departments of Commerce and Justice, NASA and science programs. Sen. Chris Van Hollen objected Thursday night to including the bill in a larger package of funding measures. The Maryland Democrat demanded that the Senate agree to adopt language that would require the FBI to meet a specific security threshold for its headquarters, as the Trump administration keeps the agency in downtown Washington instead of relocating it to the suburban Maryland campus previously selected after a yearslong competition. But Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), who chairs the funding panel that handles the bill, shot down that request on the Senate floor Thursday night, after the dispute over the FBI headquarters already snagged committee action on the bill. Tearing up as he spoke on the floor, Moran said he knows 'no path forward' that would allow Van Hollen's amendment. 'Our appropriations process is fragile,' he said. If Van Hollen, who serves as the ranking member on the Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee, hadn't objected, his amendment would have been teed up for a vote. But Van Hollen didn't want to take the risk that the language would not have been adopted. 'That is a simple request that I would have thought all of us could stand behind,' Van Hollen said, 'making sure that the new headquarters of the men and women of the FBI meets the security requirements that we and they have set out.' Senate appropriators already killed another amendment Van Hollen proposed in committee, which would have barred the Trump administration from dipping into a $1.4 billion construction account for anything besides relocating the FBI to the previously selected site. After the proposal was initially adopted, the committee later voted to strike the language because so many Republicans were threatening to tank the underlying bill if it rebuked Trump on the headquarters decision. 'We did it because the president of the United States was going to throw a fit if that provision stayed on, that's why people reversed the position,' Van Hollen said on the Senate floor Thursday night. 'And we shouldn't make our decisions out of fear about what somebody in the White House is going to do, because that distorts the entire process here in the United States Senate.' Moran's Thursday evening request was to tie together four bills to fund the government for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. Those bills would collectively fund the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture, as well as military construction projects, the operations of Congress and the FDA. The Kansas Republican touted that those four measures had made it through the full Senate Appropriations Committee with bipartisan support and 'in some instances, unanimously.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store