&w=3840&q=100)
Coder 'village' at the heart of China's artificial intelligence boom
It was a sunny Saturday afternoon, and dozens of people sat in the grass around a backyard stage where aspiring founders of tech start-ups talked about their ideas. People in the crowd slouched over laptops, vaping and drinking strawberry Frappuccinos. A drone buzzed overhead. Inside the house, investors took pitches in the kitchen.
It looked like Silicon Valley, but it was Liangzhu, a quiet suburb of the southern Chinese city of Hangzhou, which is a hot spot for entrepreneurs and tech talent lured by low rents and proximity to tech companies like Alibaba and DeepSeek.
'People come here to explore their own possibilities,' said Felix Tao, 36, a former Facebook and Alibaba employee who hosted the event.
Virtually all of those possibilities involve artificial intelligence. As China faces off with the United States over tech primacy, Hangzhou has become the center of China's AI frenzy. A decade ago, the provincial and local governments started offering subsidies and tax breaks to new companies in Hangzhou, a policy that has helped incubate hundreds of startups. On weekends, people fly in from Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen to hire programmers.
Lately, many of them have ended up in Tao's backyard. He helped found an AI research lab at Alibaba before leaving to start his own company, Mindverse, in 2022. Now Tao's home is a hub for coders who have settled in Liangzhu, many in their 20s and 30s. They call themselves 'villagers,' writing code in coffee shops during the day and gaming together at night, hoping to harness AI to create their own firms.
Hangzhou has already birthed tech powerhouses, not only Alibaba and DeepSeek but also NetEase and Hikvision. In January, DeepSeek shook the tech world when it released an AI system that it said it had made for a small fraction of the cost that Silicon Valley companies had spent on their own. Since then, systems made by DeepSeek and Alibaba have ranked among the top-performing open source AI models in the world, meaning they are available for anyone to build on. Graduates from Hangzhou's Zhejiang University, where DeepSeek's founder studied, have become sought-after employees at Chinese tech companies.
Chinese media closely followed the poaching of a core member of DeepSeek's team by the electronics company Xiaomi. In Liangzhu, many engineers said they were killing time until they could create their own startups, waiting out noncompete agreements they had signed at bigger companies like ByteDance. DeepSeek is one of six AI and robotics startups from the city that Chinese media calls the 'six tigers of Hangzhou'.
Last year, one of the six, Game Science, released China's first big-budget video game to become a global hit, Black Myth: Wukong. Another firm, Unitree, grabbed public attention in January when its robots danced onstage during the Chinese state broadcaster's televised annual spring gala.
Liangzhu villagers have been hosting film nights. They had recently gathered to watch 'The Matrix.' Afterward, they decided the movie should be required viewing, Lin said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
What to know about a potential deal to keep TikTok running in U.S.
Less than a month after extending a deadline to ban TikTok for the third time, President Donald Trump told reporters late Friday night that, 'We pretty much have a deal,' on TikTok — but he did not offer details. The details and timing of a potential deal are not clear. TikTok did not immediately respond to messages for comment on Monday. Emarketer analyst Jeremy Goldman said while TikTok is 'reportedly planning' a U.S. version of its app to comply with legal restrictions, the platform — if it launches without the original TikTok algorithm — 'risks losing the very personalization that drives user engagement.' In other words, TikTok just isn't TikTok without its algorithm. 'And getting millions to download a new app is no small feat, to say the least,' Goldman added. Here's what to know about where TikTok stands in the U.S. following Trump's comments. Though he has no clear legal basis to do so, Trump has continued to extend the deadline for TikTok to avoid a ban in the U.S. This gives his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership. It is not clear how many times Trump can — or will — keep extending the ban as the government continues to try to negotiate a deal for TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance. While there is no clear legal basis for the extensions, so far there have been no legal challenges against the administration. Trump has amassed more than 15 million followers on TikTok since he joined last year, and he has credited the trendsetting platform with helping him gain traction among young voters. He said in January that he has a 'warm spot for TikTok.' For now, TikTok continues to function for its 170 million users in the U.S. Tech giants Apple, Google and Oracle were persuaded to continue to offer and support the app, on the promise that Trump's Justice Department would not use the law to seek potentially steep fines against them. Americans are even more closely divided on what to do about TikTok than they were two years ago. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that about one-third of Americans said they supported a TikTok ban, down from 50% in March 2023. Roughly one-third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they weren't sure. Among those who said they supported banning the social media platform, about 8 in 10 cited concerns over users' data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report. Trump said Friday that on Monday or Tuesday, the U.S. would take the proposal to Chinese leader Xi Jinping or one of his representatives. The president said he thinks they 'probably' need China to approve the deal but he wasn't sure they needed to. When asked whether he was confident China would approve the deal, Trump said, 'I'm not confident but I think so.' He said that for the U.S., 'we make a lot of money if the deal goes through." The Chinese embassy in Washington said in a statement that it has no new information to share and 'China has reiterated its principled position on multiple occasions and will handle relevant issues in accordance with Chinese laws and regulations." Although it's unclear if ByteDance plans to sell TikTok, several potential bidders have come forward in the past few months. Aides for Vice President JD Vance, who was tapped to oversee a potential deal, have reached out to some parties, such as the artificial intelligence startup Perplexity AI, to get additional details about their bids, according to a person familiar with the matter. In January, Perplexity AI presented ByteDance with a merger proposal that would combine Perplexity's business with TikTok's U.S. operation. Perplexity had no comment on Monday. Other potential bidders include a consortium organised by billionaire business executive Frank McCourt, which recently recruited Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian as a strategic adviser. Investors in the consortium say they've offered ByteDance $20 billion in cash for TikTok's U.S. platform. And if successful, they plan to redesign the popular app with blockchain technology they say will provide users with more control over their online data. 'Every day that passes without a qualified divestiture of TikTok puts Americans at greater risk of manipulation and surveillance. We believe the administration will ultimately obey the courts and follow the requirements for a lawful divestiture,' McCourt's internet advocacy organization, Project Liberty, said in a statement. "We look forward to working with members of the administration, policymakers, and our many outstanding partners in The People's Bid to achieve this goal.' Among other possible investors are the software company Oracle and the investment firm Blackstone. Neither company immediately responded to messages seeking comment on Monday.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ruoming Pang quits Apple to join Meta's AI venture: Will it trigger more exits from Apple's AI models team?
Apple's AI division just took a heavy hit. Ruoming Pang, the engineer who led the company's foundation models team, is leaving Apple to join Meta. He had been at the centre of Apple's efforts to build its own AI models for Siri and Apple Intelligence. Now, he's off to work on Meta's new superintelligence group. Meta didn't just lure Pang with ambition for developing AI models. They reportedly offered him a package worth tens of millions per year. The company is pulling in top AI minds from rivals like OpenAI and Anthropic too with Mark Zuckerberg personally involved in recruiting, even hosting interviews at his home. Ruoming Pang's exit signals trouble at Apple's AI division Pang was overseeing around 100 people at Apple, working on models powering features like Genmoji, Priority Notifications, and the upgraded Siri. But all hasn't been smooth. Internally, Apple has been debating whether to continue building its own models or use outside ones from OpenAI or Anthropic. Zuck just poached another Chinese AI Pang, who led Apple's Foundation Models team, is joining Meta's Superintelligence that Apple has ~100 people working on 'Apple Intelligence' like stopping Apple from poaching AI talent like Zuck? That shift in strategy reportedly affected morale in Pang's team, known as the Apple Foundation Models (AFM) group. Some engineers have already hinted they're planning to leave. Pang's deputy, Tom Gunter, left just last month. Now that Pang is gone too, a bigger wave of exits might follow. Meta wants to dominate the AI race Meta has made it clear that AI is its top focus. It's investing tens of billions this year in AI infrastructure and hiring. The company recently reorganised its AI units to focus on what it calls 'superintelligence', a form of AI that can outperform humans at certain tasks. THE AI FREE AGENCY CONTINUES$META just poached $AAPL top AI exec, Ruoming Pang, for its new AI Superintelligence division 😳 Zuckerberg has already hired big names like Alexandr Wang from Scale AI and several researchers from OpenAI and Anthropic. Meta's offers are far higher than what most companies, including Apple, currently pay. What's next for Apple's AI efforts? After Pang's exit, Apple's AFM team will now be led by Zhifeng Chen. Instead of Pang's flat structure, Apple is now switching to a more layered format with several managers below Chen. Meanwhile, Apple's AI strategy is now mostly in the hands of Craig Federighi and Mike Rockwell. John Giannandrea, who used to lead the AI effort, has been moved away from Siri and other key projects. In June, Apple unveiled its AI features at WWDC. But most of the spotlight went to partners like OpenAI and Google, not Apple's in-house work. Now with Pang gone and other engineers potentially following, Apple's AI journey looks even harder.
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Madras HC upholds ED action on Xiaomi under FEMA
The Madras high court has upheld the Enforcement Directorate's action against Chinese mobile phone manufacturer Xiaomi under the foreign exchange management act (FEMA), in which the agency had ordered seizure of deposits worth ₹5,521 crore, stating that it cannot 'interfere' at this stage with the opinion formed under the FEMA rules. Madras HC upholds ED action on Xiaomi under FEMA The financial crimes probe agency had alleged that Xiaomi Technology India Pvt Ltd had remitted abroad foreign exchange worth ₹5,521 crore between 2015 and 2022 in the form of royalty payments to parent companies in violation of the law, and attached equivalent funds of the company in April 2022. The seizure was confirmed by an adjudicating authority or AA (a special director rank officer in ED) in September that year, which also issued a notice to the company stating it has 'formed an opinion' that an inquiry should be held in this case. Xiaomi India and its chief financial officer, Sameer B S Rao, through a batch of petitions, challenged the attachment, AA's formation of opinion under FEMA rules and the complaint filed by ED in June 2023. Declining to quash the proceedings, justice N Anand Venkatesh said in his order on June 25, 'It is not necessary for this Court to go deep into the reasons arrived at by the first respondent while forming an opinion. This Court only wanted to satisfy itself as to whether the first respondent had applied his mind and formed an opinion. Prima facie, there is application of mind on the part of the first respondent and at that stage, since it is the commencement of the proceedings towards actual adjudication, even a strong suspicion is enough to form an opinion.' Underlining why courts should not interfere in such cases, justice Venkatesh said - 'To understand it from the standpoint of view of criminal jurisprudence, it is more in the nature of taking cognizance of a complaint or a police report where strong suspicion is enough to proceed further with the trial. In cases of this nature, the courts must be wary while interfering with the further proceedings since the adjudication proceedings is at the nascent stage and only after formation of the opinion, the notices are provided with an opportunity of personal hearing to defend themselves'. '....this court is not inclined to interfere with the opinion formed by the first respondent (AA) under Rule 4(3) of the FEMA Rules,' the order adds. The high court, however, directed the ED to allow Xiaomi to inspect all the investigation records stating that 'Only if those documents are furnished to the petitioners (Xiaomi), they will be able to effectively defend themselves during the adjudication proceedings'. 'Hence, the missing documents from the entire record of investigation shall also be traced and furnished to the petitioners,' the order added. While seizing Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited's funds worth ₹5,551.27 crore in April 2022, ED had alleged that the company unauthorisedly remitted this amount in guise of royalty abroad which constitute violation of Section 4 of the FEMA. 'Such huge amounts in the name of royalties were remitted on the instructions of their Chinese parent group entities. The amount remitted to other two US based unrelated entities were also for the ultimate benefit of the Xiaomi group entities,' the ED had said then. Asserting that remittances began from 2015, a year after the company launched its operations in India, ED said 'Xiaomi India is a trader and distributor of mobile phones in India under the brand name of MI. It procures completely manufactured mobile sets and other products from the manufacturers in India. It has not availed any service from the three foreign based entities to whom such amounts have been transferred.' 'Under the cover of various unrelated documentary façade created amongst the group entities, the company remitted this amount in guise of royalty abroad which constitutes violation of Section 4 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). The company also provided misleading information to the banks while remitting the money abroad,' ED, which started a probe against Xiaomi in February 2022, said at that time. HT has reached out to Xiaomi for a comment.
