logo
Tax raid has made running my business ‘a f---ing struggle'

Tax raid has made running my business ‘a f---ing struggle'

Telegraph21-04-2025
Scott Collins has just spent £1.2m on a brand new underground bar in Covent Garden. Named Bloodsports, 30 flat-screen TVs adorn its walls, playing a combination of live sports and classic 1980s horror movies, while beers and bar snacks are served late into the night.
It is the kind of bar many could only dream of opening. So why is Collins, the co-founder of burger chain Meatliquor and one-time star of BBC Two's Million Pound Menu, so downbeat?
Running bars and restaurants, he says, just isn't fun any more. Rather, it has become 'a f---ing struggle'.
Collins signed the lease on Bloodsports last September. One month later, the Chancellor announced a swathe of tax rises on employers that kicked in earlier this month, heaping pressure on already-stretched hospitality firms.
'Had I known what the current financial climate was going to be like now, and the lack of consumer confidence, I wouldn't have bought this place,' says Collins.
'It was quite a tricky deal. It took a lot longer than expected, and since then the f------ world's got worse, which no one was expecting. So if I could turn back the clock, I wouldn't have done it.
'I can't see us making any money in the next financial year, and that's with opening a brand new site, so the coffers are empty.'
Of greatest concern to Collins is the rise in employers' National Insurance (NI) contributions and the lowering of the threshold at which contributions are due, from £9,100 to £5,000.
This, alongside a 6.7pc increase in the minimum wage, disproportionately hurts hospitality businesses because of the number of lower paid and part-time workers in the sector.
'We did our calculations in November, and just the National Insurance rise and the Living Wage rise – which then affects everyone being paid more that, because you can't not give everyone else a raise – we needed to find, as of April 1, an extra £300,000 per year,' says Collins.
'Things have got progressively worse'
That is easier said than done when consumers are cutting back on dining out after years of inflation and uncertainty. Restaurant sales fell by 0.6pc in February, according to data firm CGA, while hospitality sales within the M25 fell further, slumping 1.2pc year-on-year.
'Lunch has just fallen off a cliff, and you're now up against everyone discounting, especially the groups that have private equity backing.'
Collins is also facing pressure from suppliers who are attempting to pass the impact of the tax rises down the supply chain. 'Our big food supplier has just tried to pass on the 5pc uplift ... Everyone's trying to pass it on someone else. It's a never-ending story.'
Ultimately, 'it would be a lot easier to just shut up shop,' he says. 'But we employ 220 people. We're not going to let them go.'
Collins is the latest in a long line of boss to sound the alarm over the impact of October's Budget. Many have said they will have to cancel or pause investments and cut jobs as a result.
In a move seemingly designed to placate them, ministers have promised to slash red tape and consult with hospitality bosses on ways to boost the sector.
Sir Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, will also be handed fresh powers to 'call in' blocked planning applications. Collins says this is all 'welcomed in theory, but it needs to be more than just a press release'.
He does not say whether he backed Labour in last year's election, offering only a 'no comment'. Things were not easy under previous governments either, going as far back as the smoking ban in 2007, he says.
'Things have just got progressively worse. It's just laughable. There's no way I would be in this industry now if I'd had that all that laid in front of me 22 years ago when opening my first place, I don't think I could have done it.'
'One-stop fun shop'
A 30-year veteran of the hospitality industry, Collins ran pubs before launching Meatliquor as a pop-up kitchen in south London in 2011 with co-founder Yianni Papoutsis. Since then it has grown into a 10-site chain that is credited with helping drive a renaissance in British burgers.
'The first Meatliquor was pretty bonkers,' he says. 'We had two-hour queues almost every night the week for about two years, and at the time, that was my biggest problem in life – how to manage the queues.'
Meatliquor has endured while rival chains like Byron have been forced into restructuring and closures. Collins says this is because, unlike rivals, he never took private equity cash. These owners often load up their investments with debt to fund rapid expansion. However, high borrowing costs in the wake of the pandemic have hamstrung many of these businesses.
'A lot of people that have taken venture capital or private equity money are regretting that decision because they're just getting ground into the ground,' says Collins. 'We're fortunate. We've got very little debt.'
Meatliquor is backed by a handful of investors, including David Page, the founder of Franco Manca and former boss of Pizza Express, without whose advice Collins says he would have 'probably thrown in the towel a long time ago'.
Bloodsports, Collins' latest outing, is based on the dive bars found in the US. It serves Meatliquor's burgers, hot dogs and bar snacks such as deep fried mac and cheese, onion rings and chicken wings.
Collins calls it 'a bit of a one-stop fun shop'. 'We get the theatregoers, the theatre workers, the performers. The ballerinas from the Royal Opera House are in here quite regularly.'
But even getting the doors open at Bloodsports has been a battle. 'Just as we were about to sign [the lease], squatters moved in. The vendor was in Bali ... They came in like Die Hard. Police couldn't or wouldn't do anything. They were paid £15,000 cash to leave.'
Problems persist: it has been burgled twice since opening in February. 'The first one was just an iPad, but did a bit of damage. The second one, they took a lot of booze.'
Despite all of this, Collins remains a believer in the importance of pubs, bars and restaurants as part of the social fabric of the UK. 'We're a key pillar of the economy. We support jobs, communities, recovery,' he says.
'Hospitality brings people together. It's full of passion and potential. The red tape needs to be cut, the tax load needs to be eased, and then we can just do what we do best.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britain risks following France into a terrifying debt crisis
Britain risks following France into a terrifying debt crisis

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Britain risks following France into a terrifying debt crisis

Last week brought more bad news about the UK's public finances. June's figures for public sector borrowing came in at £20.7bn, well above the OBR's forecast and City expectations. What's more, £16.4bn of this was accounted for by debt interest payments. Yes, that's right: £16.4bn in one month. We are borrowing enormous sums to pay the interest on past borrowings of enormous sums. We are getting dangerously close to what economists call 'the debt trap'. This is when, under the pressure of rising debt interest payments, the debt ratio starts to explode. It goes without saying that it is good to avoid this, if you can. But can we? Be warned, you may need a ready supply of hot towels for this next bit. The key players in the debt drama are: the budget deficit, the debt ratio, the growth rate of the economy in money terms (which is equal to the real growth rate plus the rate of inflation) and the rate at which the Government can borrow. If the rate at which the Government borrows exceeds the growth of the economy (in nominal terms), then debt interest payments and the overall debt will rise as a share of GDP. In order to stop this process from leading to an ever-higher debt ratio, the Government must run a primary budget surplus (meaning a surplus on its budget without interest payments), requiring higher taxes and/or cuts in government spending. And the higher the initial debt ratio, the larger the surplus needs to be to stabilise the debt ratio. The debt dynamics are merciless. When emerging market countries become stuck in the debt trap, the result is usually default or much higher inflation, or both. Remarkably, given our pitifully low to non-existent real growth rate, the nominal growth of GDP (i.e. expressed in money terms), exceeds the average rate at which the Government borrows by a small margin. Phew! But this is somewhat misleading because the average cost of government debt is heavily influenced by past borrowing, some of which was at lower interest rates. When this debt matures, there is a risk that it will be refinanced at higher interest rates. So we are currently just avoiding the debt trap, but with the deficit so large, the debt ratio is still rising. In these circumstances, it is hardly surprising that the gloom is still gathering about the fiscal prospects that the Chancellor faces in the Budget this autumn. It hardly makes our position any better, but we are not alone. Amid all this domestic pessimism, few people have noticed what is happening to our close neighbour across the channel. France is facing a fiscal predicament every bit as serious as ours. For a start, France's ratio of government debt to GDP is higher than ours – 113pc of GDP compared with our 100pc. And its deficit is higher too – 5.8pc last year compared to our 5.1pc. And ours is set to be just under 4pc this year. In both countries, GDP growth has been weak, and prospects are clouded with uncertainty. The one area where France is better positioned is the cost of borrowing, and this really does show the weakness of the UK's position. Whereas 10-year bond yields here are 4.6pc, in France they stand at about 3.5pc, similar to other euro-zone members. In this regard, however, something extraordinary has been happening. French yields have been converging on Italy's. The gap between them is now only 0.18pc, the lowest for almost 20 years. It doesn't seem too fanciful to imagine that French yields will soon surpass Italy's. Admittedly, after a recent period of comparatively strong growth, it looks as though Italian economic growth is set to be slower than growth in France, returning to the long-established norm. That certainly does not make the job of stabilising the public finances any easier. And, at 135pc of GDP, Italy's debt ratio is a good deal higher than in France. But Italy possesses two striking advantages. First, its fiscal deficit is only 3.4pc of GDP, compared to France's 5.8pc. And excluding interest payments (the so-called primary budget), it is in a surplus of 0.5pc, compared to France's deficit of 3.7pc. The result is that to stabilise the debt ratio, Italy needs to tighten the budget deficit (through a mixture of higher taxes and expenditure cuts) by only 0.5pc of GDP. By contrast, to stabilise her debt ratio, France needs to tighten fiscal policy by over 3pc of GDP by 2027. Italy's second advantage is surprising to anyone who has followed Italian politics over the past 80 years. She seems to be more politically stable than France. Giorgia Meloni looks likely to be Italy's first post-war prime minister to complete their term. In France, there have been six prime ministers since 2020, and the current incumbent, Francois Bayrou, who heads a minority government, could be ousted any time soon. He recently announced a plan to tighten French fiscal policy by 1.5pc of GDP. By comparison, Rachel Reeves' Budget last October increased taxes by 1.2pc of GDP, but this was more than offset by increases in public expenditure. There is little chance of the proposed French tightening getting through parliament unscathed. The failure to pass a budget for next year, leading to the fall of the present government, could cause French bond yields to flare up. And then there is the presidential election in 2027. On voting intentions in the first round, Jordan Bardella, the likely candidate of Marine Le Pen's National Rally, is well ahead of the other candidates. Obviously, there's many a slip twixt the cup and the lip. But if the markets were to view a victory for the National Rally as likely, then they would surely send French bond yields much higher, thereby putting France in a dangerous fiscal position. We cannot gloat. There but for the grace of God go all of us.

Germany unlikely to fall foul of EU deficit rules, official tells FT
Germany unlikely to fall foul of EU deficit rules, official tells FT

Reuters

time3 hours ago

  • Reuters

Germany unlikely to fall foul of EU deficit rules, official tells FT

VIENNA, July 27 (Reuters) - The European Commission will probably not impose a so-called excessive deficit procedure on Germany for breaching the EU's budget deficit cap this year, Economic Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis told the Financial Times. Germany's new conservative-led coalition government has said it does not expect a planned spending spree, including on defence, to be found in breach of European Union rules that cap budget deficits at 3% of gross domestic product. Berlin's budget deficit is expected to come in at 3.3% of GDP this year, but since defence spending fully accounts for the amount over 3%, Germany "is likely not to end up in (the) excessive deficit procedure", Dombrovskis was quoted as saying in the FT interview published on Sunday. An excessive deficit procedure involves the Commission and EU finance ministers setting a corrective course to bring a member state's deficit back within the 3% limit. A country's failure to do so can in principle eventually lead to a fine. "We have to see the execution, because it's close (but) if everything holds, then it should not be the case for this year's budget," Dombrovskis said, adding that a final assessment would take place in the spring when data for 2025 is available. Under the EU's new fiscal rules, which the previous, more fiscally conservative German government helped negotiate, member states can exclude some defence spending from their deficits.

The DWP lists 87 medical conditions which would qualify claimants for £749 benefit
The DWP lists 87 medical conditions which would qualify claimants for £749 benefit

North Wales Live

time4 hours ago

  • North Wales Live

The DWP lists 87 medical conditions which would qualify claimants for £749 benefit

Claimants are being urged to check their eligibility for a regular support payment of up to £110 a week. Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is intended to help people living with long-term physical or mental health conditions, disabilities, or learning difficulties. And it is especially beneficial for those of State Pension age who wish to maintain their independence at home. Run by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), PIP is a non-means-tested, tax-free benefit that will pay either £73.90 or £110.40 per week during the 2025/26 financial year, depending on the level of support required. Join the North Wales Live Whatsapp community now These rates were increased by 1.7 per cent in line with inflation on April 7 this year, aiming to help households manage rising living costs. Payments are typically made every four weeks, meaning eligible claimants will receive either £295.60 or £441.60 per pay period, reports WalesOnline. Over the course of a year, this could amount to a maximum of £5,740.80. Earlier this year, the DWP announced proposed changes to PIP expected to come into effect from November 2026, impacting both new and existing claimants. Under the new rules, thousands of people are anticipated to lose their entitlement to PIP - a decision that has attracted widespread criticism. But the decision was later mostly reversed and no changes will take place next year, with a review to take place instead. This is everything you need to know about PIP, including eligibility criteria and the health conditions that qualify. What are Personal Independence Payments (PIP)? Personal Independence Payments (PIP) are designed to support individuals with long-term illnesses, mental health conditions, or physical or learning disabilities. The payments are typically made every four weeks. The eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is not based on National Insurance contributions and it's not means-tested. This implies that you can still qualify even if you're employed, have savings, or are receiving other benefits. PIP is divided into two components - a daily living rate and a mobility rate – and you could be eligible for one or both simultaneously. Both these rates offer a standard rate and an enhanced rate. This benefit is tax-free and the amount you receive is not affected by your income or savings. What is the value of PIP? Here are the new weekly rates, but remember that PIP is paid every four weeks: Daily living component: £73.90 (lower weekly rate) £110.40 (higher weekly rate). Mobility component: £29.20 (lower weekly rate) £77.05 (higher weekly rate). These rates mean that if, for example, you qualify for both the enhanced daily living and enhanced mobility components of the payments, you will receive a total of £749.80 every four weeks. If you qualify for both the standard daily living and standard mobility components, you will receive £412.40 every four weeks. Which medical conditions make you eligible for PIP? As reported by the Daily Record, there are 87 musculoskeletal conditions that could make you eligible for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) support. This aid can assist with daily living, mobility needs or both. It's crucial to remember that this list isn't exhaustive, so if your condition doesn't feature, don't be put off from making a claim. The PIP award is based on how your condition affects you, not the condition itself. Here's the list: Osteoarthritis of Hip. Osteoarthritis of Knee. Osteoarthritis of other single joint. Primary generalised Osteoarthritis. Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Fibromyalgia. Pain syndromes - Chronic - Other / type not known. Ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis - Psoriatic. Arthritis - Reactive. Inflammatory arthritis - Other / type not known. Juvenile chronic arthritis (Still's disease). Rheumatoid arthritis. Crystal deposition disorders - Other / type not known. Gout. Pseudogout. Osteochondritis. Osteonecrosis. Osteomalacia. Osteoporosis. Other metabolic and endocrine disorders of musculoskeletal system. Paget's disease. Rickets. Achondroplasia. Epiphyseal dysplasia - multiple. Genetic disorders, dysplasias and malformations - Other / type not known. Hereditary multiple exostosis (diaphyseal aclasis). Hypermobility syndrome. Marfan's syndrome. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Tumours of bone - benign. Compartment syndrome (Volkmann's ischaemia). Fracture complications - Other / type not known. Sudek's atrophy. Generalised musculoskeletal disease - Other / type not known. Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Rotator cuff disorder. Shoulder disorders - Other / type not known. Shoulder instability. Elbow disorders - Other / type not known. Golfers elbow (medial epicondylitis). Tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis). Carpal tunnel syndrome. Dupuytren's contracture. Tendon lesions. Tenosynovitis. Wrist and hand disorders - Other / type not known. Cervical disc lesion. Cervical spondylosis. Neck disorders - Other / type not known. Whiplash injury. Back pain - Non specific (mechanical). Back pain - Specific - Other / type not known. Kyphosis. Lumbar disc lesion. Lumbar spondylosis (OA spine). Schuermann's disease. Scoliosis. Spinal stenosis. Spondylolisthesis. Dislocation of the hip - congenital. Hip disorders - Other / type not known. Slipped upper femoral epiphysis. Bursitis. Chondromalacia patellae. Knee disorders - Other / type not known. Ligamentous instability of knee. Meniscal lesions. Osgood schlatters disease. Osteochondritis dissecans. Patellar dislocation - Recurrent. Ankle and foot disorders - Other / type not known. Club foot (talipes). Fore foot pain (Metatarsalgia). Hallux valgus /rigidus. Amputation - Lower limb(s). Amputation - Upper limb(s). Amputations - Upper and Lower limb/s. Abdomen - Injuries/Fracture/Dislocation of. Lower limb - Injuries/Fracture/Dislocation of. Multiple - Injuries/Fracture/Dislocation. Pelvis - Injuries/Fracture/Dislocation of. Spine - Injuries/Fracture/Dislocation of. Thorax - Injury/Fracture/Dislocation of. Upper limb - Injury/Fracture/Dislocation of. Musculoskeletal disease - Regional / Localised - Other / type not known. How to apply for PIP To qualify for the benefit, an assessment by an independent healthcare professional is required. This helps the DWP determine the level of help you need. Assessments can be conducted face-to-face, via video call, over the phone, or through paper-based evaluations. The DWP decides the method of assessment and you won't have a choice in this matter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store