
Trump considers forcing journalists to reveal sources who leaked Iran report
Donald Trump said he is weighing forcing journalists who published leaked details from a US intelligence report assessing the impact of the recent American military strikes on Iran to reveal their sources – and the president also claimed his administration may prosecute those reporters and sources if they don't comply.
In an interview Sunday with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Trump doubled down on his claim that the 21 June airstrikes aimed at certain Iranian facilities successfully crippled Iran's nuclear weapons program. He insisted the attacks destroyed key enriched uranium stockpiles, despite Iranian assertions that the material had been relocated before the strikes.
Trump dismissed the leaked intelligence assessment in question – which suggested the strikes only temporarily disrupted Iran's nuclear development – as incomplete and biased. The report, circulated among US lawmakers and intelligence officials, concluded that the damage inflicted was significantly less than what Trump's administration had publicly claimed.
The president has attacked both Democratic lawmakers and members of the media for sharing portions of the classified analysis. He then threatened legal consequences for those responsible.
During the interview, Bartiromo referenced a post Trump had shared on social media days earlier, in which he wrote: 'The Democrats are the ones who leaked the information on the PERFECT FLIGHT to the Nuclear Sites in Iran. They should be prosecuted!'
Trump then reiterated on-air that 'they should be prosecuted'.
'Who specifically?' Bartiromo asked.
Trump replied: 'You can find out – if they wanted, they could find out easily.'
In recent days, Trump has targeted CNN and The New York Times for their reporting on the strikes. He has condemned the coverage as 'unpatriotic' and even floated the possibility of legal action.
The two outlets, along with several others, reported that preliminary findings from the US's Defense Intelligence Agency indicated the strikes had only limited success. The bombings delayed Iran's nuclear ambitions by several months but stopped short of destroying the program outright, according to the assessment.
On Sunday, a social media account belonging to the Iranian leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, accused Trump of needing to 'exaggerate to cover up the truth and keep it secret' after the recent US military strikes 'could not do anything'.
Trump, in contrast, has repeatedly insisted that three nuclear facilities were 'obliterated'.
He elaborated on how his administration might pursue the sources of the leak.
'You go up and tell the reporter, 'national security – who gave it?'' Trump said. 'You have to do that. And I suspect we'll be doing things like that.'
In the US, the constitution generally protects journalists from being compelled to reveal their sources – but there are limits to that reporter's privilege, as it is colloquially known.
The president had threatened to sue CNN and the New York Times for publishing articles about the preliminary intelligence report ahead of his comments to Bartiromo.
In a letter to the Times, a lawyer for Trump said the article had damaged the president's reputation and demanded that the outlet 'retract and apologize for' the piece, which the letter described as 'false,' 'defamatory' and 'unpatriotic'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
US to restart trade negotiations with Canada immediately, White House says
WASHINGTON, June 30 (Reuters) - The United States will restart trade negotiations with Canada immediately after Canada scrapped its digital services tax targeting U.S. technology firms, White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said on Monday. "Absolutely," Hassett said on Fox News when asked about the talks restarting. President Donald Trump asked the Canadians to take the tax off at the G7 meeting in Canada, he said. "It's something that they've studied, now they've agreed to, and for sure, that means that we can get back to the negotiations."


Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Iranian threat already inside Britain
Iran's online disinformation has been paired with activism from sympathetic NGOs. The Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) is a driving force behind these campaigns. They've arranged annual Quds rallies, which is a tradition that was established by the 1979 Iranian Revolution leader Ruhollah Khomeini, and brandished Hezbollah flags until the Lebanese group was designated as a terror organisation in 2019. Despite investigations corroborating the IHRC's links to the Islamic Republic, the group still operates and is facing scrutiny for allegedly backing the Palestine Action sabotage campaign against Israeli targets. These networks thrive in part because of the endurance of Iranian dark money in the British financial system. To advance the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal, Britain lifted sanctions on Melli Bank and Bank Saderat in 2016. Melli Bank has been implicated in financing Iran-aligned Kataib Hezbollah militias in Iraq and Bank Saderat has funded Palestinian terror groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad. As major Iranian financial institutions still operate London offices and do business within a stone's throw of the Bank of England, their activities have received parliamentary scrutiny. Dame Margaret Hodge, a Labour peer from Barking, and Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former leader of the Conservative Party, both drew attention to this issue in 2024. Owing to mounting concerns about Iran's malign activities in Britain, the authorities have taken some concrete actions. In October 2024, MI5 chief Ken McCallum vowed to give his 'fullest attention to the risk of an increase in, or broadening of, Iranian state aggression in the UK' and highlighted the service's thwarting of 20 potentially lethal Iranian plots against British citizens. In March 2025 Dan Jarvis, the security minister, declared that unregistered Iranian state agents could face up to five years in prison. These half-measures are not nearly sufficient to neutralise the full scale of Iran's shadow war against Britain. Tighter sanctions on Iranian financial networks and curbs on malign influence operations are urgently needed.


Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Left has no idea how dumb and bigoted ‘free Palestine' sounds
Is there a more maddening slogan than 'Free, free Palestine'? It's inescapable. Wander into a city centre on a Saturday and you'll see swarms of the smug belting it out from behind their keffiyehs. It hangs thick in the air of every campus quad. It's chanted like a godless prayer by the plummy white saviours of Palestine Action. And of course it rang out across Glastonbury at the weekend. The eejits of Kneecap said it from inside their tricolour tea cosies. And Bob Vylan too. When he wasn't hollering for the death of the IDF, or telling us gammon that we'll never get our country back, he was barking: 'Free, free Palestine!' The crowd went wild. Those three words induce a Pavlovian response in the faux-virtuous middle classes of the modern Left. No sooner does the grim cry hit their ear drums than they're out of seats and babbling along, making a spectacle of their moral rectitude. It's partly the omnipresence of this tuneless motto that makes it so grating. It's the new 'Trans women are women' – a neo-religious mantra that the woke blather on a loop to show the world how righteous they are. Its aim is less to raise awareness about Palestine than to raise awareness about the ethical perfection of the person saying it. They say 'free, free' but all I hear is 'me, me'. But there's a bigger problem with this noise pollutant masquerading as a rallying cry: it is historically ignorant. Stunningly so. Nothing better captures the cluelessness of the Israelophobes than their unthinking utterance of this daft slogan. Ask yourself: free Palestine from what? The impression given by this suffocating chant is that evil Israel has its jackboot on Palestine's throat. Palestinians' right to statehood is being frustrated by those bastards in Tel Aviv, the keffiyeh classes will say. And it's high time to 'free, free' the Palestinian nation from the Israelis' deranged lust for every inch of the Holy Land. This just isn't true. It's a caricature bordering on defamation. The truth is that the Palestinians have been offered their own free state many times. And each time, they've turned their noses up at it. In 1947, the UN General Assembly passed a resolution calling for a two-state solution: one state for the Jews and one for Arabs. But the Arab nations said No. And when Israel declared independence in 1948, seven Arab armies invaded the newborn nation. Remind people of this next time they wail that the two-state solution is dead. Yes, but it wasn't Israel that killed it – it was strangled at birth by Israel's enemies. In 1993, the Oslo Accords tried to resuscitate the two-state solution. The Palestinian Authority was created. It was to enjoy self-governance over parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip – a nascent Palestinian state that might live in peace with Israel. But it was scuppered, by the murderous antics of Palestinian militants and the autocratic tendencies of the Palestinian Authority itself. Hamas and Islamic Jihad launched a wave of suicide bombings inside Israel to signal their bloody rejection of peace with Jews. And the PA descended into the cesspit of corruption. It is the PA that denies liberty to Palestinians. This is summed up in the fact that Mahmoud Abbas is currently in the 20th year of his four-year term as President of Palestine. Free Palestine? I agree – from its own venal leaders. Israel tried again. In 2005, then PM Ariel Sharon conceded more of the West Bank to Palestinian rule and handed over the entire Gaza Strip. We know what happened next. Hamas seized control of Gaza in 2007 and turned it into a forever launch site for fascistic violence against the Jewish nation. This culminated in the pogrom of October 7 when a 6,000-strong army of Islamofascists invaded Israel to rape and murder Jews. It is an unforgivable inversion of truth and reason to depict Israel as the thwarter of Palestinian liberty. It was Palestine's leaders, often with apocalyptic violence, who rejected statehood next to the Jewish State. The Left's Israel-haters have no idea how dumb and bigoted their cheap sloganeering sounds. If Palestine is to be 'freed', it should be from the racist, misogynistic, homophobic militia that ruthlessly rules over Gaza, and the bent elites living it up in Ramallah.