Family wants young driver restrictions after girl's crash death
Emily was one of three passengers in a car heading to school, in February 2013, when it hit a lorry that had stopped on a slip road onto the A1 at Long Bennington in Lincolnshire.Mrs Challen said the 18-year-old driver, who later pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving, had been distracted and failed to see the lorry. "There were four of them in the car," said Mrs Challen."They were all friends - good girls, just going to school, but just a moment of lost attention was fatal for Emily."The other passengers were not seriously hurt.
Graduated driving licences already exist in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, some US states, Finland, Norway, Sweden, France and Northern Ireland.Mrs Challen told the BBC she believed introducing them here could save hundreds of young lives."What I'd like to see is a restriction on young drivers carrying passengers for at least six months or a year after they pass their tests," she said."It's difficult for young people who are new to driving. It takes a lot of concentration. "Graduated driving licences would allow new drivers to build up their experience on the roads without distractions in their car."I do believe if they were in place at the time, Emily would still be alive."
The Department for Transport (DfT) has said it is not considering implementing graduated driving licences.Mrs Challen said: "Unfortunately they are not on board and they say the focus will be on educating young drivers. Emily and her friends had been educated. "They were all sensible girls and they were shown quite a graphic video of a crash [at school] the week before she was killed. I remember her saying how shocked she was, and her friends, but it didn't prevent the accident."You can't teach experience." Emily's younger sister Harriet, 26, who joined her mother at the meeting with MPs, said she restricted herself from driving with passengers after she passed her driving test aged 17."We put our own version of a graduated driving licence in," she said. "So I didn't carry passengers for the first year I drove and I self-enforced some of those restrictions we would see."Her mother said: "If we can't get a change in the law then we'd like to see more new drivers doing what Harriet did and choosing not to drive passengers until they have more experience."She felt it was important for her safety after what happened to Emily."There are now more than 200 families in our group, Forget Me Not Families Uniting, and we will keep pushing because we know this will save lives."
A Department for Transport spokesperson said: "Every death on our roads is a tragedy and our thoughts remain with the families of everyone who has lost a loved one in this way."Whilst we are not considering graduated driving licences, we absolutely recognise that young people are disproportionately victims of tragic incidents on our roads."We are determined to tackle this, including through our THINK! campaign, which has a focus on men aged 17 to 24 as they are four times more likely to be killed or seriously injured than other drivers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Car finance scandal victims to get less than £950 each in compensation
The financial regulator estimates the compensation scheme for those impacted by the car finance scandal could cost between £9 billion and £18 billion, a significant reduction from the £45 billion initially projected. Individuals eligible for compensation are forecasted to receive less than £950 each. The statement from the FCA comes after the Supreme Court ruled that hidden commissions from lenders to car dealers on car loans were not unlawful, impacting millions of potential compensation claims. The decision means the majority of claims for mis-sold car loans will not proceed, with only the most serious cases eligible for compensation. The FCA plans to launch a consultation for payouts by early October, with the first payments expected in 2026, advising consumers against using claims management companies.
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
FCA reveals plans for car finance compensation scheme that could lead to payouts for millions of drivers
Millions of drivers could still receive a pay out for 'mis-sold' car finance deals after the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said it is looking into a compensation scheme. On Friday, the Supreme Court delivered a blow to car buyers after it sided with major lenders in the car finance scandal. Had the decision gone the other way, it could have led to £44billion of payouts dubbed 'PPI on wheels'. However, today, the FCA announced it will consult on an industry-wide redress scheme that could begin paying out from next year. The financial watchdog says it hopes the scheme will offer fairness and certainty to both customers and firms and in doing so, ensure the integrity of the car finance industry. Millions of car owners have been hoping for payouts over claims they were 'mis-sold' finance deals dating back more than a decade. Many car finance firms failed to comply with rules or the law, by not providing customers with relevant information about commission paid by lenders to the car dealers who sold the loans. 'It is clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules, said Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, 'it's fair for their customers to be compensated.' He added: 'We also want to ensure that the market, relied on by millions each year, can continue to work well and consumers can get a fair deal. 'Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy to participate in, so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm. If you do, it will cost you a significant chunk of any money you get. 'It will take time to establish a scheme but we hope to start getting people any money they are owed next year.' Who will be entitled to compensation? While some car finance customers won't get compensation because in many cases commission payments were legal, the Supreme Court ruled that in certain circumstances the failure to properly disclose commission arrangements could be unfair and therefore unlawful. The FCA will propose rules on how lenders should decide whether someone is owed compensation and how much. It says it will monitor if firms are following the rules and act if they're not. The Supreme Court agreed with several factors the FCA had identified which could point towards an unfair relationship and fall foul of the Consumer Credit Act (CCA). Such factors could include the size of the commission relative to the loan charge, the nature of the commission, for example, whether it is discretionary and the characteristics of the customer. How much compensation is due to car buyers? The total cost of the compensation scheme is expected to rise above £9billion with the FCA estimating that most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation. The consultation will launch by early October. If the compensation scheme goes ahead, the first payments should be made in 2026. What should you do if you think you are eligible? People who have already complained don't need to do anything, according to the FCA. However, anyone who is concerned they were not told about commission and think they may have paid too much for their car finance lender should complain now. There is no need to use a claims management company or law firm and doing so could cost someone around 30 per cent of any compensation paid. The FCA recognises that car finance customers want to receive any compensation owed quickly while car finance firms, lenders and investors want certainty. The regulator says it will be working hard over the coming weeks on the details of how a scheme would work. What is the car finance scandal? The majority of new cars and some second-hand cars are bought via car finance deals where drivers pay an upfront deposit, borrow the rest from a lender and pay back the loan each month with interest. Each year some two million cars are purchased this way. However, many dealers and brokers were paid a behind-the scenes commission by lenders for signing buyers up to these agreements, which some drivers claimed they did not know. WHY WAS CAR FINANCE IN THE SUPREME COURT? In October, a ruling by the Court of Appeal deemed that these 'secret' commission payments without a consumers fully informed consent were unlawful. It considered the cases of three people with car finance deals, who argued they did not know about the commission made by their car dealers. Some lenders challenged that Court of Appeal decision so the case went to the Supreme Court. WHAT DID THE SUPREME COURT RULE? It ruled in favour of lenders instead of millions of consumers. Car finance firms did not unlawfully sell products by failing to disclose commissions. Supreme Court President Lord Reed said the court allowed the appeals brought by the finance companies. It did uphold one claim that a customer's relationship with the finance company was 'unfair' and that claimant will be awarded the amount of commission plus interest. Lord Reed then said 'other customers' claims are rejected'. It's a blow for motorists who did not know about the commission payments involved in their car finance deals. WILL ANYONE GET COMPENSATION? The FCA is consulting on setting up a redress scheme for those unknowingly signed up to a discretionary commission agreement (DCA) when they took out their car loans. In a DCA, lenders allow brokers and dealers to hike interest rates on car finance to increase their commission. These were banned in 2021 by the regulator. The watchdog has been probing DCAs since January 2024. Motorists must sit tight for six weeks as the FCA decides if it will set up a compensation scheme. This could cost lenders somewhere in the region of £5billion to £13billion, accountancy firm BDO says. WHAT DOES THE FCA SAY? The FCA says: Our detailed review of the past use of motor finance has shown that many firms were not complying with the law or our disclosure rules that were in force when they sold loans to consumers. Where consumers have lost out, they should be appropriately compensated in an orderly, consistent and efficient way. Some consumers have challenged their agreements with lenders through the courts. On Friday the Supreme Court ruled that in many cases commission payments could be legal, but a lender did act unfairly – and therefore unlawfully - due in part to the size of the commission it paid to the motor dealer and how it was disclosed. The Supreme Court agreed with several factors we had identified which could point towards an unfair relationship and fall foul of the Consumer Credit Act (CCA), whilst recognising it depends on the facts of each case. Such factors could include: the size of the commission relative to the charge for credit the nature of the commission, for example, whether it is discretionary the characteristics of the consumer compliance with regulatory rules the extent and manner of disclosure This clarity helps us because we have been looking at what is unfair and, prior to this judgment, there were different interpretations of the law coming from different courts. We will now consult on a redress scheme. Redress would depend on non-disclosure of the factors above and the interaction between them.
The Sun
33 minutes ago
- The Sun
Two men charged after girl, 12, is ‘kidnapped, raped and strangled in horror attack' that sparked outrage in UK town
TWO men have been charged after a girl, 12, was allegedly kidnapped, raped and strangled. Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, is accused of raping of the underage girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, on July 22. 2 2 A second man, Mohammad Kabir, also 23, has been charged with aiding and abetting rape, as well as strangulation and kidnap of the girl. News of the horror attack has sparked outrage in the local community. Many residents have demanded more answers from Warwickshire Police regarding the defendants. But a spokesperson for the force said: "Once someone is charged with an offence, we follow national guidance. "This guidance does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status." They added: "We work to hold offenders to account and will always do everything in our power to present a robust case to the courts and protect the integrity of court proceedings." Mulakhil is charged with raping the victim in the Cheverel Street of Nuneaton. The assault allegedly unfolded between 8.30pm and 9.45pm on Tuesday, July 22. CCTV footage from a nearby doorbell camera appeared to show a man walking with the girl at around 8pm. Cops detained the suspect on Saturday 26, and he was charged the following day. He appeared at Coventry Magistrates' Court on Monday and was remanded in custody. Mohammad Kabir, 23, was arrested in Nuneaton on July 31, and charged with kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting rape of a girl under 13. He appeared at Coventry Magistrates' Court yesterday and was also remanded in custody. Both defendants will next appear at Warwick Crown Court on 26 August. In their full statement, Warwickshire Police said: "There's been some questions about what we do and don't release as part of a high-profile investigation such as this. "Following the rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton on Tuesday 22 July we started an immediate and fast-moving investigation." The spokesperson added: "When something significant happens, we brief these partners and local elected officials on the circumstances of the crime, the investigation, the work being undertaken to arrest those responsible and how local people and partners can help a concerned community. "Where relevant, sensitive information around locations, details of the crime and policing activity to catch offenders can be shared, with a warning that this is sensitive or confidential information and disclosure by those being briefed could affect future court hearings. "We work to hold offenders to account and will always do everything in our power to present a robust case to the courts and protect the integrity of court proceedings."
