The first truly copyright-free AI video generator has arrived — here's what we know
Moonvalley, an AI video company, has announced the public release of its AI tool Marey. This was originally announced months ago, but is now available for filmmakers to try out.
The company makes two big promises with this release. Firstly, it will produce professional-level video that can be heavily edited and controlled. And more importantly, it was entirely trained on explicitly licensed material, avoiding all of the copyright concerns of some of its competitors.
This means that Moonvalley could be the first AI company to produce scenes for filmmakers, without the concerns of using other filmmakers' intellectual property in their own work.
'We built Marey because the industry told us existing AI video tools don't work for serious production,' Moonvalley CEO and co-founder Naeem Talukdar said, announcing the launch.
'Directors need precise control over every creative decision, plus legal confidence for commercial use. Today we're delivering both, and proving that the most powerful AI comes from partnership with creators, not exploitation of their work.'
Moonvalley has been gunning for this position for a while, looking to stand out as the ethical alternative to AI video in the professional world.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
The AI video market is packed. Along with the big professional names like Gemini and ChatGPT's Sora, there are smaller competitors from Runway, Pika, Higgsfield, Kling and more. In other words, it isn't the only AI video generator out there.
However, along with its take on copyright-free video, Moonvalley is aiming to make this new model better than its competitors. It was fully trained on native 1080p video and, by avoiding user-generated content in its training, can consistently produce higher quality footage.
The company claims that Marey can produce sharper footage up to five seconds at 24 FPS with consistent quality throughout. Directors can control object movement and camera control, and can alter motion, camera styles, and make small changes throughout the footage.
Users can try Marey on a monthly credits-based system. It's $14.99 for 100 credits, $34.99 for 250, and $149.99 for 1000.
While Moonvalley is positioning itself as a tool for Hollywood, it is more likely to appeal to small-time filmmakers who have a story to tell but lack the budget to bring it to life.
TechCrunch was shown the tool in action, detailing the level of control that users have over the film. Marey offers free camera motion, allowing you to adjust the camera trajectory with your mouse.
Moonvalley plans to roll out more features over the next few months, including controls for lighting, trajectories, and character libraries.
For now, this is in its early stages, but Moonvalley has clearly set its sights on beating the market when it comes to usable AI footage in film and TV.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' To Me Like I'm 12 — Here's What It Said
I'm no stranger to sweeping legislation. I have 30 years of combined experience covering politics and state government, advocating for healthcare and education nonprofits, and negotiating policy from both sides of the table. Discover More: Try This: However, when President Donald Trump unveiled his 'Big Beautiful Bill,' even I had to pause. What exactly is in it? What's at stake for everyday people now and in the future? I asked ChatGPT to cut through the noise and condense sprawling policy documents to provide me with a clear, emotionally neutral summary. In other words, I asked ChatGPT to explain it in a way that I would understand, as if I were a 12-year-old. Here's what it said. It's All In the Branding There's no official legislation called the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' According to ChatGPT, it's a branding phrase Trump used to signal his agenda. It includes tax cuts, deep rollbacks, and restructuring of social safety nets, carrying significant implications for energy, education, and public debt. Read Now: What Does It Mean for Average Americans? One of my first questions while reviewing any public policy, including Trump's budget bill, is how it would affect regular citizens. Same with ChatGPT. I asked how Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' would affect average Americans. It said that workers could see slightly larger paychecks if payroll taxes are reduced. However, there's a catch. 'Those same payroll taxes fund programs like Social Security and Medicare, and without a replacement funding mechanism, the long-term stability of those benefits could be in jeopardy,' ChatGPT said. 'We've seen versions of this play out before: short-term relief, long-term risk.' Healthcare on the Chopping Block For those who rely on the Affordable Care Act, it could bring significant disruption. According to ChatGPT, 'Trump has repeatedly signaled interest in dismantling parts of the ACA. That could mean higher premiums, fewer protections for people with preexisting conditions, and a market-wide ripple effect for anyone who buys insurance independently or through the exchanges.' While the bill doesn't eliminate the ACA outright, it lays the groundwork for targeted rollbacks that could weaken coverage and affordability. For millions of Americans, especially gig workers, freelancers, and early retirees, this isn't just a policy; it's a potential threat to their health and finances. Student Debt Relief Could Disappear Tucked into the Big Beautiful Bill are provisions that would unwind key aspects of the Biden administration's student debt relief efforts. While not framed explicitly as an attack on borrowers, the bill signals a sharp policy reversal, one that could shut down or restrict forgiveness programs and income-driven repayment options. According to ChatGPT, 'If you have student loans or are counting on forgiveness programs, they could disappear overnight. The bill includes a rollback of debt relief efforts and the potential return of higher interest rates for federal loans. And if you're a parent planning for college, the financial aid landscape could shift beneath your feet.' Social Security Is Fine Until It Isn't While the Big Beautiful Bill doesn't explicitly cut Social Security, its structural changes to payroll taxes and entitlement spending raise serious questions about long-term funding. By lowering or eliminating certain employer-employee tax obligations, the bill could weaken the primary revenue stream that supports Social Security's solvency. ChatGPT explained: 'Reducing payroll taxes without a clear replacement funding mechanism puts pressure on programs like Social Security and Medicare. Even if benefits aren't cut immediately, the financial sustainability of those programs becomes more fragile.' For retirees and future beneficiaries alike, this isn't just theoretical. A weakened Social Security trust fund could lead to delayed payments, reduced benefits, or increased retirement age, all of which disproportionately affect low-income earners and workers with physically demanding jobs. The Real Power Play From an AI and systems-thinking perspective, the 'Big Beautiful Bill' revealed something deeper: it's not just about the policies; it's about who benefits from speed and opacity. According to ChatGPT: 'Wealthy donors and corporate lobbyists can plan for these changes before they hit. They have access, leverage, and legal teams. The average worker? They're just trying to make rent and keep the lights on.' With a degree of self-awareness, ChatGPT said. 'While AI can help decode the structure, it can't shield anyone from the real-world consequences. That's why clarity, accountability, and deliberate scrutiny still matter. Because in a system where speed favors power, the rest of us need time to see clearly, before the ground shifts beneath our feet.' More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' To Me Like I'm 12 — Here's What It Said
Android Authority
25 minutes ago
- Android Authority
This is why I use two separate ChatGPT accounts
Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority I'll admit it: I'm a bit of a recovering AI addict. While I've had mixed feelings about AI from the start, as someone who spends a lot of time lost in thought, I've found it can be a useful tool for ideation, proofreading, entertainment, and much more. Recently, I've started scaling back my usage for reasons beyond the scope of this article, but for a while, I actually had two paid ChatGPT accounts. I know what you're thinking, and you're right, it's a bit excessive. Still, in some cases, it really can make sense to have two accounts. Would you ever consider having two AI accounts at once? 0 votes Yes, it's smart to seperate business and personal. NaN % Yes, but only if it's two different AI tools. NaN % No, it's a waste of resources and I get by fine with what I have. NaN % Other (Tell us in the comments) NaN % It all started when I found myself constantly hitting usage limits for my personal projects and entertainment, leaving me in a lurch when I needed AI for work-related tasks. For those who don't know, the ChatGPT Plus tier has different limits depending on the model. Some like the basic GPT 4o are virtually unlimited, while others have a firm daily or weekly count. For example, GPT 03 lets you send 100 messages a week, while 04-mini-high gives you 100 messages a day, and so 04-mini gives you 300 a day. I tend to rely the most on 03 and 04-mini-high outside of basic stuff like editing, because it is actually willing to tell you that you're wrong, unlike many of the other models that are people-pleasers to the extreme. Realizing I was blowing through my message limits long before the week was up, I immediately started considering my options, including adding a Gemini subscription instead of ChatGPT. Truthfully, I had tried both before and always found myself coming back to ChatGPT, so the decision was basically made for me. At that point, I began manually migrating some of my old chats over to the new account, basically copying and pasting core logs so ChatGPT and deleting records from my original mixed-use account. As a freelancer, my goal was to make sure anything related to clients was separated from my personal projects, which were mostly entertainment or experimental (like messing around with the API and similar tools just to learn). It wasn't even just about the limits. I found this separation helpful for more than just avoiding blowing through my limits on the wrong thing. As you might know, ChatGPT can learn your preferences. It's not exactly learning or memory in the traditional sense, but instead it basically creates an abstract pattern of your communication styles and preferences. Let's just say my way of talking about personal matters is very different from my professional voice. Lots of cursing and the like. After splitting my usage, I noticed that ChatGPT actually became better suited for the specific tasks I was performing on each account, as it understood my preferences for each use case a little better. That's probably an oversimplification of how ChatGPT works, but you get the idea. These days, I no longer pay for two accounts since I don't rely as heavily on ChatGPT or any AI tool anymore, but it's useful to keep my old logs around, and so I still have a ChatGPT Plus account for business and another free account that is for personal use. This way, I also retain the option of renewing my paid subscription if my usage habits change again in the future. How do you sign up for two accounts, and is this a TOS violation? Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority Think you could benefit from a second account? Signing up for two accounts is easy as long as you have at least two different email addresses. For payment, I used two different credit or bank cards, though it's unclear if that's really necessary. The bigger question is if it actually okay to do this, or will your accounts get suspended for violating policy? When I first considered this, I did my research. According to the Terms of Service (TOS), there's no firm rule against having two accounts as long as you aren't purposely trying to circumvent usage limits. My first thought was, 'Well, I kind of am' — after all, running out of limits was a big part of my problem. Still, by separating accounts, I was doing more than just trying to increase my limits. By dividing business and personal/entertainment uses, I was also organizing information better, and I was making sure I didn't use up all my limits on personal stuff that would hurt my work productivity. Before, I'd burn through my limits pretty quickly on silly time-wasting stuff like writing alternate timeline fiction and other entertainment. Ultimately, having two accounts can be a bit of a gray area, but as long as you're careful about how and why you use each account, it's not technically against the TOS. For what it's worth, ChatGPT agrees — but with some caveats. As the AI explains, two accounts are fine if: Your main reason for separating is genuinely to keep business and personal activities distinct—billing, data, privacy, and not accidentally using up the business quota on personal stuff. This is a reasonable, defensible use. If you had one account and were hitting limits due to mixed usage, it's normal (and frankly smart) to create a second account for business, especially if your work depends on reliable access. As noted by the ChatGPT bot itself, the TOS is mainly aimed at stopping people from abusing the system by creating multiple accounts to stack free or paid uses, or for heavy API stacking. Reading the actual TOS seems to give the same picture as well. Could this kind of 'gray area' usage still attract attention from ChatGPT staff? Maybe, but as long as you're genuinely separating your use cases, there shouldn't be any major issues. In fact, it's common practice to create accounts specifically for business use, including for tax purposes, and so I'd wager this is probably more common than many realize.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It's Never ‘Happened in the History of Tech to Any Company Before': OpenAI's Sam Altman Says ChatGPT is Growing at an Unprecedented Rate
When Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, described the extraordinary surge in user demand following a viral AI launch, he offered a candid glimpse into the operational pressures that come with leading the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution. Altman's remarks, delivered during a Bloomberg Originals interview, capture both the scale of recent events and the practical constraints that even the world's most advanced AI companies must contend with. Speaking about the massive spike in users resulting from the launch of Studio Ghibli-style images in a recent ChatGPT release, Altman recounted, 'This level of virality is an unusual thing. This last week, I don't think this has happened in the history of tech to any company before. I've seen viral moments, but I have never seen anyone have to deal with an influx of usage like this.' More News from Barchart OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Calls DeepSeek's Bluff: 'I Don't Think They Figured Out Something Way More Efficient' Vanguard Is Now the Top Investor in MicroStrategy Stock. Should You Buy MSTR Too? The Saturday Spread: Using Science to Pinpoint Empirically Enticing Trades in WMT, OKTA and RCAT Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! Altman's experience, while anecdotal, is rooted in the realities of managing systems that, in a matter of hours, can attract millions of new users. When pressed on the numbers, Altman confirmed that OpenAI added more than a million users in just a few hours — an unprecedented feat even by the standards of Silicon Valley. The technical demands of such growth are immense. Altman explained that generating images with the latest AI models is a computationally intensive process. To cope with the surge, OpenAI had to divert compute resources from research and slow down other features, highlighting the finite nature of their infrastructure. 'It's not like we have hundreds of thousands of GPUs sitting around spinning idly,' he noted, underscoring the limits faced even by leading AI firms. Altman's authority on these matters is well established. As the architect behind OpenAI's rise, he has overseen the development and deployment of some of the most influential AI systems in the world. His leadership has been marked by a willingness to confront both the opportunities and the constraints of large-scale AI. The decisions to borrow compute capacity and restrict certain features reflect a pragmatic approach to resource management — a challenge that is increasingly central as AI adoption accelerates. The quote also reveals Altman's forward-looking mindset. He described reviewing a list of planned feature launches and realizing that, without additional compute resources, not all could be delivered as intended. 'More compute means we can give you more AI,' he concluded, succinctly connecting infrastructure investment to the pace of innovation. Altman's comments resonate in a market environment where demand for AI services routinely outstrips supply. The rapid adoption of generative AI tools has forced companies to rethink their infrastructure strategies, driving massive investments in data centers, GPUs, and cloud capacity. Industry observers note that such surges in usage are likely to become more common as AI applications proliferate across sectors. In sum, Sam Altman's reflections on OpenAI's viral growth episode provide a window into the operational realities of modern AI development. His experience and measured responses reinforce his reputation as a leader capable of steering his company through both the promise and the growing pains of technological transformation. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
