The value of other perspective
As the topic of migration and human smuggling becomes even more politicised, understanding the human toll and the difficult choices people make is even more important today than it was a month ago. But there is bigger issue here: in a world where we put people in neat buckets of those "with us" and those "against us" - or labels of patriots and rebels - should we not question our own assumptions? Should we not think about the choices people make and the forces that shape those choices? Should we not wonder what would we do if we were to be in the same situation?
Closer to home celebrated Indian author Arundhati Roy wrote about her own interactions with Naxalites (sometimes also called Maoist insurgents) in her 2011 book, Walking with the Comrades. This book, like Jason's, focuses on the individuals, not just on the political part of the story. It focuses on a group that is viewed as insurgents and anti-state rebels by the Indian government. The author dispels many myths about who the people are, and why they think the way they do. She finds many ideas and practices of the movement deeply problematic, but she is also empathetic about human suffering, pain, frustration and marginalisation. The narrative is rich, honest and beautiful.
At a meeting with some students in January, I learned that there are courses at universities in Pakistan that use Roy's text. I was really pleased (or perhaps surprised) to hear that, but also troubled that no such text critical of our own policies is ever part of the curriculum. I went to bookstores in Lahore, Karachi and Islamabad, both in affluent areas and in old markets, and met with booksellers and those who were casually browsing, but there was rarely anything on the shelves that would humanise those who we demonise. The lived experience of those who we are quick to label, or otherise, was not to be found. Perhaps those books have not been written. Perhaps they have been written but not published.
The point here is not to agree with Jason De Leon or Arundhati Roy (and I am quite certain that they do not expect the readers to not disagree on some premise, point or argument), but to push ourselves to understand others. To allow for alternative perspectives, in books, op-eds, poetry and prose, is not a sign of weakness, but one of strength. In a hyper-polarised world, we should remember that putting people and their lives in pre-defined bins only creates sharp edges, not an integrated society.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Indian court frees 12 in 2006 Mumbai train bombings
An Indian prisoner, convicted of involvement in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts, looks out from a police van on his way to a special court in Mumbai on September 16, 2015. (AFP/File) An Indian court acquitted on Monday 12 men previously convicted for a series of bomb blasts that ripped through packed commuter trains in Mumbai in 2006 that killed 187 people. The men were convicted in 2015 of murder, conspiracy, and waging war against the country over the attacks during the evening rush hour of July 11, 2006 that also injured more than 800 people. Five were sentenced to death, while the other seven were given life imprisonment. But, 10 years later, the Bombay High Court set aside a lower court's verdict and acquitted the 12 men. Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak said in their judgment, the prosecution had 'utterly failed to establish the offense beyond the reasonable doubt against the accused on each count.' The men were ordered to be released from jail 'if they are not required to be detained in any other case.' The prosecution can appeal against the order in the Supreme Court. Read: US hosts Pakistan military chief at White House, India responds by warming to China A total of seven blasts ripped through the trains after the bombs, packed into pressure cookers, were placed in bags and hidden under newspapers and umbrellas. Prosecutors said the devices were assembled in Mumbai and deliberately placed in first-class coaches to target the city's wealthy Gujarati community. They said the bombings were intended as revenge for the riots in the western state of Gujarat in 2002, which left some 2,000 people dead, most of them Muslims. Prosecutors accused Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba of being behind the attacks, although a little-known outfit called the Lashkar-e-Qahhar later claimed responsibility. Pakistan denied the allegations.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US hosts Pakistan military chief at White House, India responds by warming to China
US President Donald Trump speaks at a dinner with Republican Senators, in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, July 18, 2025. Photo: Reuters US President Donald Trump's lunch meeting with Pakistan's military chief prompted a private diplomatic protest from India in a warning to Washington about risks to their bilateral ties, while New Delhi is recalibrating relations with China as a hedge, officials and analysts said. The meeting and other tensions in the US-India relationship, after decades of flourishing ties, have cast a shadow on trade negotiations, they said, as Trump's administration weighs tariffs against one of its major partners in the Indo-Pacific. India blames Pakistan, especially its military establishment, for supporting what it calls cross-border terrorism and has told the US it is sending the wrong signals by wooing Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, three senior Indian government officials directly aware of the matter told Reuters. It has created a sore spot that will hamper relations going forward, they said. Pakistan denies accusations that it supports militants who attack Indian targets and that New Delhi has provided no evidence that it is involved. US-India ties have strengthened in the past two decades despite minor hiccups, at least partly because both countries seek to counter China. The current problems are different, said Michael Kugelman, a Washington-based senior fellow at the Asia Pacific Foundation think tank. "The frequency and intensity with which the US is engaging with Pakistan, and seemingly not taking Indian concerns into account, especially after India's recent conflict with Pakistan, has contributed to a bit of a bilateral malaise." "The concern this time around is that one of the triggers for broader tensions, that being Trump's unpredictability, is extending into the trade realm with his approach to tariffs," he said. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's office and India's foreign ministry did not respond to a request for comment. The foreign ministry has previously said that it had "taken note" of the Trump-Munir meeting. A US official said they do not comment on private diplomatic communications and that the United States enjoys strong relationships with both India and Pakistan. "These relationships stand on their own merits, and we do not compare our bilateral relationships with one another," the US official said. LUNCH AT THE WHITE HOUSE The US seems to have taken a different tack on Pakistan after a brief conflict broke out between the nuclear-armed rivals in May when India launched strikes on what it called terrorist targets across the border in response to a deadly attack on tourists from the majority Hindu community in Indian Kashmir the previous month. After four days of aerial dogfights, missile and drone attacks, the two sides agreed to a cease-fire. Hindu-majority India and Islamic Pakistan have skirmished regularly and fought three full-scale wars since independence in 1947, two of them over the disputed Kashmir region. A few weeks after the May fighting, Trump hosted Munir for lunch at the White House, a major boost in ties with the country, which had largely languished under Trump's first term and Joe Biden. It was the first time a US president had hosted the head of Pakistan's army, considered the most powerful man in the country, at the White House unaccompanied by senior Pakistani civilian officials. Indian leaders have said Munir's view of India and Pakistan is steeped in religion. "Tourists were murdered in front of their families after ascertaining their faith," Indian foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said in May, referring to the Kashmir attack. "To understand that, you've got to also have a Pakistani leadership, especially their army chief, who is driven by an extreme religious outlook". Pakistan says it is Modi who is driven by religious extremism, and that his brand of Hindu nationalism has trampled on the rights of India's large Muslim minority. Modi and the Indian government say they do not discriminate against minorities. Munir's meeting in the White House added to India's chagrin over Trump's repeated insistence that he averted nuclear war between the two nations by threatening to stop trade negotiations with them. The comment drew a sharp response from Modi, who told Trump that the ceasefire was achieved through talks between army commanders of the two nations, and not US mediation. In the days following his June 18 meeting with Munir, people from Modi's office and India's national security adviser's office made separate calls to their US counterparts to register a protest, two of the officials said. The protest has not been previously reported. "We have communicated to the US our position on cross-border terrorism, which is a red line for us," said a senior Indian official. "These are difficult times ... Trump's inability to understand our concerns does create some wrinkle in ties," he added, seeking anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter. Trump and Munir discussed continuation of a counter-terrorism collaboration, under which the US has previously provided weapons to Pakistan, a non-NATO US ally, and talked about ways to further strengthen ties, a Pakistani readout of the meeting said. That raised concern in New Delhi that any arms Pakistan receives from the US could be turned on India if the neighbours end up in conflict again, two of the officials said. HARDER STANCE Despite what used to be public displays of bonhomie between Trump and Modi, India has been taking a slightly harder stance against the US in recent weeks, while trade discussions have also slowed, the Indian officials and an Indian industry lobbyist said. Modi declined an invitation from Trump to visit Washington after the G7 meeting in Canada in June. Earlier this month, New Delhi proposed retaliatory duties against the US at the World Trade Organization, showing trade talks were not going as smoothly as they were before the India-Pakistan clashes. India, like other nations, is trying to figure out a way to deal with Trump and is recalibrating ties with China as a hedge, said Harsh Pant, foreign policy head at India's Observer Research Foundation think tank. "Certainly there is an outreach to China," he said. "And I think it is is also reaching out". Last week, India's Jaishankar made his first visit to Beijing since a deadly 2020 border clash between Indian and Chinese troops. India is also making moves to ease restrictions on investments from China that were imposed following the 2020 clash. The thaw comes despite India's prickly relations with China and Beijing's close ties and military support to Pakistan. But New Delhi's concern about Trump's own engagement with China, which has ranged from conciliatory to confrontational, appears to have contributed to its shift in stance on Beijing. "With an unpredictable dealmaker in the White House, New Delhi cannot rule out Sino-US rapprochement," said Christopher Clary, an associate professor of political science at the University at Albany, New York. "India is troubled by Chinese help to Pakistan and growing Chinese influence elsewhere in India's near abroad, such as Bangladesh. Yet New Delhi has largely concluded that it should respond to creeping Chinese influence by focusing its pressures on its nearest neighbours and not on China."
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
The challenge of Fitna-Al-Hindustan
Security forces killed four terrorists during an operation in Balochistan's Kalat district, the military's media wing said in a statement yesterday. According to media reports, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said in a statement that the intelligence-based operation took place on the night of July 19-20, upon the 'reported presence of terrorists belonging to Indian proxy, Fitna al Hindustan'. It is important to recall that in May this year, the government designated all terrorist organisations in Balochistan as Fitna-Al-Hindustan. In my view, irked by its defeat in the four-day conflict with Pakistan, India has stepped up its support to Fitna-Al-Hindustan with a view to encouraging militants to accelerate their terrorist activities in Balochistan. Not only has India regressed immensely since Narendra Modi came to power in 2014, it is also promoting, encouraging and sponsoring terrorist activities in different parts of the world, including Pakistan. The world community must take note of growing violations of the international law by India. Nasir Bangash, (Peshawar) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
