Mass. voters refused to legalize psychedelics. Then came the campaign infighting.
:
The allegations put a spotlight on campaign finance laws for ballot question committees and nonprofit organizations.
Advertisement
Unlike rules for candidates, there are no limits on contributions to referendum committees and the groups don't have to disclose their financial activity as frequently.
In interviews, Moore and Morey said they felt a duty to inform regulators that their campaign bonuses were paid by Heroic Hearts Project and not publicly disclosed in political finance reports once they learned those payments may have violated the law.
They also said they hold Heroic Hearts Project in high esteem and accused the ballot question committee of manipulating the nonprofit. Their accusations
Related
:
'We basically ratted on ourselves because we didn't think it was right,' said Morey, a Marshfield resident who served as the campaign's community engagement director.
Advertisement
A spokesperson for the state Office of Campaign and Political Finance said it doesn't confirm complaints
made with the agency. On June 27, Maura D. Cronin, deputy general counsel at the agency, said in an email shared with the Globe that she was reviewing Moore's records.
The ballot committee, which closed in May, was known as Massachusetts for Mental Health Options or the Yes on 4 campaign, and reported raising more than
Related
:
The group pushed a measure that would have created therapeutic centers for accessing psychedelic drugs and would have allowed unregulated consumption and home growing of some psychedelic substances.
Voters
Danielle McCourt, chairperson of the ballot question committee, said she had no comment.
Related
:
Another campaign official said in a statement that the committee properly disclosed its activities. The statement said that nonprofit groups 'educated the public about psychedelics,' and that such action is legal.
'There is a basic distinction between these activities under the law,' said the official, Jared Moffat, former policy director for New Approach Advocacy Fund, a social welfare organization in Washington, D.C.
The fund shares a founder with the national political action committee, New Approach, which organized successful psychedelic legalization campaigns in Oregon and Colorado. The political action committee didn't respond to requests for comment.
Related
:
In a statement, Jesse Gould, founder and president of Heroic Hearts Project said the organization wouldn't comment on the complaints, but is 'committed to transparency and integrity in all of our activities.'
Advertisement
The group pays for veterans with post traumatic stress disorder to travel to places where psychedelics are legal for treatment.
Under tax laws, nonprofits, which don't have to disclose their donors, can take
as long as the spending doesn't exceed federal limits, which can be up to 20 percent of a group's annual spending.
Related
:
If
Geoff Foster, executive director of Common Cause Massachusetts, a nonpartisan good government group, said an investigation is appropriate.
'These are serious allegations and they warrant an investigation by OCPF,' he said.
Common Cause is backing legislation that would shed more light on campaign finance activity of ballot committees by requiring more frequent reporting.
Related
:
State regulators have previously sanctioned nonprofits for inadequately disclosing their support for ballot questions.
In 2017, the nonprofit
In 2018, regulators sanctioned
Related
:
Moore's complaints also ask state regulators to scrutinize a Massachusetts organization, Open Circle Alliance, which educates the public about psychedelics. The ballot committee helped to establish the organization in April 2024, and Emily Oneschuk, a ballot committee official, is the alliance's treasurer and a director, Moore's complaints said.
Advertisement
The committee didn't record any donations or payments involving Open Circle Alliance or Heroic Hearts Project, state campaign finance records show.
In an interview, Moore accused ballot committee leaders of using the groups to skirt campaign finance laws. He and Morey are involved with Mass Healing, a nonprofit formed this year that advocates for legal access to psychedelics for therapeutic reasons.
Related
:
'The only way for the movement to win is for this mismanagement to be exposed so it doesn't happen in other states,' said Moore, a Cambridge resident who has taken psychedelics to treat obsessive compulsive disorder.
Open Circle Alliance said in a statement that it operated independently from the campaign and did not receive funding from it or New Approach. Oneschuk 'stepped back' from alliance activities last June to work on the campaign, said Stefanie Jones and Rebecca Slater, co-founders of the group.
Moore's complaints also allege the Heroic Hearts Project paid another nonprofit, Students for Sensible Drug Policy, to organize college students.
Related
:
In an e-mail, Students for Sensible Drug Policy said it was reviewing the matter and wouldn't comment.
Moore's complaints also raised concerns about television ads.
The ballot question committee and Heroic Hearts Project paid for commercials, using the same agency to purchase time on local television, Federal Communication Commission records show.
Related
:
Commission records reviewed by the Globe show the nonprofit paid $317,603 for commercials on three local stations. The group said it looking into how much it spent.
Though the
Advertisement
Laura Crimaldi can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Prominent national Democrats ask Josh Kraft to stop using names, likenesses in unauthorized fundraising push
And, it turns out, Schiff never said Kraft could reach out with that urgent message. The Kraft Schiff's name and likeness is one of at least five the campaign has sent in recent weeks that feature prominent national Democrats who have not publicly weighed in on the Boston mayor's race. At least two of those politicians have now asked the Kraft campaign to stop using their names and likenesses in the email fundraising solicitations. 'Immediately after being informed that the Kraft campaign sent an email we did not approve of in Schiff's name, we reached out to the campaign to ask them to stop,' said a spokesperson for the Schiff campaign. 'While an unfortunate situation, the Kraft campaign let us know that it would not happen again.' Advertisement In addition to Schiff, Kraft fundraising emails featured US Representative Eric Swalwell of California; US Representative Jasmine Crockett of Texas; former North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper, who is running for US Senate; and Shawn Harris, a retired brigadier general and political candidate in Georgia. Swalwell's campaign said he also did not approve the fundraising solicitation, and is asking Kraft to put an end to it. Crockett, Cooper, and Harris did not return requests for comment from the Globe on Monday, but none appears to have publicly waded into the Boston mayor's race. Advertisement The emails sent by the Kraft campaign urged potential donors to financially support both Kraft and the highlighted politician in whose name the email was sent. So-called split list fundraising is not uncommon in Democratic politics; allied politicians often urge their donors to back like minded candidates in an effort to increase their ranks and forge connections. Typically, those fundraising solicitations come from politicians who have explicitly endorsed one another, or at least signed off on the shared fundraising push. It would be highly unusual, if not unheard of, for a political candidate to send such an email in a contested election if she had not already endorsed one of the candidates, political operatives said. Related : For example, in the last month alone, Mayor Michelle Wu's campaign has sent email blasts from US Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, as well as US Representative Ayanna Pressley. All three are vocal supporters of the mayor, and the emails sent in their name directed donors to give exclusively to Wu. Political and campaign finance experts called the Kraft campaign's recent fundraising blitz unorthodox, or even potentially misleading for donors, while Wu, whom Kraft is seeking to unseat, argued it could be illegal. In a letter on Sunday, Wu campaign treasurer Robert Binney called on the state Office of Campaign and Political Finance to investigate. Advertisement 'Even assuming a donor managed to decipher the fine print, these voters would reasonably assume that leading national figures like Senator Schiff and Representative Crockett are supporting Kraft's campaign for Mayor, which we believe to be untrue and an obvious attempt to deceive voters,' Binney wrote. 'At best these practices are highly deceptive and negligent, at worst they are illegal violations of our state campaign finance laws.' A spokesperson for the Kraft campaign defended the legality of the fundraising push, and said the unauthorized emails were 'an error on the part of our vendor.' 'Our vendor is responsible for the approvals process with all candidates involved. As a result of today's inquiries, we have been made aware that what we thought was an isolated incident in failing to seek approval was much larger,' said the spokesperson, Eileen O'Connor. 'As a result, we are moving to shut down the links and terminate our agreement with the consulting firm.' The OCPF complaint from Wu's campaign is 'lacking on both substantive and legal grounds,' O'Connor added. 'Michelle Wu is desperate to distract voters from her broken campaign promises and failures on so many pressing issues.' Related : The Kraft campaign has also The email featuring Schiff was sent on July 20. When Schiff's team reached out the next day, they were quickly told it would not happen again. But more than a week later, on Aug. 2, Kraft's campaign sent an email that appeared to come from Swalwell, another well known California Democrat. Advertisement 'As the senior-most Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, I've seen a lot,' the email begins, before railing against a Trump appointee and the actions of the administration. 'Chip in today,' the email urged, linking to an Swalwell also did not approve of the email sent in his voice, a spokesperson told the Globe Monday. 'We were not aware that they did this. We did not approve, nor would we have,' said Lisa Tucker, a spokesperson for Swalwell's campaign. Tucker said Swalwell's team had reached out to the Kraft campaign to ask that the joint Act Blue link be shut down. Tucker said Swalwell has offered a 'partner toolkit' for a year and a half 'and have never had something like this happen.' Typically, allied candidates who want to fundraise alongside him would seek permission directly, and the Swalwell campaign would approve of any fundraising emails before they are sent, she said. 'This is definitely making us reexamine our process to make sure this doesn't happen again,' Tucker said. Other emails featuring prominent national Democrats were sent on July 30 and Aug. 1, according to screenshots obtained by the Globe. Kraft is seen as Wu's closest rival in the mayor's race this year, though a recent Suffolk University/ Boston Globe poll Advertisement So far, Kraft has been a strong fundraiser. As of the end of June, Related : The fundraising emails raise serious questions about the Kraft campaign's tactics, said Jack Corrigan, a campaign finance lawyer and longtime Democratic operative who has donated to Wu this campaign cycle but does not work for her campaign. The emails — at least some of which were sent without permission of the high profile Democrats — imply an endorsement, and for donors, that could be 'deceptive,' Corrigan said. 'Even if it's legal,' he said, 'it's questionable.' Tal Kopan of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Emma Platoff can be reached at
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Texas Gov. Abbott threatened Democrats who fled state over redrawn voting maps. In Boston, they got a standing ovation.
The move has cast ripples far beyond Texas, with lawmakers in other states mulling whether to respond likewise to keep hold of their seats in Congress. Typically, state Legislatures redraw congressional district lines once every 10 years, to reflect the latest US Census. 'This not only affects Texas, but this affects the nation,' Texas state Representative Ana Hernandez a Democrat from Houston, said outside the Democrat-only lunch at the Westin Boston Seaport. Advertisement 'People are aware and watching across the nation,' said Hernandez, who also When Pritzker recognized Hernandez and the rest of the Texas delegation during the luncheon, attendees in the ballroom erupted in applause and waved white napkins in the air, according to a video viewed by the Globe. Pritzker, who has been the subject of speculation for a presidential run in 2028, did not speak to reporters Monday. Advertisement Texas Republicans began their redistricting effort after pressure from the Trump administration, which demanded state leaders If passed, the new maps would add five new Republican districts ahead of next year's midterm election cycle. The current action by Democrats effectively blocks voting on the new maps by breaking a quorum, or the minimum number of lawmakers a body's rules require for the measure to proceed. Yet to fully work, the entire Democratic delegation would need to stay out of Texas until at least November. If Democrats were still in Texas, they could be forcibly returned by Department of Public Safety state troopers. The department doesn't have jurisdiction outside the state. The quorum break is complicated by the fact that lawmakers also planned to vote on legislation to address the deadly July 4 floods in Texas's Hill Country. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton wrote Several Texas Democrats decamped to Chicago on Sunday and were greeted by Pritzker, who said Texas state Representative Armando Walle, a Houston Democrat, said his caucus has committed to breaking the quorum through the end of the special session as a way to 'awaken the national public' about the mid-decade move and its broader implications. 'It's a way to cheat the system,' Walle said. 'They are changing the district so they can choose their voters.' Advertisement The US Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that states can draw electoral maps on partisan grounds, but the Voting Rights Act maintains that the map cannot suppress the voting rights of people of color. The current Texas map, passed in 2021, is being challenged in court on allegations that it violates the act. Texas Democrats say the maps being proposed during this special legislative session would suppress the votes of people of color. Texas state Senator Carol Alvarado , a Houston Democrat, said the proposed maps break apart voting blocs 'that go to church together, that go to the grocery store, they go to the taqueria together.' She called the proposal 'a travesty.' Alvarado, who is the chair of the Texas Senate's Democratic caucus, said her caucus is backing their House colleagues 'to show a unifying front. Texas state Senator Sarah Eckhardt, of Houston, echoed the sentiment, though she acknowledged that Texas Democrats have not always had success when they've used the quorum break maneuver in the past. 'We don't win every battle. We don't know how this comes out, but to not fight this is simply not an option,' she said. 'And fighting inside the building with rigged rules is just conceding.' Texas state Senator Royce West, a Democrat from Dallas, said he's committed to backing his counterparts in the House 'to make certain that America is not unraveled based on partisan politics.' 'It's a 12-round fight, and you gotta . . . make certain that you can withstand all of the blows,' he said. At a meeting of the NCSL's standing committee on redistricting, the issue over mid-decade map changes didn't emerge until the very end of the session when Tennessee state Senator Jeff Yarbro, a Nashville Democrat, raised whether the panel would address it. Advertisement With several Texas lawmakers in attendance, Maryland state senator Cheryl Kagan, a Democrat who sits on the committee, said it wasn't prepared to address the topic because it 'was not anticipated that this would be before us the way that it now is.' Yarbro said in an interview afterward that NCSL, a bipartisan organization, should be paying attention to 'obviously one of the biggest issues facing legislatures across the country.' New York Governor Kathy Hochul said she and Democratic leaders are looking at The developments have created the prospect of 'tit-for-tat' redistricting, Yarbro said. 'All of us have an interest in avoiding a race to the bottom, which feels like where we're heading right now,' he said. 'But, like with so many things in America right now, we may have to touch the hot stove before we resolve to do better.' Samantha J. Gross can be reached at
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Breaking from his father, Josh Kraft criticizes Trump as having ‘stoked hatred and division'
Kraft, son of New England Patriots Owner Robert Kraft, has been tied to his father's connections to Trump during his campaign. Robert Kraft and Trump have a long history. In 2017, Kraft told the Globe that the two have 'been friends for years' and that during 'the worst time in my dad's life, [Trump] was there for him.' Advertisement Scrutiny over Robert Kraft's friendship with Trump increased after the Globe reported the After the meeting, Josh Kraft received campaign donations from four of the top attorneys at the firm, including its chairman, Brad Karp. At the time, a spokesperson for The Kraft Group denied any coordination between parties for the donation to the campaign. Advertisement Kraft said he is ready to deal with the consequences of the Trump presidency if he is elected mayor, amid 'a mountain of federal budget cuts along with a billion dollar tax credit shortfall.' He also spoke about Mayor Michelle Wu's criticism of his family's relationship with Trump. 'Michelle Wu wants to talk about me, I want to talk about all of you,' Kraft said. Wu could not be immediately reached for comment. Kraft also spoke out against Wu's handling of the Boston housing crisis, the White Stadium renovation, and the city's homelessness problem, saying, 'addiction does not discriminate.' Regarding housing, Kraft said his campaign promises to jump-start construction, implement ' 'Boston is going to be a place where families and young people have to leave the city, and only the wealthy can afford to live here,' Kraft said. Kraft also criticized Wu's comments about 'She's desperate to distract the voters from a record of broken and failed campaign promises and the failures of her policy plans, especially making it easier for the middle class to afford to live in the city of Boston,' Kraft said. Kraft said he proposes a plan to place White Stadium, located in Franklin Park, back in the hands of Boston Public Schools students and athletes. He previously criticized Mayor Wu for not disclosing the Advertisement The renovations, which were subject to lawsuits over alleged During the press conference, Kraft dismissed comments about Super PAC tax exemptions. Super PACs are not limited in their campaign contributions, and can donate more than the $1,000 limit. The Your City Your Future Super PAC that supports Kraft has donated more than $3 million to his campaign. He also did not discuss his tax returns, which his campaign promised to release before the preliminary vote on Sept. 9. His campaign revealed last week he earned $6.3 million in 2024 but declined to break down the sources of Kraft's income. Wu and others have criticized Kraft for his lack of income transparency and the possibility of conflicts of interest in his mayoral campaign. Kraft has already personally contributed $2 million to his campaign. Mayoral candidates are not required to release their tax returns, but it has become common practice to do so. Wu said she has disclosed her finances for the last 12 years. If elected, Kraft said he would not be involved with his family business to avoid conflicts of interest. Critics, including Wu, flagged The Kraft Group's proposed soccer stadium in Everett, to which The Kraft Group proposed mitigation payments of $750,000. Kraft served as the head of the family charity, the New England Patriot Charitable Foundation. The nonprofit reported that Kraft was not paid a salary for his role, but a spokesperson from the campaign said Advertisement Kraft was also the head of the Boston Boys and Girls Club for more than a decade, where he earned $350,000 in 2020, the year he stepped down from his leadership role. Maria Probert can be reached at
