Grad student discovers clawed creature tangled near WA lake. It's a new species
A graduate student came across a reddish-brown creature with claws that was tangled up in fishing line at a Washington lake — and it turned out to be a new species.
Its scientific name is Pacifastacus okanaganensis, but it's known commonly as the Okanagan crayfish.
A crayfish is a kind of crustacean, like a crab or lobster.
The new species identification was shared in a May 8 study in the peer-reviewed journal Zootaxa.
The graduate student, Eric Larson, has since graduated and is now an associate professor in the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
He's the lead author of the study, which also documents another new crayfish species in Oregon.
A method called genome skimming was used in identifying the new species.
The Okanagan crayfish is found in north central Washington and south central British Columbia, Canada, researchers said.
It's 'olive brown to brick red,' with a shell, claws and a pair of tubercles that extend from its head, among other features, according to researchers.
Its name comes 'from an Okanagan-Salish language place name' and acknowledges its distribution 'throughout the Okanagan and Thompson plateaus and Okanagan Lake, British Columbia, as well as Okanogan County, Washington,' researchers said.
Thousands of new species are found each year. Here are three of our most recent eye-catching stories.
→'Large' creature with black eyes found at mine and discovered as new species
→'Cryptic' creatures seen 'sunning themselves' in Canada. They're a new species
→4-foot-long island predator found 'enveloping' an attacker. It's a new species
Want to read more? Check out our stories here.
Multiple specimens were analyzed as part of the study.
Larson, who's been researching crayfish and similar creatures for years, including when he was a graduate student at the University of Washington in Seattle more than a decade ago, recalls that first Okanagan crayfish he came across — the one tangled in fishing line.
Larson was in the middle of his doctoral studies, and a colleague from Japan, Nisikawa Usio — also an author on the study — shared that he'd come across an unusual crayfish 'up the mountain from Spokane, Washington,' Larson told McClatchy News in a phone interview.
Usio encouraged Larson to take a look.
Larson did just that. He liked to hike and camp, and in his free time, he'd 'drive over the mountains and look for this animal,' he said.
He found it on the bank of a lake in the Okanogan-Omak area of Washington. When he saw it, he knew it was what he was looking for.
To Larson, crayfish are fascinating, but 'I think people can misjudge their diversity,' he said.
There are hundreds of species globally, and they differ 'in their habitat associations, how they interact with their food web (and) how abundant they might be,' Larson said.
That means they're not interchangeable and moving them around can have ripple effects, he said.
Identifying the new species is meaningful, he said, including because 'we can't really manage or conserve these animals if we don't know they exist.'
The research team included Usio, plus Cathryn L. Abbott, Scott R. Gilmore, Caren C. Helbing, Mark Louie D. Lopez, Hugh Macintosh, Liane M. Stenhouse and Bronwyn W. Williams.
Black-eyed mountain creature found under debris in Vietnam. It's a new species
Endangered seal gained 100 pounds in 'remarkable recovery.' See him waddle home
Baby baboon is first born at California zoo since 2019. See Defari snuggle mom
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
4 days ago
- Miami Herald
‘Guardian' creatures — that carry their young on their backs — are new species
In the rainforests of Malaysia, a group of 'guardian' creatures carry their young on their backs. The animals are about 1.5 inches long, but the males' bare backs can hold tadpoles carefully positioned on the skin as they are moved between shallow puddles. The guardian frogs of Borneo have long been broken up into two distinct species: Limnonectes palavanensis, the smooth guardian frog, and Limnonectes finchi, the rough guardian frog. Now, as researchers studied these frogs across the Malaysian islands, they noticed that frogs previously thought to belong to the smooth species had different calls, according to a study published June 23 in the peer-reviewed journal Zootaxa. The smooth guardian frogs aren't one species at all — they're seven different species. Limnonectes palavanensis was first identified on the island of Palawan in the Phillipines in 1894 and was later found in Borneo in 1897, according to the study. The animals were collected by British civil servant and naturalist Alfred Hart Everett, but it wasn't until the mid-20th century that researchers first observed 'tadpole-transport' by the species, researchers said. After researchers noticed discrepancies in the calls of different smooth guardian frogs, they set out to test their theory that there may be more than one species present on Borneo by collecting frogs by hand at night and photographing them in the field, according to the study. The original L. palavanensis is described as being small in size with a 'moderately sturdy' body that is widest toward the head and tapers back toward the groin. Their skin is like that of untanned leather, researchers said, and small bumps are scattered on the upper eyelid and back. The species is brown with blackish bands, and the sides of the body have white in them, according to the study. Researchers gave the species a new common name: the Palawan guardian frog. Genetic testing confirmed the presence of seven other closely related species that had been misidentified as the Palawan guardian frog, according to the study. Limnonectes gunungensis, L. kinabaluensis, L. nephophilus, L. oreibates, L. phylax, L. sarawakensis and L. suboliferus were described by researchers. L. gunungensis, or the mountain guardian frog, is found in the 'moist leaf litter' near small streams in the mountains of Sarawak, Malaysia, according to the study. The Kinabalu guardian frog, or L. kinabaluensis, was 'collected under a log, another one on a rock, others on the ground and under leaves in leaf litter,' researchers said. The frog was also observed releasing tadpoles from its back into a puddle in Kinabalu National Park. L. nephophilus earns its common name, the cloud-forest guardian frog, from its home in the montane cloud forests of Gunung Mulu and Gunung Murud, according to the study. A tadpole of the species was found in a small pool between rocks in a dried stream bed. The Penrissen guardian frog, L. oreibates, makes slow chirping calls and derives its name from the ancient Greek word for 'mountaineer,' according to the study. Another male of this species was found along an intermittent stream with tadpoles on his back. L. phylax kept the common name of the smooth guardian frog because males were found guarding their eggs before reaching the tadpole stage, researchers said. Once the eggs hatch, the tadpoles hitch a ride on their father to a close body of water. The Sarawak guardian frog, L. sarawakensis, was found in Lambir Hills National Park and has a long rising trill of a call, according to the study. Tadpoles were discovered in 'pools of small intermittent streams, in low shallow buttress tank, in a water-filled hole in a log, in small isolated rain pools on forest floor and in a shallow puddle with silky bottom and scattered leaves,' researchers said. The last new species, L. suboliferus, was found in a place called 'frog pond' in Kubah National Park, according to the study. The western guardian frog earns its name from the Latin words meaning 'the one that carries the offspring.' The research team includes J. Maximilian Dehling, Dario N. Neokleous, Indraneil Das, T. Ulmar Grafe, Pui Yong Min and Stefan T. Hertwig.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Researchers stunned after uncovering creature not seen since early 1900s: 'We spent a few hours digging'
An elusive eel species was documented anew in northeastern India, according to McClatchy News. Renamed as Ophichthys hodgarti, the animal, while not unknown to locals, hadn't been identified by scientists since an 80-mile British expedition in the early 1900s through what is now the state of Arunachal Pradesh. Researchers more recently followed in the footsteps of that expedition and were able to find live specimens along the treacherous terrain of the Siang Valley. A report of their findings was published in the journal Zootaxa on May 19. "We spent a few hours digging through the mud and rocks until we found the first one," co-author Nilanjan Mukherjee told McClatchy in May. "The moment we caught it and transferred it to a container, I knew we had found the eel." Mukherjee was surprised by how much time the eel spent outside of water, including on a wet road some distance from a water source. Many such animals stick to marine environments. In their publication, the co-authors wrote, "The fact that over a century has elapsed between the description of O. hodgarti and its rediscovery serves to highlight the gaps in our knowledge … and suggests opportunities for researchers to intensify exploratory efforts to fill these gaps." Supporting research efforts to address such gaps could uncover knowledge about other unknown or lesser-known species, potentially revealing even more eclectic wildlife communities. Indeed, the region where the elusive eels were found is home to many and varied animals. Rare tigers and fish have previously been spotted in Arunachal Pradesh, perhaps a hotbed for biodiversity, which is an important pillar of thriving ecosystems. Rich ecosystems can serve all living things, including humans, in unforeseen ways. For example, researchers discovered that a species of Thai bat has been hunting destructive insects that might otherwise wreak havoc on local crops. In another instance, sea otters have been found to be protective of kelp forests by feeding on urchins that might otherwise decimate kelp. Kelp provides an important habitat for commercial fisheries and makes for a harvestable product itself. Should we be actively working to kill invasive species? Absolutely It depends on the species I don't know No — leave nature alone Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. The more research we dedicate to these relationships, the more we can see the value of intact ecosystems and of protecting them. "We are more likely to conserve species if we know what we stand to lose and (to conserve) landscapes if we know what inhabits them," Mukherjee told McClatchy News about the importance of studying Ophichthys hodgarti, "and this information can only be gained through exploration and research." Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
USA Today
20-06-2025
- USA Today
Climate change threatens world food supply. How bad could it be in the U.S.?
It's especially worrisome in the United States, where top crop production could drop by as much as 50% by 2100. The planet's food system faces growing risks from climate change, a new study says. It's especially worrisome in the United States, where top crop production could drop by as much as 50% by 2100. The study, published June 18, assessed six staple crops – maize (corn), soybeans, rice, wheat, cassava and sorghum – and found that only rice might avoid substantial losses from rising temperatures. 'If the climate warms by 3 degrees, that's basically like everyone on the planet giving up breakfast," study co-author Solomon Hsiang of Stanford University said in a statement. Will there still be a Corn Belt? The projected losses for U.S. agriculture are especially steep, according to the study. 'Places in the Midwest that are really well suited for present-day corn and soybean production just get hammered under a high warming future,' said lead study author Andrew Hultgren of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. 'You do start to wonder if the Corn Belt is going to be the Corn Belt in the future.' Scientists estimated that for every 1.8-degree Fahrenheit increase in temperature above pre-industrial levels, production will decline by 120 calories per person per day, the equivalent of 4.4% of today's daily consumption. That will push up prices and make it harder for people to access food, Hsiang told CNN. Wheat, soy and corn most affected Wheat and corn will be among the crops most at risk, the study found. The study suggested that under a high-emissions scenario, by the end of the century, maize production could decline by up to 40% in the United States, Eastern China, Central Asia, Southern Africa and the Middle East. Wheat loses could range from 15% to 25% in Europe, Africa and South America and 30% to 40% in China, Russia, the United States and Canada. 'This is basically like sending our agricultural profits overseas," Hsiang said in a statement from Stanford. "We will be sending benefits to producers in Canada, Russia, China. Those are the winners, and we in the U.S. are the losers. The longer we wait to reduce emissions, the more money we lose.' Data center: Hot, hotter, hottest: How much will climate change warm your county? Steepest losses at the extremes The steepest losses occur at the extremes of the agricultural economy, according to a statement from Stanford University. That includes modern breadbaskets that now enjoy some of the world's best growing conditions, such as the United States, and subsistence farming communities that rely on small harvests of cassava. In terms of food production capacity from staple crops, the analysis found yield losses may average 41% in the wealthiest regions and 28% in the lowest-income regions by 2100. In the study, scientists concluded further adaptation and the expansion of cropland may be needed to ensure food security and limit the effects of climate change. A favorable climate, Hsiang said, is a big part of what keeps farmland productive across generations. 'Farmers know how to maintain the soil, invest in infrastructure, repair the barn,' Hsiang said. 'But if you're letting the climate depreciate, the rest of it is a waste. The land you leave to your kids will be good for something, but not for farming.' The study was published in the peer-reviewed British journal Nature.
