logo
Trump settlement with CBS sparks viewer outrage

Trump settlement with CBS sparks viewer outrage

Daily Mail​14 hours ago
By and ALEX HAMMER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
Published: |
CBS and Paramount are set to pay a humiliating settlement to Donald Trump that goes beyond millions in cash payouts and could flood their liberal audiences with conservative content. The president is set to get $16million from CBS and Paramount straight away to reimburse him for legal fees for what he claims is misleading editing to an interview before the election with rival Kamala Harris.
The remaining money will help fund a future presidential library and serve some of Trump's favorite charities, at his discretion. However, the president has also won more than $15million more in earned media for both himself and the conservative movement that could have left-leaning viewers seeing red. The president will receive that much in advertising, public service announcements and other content that backs conservative causes, Fox News Digital reports.
Further, CBS will institute a new 'Trump rule' in its editorial standards that forces them to quickly put out unedited transcripts of any interviews with presidential candidates. 'With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit,' a spokesperson for Trump's legal team said. 'CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle. President Trump will always ensure that no one gets away with lying to the American People as he continues on his singular mission to Make America Great Again.'
The suit, filed last October, accuses Paramount, CBS and its flagship show 60 Minutes of deceptively editing an interview with then–Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris just weeks before the election. Trump alleges the footage was manipulated to 'tip the scales' in Harris's favor. Lawyers for Trump and CBS parent company Paramount have been 'engaged in good faith, advanced, settlement negotiations,' according to court filings Monday. Now, it appears that Trump is set to get more than even the $20million a mediator for both sides proposed, and is set to have a new rule named after himself at the network.
Trump alleges the 60 Minutes footage was manipulated to 'tip the scales' in Harris's favor. CBS has denied the claim, slamming the allegations as coming 'completely without merit.' In recent weeks, Paramount reportedly balked at settling the suit over fears of facing legal backlash for bowing to the president.
Paramount brass believed any large settlement could be considered a bribe, since the the company's proposed $8 billion merger with Skydance must be approved by the Trump administration. Trump's team has denied that his administration's approval of the deal is contingent on settling. Paramount heiress Shari Redstone, who has been pushing to close the Skydance deal, stands to make more than $1 billion as Paramount's primary shareholder. She reportedly offered to pay as much as $50 million to make the suit go away. Skydance is run by David Ellison, the son of Trump ally Larry Ellison. Last week, sources told the New York Post that David, 41, had become confident the $8 billion deal would close by the end of the summer. Former CBS CEO Wendy McMahon and longtime 60 Minutes boss Bill Owens both left their roles in protest of Paramount's willingness to settle.
The A-List stars of 60 Minutes recently demanded that CBS News appoint their pick for the show's next executive producer. It's a settlement that continues Trump's winning streak against media companies he believes have engaged in dishonest practices against him. In December, ABC News agreed to pay $15 million to Donald Trump to settle a lawsuit over assertions made by top anchor George Stephanopoulos that he was found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll. The settlement, first reported by Fox News , was publicly filed on Saturday and revealed that the parties had come to an agreement in the suit. It stipulates that the network will pay $15 million as a charitable contribution towards Trump's presidential library.
ABC will also post a note on its website expressing regret over the claim in a March 10 segment on "This Week" made by Stephanopoulos. They will also pay his legal fees as part of the settlement, which have totaled $1 million. A statement from the network said: 'ABC News and George Stephanopoulos regret statements regarding President Donald J. Trump made during an interview by George Stephanopoulos with Rep. Nancy Mace on ABC's This Week on March 10, 2024.' Trump had sued Stephanopoulos and the network for defamation soon after the segment aired. His lawyers accused Stephanopoulos of making the statements with 'malice' and a disregard for the truth.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Let Puffy go': outside court, Sean ‘Diddy' Combs supporters hail verdict
‘Let Puffy go': outside court, Sean ‘Diddy' Combs supporters hail verdict

The Guardian

time22 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘Let Puffy go': outside court, Sean ‘Diddy' Combs supporters hail verdict

After the jury returned a mixed verdict in the federal sex-trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs, supporters of the 55-year-old music mogul gathered outside the courthouse on Wednesday in celebration. Combs was found guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution and not guilty of two counts of sex trafficking and a count of racketeering conspiracy. The verdict, delivered by a jury of eight men and four women, is seen by many legal experts as the best outcome Combs could have hoped for outside of a full acquittal. Outside the federal courthouse in lower Manhattan, dozens of Combs's supporters gathered after the verdict was delivered. Many chanted his name and cheered as several members of his family exited the building following the announcement. 'Let Puffy go!' some supporters chanted, putting heir fists in the air. 'Not guilty!' others shouted. Music filled the air as supporters played Diddy Free, a track released during closing arguments on Friday by one of Combs's sons, King Combs, and Ye, formerly Kanye West, who briefly came to support Combs in court during the trial. The crowd outside the courthouse danced and celebrated, with some handing out bottles of baby oil and lathering themselves in it. Baby oil played a prominent role in this trial; many witnesses testified that Combs used copious amounts of baby oil during his drug-fueled sex marathons referred to as 'freak-offs'. Additionally, large amounts of baby oil were found at Combs's home during federal raids. By early afternoon, as the crowd outside the courthouse began to grow, the New York police department increased their presence outside the courthouse. One supporter was seen holding a Sean John T-shirt, a company created by Combs, while others wore T-shirts that read 'Freako is not a Rico'. But while Combs's supporters celebrated, organizations that support victims of sexual abuse and domestic said they were disappointed in the verdict. UltraViolet, a women's rights organization that held a demonstration last week outside of the trial in support of sexual assault survivors, said in a statement that the verdict on Wednesday was 'a decisive moment for our justice system, one which threatens to undo the sacrifice of courageous survivors who stepped forward to share their stories in this trial, as well as to all those abused by Diddy who weren't able to'. 'Today's verdict is not just a stain on a criminal justice system that for decades has failed to hold accountable abusers like Diddy, it's also an indictment of a culture in which not believing women and victims of sexual assault remains endemic,' they added. More than 50 members of the media were also gathered outside the courthouse to cover the verdict and its aftermath. The attorney for Combs's former girlfriend and the star government witness in the case – Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura – told reporters outside the courthouse that his team is pleased that Combs has 'finally been held accountable' but added that 'of course, we would have liked to have seen a conviction on the sex crimes and Rico, but we understand that 'beyond a reasonable doubt' is a high standard'. 'We're just pleased he still faces substantial jail time,' he added. Combs had pleaded not guilty to one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. The jury found him guilty of the transportation to engage in prostitution counts, which each carry a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. Since his arrest last September, Combs has remained incarcerated without bail in a federal detention facility in Brooklyn. He has a bail hearing that is scheduled for 5pm ET on Wednesday to determine if he will remain in custody or whether he will be released. 'I hope he gets released today!' one supporter yelled.

Judge denies bid by the suspect in Tupac Shakur's killing for a new trial in a jailhouse fight
Judge denies bid by the suspect in Tupac Shakur's killing for a new trial in a jailhouse fight

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Judge denies bid by the suspect in Tupac Shakur's killing for a new trial in a jailhouse fight

Duane 'Keffe D' Davis, who is awaiting trial in the 1996 killing of rap icon Tupac Shakur, has lost a bid for a new trial in a separate battery case tied to a jailhouse fight. The ruling came Wednesday after a tense hearing in a Las Vegas courtroom that underscored the high-profile status of the defendant and his upcoming trial in one of hip-hop's most infamous crimes. The jurors who convicted Davis of battery in the jailhouse fight were put on the witness stand Wednesday. One by one, each of them denied claims by Davis' son and a man who describes himself as a journalist that they overheard one of the jurors talking about the battery case during a lunch break ahead of deliberations. Both Davis' son, Duane Davis Jr., and the self-described journalist, Richard Bond, testified Wednesday about hearing the juror's comments in the hallway outside of the courtroom on the final day of a two-day trial in April. 'Those two witnesses do have a relationship and a bias and a motive to testify in a certain way, whether subconsciously or not,' Clark County District Judge Nadia Krall said while ruling from the bench. It was revealed Wednesday when prosecutor Marc DiGiacomo questioned the men separately that they considered each other friends, that Bond had been sending money to both Duane Davis and his son, and that Bond had advised them to fire their attorney, Carl Arnold. 'Ever taken a class on journalistic ethics?' DiGiacomo asked Bond. 'No, I have not taken a class on journalistic ethics," Bond said. The fight in December 2024 in a common room was captured on security video. Prosecutors said Davis was being escorted by a corrections officer back to his unit when he and another man exchanged words and then started fighting. Arnold said he was ambushed and acted in self-defense. DiGiacomo, who also is prosecuting Duane Davis in the Shakur killing, said after court that he had no comment. A spokesperson for Arnold's office also declined to comment. Arnold said in court Wednesday that his client did not receive a fair trial in the battery case because of the juror's apparent comments. The juror himself denied it multiple times while on the witness stand. Wednesday's hearing was not the first time that the credibility of those with ties to Davis has been questioned in court. Davis, the only person ever charged in Shakur's death, had sought to be freed from custody shortly after his arrest in September 2023. But a judge rejected his request, saying she suspected a cover-up of the true source of funds for his bond. A music record executive offering to underwrite Davis' $750,000 bail at the time testified that he obtained the money legally and wanted to help Davis because he's 'always been a monumental person in our community." But the judge said she was skeptical after receiving two identical letters apparently from an entertainment company that Cash 'Wack 100' Jones says wired him the funds as payment for his work. One letter was signed with a name that had no ties to the company, the judge said, while the other included a misspelled name and a return address tied to a doctor's office. Davis has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder. He's accused of orchestrating the fatal drive-by shooting of Shakur nearly 30 years ago at a traffic light near the Las Vegas Strip. Prosecutors say the evidence against Davis is strong, including his own accounts of the shooting throughout the years in interviews and a 2019 tell-all memoir. His trial is scheduled for February. Shakur's death at 25 came as his fourth solo album, 'All Eyez on Me,' remained on the charts, with some 5 million copies sold. Nominated six times for a Grammy Award, Shakur is still largely considered one of the most influential and versatile rappers of all time.

Pentagon says US strikes set back Iran nuclear program ‘one to two years'
Pentagon says US strikes set back Iran nuclear program ‘one to two years'

The Guardian

time37 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Pentagon says US strikes set back Iran nuclear program ‘one to two years'

The Pentagon has collected intelligence material that suggests Iran's nuclear program was set back roughly one to two years as a result of the US strikes on three key facilities last month, the chief spokesperson at the defense department said at a news conference on Wednesday. The spokesperson, Sean Parnell, repeated Donald Trump's claim that Iran's key nuclear sites had been completely destroyed, although he did not offer further details on the origin of the assessments beyond saying it came from inside the defense department. 'We have degraded their program by one to two years,' Parnell said at a news conference held at the Pentagon. 'At least, intel assessments inside the department assess that.' Parnell's description of the strikes marked a more measured estimate than Trump's assertions about the level of destruction. A low-confidence Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report based on early assessments said Iran's program was set back several months. The evolving picture of the severity of the damage to Iran's nuclear program comes as US intelligence agencies have continued to push out new assessments, using materials that suggested the centrifuges at the key Fordow enrichment site were destroyed even if it was unclear whether the facility itself had caved in. Trump advisers have used that material, which include the use of video taken from B-2 bombers to confirm simulation models of shock waves destroying centrifuges and other Israeli intel from outside Fordow, to defend Trump's assertions, two people familiar with the matter said. The extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear program and the fate of the country's stockpile of enriched uranium – which could quickly be turned into a crude nuclear weapon – is important because it could dictate how long the program has been set back. The head of the UN nuclear watchdog said on Sunday that Iran could be producing enriched uranium in a few months. 'They can have in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium,' Rafael Grossi the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said, adding 'Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology … You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have.' The Pentagon's preliminary DIA assessment, which was based on information from little more than 24 hours after the strikes, the Guardian previously reported, found the damage could range from Iran being able to restart the facility with new centrifuges to having to abandon it for future use. The DIA report assessed the program had been pushed back by several months, although that finding was made at the so-called 'low-confidence' level, reflecting the early nature of the assessment and the uncertainty intelligence agencies have with initial conclusions. Trump advisers have pushed back on the DIA report and said privately the destruction of the centrifuges alone meant they had taken out a key component of Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons and meant it delayed the nuclear program by years. Battles over the conclusions of intelligence agencies have been at the center of American foreign policy determinations for decades, from warnings about Iraq's weapons programs that the Bush administration used to justify the 2003 invasion that were later found to be false, to claims that a Chinese lab leak was responsible for Covid. Still, much of the controversy about the US strikes has been generated by Trump's claiming that they 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear sites, which no intelligence agency has directly repeated because it is not a characterization used in intelligence assessments. Verifying the extent of the damage was made more difficult on Wednesday, after Iran put into effect a new law to suspend cooperation with the IAEA. Iran has accused the nuclear watchdog of siding with western countries and providing a justification for Israel's airstrikes. A state department spokesperson called the move 'unacceptable' and said Iran must fully comply with its nuclear non-proliferation treaty obligations, including by providing the IAEA with information on undeclared nuclear material and providing unrestricted access to any newly announced enrichment facility.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store