The British graduates with the highest student debt
The single most indebted student owes the Government nearly £300,000 for courses started in January 2012.
All 10 were more than £250,000 in debt for courses beginning between 2010 and 2015, data released to The Telegraph by the Student Loans Company (SLC) under Freedom of Information rules revealed.
Experts said that the graduates were likely to have done long courses or multiple degrees, as well as having faced high interest rates.
Student loans can be taken out to cover tuition fees – which are set to rise to £9,535 in September – and living costs.
The amount that can be borrowed depends on the financial situation of the student in question, and the loans are not repaid until graduates earn over a certain threshold.
The average graduate in England last year was £48,470 in debt when they started repaying their loan. Approximately £20bn a year is loaned to 1.5 million students, according to a briefing by the House of Commons.
The value of outstanding loans is forecast to hit £500bn by the late 2040s, government predictions show. This is in part because of the interest rate structure on higher earners.
Those who started their degrees in 2012 have so-called 'Plan 2' loans, which sees them charged the retail price index (RPI) plus up to three percentage points, and start making repayments once their salaries exceed £28,740.
For anybody earning between £28,470 and £51,245, the interest rate increases gradually from 4.3pc to 7.3pc – the higher the salary, the higher the interest rate. Anybody earning over £51,245 is charged the maximum interest rate of 7.3pc.
Sarah Coles, of investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'It's really unusual to have an outstanding loan balance of £250,000 or more. It will usually mean someone has studied a number of courses in order to rack up the debts. It's also likely to include plenty of interest.'
She said that the changes made to student loans in 2023 would mean students pay back more on lower salaries. Those on Plan 5 loans begin repayments at £25,000, and will not have their debt wiped for 40 years.
Ms Coles said: 'We have moved from a system where only 27pc of people repaid in full, to one where 65pc of people do. And because they carry it for the longest, upper middle earners will repay the most.'
Tom Allingham, of campaign group Save the Student, said: 'The amounts exposed by this data are eye-watering.'
Mr Allingham said that even though a graduate could owe as much as £300,000, the repayment terms on student loans would not change.
He said: 'The size of your debt has absolutely no impact on the amount you repay each month. Your debt could be £300,000 or £300, but you'd still only repay the same 9pc of your salary over the threshold.'
The campaigner said that because of the lower interest rates on the new Plan 5 loans, it was unlikely that future graduates would see debts as large as current graduates. Those who began their courses from 2023 will pay only RPI on their loans.
He said: 'Future graduates will see their loan balance grow more slowly than those in the past, and never have to repay more than they borrowed in real terms.'
One way that graduates are avoiding repaying the SLC is by moving abroad.
Figures show the body is trying to trace 112,000 'runaway' graduates who live overseas and are not actively repaying their loans, including 73,000 UK natives. They have a total outstanding loan balance of £2bn – or £27,000 each.
Tuition fees were introduced by Tony Blair in the 1990s, and initially sat at just £1,000 a year and then £3,000 from 2006. The coalition government controversially tripled fees to £9,000, despite a Liberal Democrat manifesto pledge to do away with the charges.
The fees then rose to £9,250 in 2017, and will increase to £9,535 later this year, an increase of 3.1pc.
A Department for Education spokesman said: 'These balances are not typical of the vast majority of graduates.
'It is vital that students can be confident the significant investment they make in higher education delivers real value for money and that universities provide teaching and an experience they deserve, to help students pursue a rewarding career.
'It's also important we have a sustainable student finance system that works for both students and taxpayers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Unite boss accuses Angela Rayner of ‘totally and utterly abhorrent' behaviour as clash with Labour escalates
The leader of Unite has described Angela Rayner's behaviour during recent bin strikes as 'totally and utterly abhorrent' as tensions ramp up between the government and Labour's biggest union backers. General secretary Sharon Graham hit out at the deputy prime minister after the union voted to suspend her in a row over how the Labour-run council in Birmingham treated striking bin workers. The union, one of Labour's biggest financial backers, claims fire and rehire tactics had 'effectively' been deployed against striking workers, who are taking industrial action in a dispute over pay and job conditions. In a fresh attack on Saturday, Ms Graham told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Angela Rayner refuses to get involved, and she is directly aiding and abetting the fire and rehire of these bin workers, it is totally and utterly abhorrent." The general secretary said Ms Rayner had been "a member of our union for over 10 years". Allies of Ms Rayner have said she resigned from Unite in April. Ms Graham said the politician may well have done 'Houdini act' in recent months by trying to leave the Union, but added: "She was very clearly a member when she asked us to give her £10,000 for the election. And on our system, obviously we go by quarters, so up to the March quarter." She added: "Now, if she has over the last couple of weeks, because she's seen the mood music, because this isn't the first time that we've discussed that we're not happy with what's going on, then she may well have done that." Ms Graham hinted that the union may have to rethink its relationship with Labour, adding that Unite members have to see that the fee to affiliate with Labour is "worth something'. "At this present moment in time, it is hard to justify it, if I'm being honest,' she continued. 'Would that money be better spent on frontline services for my members? But the decision will be a serious decision. It's not a rash decision."
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reeves opens door to weakening OBR's influence
Rachel Reeves has opened the door to weakening the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) scrutiny of tax and spending as she struggles to balance the books. It is understood that Downing Street wants to end the prospect of being forced to raise taxes or cut spending twice a year after a bruising time for Ms Reeves during Labour's first year in power. Options on the table include ordering the OBR to assess whether the Government has met its fiscal target just once a year or bringing forward a mechanism that would give the Chancellor more breathing space to meet her tax and spending goals. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) put the ideas forward at its latest health check of the British economy in May. Ms Reeves admitted last month that officials were 'looking at how the OBR works', adding that maintaining a 'grip on the public finances' should be balanced with being able to 'deliver better fiscal policymaking'. It is understood that Sir Keir Starmer has also privately questioned why the watchdog delivers its verdict twice a year when the Government has committed to just one fiscal event. However, multiple sources said the fiscal rules themselves that state the Government will only borrow to invest and get overall debt down were non-negotiable. 'This is not about more borrowing,' said one, while a Treasury spokesman highlighted that Labour's 'fiscal lock' meant the OBR could not be sidelined if the Government decided to loosen the purse strings. The watchdog is currently required by law to deliver its verdict on the Chancellor's ability to balance the books twice a year, even though Ms Reeves has repeatedly said she will deliver just one autumn Budget. The Chancellor rushed through a series of controversial welfare reforms this spring after a stagnant economy and surge in borrowing costs wiped out the £9.9bn buffer she had against her main rule of balancing the books on day-to-day spending. However, Labour backbenchers subsequently forced the Chancellor into an embarrassing about-turn on cuts to sickness and disability benefits and reforms to winter fuel allowance eligibility that have left a £5bn black hole in the public finances. Government sources said they wanted to avoid a repeat in the future, as rating agency Fitch said there were still 'sizeable' risks to getting debt down, adding that more tax rises were on the way. However, Treasury officials remain extremely nervous about investor reaction to any suggestion that the rules will be loosened and it is understood there is little appetite for major legislative changes. The Chancellor's tears in the House of Commons this month triggered a lurch in borrowing costs not seen since Liz Truss was in power as investors feared her replacement would abandon the party's already loose fiscal rules. Speaking to the Guardian earlier this month, Ms Reeves insisted the OBR would remain independent. She said: 'We are looking at how the OBR works, but I think it is really important to have those independent economic institutions, because if you start undermining those and getting rid of the checks and balances on a government, I do think that is risky.' 'Backed into a corner' She noted she was taking a series of recommendations by the IMF seriously. The Fund called for 'further refinements' to how her borrowing rules are assessed to 'improve predictability and reduce pressure for frequent fiscal policy changes'. However, economists warned that the move could be seen as a desperate manoeuvre by investors. Simon French at Panmure Liberum said: 'Changes to the fiscal framework as suggested by the IMF are sensible. But as a government you want to be making those changes from a position of strength, not when backed into a corner. 'This is the problem facing Treasury advisers – they can construct a sensible abstract argument for a framework that triggers less frequent fiscal changes. But the bond market considers context. And the context would look like the Chancellor is simply kicking the can down the road.' A Treasury spokesman said: 'Our fiscal rules are non-negotiable, they are the basis of the stability that underpins growth, and we have shown at the autumn Budget and spring statement that we will meet them. 'The first Bill passed by this Government included the fiscal lock, which prevents the sidelining of the OBR and demonstrates that this Government will never play fast and loose with public finances.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves expected to review pensions auto-enrolment
The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is expected to trigger a review of the auto-enrolment pension scheme next week in a move that could ultimately force employers to raise their contributions to staff retirement pots. The announcement could come as early as Monday, forming a key part of the Labour government's pensions review, industry sources told the Guardian. It is expected to be one of a raft of changes outlined in Reeves' Mansion House speech, which will detail the government's financial services strategy to City bosses on Tuesday evening. The review, led by the Department for Work and Pensions, will explore raising auto-enrolment contributions from the current level of 8% of worker earnings, with employees currently paying in 5% and the employer adding 3%. The consultation was put on hold last year amid concerns that it would upset businesses already reeling from a rise in employer national insurance contributions announced in Reeves' autumn budget. It is not yet clear what level the government is leaning towards as a new minimum, but leading pension providers have long called for the figure to be raised to 12%, suggesting that the increase takes place gradually over a number of years. The review will be formally launched before parliament rises for summer recess on 22 July. The auto-enrolment scheme, which was originally launched in 2012, forced employers to enrol employees automatically into a pension and contribute to their retirement funds. It was meant to make sure that everyone, whether they work for a supermarket or a corner shop, has a private pension to add to their state pension. However, there are growing concerns that the pension contributions are not high enough to support people through retirement, creating a 'ticking timebomb' where retirees will have to turn to state support and care in their old age. The independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) this week cited inadequate pensions saving as one risk factor for the public finances in the coming decades. 'Recent studies suggest a significant proportion of the population may not be saving enough through private pensions to achieve an 'adequate' retirement income,' the OBR warned – suggesting that could mean more people relying on the state pension and means-tested benefits. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion A government spokesperson said: 'We cannot pre-empt the outcome of the review, with no decision being taken relating to pension contributions. 'We're reforming the pensions market to drive economic growth, ensure greater security in retirement and put more money in people's pockets.' They added: 'Our pension schemes bill will make pension pots work harder for savers, and our forthcoming pensions review will explore how we can take this even further to give hardworking people the retirement they deserve. And thanks to our commitment to the triple lock, millions will see their state pension rise by £1,900.'
