Exclusive-Meta, X and LinkedIn appeal unprecedented VAT claim by Italy
This is the first time that Italy has failed to reach a settlement agreement after bringing tax cases against tech companies, resulting in a fully-fledged judicial tax trial being launched.
According to the sources, this came about because the case went beyond agreeing on a settlement figure and sought to establish a broader approach focused on how social networks provide access to their services.
Italian tax authorities argue that free user registrations with X, LinkedIn and Meta platforms should be seen as taxable transactions as they imply the exchange of a membership account in return for a user's personal data.
The issue is especially sensitive given wider trade tensions between the EU and the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump.
Italy is claiming 887.6 million euros ($1.03 billion) from Meta, 12.5 million euros from X and around 140 million euros from LinkedIn.
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, Elon Musk's social network X and Microsoft's LinkedIn filed their appeals with a first instance tax court after mid-July, when the deadline for responding to a tax assessment notice issued by Italy's Revenue Agency in March passed.
According to several experts consulted by Reuters, the Italian approach could affect almost all companies, from airlines to supermarkets to publishers, who link access to free services on their sites to users' acceptance of profiling cookies.
It could also eventually be extended across the EU where VAT is a harmonised tax.
In a statement to Reuters, Meta said that it had cooperated "fully with the authorities on our obligations under EU and local law".
It added that the company "strongly disagrees with the idea that providing access to online platforms to users should be subject to VAT".
LinkedIn said it had "nothing to share at this time".
X did not respond to a request for comment from Reuters.
ROME SEEN SEEKING EU ADVISORY
It is uncertain whether a full trial of the matter, which involves three levels of judgement and takes an average of 10 years, will go ahead.
Following discussions with the three companies, Italy is preparing as a next step to seek an advisory opinion from the European Commission, the sources said.
The Italian Revenue Agency will have to prepare specific questions, which the Economy Ministry will then send to the EU Commission's VAT Committee, which meets twice a year.
Rome aims to submit its questions for the meeting scheduled to be held by early November, in order to receive the EU's comments in time for the following meeting in spring 2026.
Italy's Economy Ministry and Revenue Agency declined to comment.
The EU Commission's VAT Committee is an independent advisory group. While its assessment will be non-binding, a "No" could prompt Italy to halt the case and ultimately drop the criminal investigation by Italian prosecutors, according to the sources.
The dispute is one of several between Europeans and U.S. Big Tech.
On July 11 Reuters exclusively reported that Meta would not be tweaking its pay-or-consent model further despite the risk of EU fines.
According to a Financial Times report on July 17, the European Commission has stalled one of its investigations into Musk's platform X for breaching its digital transparency rules while it seeks to conclude trade talks with the U.S.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Russian lawmakers back law punishing searches for 'extremist' content
FILE PHOTO: A general view shows the headquarters of the lower house of Russia's parliament, State Duma, in central Moscow, Russia, July 22, 2025. REUTERS/Yulia Morozova/File Photo MOSCOW - Russian lawmakers on Tuesday approved legislation imposing fines on people reading and searching online for content that the authorities deem "extremist", a tightening of censorship that could have sweeping ramifications for digital privacy and the fate of WhatsApp in Russia. The legislation, passed by parliament's lower house, the State Duma, has drawn criticism from some pro-government figures, as well as opposition activists. Opponents say the fines it prescribes, of up to 5,000 roubles ($63.82), could open the door to tougher charges and penalties. The Ministry of Justice's list of extremist materials stretches to more than 500 pages. Entities banned in Russia for carrying out "extremist activities" include late Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny's Anti-Corruption Fund, the "international LGBT movement" and U.S. tech giant Meta Platforms. On Friday, lawmakers who regulate the IT sector said Meta-owned WhatsApp should prepare to leave the Russian market as it was likely to be added to a list of restricted software. The new legislation targets people who knowingly search for extremist materials online, including through virtual private networks (VPN) that millions of people across Russia use to bypass censorship and access banned content. "This bill concerns a very narrow group of people, who look for extremist content because they themselves are already one step away from extremism," Sergei Boyarsky, head of the Duma's information technology committee, told Duma TV. Digital Development Minister Maksut Shadaev said law enforcement would have to prove that users intended to view extremist materials and that merely accessing platforms would not be penalised. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 can claim $600 SG60 vouchers from July 22 Singapore Singaporeans continue to hold world's most powerful passport in latest ranking Singapore Miscalculation of MOH subsidies and grants led to $7m in overpayments, $2m in shortfalls Asia Malaysian aide's unresolved 2009 death tests govt's reform pledge despite DAP chief's apology Singapore Woman evacuated from lift in Supreme Court building after falling glass triggers emergency halt Singapore 2 charged over alleged role in posting bail for man who later absconded Business Chat with experts on brand media coverage at the latest Conversations with ST Singapore Ports and planes: The 2 Singapore firms helping to keep the world moving It was not immediately clear how the authorities would determine intent in an online search. REUTERS
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Trump targeting trade loopholes risks 70% of China exports to US
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump's effort to target China through its trading partners across global supply chains threatens to erode the country's growth and most of its exports to the US, according to Bloomberg Economics. China has increasingly relied on third countries for the manufacturing of final products or components, a trend that accelerated following Trump's first trade war and his imposition of higher restrictions on the world's second-largest economy. China's share of total value-added manufacturing of goods destined for the US through countries including Vietnam and Mexico surged to 22 per cent in 2023 from 14 per cent in 2017, according to Bloomberg Economics. If Trump is successful in targeting transshipments via higher levies or supply chain requirements, it would threaten 70 per cent of China's exports to the US and more than 2.1 per cent of the Asian country's gross domestic product, the analysts found. There is a risk of additional economic damage if the restrictions weigh on countries' desire to do business with China, they said. 'Trade flows via third countries are substantial and have helped cushion the blow from existing US tariffs,' Bloomberg Economics analysts Chang Shu, Rana Sajedi and David Qu wrote in a research note on Tuesday (Jul 22). 'Tighter controls on these shipments would increase the damage from the trade war and could erode growth opportunities in the long term.' The US is increasingly adding pressure on China through other countries. In a slew of letters to countries announcing levies by Aug 1 unless bilateral trade deals are agreed, the administration threatened even higher tariffs for goods found to be transshipped. While not providing further details, this could allow the White House to target a broader range of China's exports to the US. The largest countries that China relies on for shipping goods to the US include Mexico and Vietnam, with the European Union also a key hub. China's role in supplying the world through third parties could shape US agreements with trading partners. There are signs of this already taking place: the US trade deal with the UK includes requirements on supply-chain security and ownership in sensitive sectors. At the same time, Shu and economists said that 'Uncertainty clouds how rigorously the US will be able to enforce transshipment restrictions. US definitions of localised goods remain vague, and details on verification are lacking.' BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Why ‘anti-coercion' tool is the EU's trade weapon of last resort
The 'anti-coercion instrument' is the EU's strongest weapon to retaliate against economic or trade duress from a third country. The European Union has a powerful tool to wield in trade disputes that it hopes it will never need to use. As US President Donald Trump ramps up pressure on the bloc with a threat to impose a blanket import tariff of 30 per cent on European goods , some member states are floating the possibility of invoking the 'anti-coercion instrument' (ACI). The ACI allows the EU to use an array of measures stretching well beyond the boundaries of trade in goods in response to coercive actions by a trading partner. In that sense, the bloc would be seeking to fight fire with fire : Mr Trump's global tariff campaign has linked trade with a variety of unrelated grievances, encompassing value-added taxes, drug trafficking and immigration. What is the anti-coercion instrument? It is the EU's strongest weapon to retaliate against economic or trade duress from a third country. If it decides that it is being coerced, the bloc may hit back with a range of punishments targeting the offending country's access to one of the world's biggest and most lucrative markets in goods and services. In the case of the US, that could mean new taxes on US tech giants, curbs on US investments in Europe or a ban on American firms bidding for public contracts. The EU sees the ACI's true purpose not as retaliation so much as deterrence, as its provisions are so potentially damaging to a trade partner that the mere threat of applying it means countries will think twice before using trade as a diplomatic weapon. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 can claim $600 SG60 vouchers from July 22 Singapore Miscalculation of MOH subsidies and grants led to $7m in overpayments, $2m in shortfalls Singapore Singaporeans continue to hold world's most powerful passport Asia Indonesia on high alert as dry weather fans forest, peatland fires in Sumatra Singapore 2 charged over alleged role in posting bail for man who later absconded Singapore Teen charged after allegedly selling vaporisers, advertising e-cigarettes on WhatsApp Singapore 2,500 turtles seized in India and sent back to S'pore, put down humanely after salmonella detected Singapore Ports and planes: The 2 Singapore firms helping to keep the world moving What is the origin of the ACI? The EU's executive, the European Commission, proposed adopting the ACI in response to a series of wake-up calls, including Mr Trump's trade actions against the bloc during his first administration and China's 2021 trade blockade targeting EU member Lithuania over the European nation's ties with Taiwan, which showed the EU's vulnerability to coercive tactics wielded through trade and investment. Under a new trade policy laid out that year, the EU has sought to become more assertive in upholding what it called a rules-based global order and its own interests and values. The bloc's 'Open Strategic Autonomy' doctrine gives it scope to act independently in strategically important areas while prioritising multilateral cooperation where possible. When can the ACI be used? EU member states decide collectively whether to use the ACI. First it needs to be established that there is coercion by a third country. Response measures can then be adopted via a qualified majority vote, which means gathering the support of 55 per cent of member states that together represent 65 per cent of the total population. This gives the EU's heavyweights, France and Germany, a significant say over the outcome. What is coercion in trade? Trade coercion is the practice of applying trade instruments such as tariffs, anti-dumping measures, quotas and other tools that inflict harm on a trade partner for reasons that are not justified under the generally accepted rules of international trade, and which do not directly address any recognised imbalance or injustice in the trading relationship. The goal instead is to impose economic costs on the target in an arbitrary way as part of a broader diplomatic dispute. Why is the ACI being talked about now? France, which has the EU's second-largest economy, has secured growing support for its call to deploy the ACI against the US if no trade deal is reached by Aug 1 and Mr Trump moves to impose a 30 per cent tariff on European goods. As he has already warned any retaliation targeting US interests would be met with even tougher countermeasures from his administration, an activation of the ACI would likely escalate the transatlantic trade clash, pitting Washington against its largest trading partner. The ACI's proponents may be counting on recent events as justification for invoking it: When the US came to blows with China in May and it looked as if bilateral trade would be brought to a grinding halt, the two sides eventually pulled back from the brink. How quickly could the ACI be activated? The process could take weeks or even months, depending on how quickly wavering member states can be persuaded to put aside their concerns. The Commission would first investigate the alleged coercion. If it decides the circumstances justify use of the ACI, then it would propose doing so to the European Council, composed of the representatives of the 27 EU member states. The Council would then have 10 weeks to adopt or reject the proposal. What else does the EU have up its sleeve? Beyond the ACI, the EU is preparing additional countermeasures if negotiations fail. Chief among them are so-called rebalancing tariffs. The latest draft list covers as much as €72 billion (S$107.9 billion) in US exports – including Boeing aircraft, automobiles, and bourbon – should the bloc decide to hit back at Mr Trump's tariff policies. BLOOMBERG
