This Bitter Earth review – fighting and flirting in a wild ride steered by Billy Porter
There are never just two people in a room, or two voices in a conversation. For the interracial gay couple in Harrison David Rivers's 2017 play, those voices are freighted with complexity: white privilege and Black hurt, queer joy and rage, all shimmering around the simplest dialogue.
Jesse (Omari Douglas) is a Black playwright who prioritises his work; Neil (Alexander Lincoln) is a white activist who comes from wealth and will cross the country to support a protest. Set between 2012 and 2015 – from Obama in excelsis to rising Trump – the play skitters across this timeline, not always clearly ('Emotional truth is of greater value than logic,' reads an author's note). Scenes are short and sharp – some only a splinter – and typically end in a snog or a strop.
In Billy Porter's finely cast production, Douglas's Jesse, spindly and spiky, has a crackling chemistry with Lincoln's righteous, goofy Neil. The pair relate their first encounter – when Neil demonstrated his allyship at a protest, clinging to a statue and reciting poetry ('This bitch with the bullhorn,' as Jesse calls him). Cue fierce conversations in cabs, bars and subways. Neil can't understand his lover's wariness around public dissent; Jesse despairs at the other's unquestioned ease. Jesse, his hinterland withheld, finds it easier to address the audience than unpack his mind to Neil.
Rivers drives a wild ride – he'll grab the wheel and swerve between acrimony and snuggle, from banter to bitter division. As the couple navigate their differences, conversations get deep quickly – perhaps they were always skating on thin ice.
Rivers's writing can editorialise, and while Porter's production brings energy and an excellent playlist, it pushes hard on the pedals – the actors commit to flirt and fight, but by the end of the 90 minutes, both voices sound raw. Lee Curran's lighting frames the stage in neon, flaring yellow in alarm whenever something terrible happens in the wider country – as it does, again and again. And, as slowly emerges, something terrible also happens close at hand.
At Soho theatre, London, until 26 July
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump dropped an F-bomb this week – and just for a moment, I warmed to him
I did not get out of bed this morning expecting to praise the public use of an expletive, but such is 2025. If any president was going to break this presidential norm, as NPR put it, it was always going to be Donald Trump. 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing,' the president told a group of reporters this week. 'Do you understand that?' he asked, before storming off. It appears to be the first time a president has deliberately used the F-word live on camera to a press scrum or in a public forum, instead of being 'caught' using the term accidentally on a hot mic (even that has only happened a handful of times). Cue plenty of puns from journalists about the 'dropping of the F-bomb'. For the record, Trump actually used the F-word about Iran in 2020, but the slightly delayed radio broadcast bleeped it out. Plus, as this 2016 video compilation shows, it's not unusual for him to swear. But what was different about this time – coming as it did at a moment of heightened global anxiety about military escalation – is that it came across as … authentic. Many people watching will have felt, heard and even shared that frustration about Israel and Iran's alleged breaking of the ceasefire. Trump's swearing made the point more forcefully than any diplomatic 'disappointment' could have done. It wasn't eloquent, but I believed it. We know other presidents – such as Lyndon Johnson, and especially Richard Nixon – swore in private. They wouldn't have dreamed of risking the reputational damage to do so in public, and would have had to apologise if they did. No British prime minister has ever said 'fuck' publicly to my knowledge. Few world leaders ever have. Which is potentially part of the problem. The most common complaint about the political elite is that they're out of touch; that we can't trust a word that comes out of their mouths because it's all untrustworthy scripted spin. Yet at the same time we believe they're swearing like sailors – and saying what they really think – behind closed doors (a perception bolstered by iconic roles such as Peter Capaldi's Malcolm Tucker, the foul-mouthed spin doctor in The Thick of It, or the blue-mouthed Roger Furlong from Veep.) Of course, swearing doesn't equate to honesty. And, in Trump's case, the obscenity only masked his own complicity in creating the situation that frustrated him – from pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal in 2018 to his 'monumental' airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. But my point is that the public clearly doesn't trust the polished and sanitised scripts that characterise so much political speech. I'm not suggesting world leaders all suddenly disrespect the gravitas of their office. Can you imagine Keir Starmer being encouraged to swear? He'd sound like a headteacher attempting to rap. What I am saying is there's power in judicious swearing. You want to appear more human to voters? Act more like one. YouGov polling reported in April revealed that just 8% of Britons never swear. Perhaps an occasional curse or two would allow politicians to ally themselves with the 92% of us who do. Linguistic norms are always changing. For six years, I wrote a regular column for the Guardian's Mind your language section. During that time, I saw changes that would incense any purist. For instance, the BBC made even less use of those with received pronunciation accents and started broadcasting more voices that really sound like people across the country. Such 'real' accents are supposed to make the institution seem less remote and more trustworthy. The same is true of the institution of politics. Sounding more like real people does nobody any real harm. If the stakes are literally life and death, and people aren't listening, a well-placed, truly meant expletive will wake everyone up. At time of writing, the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran is holding. Maybe the F-bomb did the job after all. Gary Nunn is a freelance journalist and author
Leader Live
35 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Trump says he is terminating trade talks with Canada over tax on tech firms
Mr Trump, in a post on his social media network, said Canada had just informed the US that it was sticking to its plan to impose the digital services tax, which applies to Canadian and foreign businesses that engage with online users in Canada. The tax is set to go into effect on Monday. 'Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,' Mr Trump said in his Truth Social post. Mr Trump's announcement was the latest move in the trade war he has launched since taking office for a second term in January. Progress with Canada has been a roller coaster, starting with the US president repeatedly suggesting it would be absorbed as a US state. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Friday that his country would 'continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians. It's a negotiation'. Mr Trump later said he expects that Canada will remove the tax. 'Economically we have such power over Canada. We'd rather not use it,' Mr Trump said in the Oval Office. 'It's not going to work out well for Canada. They were foolish to do it.' When asked if Canada could do anything to restart talks, he suggested Canada could remove the tax, predicted it will but said: 'It doesn't matter to me.' Mr Carney visited Mr Trump in May at the White House. Mr Trump last week travelled to Canada for the G7 summit in Alberta, where Mr Carney said Canada and the US had set a 30-day deadline for trade talks. The digital services tax will hit companies including Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb with a 3% levy on revenue from Canadian users. It will apply retroactively, leaving US companies with a two billion US dollar (£1.4 billion) bill due at the end of the month. 'We appreciate the Administration's decisive response to Canada's discriminatory tax on US digital exports,' Matt Schruers, chief executive of the Computer & Communications Industry Association, said in a statement. Canada and the US have been discussing easing a series of steep tariffs Mr Trump imposed on goods from America's neighbour. The Republican president earlier told reporters that the US was soon preparing to send letters to different countries, informing them of the new tariff rate his administration would impose on them. Mr Trump has imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium as well as 25% tariffs on cars. He is also charging a 10% tax on imports from most countries, though he could raise rates on July 9, after the 90-day negotiating period he set would expire. Canada and Mexico face separate tariffs of as much as 25% that Mr Trump put into place under the auspices of stopping fentanyl smuggling, though some products are still protected under the 2020 US-Mexico-Canada Agreement signed during Mr Trump's first term. Addressing reporters after a private meeting with Republican senators on Friday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent declined to comment on news that Mr Trump had ended trade talks with Canada. 'I was in the meeting,' Mr Bessent said before moving on to the next question. About 60% of US crude oil imports are from Canada, and 85% of US electricity imports as well. Canada is also the largest foreign supplier of steel, aluminium and uranium to the US and has 34 critical minerals and metals that the Pentagon is eager to obtain. About 80% of Canada's exports go to the US. Daniel Beland, a political science professor at McGill University in Montreal, said it is a domestic tax issue, but it has been a source of tensions between Canada and the US for a while because it targets US tech giants. 'The Digital Services Tax Act was signed into law a year ago so the advent of this new tax has been known for a long time,' Mr Beland said. 'Yet, President Trump waited just before its implementation to create drama over it in the context of ongoing and highly uncertain trade negotiations between the two countries.'
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Want to get the perfect candid photo? People claim this is a foolproof hack although it makes you look ridiculous
Social media users have shared a 'foolproof' hack for nailing the 'perfect candid picture' - but prepare to look absolutely ridiculous in public while doing it. In an attempts to capture the perfect seemingly un-posed, relaxed snap, many have started to gallop while giggling up and down the road. While the subjects of the image are prancing, someone else films them, with the theory being that freeze-framing any part of the footage will result in an aesthetically pleasing pose. Some social media users have noted that using this system means that the photos are not candid per se. However, others have simply admired how effective the method is, with some impressed by how well images can turn out when taken this way. One video clip shared by family TikTok channel @thefamileigh showed the father and his two sons laughing as they cantered casually down a path while being filmed. A crucial part of the system requires that the photo subjects enjoy themselves while posing. This often results in those in the photo throwing back their heads in joy, open-mouthed in laughter. Commenting on the @thefamileigh video, and resulting snaps, many were surprised by how well the technique worked. One said: 'It's funny cause I paused and played through the entire video and saw one great shot after another.' 'I actually saw all the candid pictures by pausing at random,' added another. A further viewer wrote: 'I paused a dozen random spots and all were perfect.....' 'I paused it several times and each time it was a great snapshot,' another noted. A further TikTok user said: 'I tried to pause the vid a few times and they actually turned out good hahaha. In a similar vein, another wrote: 'Wait they came out so good though.' 'These are freaking hysterical,' added another. 'I'm gonna see if my kids will do it. I's frame them in a sequence.' Many of the video's viewers were impressed by the system, and agreed that the snaps came out well Meanwhile, another TikTok creator known as @ posted her own video featuring the viral trick. As she linked her arms with a friend, the two women laughed as they cantered for while someone filmed them. Again, social media users were impressed with the results. One said: 'I love every video I see of this trend.' In a similar vein, another added an almost identical view. They wrote: 'Loving this trend.' A further TikTok user asked: 'How does it work every time?' 'Would have come out better with a professional camera but looks pretty good,' wrote another. As with other photos taken using this hack, the image was praised by many TikTok commentators And a further TikTok user wrote: 'Super cute and beautiful photo, made me smile.' The hack has become so popular, that even workers at a Waitrose supermarket used it to try and take their own image. A clip, posted on the upmarket supermarket's TikTok channel, featured two men. They laughed widely as they linked arms, and cantered through the aisles in one of the stores. Their video featured a caption, which was superimposed on top of the moving video.
