Karnataka school association urges government to retain three-language policy to protect kids' rights
The association said it would approach the court in case the state plans to change it to a two-language formula.
It may be recalled that following developments in Maharashtra, Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah said he also approves of two-language formula.
The association said, "Political resistance to the three-language policy in Karnataka disproportionately affects state board students. Students under CBSE and ICSE enjoy access to three languages, often including their mother tongue or a foreign language.
The state cannot impose a medium of instruction or deny parental rights regarding language education. Any denial of the third language also adversely affects non-Kannada speakers and linguistic minorities.
"
You Can Also Check:
Bengaluru AQI
|
Weather in Bengaluru
|
Bank Holidays in Bengaluru
|
Public Holidays in Bengaluru
It also pointed out that Karnataka is the only state that evaluates the first language paper for 125 marks, while across the nation, all boards restrict this to 100. This creates unnecessary pressure on students, it pointed out.
The Karnataka School Education and Assessment Board has already submitted a proposal to the state govt to make the assessment in line with CBSE. The proposal recommends the inclusion of internal marks, reduction of pass mark to 33 instead of 35, and evaluating the first language out of 100 instead of 125 marks.
"Don't disturb the three-language policy; make it a choice and flexible with freedom of choice, rather than enforcing or eliminating specific languages. These measures are essential for protecting students' rights, promoting multilingualism, and enabling Karnataka's children to thrive in a national and global context," said D Shashi Kumar, secretary of the association at a press conference Saturday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Replace ‘Palli' with ‘Halli' in village names, Kalyana K'taka demands
Kalaburagi: Following the renaming of Bagepalli to Bhagyanagar, social activists, local bodies, and residents of Kalyana Karnataka are now demanding the removal of the Telugu suffix 'Palli' from more than 50 village names in the region, replacing it with 'Halli' — the Kannada equivalent. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The villages span Kalaburagi, Raichur, Koppal, Yadgir, and Bidar districts. Though similar demands were made earlier, those were not met. Laxman Dasti, the founder president of Kalyana Karnataka Horata Samiti, Kalaburagi, said states were reorganised based on the Justice Fazl Ali Commission report in 1956, giving priority to the issue of convenience of residents. "As soon as the states were reorganised, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, and some of the other states renamed their villages and towns in keeping with their history and language. However, 'Mysuru' state remained unchanged, and so did its cities and villages," said Dasti. "Now, Kannada language has acquired a crucial role, and village names should be renamed. Not only 'Palli', but even Urdu words such as 'Khurd' and 'Bujurg' have remained in Kalyana Karnataka region as the Nizams of Hyderabad followed a single-language formula with Urdu," he further explained. "There is no need for any special drive, it's just a matter of commitment, like we did with Gulbarga as Kalaburagi and Bangalore as Bengaluru," he added. Chidanand Sali, a writer in Raichur, noted that there are villages like Golapalli, Devanpalli, and Govindpalli in Raichur district. "As we share a border with Telangana, there is an influence of the Telugu language. Whether it's 'Palli' or 'Halli', people are living in harmony here. Moreover, there is need for development of the villages rather than renaming them," he observed. Mahesh Angadi, a Koppal-based social worker, said Koppal was part of the Raichur district until 1997. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Since it was also ruled by the Hyderabad Nizams, in some villages such as Kukanapalli, Telugu language is quite common," he noted. H S Patil, the Koppal district president of Hyderabad Karnataka Horata Samiti, claimed it is the current generation that's demanding these name changes. "Today's youngsters are much more alert about land and language. It [name changes] should be done to cater to their wishes," he said.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
From the margins to the centre
The idea of the Global South historically referred to the grouping of countries primarily in Asia, Africa and Latin America that shared a history of colonialism and ongoing struggles against global inequalities. They sought to transform a historically Western-dominated world order through 'South-South cooperation' — a set of practices and organising concepts that these nations aim to use to achieve development through mutual assistance and increased solidarity among themselves. This aspiration has roots in landmark initiatives such as the Bandung Conference of 1955 and the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), which sought to foster economic and cultural cooperation while promoting human rights and establishing a New International Economic Order (NIEO). These movements aimed to counteract the vertical power relations between former colonies and their colonisers, advocating for fair trade relationships, sovereignty over natural resources, and the right to nationalise key industries. Also Read | Global South's voice key to contemporary world's progress: PM Modi tells Ghana's Parliament The Global South has never been monolithic. Its diversity — vastly different histories, economies and political systems — has been both a potential source of strength and a cause of internal divisions that complicate efforts to form unified positions on global issues. However, the BRICS grouping has emerged as a more solidified possibility, representing a formalised attempt to advance many of the Global South's aims, even if it doesn't entirely embody its full aspirations or overcome all its inherent contradictions. The recent BRICS summit held in Rio de Janeiro exemplified this challenge, with members navigating different relationships with both the U.S. and Russia, particularly regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, where most BRICS members have sought a middle ground in contrast to Western positions. Institutional voice BRICS began as an economic acronym coined by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill in 2001. It has now evolved into a substantial intergovernmental organisation comprising 35% of the global economy and almost half of the world's population — surpassing the G7's 30% economic share as of 2024. The bloc's primary objectives centre on fostering economic, political, and social cooperation among members while increasing their collective influence in international governance. This includes advocating for greater representation in global bodies, coordinating economic policy, and reducing reliance on the U.S. dollar. Initiatives such as the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) were designed to offer alternatives to Western-dominated financial institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Also Read | G7 summit: Will highlight priorities of Global South in G-7, says PM Modi The Rio summit demonstrated both the potential and limitations of this approach. The declaration's strong language on Gaza and Iran reflected genuine consensus on critical geopolitical issues as opposed to the West's view, while India's successful inclusion of condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack showcased the bloc's capacity to address diverse security concerns. The summit also endorsed expanded roles for India and Brazil in the UN Security Council, advancing a long-standing demand for greater Global South representation. Significantly, the summit introduced a new 'partner countries' category, extending associate status to nations including Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and Uzbekistan. This institutional innovation suggests BRICS is evolving beyond its original membership structure to accommodate broader Global South participation. Priorities and realities The Global South's diversity becomes particularly apparent when examining BRICS members' different regional contexts and priorities. Brazil's focus on environmental issues and sustainable development reflects its role as a guardian of the Amazon rainforest, while also serving its agribusiness interests. India's emphasis on technology and services reflects its emergence as a global IT powerhouse, even as it maintains significant agricultural and manufacturing sectors. China's Belt and Road Initiative represents perhaps the most ambitious attempt at South-South cooperation, yet it has also generated concerns about debt dependency among recipient countries. Russia's inclusion in BRICS, despite its geographical location largely in the Global North, reflects how the grouping wants to transcend simple geographical boundaries for shared interests in challenging Western hegemony. Intra-BRICS trade has grown at a faster pace than that of G7 countries, demonstrating tangible shifts in global economic activity. Trade between Brazil and China increased fiftyfold in 20 years, and China-India trade rose 28 times in the same period. The NDB has begun providing alternative funding for sustainable development and infrastructure projects, addressing perceived gaps left by traditional financial institutions. Yet, the path to challenging Western economic dominance faces significant obstacles. The U.S. dollar remains entrenched as the world's principal reserve currency, used in the vast majority of global trade transactions. While BRICS advocates for lesser dependence on the dollar, creating a workable alternative currency system faces enormous technical and political hurdles. Internal Contradictions A critical examination of BRICS reveals inherent contradictions that mirror broader challenges in South-South cooperation. While the rhetoric emphasises solidarity and mutual benefit, the pursuit of national interests by individual members can overshadow collective goals. For example, China's domination within the grouping has resulted in lopsided economic engagement with other developing nations, leading to what some critics have termed 'near-colonial patterns of trade', where raw materials are exported to China in exchange for manufacturing goods. Brazil's advocacy for fairer global trading systems, while simultaneously pursuing the interests of its competitive export-oriented agribusiness sector, exemplifies how national economic interests can complicate collective solidarity. Russia's recent actions in Ukraine negate the idea of South-South cooperation as a legacy of former colonised nations. Besides, Western powers have not remained passive observers of BRICS' growth. Donald Trump, responding to the bloc's criticism of unilateral tariffs and military strikes on Iran, threatened that any country 'aligning itself with' what he termed 'the Anti-American policies of BRICS' would face an additional 10% tariff. This marked an escalation from his earlier threats of 100% tariffs if BRICS countries attempted to replace the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency. Moreover, Western institutions have shown capacity to adapt and co-opt rising powers. The emergence of the G20 can be seen as a response designed to give emerging economies a seat at the table, even if decision-making remains largely influenced by dominant Western powers. Beyond National Interests: A People-Centered Vision As India prepares to assume BRICS leadership next year with its theme of 'Building Resilience and Innovation for Cooperation and Sustainability', the bloc stands at a crossroads. As the world's largest democracy and a major economy with complex relationships with both China and the U.S., India may be uniquely positioned to bridge internal divisions within BRICS. However, ongoing border tensions with China and India's growing strategic partnership with the U.S. through initiatives such as the Quad complicate its role as a unifying force. BRICS undoubtedly represents the most viable institutional expression of Global South aspirations, offering developing nations unprecedented collective economic leverage and political voice in global affairs. However, its current trajectory risks becoming merely another arena for great power competition rather than genuine transformation. The bloc's ultimate promise lies not in replacing Western hegemony with a new form of elite-driven multipolarity, but in evolving into a platform that prioritises the developmental needs and democratic aspirations of the Global South's peoples.
NDTV
7 hours ago
- NDTV
Minister Alleges 1,000 Non-Hindus On Tirumala Temple Board's Payroll, Seeks Action
Hyderabad: Union Minister and prominent Telangana BJP leader, Bandi Sanjay Kumar, has ignited a fresh controversy by alleging that more than 1,000 non-Hindus are currently employed within the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), the administrative body managing the revered Lord Venkateswara temple at Tirumala. The Minister made the remarks after a darshan of Lord Venkateswara at Tirumala. Mr Kumar questioned the very presence of individuals from other faiths within an institution dedicated to Hindu deities and traditions. "How can an organization like TTD, which upholds the sanctity of Hindu dharma, allow over 1,000 non-Hindus to be on its payroll?" he asked, emphasising the need to preserve the sanctity and spiritual purity of the temple. The BJP leader further demanded stringent action, urging the TTD to immediately identify and remove all non-Hindu employees. He stressed that the employment of non-Hindus not only violates the spiritual ethos of the temple but also potentially hurts the sentiments of millions of Hindu devotees who visit Tirumala from across the globe. "Does anyone provide employment for Hindus at mosques and churches?" Mr Kumar asked. The Minister also called for a comprehensive inquiry into how these appointments were made, suggesting a potential lapse in recruitment policies or deliberate circumvention of existing regulations. This is not the first time concerns have been raised about the employment of non-Hindus within TTD. Previous instances have also drawn criticism, with proponents arguing that only devout Hindus should be employed in a religious institution of such significance. The TTD administration is yet to issue an official response to Bandi Sanjay's specific claims regarding the number of non-Hindu employees. However, the allegations are likely to put pressure on the board to conduct an internal review and provide clarity on the matter. The BJP leader demanded stringent action, urging the TTD to immediately identify and remove all non-Hindu employees. He highlighted a recent case where a TTD AEO, A Rajasekhar, was suspended after being found regularly worshipping at a local church, questioning why action is only taken after such exposures. This is not the first time concerns have been raised about the employment of non-Hindus within TTD. Previous instances have also drawn criticism, with proponents arguing that only devout Hindus should be employed in a religious institution of such significance. TTD's service rules, amended in 2007, generally prohibit the hiring of non-Hindus, though some employees hired before this amendment have continued their service. The TTD administration has yet to issue an official response to Bandi Sanjay's specific claims regarding the number of non-Hindu employees. However, the allegations are likely to put pressure on the board to conduct an internal review and provide clarity on the matter. The Andhra Pradesh government, led by Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu, has previously stated that non-Hindu employees in TTD would be reassigned to other government departments. Bhumana Karunakar Reddy, former Chairman of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), has strongly reacted to Bandi Sanjay's comments regarding the employment of non-Hindus within the TTD. Mr Reddy has challenged Bandi Sanjay to provide evidence for his claim of over 1,000 non-Hindu employees. He pointed out that the current TTD board had recently stated there were only 22 non-Hindu employees. Bhumana Karunakar Reddy expressed suspicion that there might be a conspiracy behind Bandi Sanjay's remarks to undermine the sanctity of the Tirumala Srivari temple. He demanded an explanation from the "alliance government" regarding Bandi Sanjay's statements. The TTD rules ( No. 1060, read with No. 1372 in 2007) mandate that only individuals professing the Hindu religion are eligible for recruitment into TTD service, and employees must adhere to Hindu dharma and traditions. The TTD board has also taken steps to transfer non-Hindu employees to other Andhra Pradesh government departments or offer them voluntary retirement schemes.
