Avoid store-bought baby food unless travelling, nutritionist warns
Photo:
123rf
A nutrition expert says parents should only rely on store-bought baby food when they are travelling and it's too difficult to feed fresh food.
It comes after the
UK's National Health Service (NHS) advised parents not to rely on baby food pouches
as everyday meals after six brands failed to meet key nutritional standards.
The NHS also said parents shouldn't let babies suck on a pouch and should always feed from a spoon because of the risk of tooth decay.
Auckland-based dietician Anna Richards agreed with the advice.
"I think we should be relying on pouch foods only for travelling, out-and-abouting when it's absolutely too difficult to feed fresh food."
Richards told
Morning Report
commercially-made baby food was high in sugar and evidence showed once a baby tasted sweet food they preferred it to the bitter taste of vegetables.
"We have a lot of issues with children relying on pouch food in that many of them are very high in sugar.
"And while they don't have any added sugar, they have a fruit base to them, the majority of them, or very sweet vegetable base."
She said parent confidence played a key role in decisions around food.
"We've seen, particularly since Covid, parents are time-poor. They're really anxious about giving their babies the best start in life.
"And so they're just lapping up a lot of the marketing that's coming around these products."
On top of that, eating directly from a pouch limited a baby's ability to learn about food through chewing and play.
"In order to meet and explore food, children need to see it. They need to smell it. They need to rub it in their hair and get it on their fingers and their faces.
"And when children are eating straight from pouches they're not getting any of that surrounding feeding experience."
She said because of that, pouch food would taste "pretty much" the same, and have the same texture.
"We find children who have had a heavy reliance on a homogenous texture through the initial stages of their feeding, are children that then want to go onto foods that have a homogenous texture.
"So things like chicken nuggets for example, that all look exactly the same, and they all taste exactly the same and the texture's utterly predictable as opposed to home-made food where we get a variety in texture - things look a little bit different."
It was also important to give children foods that required some chewing, Richards said.
"Chewing is actually really important for satiety and for us getting our messages that we've had enough to eat.
"So there's a lot of concern that when we consume a lot of calories or a lot of energy without chewing, that that can then lead to obesity.
"So not only in children and pouches but in adults that consume a lot of food in liquid form rather than actually chewing it."
Richards said a serving size of fruit was what sits in the palm of a child's hand - it was not a whole piece of fruit.
"Some of these children can hoover their way through a couple of pouches so that's the equivalent of five tennis ball pieces of fruit which is way above (more than) what we want children to be having, which is two or three handfuls of fruit in a day and in fact there's a big move for veggies only as first foods."
She said it was believed children who were predominantly introduced to vegetables would be far more accepting of them at five-years-old and later in life.
"We want children to progress to family food and eat what their family's eating."
The Ministry of Health's advice when buying baby food is:
The NHS also advised not giving snacks to baby's under the age of 12 months.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Whakatāne rest home failed to care for resident with dignity and respect, report shows
File photo. Photo: 123RF Multiple staff at a Whakatāne care home were demeaning and disrespectful to a resident in her seventies suffering a neurological condition in their care, the Aged Care Commissioner has found. Commissioner Carolyn Cooper's report into Golden Pond Private Hospital found staff repeatedly failed to treat the woman with dignity and respect, including ignoring and at times berating her pleas to go to the toilet, and standing over and arguing with her while she was on the toilet. The woman - called Mrs A - was in her seventies and lived at Golden Pond between May 2019 and November 2020, where she received hospital-level care for a neurological condition called progressive supranuclear palsy, affecting her speech, swallowing, eye movements and mobility. She was deaf, needing face-to-face conversations, and had a history of depression. Her daughter had installed security cameras in her mother's unit to watch over her belongings and to establish the cause of her falls, but became concerned with the way staff were treating her mother after reviewing the footage. She lodged complaints over a number of matters with the Health and Disability Commissioner. Cooper recommended that Golden Pond provide evidence of newly implemented staff training, including on elder abuse, in six months. Cooper watched 23 videos of interactions between staff members and Mrs A at Golden Pond, and found a "concerning pattern of demeaning and disrespectful treatment" involving six staff members, including two nurses. While noting that each video only captured a short period of time, Cooper said the way staff spoke to Mrs A in a repeatedly negative way showed a culture of disrespect for those under Golden Pond's care. Three videos between January and April 2020, relating to Mrs A toileting needs, were "particularly concerning". A video from January 2020 showed a nurse arguing loudly with Mrs A while she was sitting on the toilet, while Mrs A sounded distressed. Cooper said a healthcare assistant, who was in Mrs A's bedroom, stated she was wasting staff time. Cooper said the incident showed an "appalling disregard for Mrs A's dignity". "While it is not clear what happened prior to the clip shown in the video, there is no conceivable circumstance in which it would be acceptable for a carer to stand over a vulnerable consumer and argue with them while they are on the toilet." Another video, taken in April 2020, showed Mrs A sitting on a commode with a healthcare assistant standing next to her searching for toilet paper. Cooper said the video showed Mrs A saying she could not go to the toilet while the healthcare assistant was there, and the assistant responding abruptly that other residents could. A third video, from April 2020, showed Mrs A distressed and pleading to go to the toilet, but being told by healthcare assistants that her incontinence pad would suffice, and that she should have gone to the toilet earlier. Cooper said the independent clinical adviser, registered nurse Julia Russell, called the incident a "severe departure from the accepted standard of care". She said that concerns about Mrs A's care were raised as early as January 2020, but staff did not improve their conduct, and the situation was not adequately monitored for months. While staff would have been under stress due to the Covid-19 pandemic during these months, it was not an excuse for the behaviour, Cooper said. Cooper was also critical of Golden Pond's lack of records about Mrs A's care plan from the first half of 2020, and the fact that Golden Pond did not provide these records to the Health and Disability Commissioner after the investigation was launched. Cooper said that Golden Pond had made significant changes since a provisional decision relating to the investigation was released. Staff received education and training including about elder abuse, respectful conduct, managing stress and challenging resident behaviours. A new facility manager was appointed in 2021, and multiple policies, including one highlighting a zero tolerance towards abuse, were updated. Cooper said a March 2025 audit of Golden Pond found that residents were safe from abuse, and there were no examples of discrimination, coercion or harassment. Cooper recommended that Golden Pond provide evidence of the new training material and staff attendance records to the Health and Disability Commissioner in six months. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Over 36,000 nurses, midwives to strike for 24 hours on Wednesday
Nurses striking in Auckland on 3 December, 2024. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Last-ditch talks between Health NZ and the country's biggest nurses' union on Monday have failed to avert a nationwide strike later this week. More than 36,000 nurses, midwives, heatlhcare assistants and kaimahi hauora are set to walk off the job for 24 hours from 9am on Wednesday. Health NZ said the latest bargaining meeting with the Nurses Organisation on Monday had not resolved all the outstanding issues, but there were contingency plans in place to ensure patient safety during the strike. It estimated about 4300 procedures and specialist appointments would have to be postponed as a result.. NZNO chief executive Paul Goutler said its members were "exasperated" by Health NZ's refusal to acknowledge chronic short-staffing through negotiations, which began last September. "Short-staffing not only puts patients at risk, it impacts on the number of procedures and assessments hospitals can carry out, adding to wait times. "Nurses, midwives and health care assistants want to give their patients the care they need, when they need it. Instead they are stretched too thin and their patients are forced to wait for care. This can lead to unnecessary pain and discomfort for patients and heartbreak for their friends and whānau watching them suffer." There was such a dire lack of health care assistants at Christchurch Hospital recently that whānau were asked to come in and help their loved ones, he said. NZNO president and Dunedin nurse Anne Daniels said in 45 years of nursing, she had never seen the public health system "in such a state of failure". "We have far too few nurses to provide safe and timely care. That is hurting our patients, and it is heartbreaking for us to go to work each day knowing that despite all our best efforts there are just not enough of us to stop the escalating avoidable patient harm. "Nurses are not being recruited to replace those who are leaving in their thousands, and nurses are not being paid competitively to keep them in New Zealand. Our work conditions are desperate, and that takes a toll on us all every day. That's why I am striking." Health NZ was disappointed at the strike action "when there is a fair offer on the table". "We are concerned about the impact strike action will have on patients who are waiting for planned care. "We appreciate it is never an easy decision for any of our nurses to strike. We sincerely thank the nurses who will be delivering life preserving services and all the volunteers who will be supporting our clinical services during the strike period." It said it was committted to safe staffing and its offer was fair given its financial contraints. "The offer rejected by the union would see a new graduate nurse on $75,773 gain a total pay increase of $8337 (or 11 percent) by the end of June 2026 once step progression is included. A registered nurse on the highest step with a base salary of $106,739 would see their pay increase by $3224 to $109,963 by the end of June 2026." The average salary for both senior and registered nurses, including overtime and allowances, was $125,662, Health NZ said. It's advising patients: Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
New medical school at University of Waikato boasts better cost-benefit ratio, case shows
University of Waikato. Photo: Supplied / Google Maps A new medical school at the University of Waikato has been found to have a better cost-benefit ratio than other options, although only slightly. The business case for the new school has been released, which said it would have lower operating costs than other options, and would produce a higher proportion of graduates going on to become GPs. The University of Auckland has raised concerns over some of the business case's assumptions, but the health minister insists the new school was the most effective proposal at building New Zealand's "critical" health workforce. Last week, the government confirmed it would move ahead with the Waikato school, and was confident it presented the best value for money. From 2028, students will be able to start at the four-year graduate entry programme, which is intended to boost the country's rural GP workforce. National had campaigned on establishing the school at the 2023 election, but a [ full cost-benefit analysis was required as a condition of its coalition agreement with ACT. The Ministry of Health dumped a series of documents on Friday evening, including various Cabinet papers and minutes, the cost-benefit analysis conducted by Sapere, and the Ministry's detailed business case. The business case looked at three options: increasing the intake at the existing University of Auckland and University of Otago schools, a joint rural training programme run by the two schools, and the new Waikato school. The first option was estimated to cost $10.9b over the years between 2026 and 2042, and deemed the more expensive option. The joint rural training programme was estimated to cost $10.27b over the same period, while the new school - the cheapest option - was estimated to cost $9.1b. While it had the most expensive capital costs ($236.3m) the new school's operating costs ($361.6m) were deemed to be cheaper than increasing the intake at the existing schools ($513.6m) or the joint rural training programme ($508m). The lower operating costs were due to the Waikato course being shorter, the business case said. Prior degrees were also out of scope of the business case, despite the Waikato course being a graduate-entry programme. Professor Warwick Bagg, Dean of the University of Auckland's medical school, said this meant it was not a fair comparison, as it did not take into account the total cost of education. Professor Warwick Bagg. Photo: Supplied "In order to enter a graduate programme, you need to have graduated from a degree. So that's a minimum of three years, possibly longer, but at least three years which will have been funded by the government if it's been completed in New Zealand," he said. The new school also had the most favourable cost-benefit ratio, at 1.986 (meaning for every dollar invested, the benefits were worth $1.99), compared to increasing Auckland and Otago's intake (1.495) and the joint rural training programme (1.798). Waikato was also estimated to have a much higher estimated proportion of new graduates that would go on to become GPs than the other two options. The analysis estimated 38 percent of Waikato graduates would become GPs, compared to increasing the intake at Auckland and Otago (23 percent) and the joint rural training programme (33 percent). However, this is only an assumption, based on figures from the University of Wollongong's medical school, which has been used as a model for Waikato's programme. "It offers a new model, provided by a new entrant, underpinned by proven performance in an Australian context. It offers the greatest opportunity to increase GP propensity," the business case said of the Waikato option. "Option 3's propensity to provide a pathway for GPs is a consequence of a purposeful curriculum, training environments connected to communities, and a different way of selecting students. It can do this as a new entrant medical school, whereas change in an existing academic institution may be more difficult." Bagg said the modelling seemed "experimental" and "speculative," and the Australian context was different to the New Zealand context. "There are very big incentives for rural general practice in Australia that, at least to date, haven't existed in New Zealand, and certainly not historically. That's an important market force that will change behaviour. To my way of thinking, they've used the most optimistic possible outcome that could be found to make the case for the new programme." He also said the rate of graduates from the existing universities working as GPs was "quite a lot" higher than what the business case reported, saying it about 35 percent were working as GPs eight years after graduation. The health minister is standing by the figures, saying Sapere's cost-benefit analysis drew upon information about the existing Auckland and Otago graduates, as well as from Australian universities with a similar curriculum to Waikato. Health Minister Simeon Brown . Photo: RNZ/Marika Khabazi Simeon Brown said the decision was a "game-changer" for the long-term growth of New Zealand's medical workforce. "The Waikato Medical School will offer a post-graduate medical qualification based on similar successful programmes in Australia. These programmes include a year-long primary care placement and encourage students to work in primary care settings following graduation. The selection criteria of students alongside their long-term placements in primary care will both support a higher degree of these medical students to work in primary care after graduation," he said. "The Waikato Medical School will support growth of the number of general practitioners who play a critical role in keeping people healthy in the community and in managing long-term health conditions outside of hospital settings. " Labour's tertiary education spokesperson Shanan Halbert said Otago and Auckland were clear that they would be able to produce more doctors faster, if they were funded to do so. "We've got to make sure we're comparing degree with degree, apples with apples, so to speak. Because what we're seeing, as an example, is that we're comparing degrees at different lengths already." The Green Party's tertiary education spokesperson Francisco Hernandez said the dumping of the documents on a Friday evening showed the government was not confident in the business case. "The cost benefit analysis repeats the main mistake the government has made that has made this such a flawed process - rather than engaging in good faith with Otago and Auckland, and running an open process for a new graduate programme, they have deliberately stacked the deck to produce the outcome they want," he said. "The cost benefit analysis also assumes no further cost escalations - and with the minister refusing to rule out further funding - we just don't know how deep the government's blank cheque will extend to back this flawed proposal." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
