
I think the new Fujifilm X-E5 is overrated — and I'm so glad I bought this camera instead
To me, Fuji cameras feel magical with film simulation recipes that are just way too delicious.
So, of course, when Fujifilm announced the brand new X-E5, I was intrigued, and why wouldn't I be? It features a 40MP sensor, utilizes the X-Trans CMOS 5 processor, and has a film simulation dial... wait, that sounds an awful lot like the X-T50. And the X100VI.
The Fujifilm X-T50 succeeds and improves on the X-T30 II, and it packs a punch with a huge 40.2MP sensor, excellent in-body image stabilization and reliable autofocus. It's also the first Fuji camera to sport a dedicated film simulation dial on its body for maximum (and easy-to-reach) creativity.
As soon as the X-E5's product page went live, I quickly compared its specs against the X-T50 — a camera that had been sitting in my online cart for nearly a month. Nothing jumped at me (except for the price), and nothing made me go, "Okay, I'm waiting until August now." So what did I do? I paid for the X-T50 and within three days, it was in my hands.
Do I regret it? No. Should you buy the X-T50 instead of the X-E5? That depends. Let me show you why I pulled the trigger when I should have done so a month ago.
I have a soft spot for the Fujifilm X-T50: it's the first mirrorless camera I reviewed for Tom's Guide, and I immediately fell in love with its design. The charcoal gray colorway is stunning, and the metal alloy used in the construction of its top plate lends the X-T50 a premium edge.
One of the X-E5's most significant selling points is its compact design, with a body measuring 4.9 x 2.8 x 1.5 inches. Even when combined with the new 23mm pancake lens, the size change is negligible, allowing you to slip the camera into your pocket and go about your day.
However, it's not as if the X-T50 isn't portable either, measuring 4.8 x 3.3 x 1.9 inches.
Its current kit lenses are bulkier than the pancake lens, but even then, a handbag is more than enough for transport. No, scratch that, I'm hanging the X-T50 around my neck because it's such a gorgeous camera — why wouldn't I want to show it off? It's not heavy either, weighing 15.5 ounces (0.2 ounces lighter than the X-E5, actually).
When I tested the Fujifilm X-T50 back in May 2024, I took some lovely photos (if I can toot my own horn for a second, thank you), and you can scroll through the sample gallery above.
The X-T50, like I mentioned up top, boasts a 40.2MP sensor with Fuji's latest X-Trans CMOS 5 processor, just like the X-E5. Having that many megapixels at your disposal gives you some room for tight crops.
Both cameras' autofocus systems remain the same, too, utilizing 425 AF points to lock onto animals and humans. Fuji's color science is mindblowing, as always, and both cameras sport dedicated film simulation dials. You can quickly swap between recipes and assign custom ones too.
The X-T50 is a year old — which isn't old at all, in camera terms — and I think it's severely underrated. I get the appeal of the X-E5. It's a shiny new thing that online forums have quickly dubbed the savior of the X-E lineup. But the X-T50 shouldn't be underestimated. I believe it's the camera for those who don't want to spend too much money but still achieve beautiful colors and be able to change lenses.
Let's talk about the elephant in the room: the price difference between the Fujifilm X-E5 and the Fujifilm X-T50. The X-T50's body retails for $1,399 / £1,299, and if you're in the U.K., it's currently down to £1,039 at Amazon. On the other hand, the X-E5's body (currently available to pre-order) retails for $1,699 / £1,299.
Both cameras are the same price in the U.K., but the X-E5 is pricier in the U.S. — and attaching the new 23mm pancake lens to the camera drives its price up by $200. Or you could get the X-T50 with a 15-45mm lens for $1,499 / £1,399, which isn't shabby at all.
Specs-wise, the X-T50 one-ups the X-E5 in a few ways. Its 1.84 M-dot touchscreen is better than the X-E5's 1.04 M-dot one. It features a built-in flash for low-light shooting. It can shoot RAW video, which the X-E5 cannot. Both cameras' electronic shutters can shoot 20fps bursts.
If you can afford it without thinking twice about the money leaving your account, I can't think of any reason to stop you from buying the X-E5. But personally, for me, the X-E5 didn't offer anything enticing enough to tempt me away from the X-T50.
Sure, the flip-up screen for taking selfies is a thoughtful addition, but I'm not a chronic selfie-taker, so it's not useful enough for me. There's also a new front control lever to toggle the Surround View function, which I didn't use much even when testing the Fujifilm GFX100RF.
It's simple, really: the X-E5 isn't the camera for me, but the X-T50 was always the camera for me, from the moment I first held it in my hands.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Business News
7 hours ago
- Time Business News
BrainSim-X Launches Developer Platform for Neural Simulation Data
BrainSim-X announced the launch of a developer access program that allows researchers and app developers to integrate brain simulation data into their applications. More information about the platform is available at their official website . The Bangalore-based research initiative said the platform will focus on medical applications, particularly epilepsy research and neurological treatment development. Unlike typical API services, BrainSim-X requires developers to submit applications explaining their intended use cases before gaining access to the platform. Interested developers can request API credentials through their secure portal. The approval process takes approximately one week, with the organization reviewing each application to ensure it aligns with their medical research focus. One developer who has used the platform for three months described it as providing detailed neural activity data that requires significant technical expertise to implement properly. A detailed account of this developer's experience can be found in their comprehensive review . 'The platform generates large amounts of data that require powerful computing resources,' the developer said. 'It's designed for serious medical research rather than general app development.' The organization provides documentation and support for developers working on brain-computer interfaces, neuroscience research projects, and medical applications. Their research findings are available for review in published papers. Real-time data access became available recently, allowing developers to integrate live neural simulation feeds into their applications. The platform is intended for researchers studying brain activity patterns, testing neurological treatments, and developing diagnostic tools. BrainSim-X operates the service through a secure API that provides access to neural simulation data generated by their brain modeling platform. Technical requirements include high-memory computing systems capable of processing large neural datasets. Additional technical insights about the platform's capabilities can be found in this technical analysis . The research initiative says the developer program represents part of their commitment to making brain simulation technology accessible to the global research community. Applications are evaluated based on their potential contribution to medical research and neurological treatment development. BrainSim-X has not disclosed revenue generated from the developer platform, stating that funds support ongoing research activities. The organization expects demand for the platform to grow as more researchers learn about neural simulation applications in medical research. Future platform updates will include enhanced simulation capabilities and additional tools for analyzing neural activity patterns. BrainSim-X says the developer program differentiates it from commercial AI companies by focusing on open research collaboration rather than proprietary technology development. The platform supports research into cognitive enhancement, educational technology, and advanced diagnostic systems. Developers interested in accessing the platform must demonstrate relevant research experience and explain how they plan to use neural simulation data in their projects. BrainSim-X provides training resources to help developers understand neuroscience concepts necessary for effectively using the platform. The organization says it will continue expanding the developer program while maintaining focus on medical and scientific applications. Related Resources TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
xAI Partners With Kalshi To Offer Stock Insights for Investors
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. Over the years, there have been various stories about Elon Musk's higher-than-normal risk tolerance, and his willingness to take major chances on things, despite the potential impacts that may come, to himself and to his companies. We've seen that with X s well, with Musk randomly ripping out servers and cutting staff, despite not knowing, for sure, what the actual outcome of such might be. Such actions, despite carrying significant risk, have turned out fine (in relative terms), and it's this gung-ho, action-first approach that many attribute to Elon's ongoing business success. Which is what came to mind when I saw today's announcement that X is partnering with Kalshi to provide Grok insights within Kalshi's market prediction overviews. As you can see in this example, market analytics platform Kalshi will now be able to display contextual insights from Grok within its stock overviews, providing more data for investors to incorporate into their buying and selling approach. Which makes sense, in helping investors make more sense of what's happening. But then again, there is a line that needs to be drawn between adding insight, and influencing investment decisions, based on what an AI bot says. Because that seems pretty risky. If an investor loses out because Grok told them not to buy in, that would be considered direct financial advice, and the FTC has some pretty strict rules around that element. Because it's so risky, because it can have a major impact, yet X is stepping into this with seemingly little regard for potential fallout in this respect. X also announced a similar deal with Polymarket last month, with Polymarket now able to incorporate predictions based on X posts, along with insights from xAI's Grok system, to provide contextual pointers for its forecasts. And both of these activations present the same level of risk in providing financial advice, or financial-type advice, via AI means. It seems like a potential lawsuit waiting to happen, particularly when you also consider Elon Musk's own business ties, and how these advice notes could link back to them. Indeed, the FTC advises that: 'If you endorse a product through social media, your endorsement message should make it obvious when you have a relationship ('material connection') with the brand. A 'material connection' to the brand includes a personal, family, or employment relationship or a financial relationship – such as the brand paying you or giving you free or discounted products or services.' That's more specifically related to influencer endorsement, but the same rules would apply to AI tools as well. And with Elon having a hand in various stock impacting elements, and with xAI looking to angle Grok to better align with his personal views, it seems like only a matter of time before both of these partnerships lead to at least some issues on this front. But again, Elon is fine with higher levels of risk than most. And with X's 'everything app' vision being largely centered on finance, and enabling people to manage their entire financial life within the app, investment integrations make sense in that broader scope. I'm just not sure there are clear enough parameters as yet around the use of AI for stock advice, and for X specifically to be facilitating such.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Should Investors Buy Microsoft Stock Ahead of Q4 Earnings Release?
Microsoft MSFT is slated to report fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results on July Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $73.71 billion, indicating growth of 13.88% from the figure reported in the year-ago consensus mark for earnings has remained steady at $3.35 per share over the past 30 days, suggesting 13.56% year-over-year growth. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research MSFT Earnings Surprise History In the last reported quarter, the company delivered an earnings surprise of 8.13%. The company's earnings beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 5.21%. Microsoft Corporation Price and EPS Surprise Microsoft Corporation price-eps-surprise | Microsoft Corporation Quote Earnings Whispers for MSFT Our proven model does not conclusively predict an earnings beat for Microsoft this time around. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. This is not the case here. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they are reported with our Earnings ESP has an Earnings ESP of -0.64% and a Zacks Rank #2 at present. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Factors Shaping MSFT's Upcoming Results Microsoft's upcoming fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results are expected to demonstrate strong momentum across its core business segments, driven by continued AI infrastructure investments and robust cloud adoption. The company positioned itself well for solid quarterly performance through strategic platform expansions and key product launches during the period, thus making it an appealing pick for investors ahead of the upcoming Productivity and Business Processes, Microsoft projects revenues between $32.05 billion and $32.35 billion, with model estimates indicating 12.2% year-over-year growth to $32.1 is expected to have benefited from sustained Microsoft 365 Commercial cloud growth, with management guiding approximately 14% constant currency (cc) expansion. The segment capitalized on continued ARPU growth through E5 and Microsoft 365 Copilot adoption, while LinkedIn maintained steady performance despite hiring market headwinds. For LinkedIn, the company expects revenue growth in high single enhanced its competitive position through major Build 2025 conference announcements, including new agent capabilities and enterprise-grade AI tuning features rolled out during the Intelligent Cloud segment continues to remain the primary growth engine, with revenue projections between $28.75 billion and $29.05 billion. Our model estimate for this segment is pegged at $28.89 billion, indicating growth of 21.5% from the figure reported in the year-ago quarter. Azure remains the standout performer, with revenue growth projected between 34% and 35% in cc. Microsoft added more AI computing power ahead of schedule in the previous quarter, helping the company meet rising customer demand even with some supply limits continuing past June. The company's $80 billion spending plan for fiscal 2025 helped build more data centers worldwide, with most of the investment happening in the United Build 2025 developer conference showcased the company's comprehensive AI platform strategy, introducing multi-agent orchestration capabilities, enterprise-grade security features and expanded model partnerships. These initiatives reinforced Microsoft's leadership position in enterprise AI adoption and positioned the company well for sustained growth momentum into fiscal Enterprise Services, revenues are expected to grow in mid-to-high single digits. The company expects Server product revenues to decline in mid-single More Personal Computing, the company projects revenues between $12.35 billion and $12.85 billion. Our model estimate for this segment is pegged at $12.43 billion, indicating growth of 1% from the figure reported in the year-ago Personal Computing is expected to have shown resilience through successful product rollouts, including the deployment of Recall, Click to Do, and enhanced Windows Search features to all Copilot+ PCs during the to-be-reported quarter. The segment received a significant boost from the phenomenal success of A Minecraft Movie, which achieved record-breaking box office performance, exceeding $900 million globally and drove increased weekly active users for the gaming franchise by over 75% year over revenue performance appears contingent on improving PC demand trends. According to the preliminary results from the International Data Corporation Worldwide Quarterly Personal Computing Device Tracker, second-quarter 2025 worldwide PC shipments reached 68.4 million units, growing 6.5% year over year, though Microsoft expects Windows OEM revenues to decline in mid-to-high single digits. The competitive landscape shows mixed results, with Lenovo LNVGY and Hewlett Packard HPE achieving 15.2% and 3.2% shipment growth, respectively, while Dell Technologies DELL experienced a 3% Gaming, the company expects revenues to grow in mid-single digits. Microsoft expects Xbox content and services revenues to grow in high single digits. This moderate performance in consumer-facing segments contrasts with the stronger enterprise and cloud divisions. MSFT Price Performance & Stock Valuation Shares of MSFT have gained 21.2% in the year-to-date period compared with the broader Zacks Computer & Technology sector's increase of 10.8%. Shares of LNVGY and DELL have gained 2.3% and 11.4%, respectively while HPE has lost 3.9% in the same period. Year-to-date Performance Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Now, let's look at the value Microsoft offers investors at current levels. MSFT is trading at a premium with a forward 12-month P/S of 11.99X compared with the Zacks Computer - Software industry's 8.93X, reflecting a stretched valuation. MSFT's P/S F12M Ratio Depicts Stretched Valuation Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Investment Thesis Microsoft presents a compelling investment opportunity ahead of fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 earnings, with an estimated 13.88% revenue growth to $73.71 billion driven by robust AI infrastructure investments and cloud adoption. The company's strategic positioning in enterprise AI through comprehensive platform expansions and Azure's impressive 34-35% cc growth trajectory demonstrate sustainable competitive advantages. Despite premium valuation and intensifying competition, Microsoft's $80 billion investment in global data centers, successful AI integration across productivity suites and strong momentum in the Intelligent Cloud segment position the company for continued market leadership and long-term value creation for shareholders. Final Thoughts Microsoft's strong fundamentals, driven by AI leadership and cloud dominance, make it an attractive investment despite a premium valuation. With projected double-digit revenue growth, robust Azure expansion and strategic AI investments positioning the company for sustained market leadership, investors should consider buying the stock ahead of fiscal fourth-quarter earnings. The company's comprehensive AI platform strategy ensures long-term competitive advantages and value creation. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) : Free Stock Analysis Report Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL) : Free Stock Analysis Report Lenovo Group Ltd. (LNVGY) : Free Stock Analysis Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data