logo
PMO won't say if Carney raised India's alleged role in killing of Canadian Sikh leader with Modi

PMO won't say if Carney raised India's alleged role in killing of Canadian Sikh leader with Modi

Globe and Mail19-06-2025

Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree says Ottawa continues to have 'difficult conversations' with New Delhi about the 2023 killing of a Canadian Sikh leader, but the Prime Minister's Office has declined to say if the matter was raised earlier this week in talks between Mark Carney and his Indian counterpart, Narendra Modi.
Mr. Carney ducked a question Tuesday about whether he and Mr. Modi had discussed the killing of the Sikh leader, Hardeep Singh Nijjar, during a one-on-one meeting that day at the G7 leaders' summit in Kananaskis, Alta.
The Globe and Mail pressed the PMO on Wednesday about whether Mr. Nijjar's slaying and Indian foreign interference were part of the discussions. Sikh organizations and human-rights activists have also sought clarification on the content of the discussion.
Press secretary Audrey Champoux would not comment on Wednesday. She referred The Globe to a statement the two leaders released Tuesday: 'Prime Minister Carney raised priorities on the G7 agenda, including transnational crime and repression, security, and the rules-based order.'
After the meeting, the two leaders announced that they would designate new high commissioners and restore regular diplomatic services to citizens in both countries.
Bilateral relations went into a deep freeze in 2024, after then-prime minister Justin Trudeau and the RCMP said there was evidence linking agents of the Modi government to Mr. Nijjar's slaying.
Canada expelled the Indian high commissioner and five other diplomats over the killing. India denied any role and responded with similar diplomatic expulsions.
On Wednesday, the Public Safety Minister was asked to explain why Canada is resetting relations with the Modi government despite the Nijjar killing, and when Canada's spy agency is saying India is one of the top perpetrators of foreign interference in this country.
Mr. Anandasangaree told reporters that Canada has 'had difficult conversations with the Indian government and that will continue.'
'There is no way in which a third country can come into Canada and … using proxies be involved in the murder of a Canadian, and we have expressed our concerns over many months, and we will continue to do so,' he said.
A year after Hardeep Singh Nijjar's death, mysteries remain about how he really lived
Gurpatwant Pannun, general counsel for Sikhs for Justice, said the Prime Minister needs to publicly tell Canadians whether he questioned Mr. Modi about the role of Indian agents in the killing of Mr. Nijjar. The FBI foiled an alleged Indian plot to kill Mr. Pannun, a dual Canadian-U.S. citizen, in New York City last year.
'Accountability for Nijjar's killing cannot be sidestepped in the name of diplomacy or trade. Diplomatic normalization with the Modi regime must not come at the expense of justice and transparency,' Mr. Pannun said.
NDP MP Jenny Kwan, an outspoken human-rights activist, said in a June 17 letter to Mr. Carney that re-establishing diplomatic normalcy with India when it has yet to account for its role in the death of Mr. Nijjar 'sends a deeply painful message to Sikh Canadians who continue to live under threat.'
Major Sikh organizations and human-rights advocates also wrote a separate letter to Mr. Carney on Tuesday, saying the Nijjar killing was part of a co-ordinated campaign of transnational repression that 'continues to violate Canadian sovereignty.'
'Sikhs across the country are still receiving warnings from intelligence agencies about active threats to their lives,' the open letter states. 'To extend an invitation to the architect of these policies who proudly boasts that India 'enters the homes of its enemies and kills them' − without any public commitment to justice or accountability, undermines the very principles Canada is meant to uphold.'
However, foreign policy and security experts say Mr. Carney made the right decision to restart diplomatic relations with the world's most populous country and fourth-largest economy, while still pursuing accountability for the Nijjar killing.
If the Prime Minister is serious about diversifying trade away from the United States then he can't ignore India or China, said Jonathan Berkshire Miller, senior fellow and director of foreign affairs, national defence and national security at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.
'We cannot afford diplomatic silence with a country so vital to the Indo-Pacific and global affairs,' he said. 'Diplomacy is not about agreeing on everything – it's about managing differences.'
Alan Jones, a former assistant director at the Canadian Security Intelligence Service who is executive adviser at the University of Ottawa Professional Development Institute, said there's no excuse for India going rogue and plotting murder.
But Mr. Carney is right not to take a 'sanctimonious' position and ignore the geopolitical and trade role that India plays in the world, he said.
'Carney is a businessman at heart and this is a business decision. I'm sure he knows full well that he will take some heat and be criticized for it. But at some point, you have to turn the page.'
Mr. Jones said Mr. Carney campaigned on fixing the economy and getting the country on stable economic, defence and security footing. 'I think most Canadians understand that,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘We're on the side of kids': Alberta premier pushes back on court injunction against law banning doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth
‘We're on the side of kids': Alberta premier pushes back on court injunction against law banning doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth

CTV News

time2 hours ago

  • CTV News

‘We're on the side of kids': Alberta premier pushes back on court injunction against law banning doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth

Danielle Smith said she welcomes a debate in court after an Alberta judge put a hold on a provincial law that bans doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth on Friday. On her Saturday radio show, Your Province, Your Premier, Danielle Smith said she believed her government's case was solid, measured, evidence-based – and on the side of young patients that Justice Allison Kuntz said faced 'irreparable harm' if she didn't issue a temporary injunction against the law before it fully came into effect. 'The evidence shows that singling out health care for gender diverse youth and making it subject to government control will cause irreparable harm to gender diverse youth by reinforcing the discrimination and prejudice they are already subjected to,' Kuntz wrote in the judgment. The law, passed late last year but not fully in effect, would have prevented doctors from providing treatment such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to those under 16. 'I think the court was in error,' Smith said. 'That's part of the reason why we're taking it to court. The court had said there will be irreparable harm if the law goes ahead. I feel the reverse. I feel there will be irreparable harm to children who get sterilized at the age of 10 years old – and so we want those kids to have their day in court. 'We want those who were counselled to have sex change operations prematurely who now feel like they weren't protected to be able to be witnesses so we don't make these kinds of mistakes.' Kuntz wrote that denying access to this care not only risks causing youth emotional harm but also exposes them to permanent physical changes that don't match their gender identity. 'Intentionally or not, the ban will signal that there is something wrong with or suspect about having a gender identity that is different than the sex you were assigned at birth,' Kuntz wrote. 'Gender diverse youth will bear the entire burden of that speculation.' Smith said there's a long history of governments making decisions that have caused harm. 'We had a sterilization of those who were committed to mental institutions that we had to do a major payout on,' she said. 'There are Indigenous women who are challenging their sterilization that happened at the hands of doctors that they want to make a criminal code provision on that–we shouldn't be capricious in taking away a person's right to have children. 'So we want to battle this out,' she added.' And the way you do that is you go to the higher levels of court.' Last month, the Canadian Medical Association and three Alberta-based doctors launched a legal case challenging the constitutionality of the bill, arguing it violates their Charter right to freedom of conscience. Alberta's other two pieces of transgender legislation — banning transgender women from competing in women's sports and preventing youth under 16 from changing their name or pronouns in the school system without parental consent — have yet to be challenged in court. The education bill also requires parents to opt in for their children to receive lessons in school on sexuality, sexual orientation and gender identity. 'Demonizing vulnerable kids': Nenshi Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said in a statement that his party was pleased to see the court decision, calling it a 'great day for young Albertans who simply want to live authentically and safely.' 'The court has determined what we already knew that this ban could cause irreparable harm to gender diverse young Albertans,' Nenshi said. 'This was never about doing the right thing: it was always about demonizing vulnerable kids to boost Danielle Smith's political fortunes.' LGBTQ+ advocacy groups Egale Canada and the Skipping Stone Foundation took the case to court, and in a statement Egale said the decision was a 'historic win.' Also listed as applicants in the case are five transgender youth who will be directly affected. Egale's legal director Bennett Jensen said Friday that the decision was a 'huge relief' for the youth involved. '(The legislation) does not solve any real issues in the medical system,' Jensen said in an interview. 'It simply creates them and targets an already very vulnerable, small group of young people with further discrimination, and that's what the judge found.' Despite the Friday decision, Smith expressed confidence moving forward. 'We actually think we've got a very solid case,' she said. 'We think we've been measured, we think we've been evidence-based, and we think we're on the side of kids. 'So we want to see how long that process will play out, but we think it's really important for these issues to be debated in court.' With files from The Canadian Press and Aaron Sousa

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store