Trump gives off strongman pageantry with military parade we're paying for
Now imagine that wedding, but with tanks.
Because on June 14, the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army and, coincidentally, the 79th birthday of President Donald Trump, we're all invited to his "Big Fat Military Parade."
It's unnecessary. It's over the top. It's wildly expensive. And yes — we're paying for it.
Letters: House budget provision exempts executive branch from following court orders
So in the spirit of love, liberty, and judgment, here are 6 ways Trump's parade is like your friend's over-the-top gauche wedding:
Your friend spent $100,000 on a single day while still renting a studio apartment and paying 23.99% interest on her credit card balance. This parade? Same energy.
It's projected to cost up to $45 million dollars, but just like any good wedding, this one will likely blow the budget. We're talking tens of millions of dollars for tanks, jets, porta-potties, and housing the troops. Let's hope Rudy Giuliani's appearance fee these days is just a bottle of scotch and partial immunity. That's money that could actually help our troops and veterans with housing, healthcare, and food assistance.
Instead they're being paraded around like GI Joe action figures at an America First themed birthday party with enough red, white, and blue smoke to make a bald eagle develop asthma.
Trump's argument that tanks rolling down Pennsylvania Avenue is a demonstration of 'patriotism' is about as believable as your friend's horse-drawn carriage, champagne wall and a third outfit change demonstrating her love and commitment to Chad.
This parade is about creating an Instagram thirst-trap but with tanks. We're about to get an epic amount of social media content set to a Lee Greenwood soundtrack.
Just like a destination wedding, this isn't something most people asked for — and yet, we're the ones footing the bill. Americans struggling with rent, insulin costs, and groceries now get to sponsor the equivalent to a wedding in Bali they never RSVPed to — except instead of frequent flyer miles, they're paying for it in federal deficit.
We didn't ask for this. We didn't budget for this. And we certainly don't need a military-themed engagement party for a man who avoided military service and now wants to wear patriotism like a rented tux.
After the wedding? Broken wine glasses, credit card debt, and a drunk cousin crying by the photo booth. After the parade? Damaged streets, a gross misuse of public funds, and a fresh round of international side-eye. And like any bad wedding, the rest of us are left with a hangover and haunting memories of forced applause.
Some brides plan weddings that are less about a joyful union and more about going viral. She's not inspired by love; she's copying Kim Kardashian's flower wall and Marie Antoinette's budget. Trump's parade Pinterest board seems to be emulating an aesthetic that is part Putin, part Kim Jong Un, with a little young Mussolini mustache twirl.
The whole thing screams 'strongman pageantry,' except instead of tiaras and couture, we're flexing tanks and fighter jets.
Trump's June 14 parade isn't about the country. It's about control, image, and the illusion of strength — just like your friend's over the top wedding was less about commitment and more about drone footage of the Amalfi Coast.
Letters: Making Canada 51st state is a great idea, but not for reason Trump thinks
Let's stop pretending this is normal.
A true celebration of America doesn't need tanks. Just like a good wedding doesn't need a fog machine, a 17 piece big band or a commemorative hashtag.
If this really were a wedding? I'd give it six months.
Kristin Brey is the "My Take" columnist for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: True celebration of America doesn't need tanks or flyovers | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US end of parcel tax relief threatens eBay, Etsy trade
LONDON/NEW YORK (Reuters) -Americans shopping for secondhand, vintage or handmade items on platforms like eBay and Etsy face steep customs duties on international purchases next month, potentially hurting trade on those peer-to-peer sites. In a surprise move late on Wednesday, U.S. President Donald Trump ordered the removal of "de minimis" duty-free treatment on parcels under $800 from all countries, starting August 29 - bringing forward a change previously set for July 2027. The acceleration follows pressure from groups that argue the exemption facilitates fentanyl smuggling and has led to a flood of cheap products entering the U.S. duty-free, undermining U.S. retailers and manufacturers. Trump ended duty-free access for low-value parcels from China and Hong Kong at the start of May, disrupting ecommerce flows for online retailers like Shein and Temu. After asking for feedback on widening the removal of de minimis, some U.S. businesses had spoken out against the policy. "These exemptions are a powerful tool that helps small creators, artisans, and makers participate in and navigate cross-border trade," Etsy's global head of public policy and advocacy Jeffrey Zubricki wrote in a submission to Customs and Border Protection in March. "Many American Etsy sellers rely on de minimis to import and export products with key trading partners, sustaining their businesses and generating income to support their families." The majority of Etsy's 5.6 million active sellers and nearly 90 million buyers are in the U.S. Etsy did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. eBay also urged the customs agency to reconsider, arguing that de minimis gives American consumers access to "a global market to find value at lower prices, particularly for used goods and a unique, collectible inventory that is not available domestically". In a results call on Wednesday, eBay CEO Jamie Iannone flagged the elimination of de minimis outside of China as a potential disruption that may impact revenue. eBay did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Goods shipped through the postal system will face one of two tariffs: either an "ad valorem duty" equal to the effective tariff rate of the package's country of origin or, for six months, a specific tariff of $80 to $200 depending on the country of origin's tariff rate. It is the latest headache for small businesses grappling with hefty import tariffs imposed by Trump, driving up costs, forcing many to hike prices and fuelling concerns that Americans will be paying more for everyday goods. "The complexity of doing business with the U.S. has gone to levels nobody could have imagined," said Andrew Wilson, deputy secretary general of the International Chamber of Commerce. He also questioned whether U.S. authorities can handle the tariff collections, potentially leading to delays and backlogs. "Is border trade equipped to manage the checks and duties collection? If not, what happens with customs backlogs? It's a huge additional burden from next month," said Wilson. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump announces 90-day negotiating period with Mexico as 25% tariff rates stay in place
WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States will enter a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico over trade as 25% tariff rates stay in place, President Donald Trump said Thursday. Trump, posting on his Truth Social platform, said a phone conversation he had with Mexican leader Claudia Sheinbaum was 'very successful in that, more and more, we are getting to know and understand each other.' The Republican president said that goods from Mexico imported into the U.S. would continue to face a 25% tariff that he has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking. He said that autos would face a 25% tariff, while copper, aluminum and steel would be taxed at 50%. He said that Mexico would end its 'Non Tariff Trade Barriers,' but he didn't provide specifics. Trump had threatened tariffs of 30% on goods from Mexico in a July letter, something that Sheinbaum said Mexico gets to stave off for the next three months. 'We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue,' Sheinbaum wrote on X. Some goods continue to be protected from the tariffs by the 2020 U.S. Mexico Canada Agreement, or USMCA, which Trump negotiated during his first term. But Trump appeared to have soured on that deal, which is up for renegotiation next year. One of his first significant moves as president was to tariff goods from both Mexico and Canada earlier this year. Census Bureau figures show that the U.S. ran a $171.5 billion trade imbalance with Mexico last year. That means the U.S. bought more goods from Mexico than it sold to the country. The imbalance with Mexico has grown in the aftermath of the USMCA as it was only $63.3 billion in 2016, the year before Trump started his first term in office.
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate panel advances funding bill with $1 billion for Ukraine
The Senate Appropriations Committee on Wednesday advanced legislation that provides approximately $1 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. The funding was included in the fiscal year 2026 Defense appropriations legislation and was pushed by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the chair of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, and Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.). The bill advanced in the committee by a vote of 26 to three. It includes $800 million in security assistance for Ukraine and $225 million in security assistance for Baltic countries. Coons earlier told reporters that the funding for the Baltics — Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia — is likely to go towards those countries' support for Ukraine, saying the total for Kyiv can be viewed as $1 billion. 'The secretary of the Army rightly calls Ukraine the Silicon Valley of warfare. The navy considers the maritime fight between Russia and Ukraine as the Black Sea battle lab, and recognizes the need for rapid innovation,' McConnell said at the committee's meeting on Thursday. 'But abandoning the foremost experts in drone warfare would be strategic self-harm, shutting off engagement with Ukraine would undermine our military's efforts to prepare for the modern battlefield. Like our friends on the Armed Services Committee we are restoring funding for the USAI and other security assistance programs that make America safer.' The funds for Ukraine proved non-controversial in Thursday's committee meeting, where partisan debates focused on things like Trump's acceptance of a luxury plane from Qatar and requested funds to retrofit it as Air Force One. There's a bipartisan majority supporting Ukraine in the Congress, even if Trump and the MAGA movement argue against the U.S. sending military assistance to other nations. 'I think there's broad enthusiasm for bringing this war to a just conclusion, but also broad awareness that that means, not peace at any price, by strengthening Ukraine so that it is able to defend itself against what will almost certainly be either continued or renewed attacks by Russia,' Coons told reporters in a briefing on Wednesday. The Senate bill will put the $800 million into the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI), which funds sending direct military assistance to Ukraine, provides other support systems and training programs. The fund, established in 2016, typically receives $300 million per year from Congress. Coons said it was important to increase the funding in the face of Trump's efforts to completely end U.S. funding for military support to Ukraine. But the $1 billion appears to be a drop in the bucket to the more than $60 billion Congress approved in an April 2024 in a supplemental military assistance package, and as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has issued an urgent appeal for air defense missiles and long-range munitions that the U.S. is the foremost supplier. 'Last night, Russia launched another massive attack on Kyiv: hundreds of Shahed drones and missiles. Air defense shot down many, but not all,' Zelensky said in a speech Thursday, marking 50 years of the Helsinki Final Act, which established the OSCE, a forum between western Europe and former Soviet Union countries. 'President Trump is truly interested in ending the war. We must do everything we can to make sure the U.S. and Europe act together – for security.' Trump has spoken out against the U.S. sending weapons to Ukraine at the expense of the American taxpayer and did not request funding for Ukraine in his 2026 budget. A House version of the Defense appropriations bill had no money for Ukraine. But Trump has not completely halted U.S. weapons deliveries sent with funds approved during the Biden administration. He's also provided a quick green light for Ukrainian purchases of military equipment from U.S. companies. He has also increasingly shown frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin as the obstacle to a ceasefire and set a deadline of Aug. 8 for Moscow to halt the fighting or face financial penalties. Earlier this month, Trump announced a deal where NATO would purchase U.S. weapons to send to Ukraine, a workaround from direct American support for Kyiv. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the funding.
