Rate of women being hired into top jobs falls for third year running
This has left the rate of female hires into senior roles back where it was in 2020, according to the figures.
The data also showed that while more UK women are now in top management roles than they were in 2019 – at 30.9% last year versus 27.6% in 2019 – the progress has slowed significantly in the past two years, rising by just 0.3 percentage points.
The figures suggest it becomes more difficult for older generations to reach senior management, with 19.4% of so-called baby boomers – those born between 1946 and 1964 – in these roles compared with 28.9% for gen X, 36.7% for millennials and 39.3% for gen Z.
The statistics, compiled by analysing the group's 43 million-strong membership base across the UK, also show that, as of March, women made up 45.8% of hires in the UK, down 4.6% year-on-year.
Globally, the figures paint a similar picture, revealing that less than a third of senior leadership roles are held by women (30.9%) despite making up almost half (43.2%) of the worldwide workforce.
This 'drop to the top' is most pronounced in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (Stem) sector, where only around one in eight (12%) of leadership positions are held by women, according to LinkedIn.
It is calling for the Government and businesses to promote hiring based on skills rather than qualifications to help ensure women do not get left behind, in particular amid the shift towards artificial intelligence (AI).
Janine Chamberlin, head of LinkedIn UK, said: 'Just as AI is reshaping the workplace and demanding more adaptable, collaborative leadership, we're seeing women's progress into senior roles stall for the third year running.
'Women are 20% more likely to have that multi-domain experience, working across different industries and functions, which creates exactly the kind of flexible, agile leaders businesses need for AI transformation.
'Yet we're locking them out of leadership precisely when we need those skills most.'
The online giant believes that a skills-based approach to hiring – through prioritising skills over qualifications in recruitment – could broaden the talent pool for women by 6.3 times globally.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
2 hours ago
- North Wales Live
State Pension age rise for some people to start next year - here's what you need to know
The State Pension age is due to begin its rise from 66 to 67 next year, with the increase expected to be fully implemented for all men and women across the UK by 2028. This planned alteration to the official retirement age has been in legislation since 2014, with an additional increase from 67 to 68 scheduled to take place between 2044 and 2046. The Pensions Act 2014 expedited the increase in the State Pension age from 66 to 67 by eight years. The UK Government also altered the method of phasing in the increase in State Pension age, meaning that instead of reaching State Pension age on a specific date, individuals born between March 6 1961 and April 5 1977 will be eligible to claim the State Pension once they turn 67. It's crucial to be aware of these impending changes now, particularly if you have a retirement plan in place. All those affected by alterations to their State Pension age will receive a letter from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) well in advance. Under the Pensions Act 2007, the State Pension age for both men and women will rise from 67 to 68 between 2044 and 2046. The Pensions Act 2014 mandates a regular review of the State Pension age, at least once every five years. This review will be centred around the concept that individuals should be able to spend a certain proportion of their adult life receiving a State Pension, reports the Daily Record. A review of the planned rise to 68 is due before the end of this decade and had originally been scheduled by the then Conservative government to take place two years after the general election - which would have been 2026. Any review of the State Pension age will take into account life expectancy along with a range of other factors relevant to setting the State Pension age. After the review has reported, the UK Government may then choose to bring forward changes to the State Pension age. However, any proposals would have to go through Parliament before becoming law. Check your State Pension age online Your State Pension age is the earliest age you can start receiving your State Pension. It may be different to the age you can get a workplace or personal pension. Anyone of any age can use the online tool at to check their State Pension age, which can be an essential part of planning your retirement. You can use the State Pension age tool to check: When you will reach State Pension age Your Pension Credit qualifying age When you will be eligible for free bus travel - this is at age 60 in Scotland Check your State Pension age online here. Boosting State Pension payments HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) recently announced more than 10,000 payments worth £12.5 million have been made by people through the new digital service to boost State Pensions since it launched last year. However, anyone keen to maximise their retirement income through the contributory benefit has just a few weeks left to fill any gaps in their National Insurance (NI) records going back as far as 2006. Usually people can only pay voluntary contributions for the past six tax years, and after the April 5 deadline this year the normal six-tax year time limit will apply. In 2023, the previous government extended the deadline to pay voluntary NI contributions to April 5, 2025 for those affected by new State Pension transitional arrangements, covering the tax years running from April 6, 2006 to April 5, 2018. The extended deadline has allowed people more time to consider what is right for them and make their contributions. Men born after April 6, 1951 and women born after April 6, 1953 are eligible to make voluntary NI contributions to boost their New State Pension. Some people may be entitled to NI credits rather than needing to pay contributions, so they will need to check and consider what is right for them. People can find out more about making voluntary contributions on here. People of working age can also check their State Pension forecast on here. Alice Haine, personal finance analyst at Bestinvest by Evelyn Partners, the online investment platform, said: 'People typically need at least 10 qualifying years of NI (national insurance) contributions to receive any state pension at all and at least 35 years to receive the full new State Pension - though they don't need to be consecutive years. 'Plugging gaps can be quite an expensive process, so it is important to assess whether you actually need to buy back any missing years. This will depend on how many more years you plan to work, and whether you are eligible for NI tax credits, which fill the gaps, such as those who have been sick, were unemployed or took time out to raise a family or care for elderly relations. 'Plugging gaps in your record is relatively straightforward since the Government rolled out its new NI payments services in April last year - a State Pension forecast tool that has been checked by 3.7m since its launch.' She continued: 'People simply need to log into their personal tax account or the HMRC app to not only view any payment gaps but also check if they can plug those gaps directly through the Government's digital channels. 'A short survey assesses the person's suitability to pay online with those eligible to pay directly given a series of options to plug any gaps depending on when someone wants to stop working. 'Calculating whether to top up can be confusing though and ultimately there is no point paying for more years than you need because you won't get that money back.' Ms Haine added: 'People who might need to top up include those that took a career break as well as low earners or expatriates living and working abroad.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labour does not deserve to win next election without change, Reeves says
Labour does not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not change the country, Rachel Reeves has said, as she acknowledged some voters were disappointed with the party's record since entering government. The chancellor said she understood the unhappiness felt by some voters towards a government that has U-turned on winter fuel allowance and welfare policies in recent months. Reeves claims she has had to grapple with financial challenges inherited from the Conservatives, while increasing spending to repair public services. Speaking to broadcaster Iain Dale at the Edinburgh festival fringe, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' She told the audience at the Edinburgh International Conference Centre that Labour needed to enact the change that voters wanted. She added otherwise the party did not 'deserve' to win the next general election in 2029. Reeves said the government had the balance 'about right' on taxes, in a week where she faced renewed calls from Labour politicians for a wealth tax. Former Foreign Office minister Anneliese Dodds, who briefly held the shadow chancellor position for Labour in opposition, said ministers should consider evidence set out by the Wealth Tax Commission, which she said had 'changed the debate' on the policy. Reeves said: 'Of course you're going to disappoint people. No one wants to pay more taxes. Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints but no one really likes them and I'm the one that has to sort the sums up.' The party faces difficulties ahead of the Scottish parliament elections in Holyrood next year. It has slipped backwards into third place, according to opinion polling, a year after it was neck and neck with the SNP. Polling in June showed it on 19%, behind the SNP in 29% and Reform UK on 22%. This is in contrast to a survey carried out a month after Labour's general election win last year, which showed the party just ahead of the ruling SNP, with Reform languishing far behind. There have been some signs of promise, however, as Labour won the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse byelection for the Scottish parliament in June. The closure of the Grangemouth oil refinery before its transition to an import-only terminal caused unpopularity for Labour. About 400 jobs were lost as a result of it shutting in April. The MP who had championed it being kept open, Brian Leishman, has since been suspended by Labour for rebelling over welfare reform. Meanwhile, the Labour government in Westminster's ban on new drilling in the North Sea has been accused of causing 'strangulation' of the economy in north-east Scotland. However, Reeves told the audience in the Scottish capital that the government was further investing in Scotland. She said the £200m investment in carbon capture technology in Aberdeenshire had been welcomed by the industry. She said she also understood Labour's windfall tax on oil and gas were not welcomed by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying but you can't really have one without the other,' she said.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves admits Labour has ‘disappointed' people while in government
Rachel Reeves admits Labour has 'disappointed' people while in government. The politician said she understood that being Chancellor meant making unpopular decisions. She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that Labour had got the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing. But she said that balancing the books meant making tough decisions, even if the are unpopular. Appearing on the Iain Dale All Talk fringe show, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' Ms Reeves pointed to Labour's £200 million investment in carbon capture in the north east of Scotland, which she said was welcomed by the industry. At the same time, Labour's windfall tax, she said, was not liked by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying, but you can't really have one without the other,' she said. Defending Labour's record, she said her party had the 'balance about right'. 'But of course you're going to disappoint people,' she added. 'No-one wants to pay more taxes. 'Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no-one really likes them and I'm the one, I guess, that has to sort the sums up.' Ms Reeves said Labour had to deliver on its general election campaign of change, adding that her party did not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not deliver the change it promised.
