Controversial bills await action from Governor Stein
Senate Bill 153 and House Bill 318 both look to increase cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration officials. Senate Bill 50 allows for those 18 and older to carry a concealed handgun without a permit.
With only five months on the job and a lot of his work focused on Hurricane Helene recovery efforts, Stein has enjoyed a mostly amicable relationship with the GOP-controlled legislature. That could change if Stein were to reject any of the three pieces of legislation.
'Certainly the Republicans will use that as messaging for their base…parties are always looking for opportunities to dent the other side,' said Eric Heberlig, a political science professor at UNC Charlotte.
Heberlig told Queen City News that Stein will have to weigh whether he has enough votes for his vetoes to stand, as he will need every single democrat on his side. A three-fifths vote is required in both chambers to override. Democrats hold 49 seats in the House, the exact number needed to reject such a vote.
'Second thing he has to think about is his ongoing relationship with Republican leadership. Is it worth taking them on at this point and perhaps poisoning the well for future negotiations,' said Heberlig.
For now, Stein nor his staff are revealing how he will act.
'The Governor will continue to review the bills. He has made clear that if someone commits a crime and they are here illegally; they should be deported,' a spokesperson told Chief Political Correspondent Andy Weber.
Stein has until the end of next week to sign or veto all three of the bills.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
14 minutes ago
Which Republican senators voted against Trump's agenda bill and why
President Donald Trump's tax cut and spending bill came down to the wire as Senate Republican leaders scrambled to get all GOP members on board before the final vote Tuesday. In the end, three long-serving GOP members, Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina voted against, forcing Vice President JD Vance to break a 50-50 tie. Each of the three has explained their reasons for bucking the president. Susan Collins One of the mostly closely watched as the vote neared was Collins, who had been on the fence due to the bill's proposed Medicaid cuts. "Approximately 400,000 Mainers – nearly a third of the state's population – depend on this program," she said in a statement after voting no. "A dramatic reduction in future Medicaid funding, an estimated $5.9 billion in Maine over the next 10 years, could threaten not only Mainers' access to health care, but also the very existence of several of our state's rural hospitals." Collins added that the bill had "additional problems." "The tax credits that energy entrepreneurs have relied on should have been gradually phased out so as not to waste the work that has already been put into these innovative new projects and prevent them from being completed," she said. Thom Tillis Tillis has been extremely vocal in his opposition sine the weekend, drawing attention for a passionate floor speech citing Medicaid provisions he claimed would hurt his North Carolina constituents. During a closed-door GOP conference meeting two weeks ago, Tillis is reported to have made the point that Medicaid coverage for more than 600,000 North Carolinians would be at risk under the Senate's proposal and asked his colleagues to consider how the policy would affect their own states -- even providing state-specific data on a handout. "I just encouraged other members to go to their states and just measure how ... take a look at the proposed cuts and tell me whether or not you can absorb it in the normal course of business, and in many cases, you're gonna find that you can't," Tillis told reporters at the Capitol last week. Trump lashed out against Tillis on his social media platform and to the press and threatened to field primary challengers. Tillis announced on Saturday that he would not seek reelection. Rand Paul Paul, a staunch advocate for keeping spending and the debt ceiling in check, posted on X that he wanted the bill to include a 90% reduction in the ceiling. "No earmarks. No handouts. Just real fiscal reform. I wasn't looking for favors. I wasn't horse-trading. I was fighting for the American people and against our out-of-control debt," he said. "Bottom line: I offered my vote for fiscal sanity. Congress chose to sell out taxpayers instead. Only once the bill is released, we will know what the true price was," Paul added.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DC becomes Republicans' favorite target — again
Republicans who've made a habit of using their power over DC to undercut progressive policymaking are mounting a new push to rein in the capital — and this one may have legs. Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., told Semafor that he is inclined to support a House-passed bill that would bar noncitizens from serving in local office as well as voting locally in the city lawmakers call a home away from home. The bill passed the House with 56 Democratic votes in June. 'Voting in American elections should be limited to American citizens,' said Fetterman, whose wife Gisele became a US citizen in 2009. 'I say that as a guy that's absolutely very pro-immigration. The opportunity to vote, that should be for American citizens.' A similar ban passed the House last year with support from two Democrats who've since ascended to the Senate, Arizona's Ruben Gallego and Michigan's Elissa Slotkin. While it's not clear if they'd change their votes this time, should it come to the Senate floor, support from those three Democratic senators would put the GOP closer than ever to the 60 votes needed for passage. Congress has substantial constitutional power over DC, which Republicans frequently deploy to undermine the city's elected government — and point a finger at unpopular leftwing policies. After the GOP took back the House in 2023, it reversed a criminal justice reform passed by the DC council. Local Democrats expected then-President Joe Biden to veto it; he signed it into law. Democratic control of the Senate had, until this year, stalled action on other Republican-passed legislation to rein in the DC government. But under complete GOP control of Washington, the capital's government has taken further hits. A stopgap government funding bill slashed $1 billion from the DC budget, and the House GOP continues to decline to take up a Senate-passed fix. Then this month, as the Senate focused on President Donald Trump's tax-cuts bill, House Republicans passed a trio of proposals that would force DC to cooperate with Trump's immigration enforcement, scrap another police reform, and remove noncitizens' local voting rights. Senate Majority Leader John Thune's office did not return a request for comment on the chamber's timetable for taking up the House-passed bill. Republicans sold the noncitizen voting ban as a defense of DC citizens' rights. The city's rules don't affect voting in federal elections, which has long been limited to US citizens. But for the GOP, they raised the possibility that some Americans might be out-voted in DC elections by people who were neither born here or naturalized. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' said House Oversight Chair James Comer, R-Ky., during the bill's markup this month. 'Diluting that right, to its non-citizens, whether here legally or illegally, undermines the voice of DC residents.' The bill's proponents described reform as not just necessary but politically popular, and a mistake for Democrats to vote against. 'Once again, Democrats are taking the 20% side on another 80-20 issue,' said Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas. 'The American people do not want illegal aliens voting. They shouldn't be here to begin with.' For some local politicians, the legislation would hit home — in a very big way. Last year, for the very first time, Mónica Martínez López decided to run for office. Born in Mexico City, she had lived for a while in DC's Brookland neighborhood and gotten involved in the Vision Zero initiative to end traffic deaths. When her member of the Advisory Neighborhood Commission moved away, Martínez López ran for her seat. By a 734-341 vote margin, she won. The House bill would remove Martínez López, along with fellow ANC member Jingwen Sun, from the voter rolls and from their posts on the commission. 'It's another example of the lack of self-determination for our city,' Martínez López told Semafor. 'The close to 1,000 neighbors/residents who registered to exercise their right to participate in local electoral processes now face the limits of Home Rule that US citizens who live in Washington DC have long faced.' Sun, who ran for council while having a green card but not citizenship, said that he would stay in the city and keep up his work, even if his vote and job were erased initially. 'I'm pretty positive that I will speak to the DC council and mayor, and run for ANC again, whenever the time comes that I become a US citizen,' Sun said. Democrats have conducted a somewhat circular conversation about how their party needs to change, less about specific policies than about a battered 'brand.' What sort of policies could they moderate or jettison, if they wanted to move right? On paper, noncitizen voting could be sacrificed without much downside for the party. The few hundred people who take advantage of it in DC can't support the party in any other way (federal voting, donations) unless they obtain citizenship. Non-citizens are often less progressive than the Democrats who give them the franchise — as we saw three years ago in San Francisco, when opponents of left-wing school board members registered recent immigrants to help recall them. So why would a majority of congressional Democrats vote with DC? They feel solidarity with the city's residents, whose progressive votes are undermined whenever Republicans run Congress. Some of them, in seats that are too blue to become GOP targets, are comfortable defending the concept that people who raise families and pay taxes in a city deserve some say in who runs their local government. But other Democrats are less eager to make a stand for that idea. Which makes it a soft target for Republicans. The House-passed bill has vocal Democratic opponents, and it's still an open question whether it would get the necessary seven votes needed to overcome a filibuster — and that's assuming all Senate Republicans vote in favor. DC Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton and Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., argued against the measure on the House floor in June, making the case that Republicans were being hypocrites and hurting American citizens as well as non-citizens. 'Republicans claim that voting is a core right for the privilege of American citizenship,' Frost said. 'Republicans have fought tooth and nail to defeat legislation that would give the American citizens who reside in DC voting representation in the House and the Senate.' Frost, like voting reform advocates in DC, pointed out that other cities let non-citizens vote in local elections, and that there was some history — not recent, but real — of letting people vote in US elections if they weren't yet Americans. That was at the heart of the reasoning when DC's city council first passed the measure. 'The idea clicked for me when I realized DC has many people who live here, pay taxes, work locally, and don't have a voice in even their local government,' said Charles Allen, the DC council member who chaired the committee that approved the voting amendment. 'My colleagues and I make decisions every day that spend their tax dollars and impact their work,' he added. 'If they can prove they live here, why shouldn't they have a say locally?' In the Austin-American Statesman, Tony Quesada an investigation into noncitizen votes in Texas, which proved less than promised. 'It turns out that a bunch of those people were naturalized citizens who were labeled possible noncitizens based on outdated — i.e., false — data.' For NPR, Mikaela Lefrak into how many noncitizens take advantage of these open systems, and how the people who control the rolls prevent fraud. 'They know that one slip-up, like a presidential ballot being mailed to a noncitizen, could end up on the national news.' In The Washington Post, Olivia George and Meagan Flynn to the DC elected officials who'd have to resign if Republicans passed this into law. 'The repeal would force special elections for those seats [and] the unpaid positions could remain vacant, leaving residents without representation.'
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Republicans in Congress see highest approval rating in more than a decade: Poll
A record-high share of American voters are content with the work of Republican lawmakers, according to the latest NPR/PBS News/Marist Poll. In the survey, conducted in late June, 36 percent of registered voters approve of the job Republicans in Congress are doing — the highest level recorded since pollsters began asking the question in 2011. The latest approval rating also marks a 10-point jump from the last time the question was asked, in February 2024, when 26 percent of registered voters approved of the job Republicans in Congress were doing. Before that, the survey was conducted in March 2021, when 28 percent approved; and in January 2019, when 29 percent approved. The question was asked numerous times each year from 2011 to 2018. The previous high was recorded in March 2015, when 33 percent of registered voters approved of the job Republicans in Congress were doing. The record low came just a few months later, in August 2015, when 19 percent approved of the job they were doing. The jump in GOP approval comes as the party has taken back control of both chambers of Congress. Democrats in Congress, meanwhile, have seen a dramatic drop in their approval rating in the latest poll. Only 27 percent of registered voters approve of the job congressional Democrats are doing — down 12 points since February 2024, when 39 percent approved of Democrats' work. In the March 2021 poll, Democrats saw their record-high approval of 41 percent. This latest approval rating is tied for the lowest that congressional Democrats' have recorded since the survey began in 2011. It is also only the third time in the survey's history that congressional Republicans led their Democratic counterparts in approval ratings: Republicans led by 3 points in March 2015 and by 1 point in December 2014. Congressional Democrats' showing in the latest poll seems to be fueled by members of their own party — only 44 percent of Democratic respondents approve of their party's work in Congress, while 43 percent disapprove. Meanwhile, among Republican respondents, 73 percent approve of the GOP's work in Congress, while 15 percent disapprove. Among independents, 25 percent gave a nod of approval to the job Republicans in Congress are doing, while 20 percent approve of the job Democrats in Congress are doing. The survey was conducted on June 23-25 and included 1,381 adults, with a margin of error of 2.9 percentage points. The survey included 1,206 registered voters, with a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points.
